Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T11:47:22.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary protein and exercise training in ageing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2010

René Koopman*
Affiliation:
Basic and Clinical Myology Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Dr René Koopman, fax +61 3 8344 5818, email rkoopman@unimelb.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ageing is accompanied by a progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, leading to the loss of functional capacity and an increased risk for developing chronic metabolic diseases such as diabetes. The age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass results from a chronic disruption in the balance between muscle protein synthesis and degradation. As basal muscle protein synthesis rates are likely not different between healthy young and elderly human subjects, it was proposed that muscles from older adults lack the ability to regulate the protein synthetic response to anabolic stimuli, such as food intake and physical activity. Indeed, the dose–response relationship between myofibrillar protein synthesis and the availability of essential amino acids and/or resistance exercise intensity is shifted down and to the right in elderly human subjects. This so-called ‘anabolic resistance’ represents a key factor responsible for the age-related decline in skeletal muscle mass. Interestingly, long-term resistance exercise training is effective as a therapeutic intervention to augment skeletal muscle mass, and improves functional performance in the elderly. The consumption of different types of proteins, i.e. protein hydrolysates, can have different stimulatory effects on muscle protein synthesis in the elderly, which may be due to their higher rate of digestion and absorption. Current research aims to elucidate the interactions between nutrition, exercise and the skeletal muscle adaptive response that will define more effective strategies to maximise the therapeutic benefits of lifestyle interventions in the elderly.

Type
Conference on ‘Nutrition and health: cell to community’
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2010

Abbreviations:
AA

amino acids

EAA

essential amino acids

mTOR

mammalian target of rapamycin

mTORCI

mTOR complex I

S6K1

S6 protein kinase

The preservation of muscle function is crucial for maintaining an independent lifestyle and the capacity to perform the activities of daily living in the elderly. One of the important factors in the loss of functional performance is the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass with ageing, called ‘sarcopenia’(Reference Baumgartner, Koehler and Gallagher1Reference Melton, Khosla and Crowson3). This apparent muscle wasting in elderly human subjects occurs at a rate of about 0·5–1·0% per year starting at about 40 years of age. Lean muscle mass contributes up to about 50% of the total body mass of young adults but can decline to 25% by 75–80 years of age(Reference Short and Nair4, Reference Short, Vittone and Bigelow5). The loss of muscle mass is most notable in the lower limb muscles, with the cross-sectional area of the vastus lateralis reduced by as much as 40% at the age of 80 years(Reference Lexell6). Sarcopenia is associated with a three- to fourfold increased likelihood of disabilities and the loss of muscle mass especially in the lower limbs is associated with an increased risk of falls and impairment in the ability to perform routine activities.

The loss of muscle mass is viewed as a largely inevitable and undesirable consequence of ageing(Reference Paddon-Jones and Rasmussen7), with muscle loss estimated to affect 30% of people older than 60 years and >50% of those older than 80 years(Reference Baumgartner, Koehler and Gallagher1). Demographic studies indicate that the world's population aged 60 years and above will triple within the next 50 years, and the subpopulation of older adults aged 80 years and above represents the fastest-growing subpopulation in the developed world(8). It is therefore not surprising that the global ageing will have a major impact on our health-care system, as the number of frail elderly requiring hospitalisation and/or institutionalisation increases. Good health is essential for maintaining independence and to continue to actively enjoy family and community life. As such, life-long health promotion is warranted to prevent or delay the onset of non-communicable and chronic (metabolic) diseases such as heart disease and stroke, cancer and diabetes. Preventing, attenuating and/or reversing the decline in skeletal muscle mass should be the main goal for interventional strategies to promote healthy ageing.

Ageing and protein turnover in skeletal muscle

The loss of skeletal muscle mass in the elderly is characterised by atrophy of type-II (fast) muscle fibres (Fig. 1(A)), fibre necrosis, fibre-type grouping and a reduction in satellite cell content in type-II muscle fibres(Reference Lexell6, Reference Kadi, Charifi and Denis9Reference Verdijk, Koopman and Schaart14). The loss of skeletal muscle mass is accompanied by the loss of muscle strength (Fig. 1(B)), a decline in functional capacity(Reference Bassey, Fiatarone and O'Neill15Reference Wolfson, Judge and Whipple22) and a reduction in whole-body and muscle oxidative capacity(Reference Short and Nair4, Reference Nair23, Reference Nair24). Together, these alterations at a muscle level have substantial health consequences, since they contribute to the greater risk of developing insulin resistance due to the reduced capacity for blood glucose disposal and a greater likelihood of excess lipid deposition in liver and skeletal muscle tissue leading to hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and cardiovascular co-morbidities.

Fig. 1. Muscle fibre cross-sectional area in young (about 20 year) and elderly (about 76 year) men (A). Note the smaller type-II muscle fibres in the elderly men compared with the young controls (adapted from (Reference Verdijk, Koopman and Schaart14)). (B) Correlation between age and one-repetition maximum (1RM) leg press strength (adapted from(Reference Verdijk, van Loon and Meijer146)).

