Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:52:45.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in Naming and Semantic Abilities With Aging From 50 to 90 years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2012

Clémence Verhaegen*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology: Cognition and Behavior, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
Martine Poncelet
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology: Cognition and Behavior, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Clémence Verhaegen, University of Liège, Department of Psychology: Cognition and Behavior, B33 Boulevard du Rectorat, 4000 Liège, Belgium. E-mail: clemence.verhaegen@ulg.ac.be

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether naming difficulties arise in individuals as young as their 50s. Participants of 25–35, 50–59, 60–69, and above 70 years of age were given a picture naming task. To uncover subtle naming difficulties, latencies were analyzed in addition to accuracy. To control whether the expected slower naming latencies could be due to a general slowing affecting all cognitive tasks, participants were also given an odd/even judgment task to assess cognitive processing speed. The results confirmed that participants in their 50s presented decline in naming performance, reflected by an increase in naming latencies, whereas adults in their 60s and their 70s showed both a decrease in accuracy and an increase in latency. Moreover, the increase in naming latencies remained significant even after controlling for odd/even judgment latencies, suggesting a degradation specific to the picture naming task. We assumed that these slower latencies may result from a language-specific impairment. As a further test for language-specific degradation, participants’ semantic capacities were also assessed with a synonym judgment task and the Pyramids and Palm Trees test. The above-70 group showed semantic degradation. The contributions of multiple factors to naming difficulties in aging are discussed. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1–8)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, M.L., Spiro, A., Sayers, K.J., Cohen, J.A., Brady, C.B., Goral, M., Obler, L.K. (2009). Effects of health status on word finding in aging. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57, 23002305.Google Scholar
Amos, J., Jaunin, A., Le Roy-Zen Ruffinen, O., Lurin, J., Petrucci, F., Pillet, M. (2003). Relever les défis de la société de l'information—Rapport Genevois ALL. Genève, Switzerland: Service de la recherche en éducation.Google Scholar
Au, R., Joung, P., Nicholas, M., Obler, L.K., Kass, R., Albert, M.L. (1995). Naming ability across the adult life span. Aging and Cognition, 2(1), 300311.Google Scholar
Barresi, B., Nicholas, M., Connor, L.T., Obler, L.K., Albert, M.L. (2000). Semantic degradation and lexical access in age-related naming failures. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 7(3), 169178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Maladier, N., Méot, A., Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 158167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, D.M., MacKay, D.G., James, L.E. (2000). Theoretical approaches to language and aging. In T. Perfect & E. Maylor (Eds.), Models of cognitive aging (pp. 204237). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, D.M., MacKay, D.G., Worthley, J.S., Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 542579.Google Scholar
Burke, D.M., Shafto, M.A. (2004). Aging and language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 2124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark-Cotton, M.R., Williams, R.K., Goral, M., Obler, L.K. (2007). Language and communication in aging. In J.E. Birren (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gerontology: Age, aging, and the aged (2nd ed., pp. 18). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Connor, L.T., Spiro, A., Obler, L.K., Albert, M.L. (2004). Change in object naming ability during adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 59(5), 203209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deltour, J.J. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire Mill Hill de J.C. Raven. Braine-le-Chateau, Belgium: Editions l'Application des Techniques Modernes.Google Scholar
Desrochers, A., Bergeron, M. (2000). Valeurs de fréquence subjective et d'imagerie pour un échantillon de 1,916 substantifs de la langue française. Revue canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 54(4), 274325.Google Scholar
Feyereisen, P. (1997). A meta-analytic procedure shows an age-related decline in picture naming: Comments on Goulet, Ska, and Kahn (1994). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(6), 13281333.Google Scholar
Goral, M., Spiro, A.I., Albert, M.L., Obler, L.K., Connor, L.T. (2007). Change in lexical skills in adulthood: Not a uniform decline. Mental Lexicon, 2, 215238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulet, P., Ska, B., Kahn, H.J. (1994). Is there a decline in picture naming with advancing age? Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37(3), 629644.Google Scholar
Hillis, A.E., Rapp, B., Romani, C., Caramazza, A. (1990). Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7(3), 191243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, M.S. (2007). Incidence of word finding deficits in normal aging. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 59(1), 1019.Google Scholar
Howard, D., Patterson, K. (1992). The pyramids and palm trees test. Bury St Edmunds, UK: The Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar
Lima, S.D., Hale, S., Myerson, J. (1991). How general is general slowing? Evidence from the lexical domain. Psychology and Aging, 6(3), 416425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, A., Burke, D.M. (1990). Cognition and aging: A theory of new learning and the use of old connections. In T. Hess (Ed.), Aging and cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization (pp. 213263). Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
MacKay, A., Connor, L.T., Albert, M.L., Obler, L.K. (2002). Noun and verb retrieval in healthy aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8(1), 764770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majerus, S., Lekeu, F., Van der Linden, M., Salmon, E. (2001). Deep dysphasia: Further evidence on the relationship between phonological short-term memory and language processing impairments. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(5), 385410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariën, P., Mampaey, E., Vervaet, A., Saerens, J., De Deyn, P.P. (1998). Normative data for the Boston Naming Test in native Dutch-speaking Belgian elderly. Brain and Language, 65(3), 447467.Google Scholar
Morrison, C.M., Hirsh, K.W., Duggan, G.B. (2003). Age of acquisition, ageing and verb production: Normative and experimental data. The Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56(A), 226.Google Scholar
Mortensen, L., Meyer, A.S., Humphreys, G.W. (2006). Age-related effects on speech production: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(1/2/3), 238290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, J., Ferraro, F., Hale, S., Lima, S. (1992). General slowing in semantic priming and word recognition. Psychology and Aging, 7(2), 257270.Google Scholar
Neumann, Y., Obler, L.K., Gomes, H., Shafer, V. (2009). Phonological vs sensory contributions to age effects in naming: An electrophysiological study. Aphasiology, 23(7-8), 10281039.Google Scholar
Nicholas, M., Connor, L.T., Obler, L.K., Albert, M.L. (1998). Aging, language, and language disorders. In M.T. Sarno (Ed.), Acquired aphasia (pp. 413449). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, M., Obler, L.K., Albert, M.L., Goodglass, H. (1985). Lexical retrieval in healthy aging. Cortex, 21(1), 595606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salthouse, T.A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403428.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R., Freidl, W., Fasekas, F., Reinhart, B., Grieshofer, P., Koch, M., Lechner, H. (1994). Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. Neurology, 44, 964966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schyns, T., Poncelet, M. (2002). Cognitive Processing Speed Task. University of Liège, Belgium: Unpublished test.Google Scholar
Samson, D., Pillon, A., De Wilde, V. (1998). Impaired knowledge of visual and non-visual attributes in a patient with a semantic impairment for living entities: A case of a true category-specific deficit. Neurocase, 4(4-5), 273290.Google Scholar