Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T05:56:41.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Licit International Trade in Cultural Objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2007

John Henry Merryman
Affiliation:
Sweitzer Professor of Law and Cooperating Professor of Art Emeritus, Stanford University, and President, International Cultural Property Society

Summary

Retentive nationalism has until recently dominated thinking about the international movement of cultural property, while the international interest in an active licit trade has been ignored and the interests of museums, collectors and the art and antiquities trade have been denigrated. An active licit market in cultural property advances the international interest, provides income to source nations and reduces the harm done by the black market. Trade in “culturally moveable” objects in private hands serves the international interest and is internationally licit, even when it offends national export controls. Source nations can reduce the damage from clandestine excavations by employing more sophisticated domestic controls and feeding surplus archaeological objects to the licit market. The “commodification” objection to an active trade in cultural objects lacks substance. Market nations can provide the most effective political force for development of an active market. They, and the art and antiquities trade, can help source nations finance organization of their cultural property resources for effective participation in a licit international trade.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)