The progressive muscle wasting with ageing must be due to a disruption in the regulation of skeletal muscle protein turnover, leading to a chronic imbalance between muscle protein synthesis and degradation. Although it was originally reported that healthy older adults had decreased rates of basal muscle protein synthesis(Reference Short, Vittone and Bigelow5, Reference Short, Vittone and Bigelow25Reference Yarasheski, Zachwieja and Bier31), more recent studies have failed to reproduce these findings and generally show little or no differences in basal muscle protein synthesis rates between young and old adults(Reference Cuthbertson, Smith and Babraj32Reference Kumar, Selby and Rankin39). These discrepancies may be due to the standardisation of prior physical activity(Reference Nair24), selection of subjects(Reference Yarasheski, Welle and Nair30) or the selection of different precursor pools to calculate muscle protein synthesis(Reference Tipton40). It seems unlikely that basal muscle protein fractional synthesis rates are diminished by 20–30% as reported previously(Reference Balagopal, Rooyackers and Adey25, Reference Hasten, Pak-Loduca and Obert26, Reference Welle, Thornton and Jozefowicz28, Reference Welle, Thornton and Statt29) and/or that muscle protein breakdown is elevated by as much as 50% in the elderly compared to younger adults(Reference Trappe, Williams and Carrithers41). Such opposing alterations in the rates of protein synthesis and breakdown would be accompanied by more rapid muscle wasting than what is typically observed (3–8% per decade(Reference Lindle, Metter and Lynch20, Reference Lynch, Metter and Lindle42)), and it therefore seems unlikely that basal muscle protein fractional synthesis rates could be diminished by 20–30% during ageing as reported previously(Reference Balagopal, Rooyackers and Adey25, Reference Hasten, Pak-Loduca and Obert26, Reference Welle, Thornton and Jozefowicz28, Reference Welle, Thornton and Statt29). The relatively slow rate of muscle loss during ageing must mean that the mismatch between the average diurnal rate of muscle protein synthesis and breakdown is small. It is currently accepted that basal fasting protein synthesis and/or breakdown rates are not (substantially) different between young and elderly human subjects(Reference Hasten, Pak-Loduca and Obert26, Reference Cuthbertson, Smith and Babraj32Reference Kumar, Selby and Rankin39, Reference Rasmussen, Fujita and Wolfe43). To better understand the skeletal muscle wasting in the elderly, researchers have started to focus on the muscle anabolic response to anabolic stimuli such as physical activity, food intake and anabolic hormones such as insulin. It was well established that the protein turnover in skeletal muscle is highly responsive to exercise and nutrient intake in healthy young individuals(Reference Koopman, Saris and Wagenmakers44). Interestingly, data from recent studies suggest that the muscle protein synthetic response to resistance exercise(Reference Kumar, Selby and Rankin39) and following the ingestion of a small amount of amino acids (AA) with(Reference Volpi, Mittendorfer and Rasmussen36, Reference Guillet, Prod'homme and Balage45) or without carbohydrate(Reference Cuthbertson, Smith and Babraj32, Reference Katsanos, Kobayashi and Sheffield-Moore33) is reduced in the elderly when compared with young controls. The latter is believed to represent a key factor responsible for the age-related decline in skeletal muscle mass(Reference Rennie46).

Anabolic response to exercise

Exercise is a powerful stimulus to promote net muscle protein anabolism, resulting in specific metabolic and morphological adaptations in skeletal muscle. Endurance training can increase whole-body and muscle oxidative capacity and endurance(Reference Wilkinson, Phillips and Atherton47), whereas resistance exercise training can increase muscle mass and strength, and thus improve physical performance and functional capacity(Reference Evans48). It generally takes weeks to months before training-induced changes in skeletal muscle mass become apparent(Reference Rennie and Tipton49). The prolonged time course for hypertrophy is a reflection of the slow turnover rate of muscle proteins, i.e. about 1% per day for contractile proteins(Reference Balagopal, Rooyackers and Adey25, Reference Nair, Halliday and Griggs50, Reference Volpi, Ferrando and Yeckel51). Although muscle hypertrophy occurs at a slow rate, a single bout of resistance exercise can rapidly (within 2–4 h(Reference Phillips, Tipton and Aarsland52)) stimulate muscle protein synthesis, and increase protein synthesis rates, particularly the myofibrillar protein synthesis(Reference Welle, Thornton and Jozefowicz28, Reference Yarasheski, Zachwieja and Bier31, Reference Wilkinson, Phillips and Atherton47), which persist for up to 16 h in trained(Reference Tang, Perco and Moore53) and 24–48 h in untrained individuals(Reference Phillips, Tipton and Aarsland52Reference MacDougall, Tarnopolsky and Chesley54). Muscle protein breakdown is also stimulated following exercise, albeit to a lesser extent than protein synthesis(Reference Phillips, Tipton and Aarsland52, Reference Biolo, Maggi and Williams55), and results in an improved net muscle protein balance that persists for up to 48 h in untrained individuals(Reference Phillips, Tipton and Aarsland52).

