Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T11:31:00.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The diffraction of a planar detonation wave at an abrupt area change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

D. H. Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
G. O. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
M. A. Nettleton
Affiliation:
Central Electricity Research Laboratories, Leatherhead

Abstract

Previous experimental work on the diffraction of a detonation wave at a large and abrupt area change in a tube, has shown that every system is characterized by a critical tube diameter at which quenching of the detonation occurs. Zeldovich, Kogarko & Simonov (1956) established that the critical tube diameter, for the oxy-acetylene system with varying dilution of nitrogen, lies between 500 and 700 times the one-dimensional induction zone length. Later, Mitrovanov & Soloukhin (1964) discovered that, for the same system, the critical diameter is 10 or 13 times the transverse wave spacing for a flat channel and cylindrical tube respectively. The two results are shown to be equivalent and are confirmed by further experiments in a 75 × 6 mm channel in which the flow is two-dimensional.

Smoked foil and schlieren records show that, for supercritical waves, re-ignition occurs at sites along the wedge formed by the head of the expansion from the diffracting aperture and criticality is attained when the site is located at the apex of the wedge. A universal feature of re-initiation, which is also observed in liquid and solid explosives, is the sudden appearance of a transverse detonation which sweeps through the compressed, but unreacted, gas of the dissociated shock-reaction zone regime; this is signalled by the appearance of fine triple-point writing on smoked-foil records.

A criterion for re-initiation is formulated by equating the critical velocity gradient which characterizes the decay of the wavefront in a cell, to that obtaining in the diffracted shock front at the head of the expansion fan; an expression for the latter is derived from Whitham's (1957) theory for non-reactive shocks. The prediction of the criterion is in good agreement with observation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1979 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barthel, H. O. 1974 Predicted spacings in hydrogen—oxygen—argon detonations. Physics Fluids 17, 1547.Google Scholar
Bull, D. C., Elsworth, J. E., Hooper, G. & Quinn, C. P. 1976 A study of spherical detonation in mixtures of methane and oxygen diluted by nitrogen. J. Phys. (D: Appl. Phys.) 9, 1991.Google Scholar
Dremin, A. N. & Trofimov, V. A. 1965 On the nature of the critical diameter. Tenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, p. 839 The Combustion Institute.
Edwards, D. H., Hooper, G., Morgan, J. M. & Thomas, G. O. 1978 The quasi-steady regime in critically initiated detonation waves. J. Phys. (D: Appl. Phys.) 11, 2103.Google Scholar
Gvozdeva, L. G. 1961 Prkl. Mekh. 33, 731.
Mitrovanov, V. V. & Soloukhin, R. I. 1964 The diffraction of multifront detonation waves. Soviet Phys. Dokl. 9, 1055.Google Scholar
Shchelkin, K. I. 1959 Two cases of unstable combustion. Soviet Phys. JETP 9, 416.Google Scholar
Skews, B. W. 1967 The shape of a diffracting shock wave. J. Fluid Mech. 29, 297.Google Scholar
Soloukhin, R. I. & Ragland, K. W. 1969 Ignition processes in expanding detonations. Combust. Flame 13, 295.Google Scholar
Sloan, S. A. & Nettleton, M. A. 1975 A model for the axial decay of a shock wave in a large abrupt area change. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 769.Google Scholar
Sloan, S. A. & Nettleton, M. A. 1978 A model for the decay of a wall shock in a large abrupt area change. J. Fluid Mech. 88, 259.Google Scholar
Strehlow, R. A. & Engel, C. D. 1969 Transverse waves in detonations. II. Structure and spacing in H2—O2, C2H2—O2, and CH4—O2 systems. A.I.A.A. J. 7, 492.Google Scholar
Strehlow, R. A. 1970 Multidimensional detonation wave structure. Astronautica Acta 15, 345.Google Scholar
Subbotin, V. A. 1974 Two kinds of transverse wave structures in multifront detonation. Fiz. Goreniya i Vzryva, II, no. 1, 96.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. O. 1979 Gasdynamic studies of diverging detonations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wales.
Urtiew, P. A. 1975 From cellular structure to failure waves in liquid detonations. Combust. Flame 25, 241.Google Scholar
Vasiliev, A. A., Gavrilenko, T. P. & Topchian, M. E. 1972 On the Chapman—Jouguet surface in multiheaded gaseous detonations. Astronautica Acta 17, 499.Google Scholar
White, D. R. 1967 Density induction times in very lean mixtures of D2, H2, C2H2 and C2H4 with O2. Eleventh Symposium (International) on Combustion, p. 147 The Combustion Institute.
Whitham, G. B. 1957 A new approach to problems of shock dynamics. Part I. Two-dimensional problems. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 145.Google Scholar
Zeldovich, Y. B., Kogarko, S. M. & Simonov, N. N. 1956 An experimental investigation of spherical detonation in gases. Soviet Phys. tech. Phys. 1, 1689.Google Scholar