It has been generally accepted that the increase in protein synthesis following exercise is due to increased mRNA translation(Reference Laurent, Sparrow and Millward56). Many laboratories have shown that the signalling pathway involving a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex I (mTORCI) plays a crucial role in the control of mRNA translation initiation and elongation(Reference Bodine, Stitt and Gonzalez57Reference Dreyer, Fujita and Cadenas59). The activity of mTORCI determines the activity of downstream effectors such as the 70-kDa S6 protein kinase (S6K1) and the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein(Reference Kimball, Farrell and Jefferson60). Both play key regulatory roles in modulating translation initiation, and control the binding of mRNA to the 40S ribosomal subunit(Reference Kimball, Farrell and Jefferson60). Studies have shown that the mTORCI signalling pathway is activated after acute resistance exercise in healthy human subjects(Reference Wilkinson, Phillips and Atherton47, Reference Dreyer, Fujita and Cadenas59, Reference Drummond, Dreyer and Pennings61, Reference Koopman, Zorenc and Gransier62). Moreover, Drummond et al. (Reference Drummond, Fry and Glynn63) showed elegantly that early acute contraction-induced increase in human protein synthesis in human subjects can be blocked with rapamycin treatment indicating that mTORCI signalling is crucial during the early post-exercise recovery. In addition, it was shown that the phosphorylation status of S6K1 following resistance exercise is a good marker for the long-term increase in skeletal muscle mass in rats(Reference Baar and Esser64) and human subjects(Reference Terzis, Georgiadis and Stratakos65). Moreover, significant correlations were reported between S6K1 phosphorylation/activation and muscle protein synthesis following exercise in young healthy human subjects(Reference Kumar, Selby and Rankin39), highlighting the importance of this signalling pathway in the adaptive response to resistance exercise.

Ageing and the anabolic response to exercise

Muscle protein synthesis is responsive to resistance and endurance exercise in both young and elderly human subjects(Reference Welle, Thornton and Statt29, Reference Yarasheski, Welle and Nair30, Reference Kumar, Selby and Rankin39, Reference Drummond, Dreyer and Pennings61, Reference Fujita, Rasmussen and Cadenas66, Reference Sheffield-Moore, Yeckel and Volpi67). Some studies have reported subtle differences in changes in gene expression and anabolic signalling(Reference Hameed, Orrell and Cobbold68), with early studies indicating that the protein synthetic response to resistance-type exercise did not differ considerably between the young and elderly(Reference Hasten, Pak-Loduca and Obert26, Reference Yarasheski, Zachwieja and Bier31). In contrast, an elegant study by Kumar et al. (Reference Kumar, Selby and Rankin39) showed anabolic resistance of anabolic signalling (i.e. 4E-binding protein and S6K1) and muscle protein synthesis after resistance exercise (performed in the fasted state) in elderly men compared with young controls, which became apparent especially at higher exercise intensities. This study demonstrated that the sigmoidal response of muscle protein synthesis to resistance exercise of different (increasing) intensities was shifted downward in older men compared to younger men(Reference Kumar, Selby and Rankin39). Interestingly, this study shows that the linear relationship between S6K1 phosphorylation and muscle protein synthesis after resistance exercise, which is observed in young healthy adults, was not present in the elderly, indicating that anabolic signalling regulating mRNA translation is impaired in the older human subjects(Reference Kumar, Selby and Rankin39).

Compared to protein synthesis, not many studies have actually measured muscle protein breakdown using stable isotope tracers. Most studies rely on measurements of mRNA or protein expression of proteins involved in protein degradation such as Atrogin-1, MuRF-1, calpains and their regulators. It has been suggested that mRNA expression of proteolytic regulators, such as Atrogin-1, are elevated in muscles from old compared with young adults at rest and these levels increased even further in the elderly in response to resistance exercise. These findings from Raue et al. (Reference Raue, Slivka and Jemiolo69) suggest that the regulation of ubiquitin proteasome-related genes involved in muscle atrophy might be altered in the elderly and protein breakdown may be increased in elderly human subjects. However, whether these changes in mRNA expression translate to actual changes in protein expression and altered proteasome activity has yet to be established. Thus, there is a paucity of data regarding the measurement of muscle protein breakdown in response to exercise in the elderly and it is clear that further research is needed to assess the impact of exercise and specific exercise modalities on post-exercise muscle protein synthesis and breakdown rates and associated myocellular signalling in young and elderly human subjects.

Anabolic response to food intake

Protein turnover in skeletal muscle is highly responsive to nutrient intake(Reference Rennie, Edwards and Halliday70). Ingestion of AA and/or protein strongly stimulates muscle protein synthesis(Reference Paddon-Jones, Sheffield-Moore and Zhang35, Reference Volpi, Mittendorfer and Wolf37, Reference Volpi, Ferrando and Yeckel51, Reference Rennie, Edwards and Halliday70, Reference Paddon-Jones, Sheffield-Moore and Katsanos71). Besides serving as a substrate for polypeptide biosynthesis, AA were shown to directly activate regulatory proteins in mRNA translation, while non-essential AA do not induce a substantial increase in muscle protein synthesis. In contrast, essential amino acids (EAA) increase muscle protein synthesis in the absence of increased non-essential AA availability. The branched-chain amino acid, leucine, is of particular interest since it has the unique ability to directly increase signalling through mTOR and its downstream targets 4E-binding protein and S6K1 and ribosomal S6. The EAA(Reference Tipton, Gurkin and Matin72, Reference Volpi, Kobayashi and Sheffield-Moore73), and leucine in particular(Reference Smith, Barua and Watt74, Reference Norton and Layman75), seem to represent the main anabolic signals responsible for the post-prandial increase in muscle protein synthesis. The observations that EAA show a dose-dependent stimulation of muscle protein synthesis without increasing plasma insulin(Reference Bohe, Low and Wolfe76), and that carbohydrate ingestion does not affect protein synthesis(Reference Borsheim, Cree and Tipton77), suggest that insulin is rather permissive instead of modulatory(Reference Rennie46, Reference Bohe, Low and Wolfe76, Reference Greenhaff, Karagounis and Peirce78). Greenhaff et al. (Reference Greenhaff, Karagounis and Peirce78) showed that insulin in the range of 30–150 μU/ml does not further stimulate muscle protein synthesis. In contrast to protein synthesis, muscle protein degradation seems to be very responsive to relatively small changes in insulin concentrations. Insulin levels of 15 μU/ml can almost maximally reduce muscle protein breakdown(Reference Wilkes, Selby and Atherton79) and there seems to be no further inhibition above 30 μU/ml(Reference Greenhaff, Karagounis and Peirce78). These data suggest that protein breakdown can be already maximally reduced by slightly increased insulin concentrations which can be achieved by the intake of a small breakfast in healthy young men(Reference Rennie46).

Ageing and the anabolic response to food intake

Data from recent studies suggest that the muscle protein synthetic response to the ingestion of a small amount of EAA(Reference Cuthbertson, Smith and Babraj32, Reference Katsanos, Kobayashi and Sheffield-Moore33) is attenuated in the elderly, and is now believed to represent one of the key factors responsible for the age-related decline in skeletal muscle mass. The so-called ‘anabolic resistance’ in elderly human subjects was demonstrated by a rightward and downward shift of the dose–response relationship between myofibrillar protein synthesis and the availability of leucine in the plasma(Reference Cuthbertson, Smith and Babraj32). Cuthbertson et al. (Reference Rennie46) showed that even a very large (40 g) dose of EAA is not able to bring the curve back to values for young subjects, suggesting that supplementation with extra protein, EAA or leucine will not be sufficient to restore the rate of muscle protein synthesis in older adults, relative to those found in the young.

The mechanisms responsible for the proposed anabolic resistance to protein and/or AA administration in the elderly are yet to be elucidated fully. Cuthbertson et al. (Reference Cuthbertson, Smith and Babraj32) reported decrements in amounts of signalling protein in the protein kinase B/mTORCI pathway in old muscle and showed an attenuated rise in the activation of key signalling proteins in this pathway after ingesting 10 g EAA in the elderly v. the young. These findings seem to be consistent with previous observations by Guillet et al. (Reference Guillet, Prod'homme and Balage45) who showed reduced S6K1 phosphorylation following combined AA and glucose infusions in the elderly. Combined, these data suggest that anabolic signalling is impaired in skeletal muscles of older compared to younger adults(Reference Cuthbertson, Smith and Babraj32, Reference Bohe, Low and Wolfe76), which may be in part due to insulin resistance in the elderly. Recent data suggest that muscle protein breakdown is not strongly inhibited by insulin in the elderly(Reference Wilkes, Selby and Patel80), whereas other reports suggested that muscle protein synthesis is resistant to the anabolic action of insulin in the elderly(Reference Volpi, Mittendorfer and Rasmussen36, Reference Rasmussen, Fujita and Wolfe43). It has been proposed that the anabolic resistance can be attributed to a less responsive impact of physiological hyperinsulinemia on the increase in skeletal muscle blood flow and subsequent AA availability in aged muscle(Reference Rasmussen, Fujita and Wolfe43, Reference Fujita, Rasmussen and Cadenas81), which would agree with the reduced activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase–protein kinase B–mTOR signalling pathway and with the lesser increase in the muscle protein synthetic rate after AA/protein ingestion in the elderly(Reference Cuthbertson, Smith and Babraj32).

Another mechanism that has been suggested to contribute to the anabolic resistance to food intake in elderly men is an impairment in dietary protein digestion and/or absorption(Reference Boirie, Dangin and Gachon82). Recent data show that the digestion rate of protein is an independent regulating factor of post-prandial protein anabolism(Reference Dangin, Boirie and Garcia-Rodenas83). As such, it seems plausible to assume that any impairment in protein digestion and/or absorption will reduce the appearance rate of dietary AA in the bloodstream, thereby reducing AA delivery to the muscle and subsequently attenuating the muscle protein synthetic response. To accurately assess the appearance rate of AA derived from dietary protein, the labelled AA need to be incorporated in the dietary protein source(Reference Beaufrere, Dangin and Boirie84Reference Dangin, Boirie and Guillet86). As free AA and protein-derived AA exhibit a different timing and efficiency of intestinal absorption(Reference Boirie, Gachon and Corny85), simply adding labelled free AA to a drink containing protein does not provide an accurate measure of the digestion and absorption kinetics of the ingested dietary protein(Reference Boirie, Fauquant and Rulquin87). These methodological restrictions represent the main reasons why only a few researchers have investigated the differences in digestion and absorption kinetics of specific dietary protein sources and the disparity in anabolic response between young and elderly human subjects. These studies have suggested that AA utilisation in the splanchnic area is elevated in the elderly(Reference Boirie, Dangin and Gachon82), which would imply that less of the ingested AA are available for muscle protein synthesis(Reference Boirie, Dangin and Gachon82). We have recently repeated similar experiments, comparing the appearance rate of dietary L-[1-13C]phenylalanine in the circulation following the intake of 35 g intact intrinsically labelled casein protein(Reference Koopman, Walrand and Beelen88). Our data clearly show that splanchnic extraction is not altered significantly in elderly men, and that over a 3 and 6 h period the same amount of dietary phenylalanine appears in the circulation(Reference Koopman, Walrand and Beelen88). Although we did not observe any impairment in digestion and absorption in the elderly, we observed substantially (about 12%) lower rates of whole-body protein synthesis and phenylalanine hydroxylation following protein ingestion in the elderly men compared to the young men (Fig. 2), calculated over the first 3 h, subsequent 3 h or total 6 h time period after protein ingestion. Consistent with these observations, we observed a 14% difference in muscle protein synthesis rates between young and elderly men over the 6 h period, although this difference did not reach statistical significance(Reference Koopman, Walrand and Beelen88). Not all researchers have found impaired muscle protein synthetic response to protein intake in the elderly as similar protein synthetic rates were observed in young and elderly human subjects after ingestion of large amounts of carbohydrate and proteins(Reference Koopman, Verdijk and Manders89), and following ingestion of large(Reference Symons, Sheffield-Moore and Wolfe90) and small amount of beef(Reference Symons, Sheffield-Moore and Wolfe90, Reference Symons, Schutzler and Cocke91). Discrepancies may arise from differences in timing of biopsy collection, the precursor pool used to calculate muscle protein synthesis or the age of the elderly volunteers studied. Clearly, more research is warranted to determine the extent of an anabolic resistance to food (i.e. intact protein) intake that exists in elderly human subjects.

Fig. 2. Whole-body protein synthesis rates, calculated over 3 h or 6 h periods, following the ingestion of 35 g of casein protein in young (about 23 year, n 10) and elderly (about 64 year, n 10) men. Whole-body protein synthesis rates, calculated per kg body weight, are significantly lower in the elderly compared to the young controls (*P<0·05). Adapted from Koopman et al. (Reference Koopman, Walrand and Beelen88).

Early work from the laboratory of Yves Boirie(Reference Boirie, Dangin and Gachon82Reference Beaufrere, Dangin and Boirie84, Reference Dangin, Boirie and Guillet86, Reference Dangin, Guillet and Garcia-Rodenas92) showed that ingestion of a slowly digested protein (casein) led to a more positive whole-body protein balance (averaged over a 7 h period) when compared with the ingestion of a fast digestible protein (whey) or a mixture of free AA in healthy, young subjects(Reference Dangin, Boirie and Garcia-Rodenas83). In contrast, ingestion of a fast protein resulted in greater (whole-body) net protein retention compared to a slow protein when provided to healthy, older men(Reference Boirie, Dangin and Gachon82, Reference Beaufrere, Dangin and Boirie84, Reference Dangin, Boirie and Guillet86, Reference Dangin, Guillet and Garcia-Rodenas92). The latter response might be attributed to the reported anabolic resistance of the muscle protein synthetic machinery to become activated in the elderly. In accordance with the fast v. slow protein concept, we tested the hypothesis that the ingestion of a casein protein hydrolysate, i.e. enzymatically pre-digested casein, would enhance protein digestion and the absorption rate in elderly men(Reference Koopman, Crombach and Gijsen93). We expected that this enhanced AA uptake in the gut would result in a greater increase in plasma AA availability and might improve the post-prandial muscle protein synthetic response. Elderly men ingested 35 g intrinsically L-[1-13C]phenylalanine labelled casein or casein hydrolysate and we assessed the appearance rate of dietary phenylalanine in the circulation and the subsequent muscle protein synthetic response. The ingestion of casein hydrolysate accelerated the appearance rate of dietary phenylalanine in the circulation, lowered splanchnic phenylalanine extraction, increased post-prandial plasma AA availability and tended to augment the subsequent muscle protein synthetic response in vivo in human subjects, compared to the ingestion of intact casein(Reference Koopman, Crombach and Gijsen93). The difference in the appearance rate of dietary protein between intact and hydrolysed casein was particularly evident in the first 3 h after the protein ingestion, with about 50% more dietary phenylalanine appearing in the circulation after ingestion of the casein hydrolysate(Reference Koopman, Crombach and Gijsen93). Consistent with these findings, it was reported that protein pulse feeding (providing up to 80% of daily protein intake in one meal) leads to greater protein retention than ingesting the same amount of protein provided over four meals throughout the day (spread-feeding) in elderly women(Reference Arnal, Mosoni and Boirie94, Reference Arnal, Mosoni and Boirie95). These findings may indicate that part of the proposed anabolic resistance in the elderly might be compensated for, in part, by enhancing AA availability during the post-prandial period.

Ageing and the anabolic response to combined exercise and nutrition

We have shown previously that muscle protein synthesis rates are lower in the elderly (about 75 year) compared to young controls under conditions in which resistance-type exercise is followed by food intake(Reference Koopman, Verdijk and Manders96). However, combined ingestion of carbohydrate and protein during recovery from physical activity resulted in similar increases in mixed muscle protein synthesis rates, measured over a 6-h period, in young and elderly men(Reference Koopman, Verdijk and Manders96). Consistent with our findings, Drummond et al. (Reference Drummond, Dreyer and Pennings61) reported similar post-exercise muscle protein synthesis rates over a 5-h recovery period in young v. elderly subjects following the ingestion of carbohydrate with an EAA mixture. However, their data indicated that the anabolic response to exercise and food intake was delayed in the elderly. During the first 3 h of post-exercise recovery, the young subjects showed a substantial increase in the muscle protein synthesis rate, which was not observed in the elderly. The delayed activation of muscle protein synthesis in the elderly may be attributed to a more pronounced activation of AMP-activated protein kinase and/or reduced extracellular-signal-regulated kinases1/2 activation during exercise, which seems to be consistent with an attenuated rise in 4E-binding protein phosphorylation following resistance-type exercise in older adults(Reference Kumar, Selby and Rankin39). These data highlight the importance of measuring muscle protein synthesis over different time periods (0–3 h and 3–6 h) following exercise and/or food intake to gain more information about impairments in activation of protein synthesis in the elderly. The mechanisms responsible for the delayed intracellular activation of the mTOR pathway in skeletal muscle remain unclear, but might include differences in muscle recruitment, muscle fibre-type composition, the capacity and/or sensitivity of the muscle protein synthetic machinery, the presence of an inflammatory state and/or the impact of stress on the cellular energy status of the cell between young and older adults.

Long-term interventions

The clinical relevance of nutritional and/or exercise intervention in the elderly stems from the long-term impact on skeletal muscle mass and strength, and the implications for functional capacity. In accordance with the previously discussed findings, the muscle protein synthetic machinery is able to respond to anabolic stimuli, albeit maybe to a lesser extent(Reference Rennie46), until very old age(Reference Fiatarone, Marks and Ryan97, Reference Frontera, Meredith and O'Reilly98). Although it was suggested previously that elderly human subjects need more protein(Reference Campbell, Trappe and Jozsi99), more recent studies by Campbell et al.(Reference Campbell, Johnson and McCabe100), who performed very comprehensive nitrogen balance experiments, clearly showed that dietary protein requirements did not increase with age, and that a dietary protein allowance of 0·85 g/kg per day is adequate. Some researchers believe that the attenuated muscle protein synthetic response to food intake in the elderly can, at least partly, be compensated for by increasing the leucine content of a meal(Reference Katsanos, Kobayashi and Sheffield-Moore34, Reference Rieu, Balage and Sornet101). However, we have shown previously that additional leucine intake does not further increase muscle protein synthesis after resistance exercise when ample protein is ingested by elderly men(Reference Koopman, Verdijk and Beelen102). In addition, we investigated the effect of 3 months of leucine supplementation with each main meal (7·5 g/d) on skeletal muscle mass and strength and on glycemic control in healthy elderly men(Reference Verhoeven, Vanschoonbeek and Verdijk103). Consistent with our observations from our acute post-exercise study, we did not observe any effect of leucine supplementation on skeletal muscle mass and strength. In addition, no improvements in indices of whole-body insulin sensitivity blood-glycated Hb content, or the plasma lipid profile were observed. We concluded that long-term leucine supplementation (7·5 g/d) does not augment skeletal muscle mass or strength and does not improve glycaemic control or the blood lipid profile in healthy elderly men.

Resistance exercise training interventions were shown effective in augmenting skeletal muscle mass, increasing muscle strength and/or improving functional capacity in the elderly(Reference Fiatarone, Marks and Ryan97, Reference Frontera, Meredith and O'Reilly98, Reference Ades, Ballor and Ashikaga104Reference Verdijk, Gleeson and Jonkers119). In addition, endurance(Reference Fiatarone, Marks and Ryan97, Reference Frontera, Meredith and O'Reilly98, Reference Ades, Ballor and Ashikaga104Reference Vincent, Braith and Feldman110) exercise was shown to enhance the skeletal muscle oxidative capacity, resulting in greater endurance capacity(Reference Short, Vittone and Bigelow5, Reference Short, Vittone and Bigelow120). Although the muscle regenerative capacity seems to decline at a more advanced age, the reduced satellite cell pool size(Reference Verdijk, Gleeson and Jonkers119) does not compromise the capacity for muscle hypertrophy to occur even at an advanced age(Reference Dedkov, Borisov and Wernig121Reference Thornell, Lindstrom and Renault123) and resistance exercise training was shown to increase muscle fibre size(Reference Kadi, Schjerling and Andersen124Reference Olsen, Aagaard and Kadi127). Recently, Verdijk et al.(Reference Verdijk, Gleeson and Jonkers119) assessed the effects of 12 weeks of leg resistance exercise training on fibre-type specific hypertrophy and satellite cell content in healthy, elderly men. Prolonged training resulted in a 28% increase in the size of type-II muscle fibres and a concomitant 76% increase in type-II muscle fibre satellite cell content in elderly males(Reference Verdijk, Gleeson and Jonkers119). The apparent differences in fibre size and/or satellite cell content between type-I and type-II muscle fibres prior to intervention were no longer evident after 12 weeks of training. Overall, these findings suggest that satellite cells are instrumental in the generation of new myonuclei to facilitate muscle fibre hypertrophy(Reference Snijders, Verdijk and van Loon128).

Protein/AA ingestion before, during and/or after exercise acutely stimulates muscle protein synthesis and reduces muscle protein breakdown to facilitate muscle fibre hypertrophy. Remarkably, little evidence exists that dietary interventions can further augment the adaptive response to prolonged exercise training in the elderly. The proposed importance of ample dietary protein intake in the long-term adaptive response to resistance training in the elderly has been a topic of intense debate(Reference Campbell and Evans129Reference Campbell and Leidy131). Some researchers suggest that the current RDA for habitual protein intake of 0·8 g/kg per day(Reference Rand, Pellett and Young132, Reference Trumbo, Schlicker and Yates133) is marginal to allow lean mass accretion following resistance exercise training(Reference Campbell, Trappe and Jozsi99) or even insufficient for long-term maintenance of skeletal muscle mass in sedentary elderly human subjects(Reference Campbell, Trappe and Wolfe134). However, others have shown that when habitual dietary protein intake is standardised at 0·9 g/kg per day, exercise-induced increases in muscle mass become apparent and further increases in protein intake does not provide any additional effect(Reference Iglay, Thyfault and Apolzan114). In addition, data from Walrand et al. (Reference Walrand, Short and Bigelow135) indicated that although increased protein intake in the elderly further improved nitrogen balance (by increasing AA oxidation), no beneficial effects on muscle protein synthesis and muscle function were observed. These observations might explain why most studies fail to observe any additional benefit of nutritional co-intervention on the skeletal muscle adaptive response to prolonged resistance exercise training in the elderly(Reference Fiatarone, Marks and Ryan97, Reference Frontera, Meredith and O'Reilly98, Reference Fiatarone, O'Neill and Ryan106, Reference Godard, Williamson and Trappe113, Reference Iglay, Thyfault and Apolzan114, Reference Verdijk, Jonkers and Gleeson117, Reference Haub, Wells and Tarnopolsky118, Reference Campbell, Crim and Young136Reference Welle and Thornton139). However, it has been suggested that it is not the total protein amount per se, but the timing of protein intake that is crucial for its stimulatory effect on muscle protein synthesis and muscle fibre hypertrophy. Esmarck et al. (Reference Esmarck, Andersen and Olsen140) concluded that the intake of a protein supplement immediately after each bout of resistance-type exercise was required for skeletal muscle hypertrophy to occur with a 12-week intervention in the elderly. Although the absence of any hypertrophy in the control group seems to conflict with previous studies that show muscle hypertrophy following resistance training without any dietary intervention, the proposed importance of nutrient timing is supported by more recent studies investigating the impact of AA or protein co-ingestion prior to, during and/or after exercise on the acute muscle protein synthetic response(Reference Beelen, Koopman and Gijsen141, Reference Tipton, Rasmussen and Miller142). Verdijk et al.(Reference Verdijk, Jonkers and Gleeson117) compared increases in skeletal muscle mass and strength following 3 months of resistance exercise training with or without protein ingestion prior to and immediately after each exercise session in elderly males. Timed protein supplementation prior to and after each exercise bout did not further increase skeletal muscle hypertrophy in healthy, elderly men who habitually consumed about 1·0 g protein/kg per day. Taken together, the available data suggest that sufficient habitual protein intake (about 0·9 g/kg per day) combined with a normal meal pattern (i.e. providing ample protein three times daily) will allow for substantial gains in muscle mass and strength with resistance exercise training in the elderly. Additional protein supplementation does not seem to provide large surplus benefits to the exercise intervention in healthy, elderly males. Additional protein intake may reduce subsequent voluntary food consumption in the elderly(Reference Fiatarone Singh, Bernstein and Ryan143) and consequently some have suggested that supplementation with EAA would be more efficient(Reference Timmerman and Volpi144). Clearly, acute studies have shown benefits of timed supplementation with small (7–15 g) amounts of EAA on muscle protein synthesis(Reference Katsanos, Kobayashi and Sheffield-Moore33, Reference Paddon-Jones, Sheffield-Moore and Zhang35, Reference Paddon-Jones, Sheffield-Moore and Katsanos71). However, well-designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled long-term studies to investigate beneficial and adverse effects of long-term EAA supplementation in the elderly are yet to be performed(Reference Henderson, Irving and Nair145).

Conclusions

The loss of skeletal muscle mass with ageing is associated with reduced muscle strength, the loss of functional capacity and an increased risk for developing chronic metabolic disease. The progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass does not appear to be attributed to age-related changes in basal muscle protein synthesis and/or rates of protein breakdown. Recent studies suggest that the muscle protein synthetic response to the main anabolic stimuli, i.e. food intake and/or physical activity, is blunted in the elderly. Despite this potential anabolic resistance to food intake and/or physical activity, resistance exercise training can stimulate net muscle protein accretion significantly. Prolonged resistance exercise training has proved to be an effective intervention for attenuating and/or treating the loss of muscle mass and strength in the elderly. Further research is warranted to provide insight into the interactions between nutrition, exercise and skeletal muscle adaptations in order to define more effective nutritional, exercise and/or pharmaceutical interventional strategies to prevent and/or treat sarcopenia.

Acknowledgements

R. K. is a C.R. Roper Senior Research Fellow in the Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences at The University of Melbourne and his research is currently funded by grants/fellowships from the Ajinomoto Amino Acid Research Program (3ARP, Ajinomoto, Japan) and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

1.Baumgartner, RN, Koehler, KM, Gallagher, D et al. (1998) Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol 147(8), 755763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Forbes, GB & Reina, JC (1970) Adult lean body mass declines with age: some longitudinal observations. Metabolism 19, 653663.Google Scholar
3.Melton, LJ 3rd,Khosla, S, Crowson, CS et al. (2000) Epidemiology of sarcopenia. J Am Geriatr Soc 48, 625630.Google Scholar
4.Short, KR & Nair, KS (2000) The effect of age on protein metabolism. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 3(1), 3944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Short, KR, Vittone, JL, Bigelow, ML et al. (2004) Age and aerobic exercise training effects on whole body and muscle protein metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286, E92–E101.Google Scholar
6.Lexell, J (1995). Human aging, muscle mass, and fiber type composition. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 50, 1116.Google Scholar
7.Paddon-Jones, D & Rasmussen, BB (2009) Dietary protein recommendations and the prevention of sarcopenia. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 12, 8690.Google Scholar
8.WHO (2008) Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/ageing/.Google Scholar
9.Kadi, F, Charifi, N, Denis, C et al. (2004) Satellite cells and myonuclei in young and elderly women and men. Muscle Nerve 29, 120127.Google Scholar
10.Larsson, L (1978) Morphological and functional characteristics of the ageing skeletal muscle in man. A cross-sectional study. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 457, 136.Google Scholar
11.Larsson, L, Sjodin, B & Karlsson, J (1978) Histochemical and biochemical changes in human skeletal muscle with age in sedentary males, age 22–65 years. Acta Physiol Scand 103, 3139.Google Scholar
12.Lexell, J, Henriksson-Larsen, K & Sjostrom, M (1983) Distribution of different fibre types in human skeletal muscles. 2. A study of cross-sections of whole m. vastus lateralis. Acta Physiol Scand 117(1), 115122.Google Scholar
13.Lexell, J, Henriksson-Larsen, K, Winblad, B et al. (1983) Distribution of different fiber types in human skeletal muscles: effects of aging studied in whole muscle cross sections. Muscle Nerve 6, 588595.Google Scholar
14.Verdijk, LB, Koopman, R, Schaart, G et al. (2007) Satellite cell content is specifically reduced in type II skeletal muscle fibers in the elderly. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 292, E151E157.Google Scholar
15.Bassey, EJ, Fiatarone, MA, O'Neill, EF et al. (1992) Leg extensor power and functional performance in very old men and women. Clin Sci (Lond) 82, 321327.Google Scholar
16.Brown, M, Sinacore, DR & Host, HH (1995) The relationship of strength to function in the older adult. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 50, 5559.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Frontera, WR, Hughes, VA, Lutz, KJ et al. (1991) A cross-sectional study of muscle strength and mass in 45- to 78-yr-old men and women. J Appl Physiol 71, 644650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Landers, KA, Hunter, GR, Wetzstein, CJ et al. (2001) The interrelationship among muscle mass, strength, and the ability to perform physical tasks of daily living in younger and older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56, B443B448.Google Scholar
19.Larsson, L & Karlsson, J (1978) Isometric and dynamic endurance as a function of age and skeletal muscle characteristics. Acta Physiol Scand 104, 129136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Lindle, RS, Metter, EJ, Lynch, NA et al. (1997) Age and gender comparisons of muscle strength in 654 women and men aged 20–93 yr. J Appl Physiol 83, 15811587.Google Scholar
21.Petrella, JK, Kim, JS, Tuggle, SC et al. (2005) Age differences in knee extension power, contractile velocity, and fatigability. J Appl Physiol 98, 211220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Wolfson, L, Judge, J, Whipple, R et al. (1995) Strength is a major factor in balance, gait, and the occurrence of falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 50, 6467.Google Scholar
23.Nair, KS (1995) Muscle protein turnover: methodological issues and the effect of aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 50 Spec No, 107112.Google Scholar
24.Nair, KS (2005) Aging muscle. Am J Clin Nutr 81, 953963.Google Scholar
25.Balagopal, P, Rooyackers, OE, Adey, DB et al. (1997) Effects of aging on in vivo synthesis of skeletal muscle myosin heavy-chain and sarcoplasmic protein in humans. Am J Physiol 273(4 Pt 1), E790E800.Google Scholar
26.Hasten, DL, Pak-Loduca, J, Obert, KA et al. (2000) Resistance exercise acutely increases MHC and mixed muscle protein synthesis rates in 78–84 and 23–32 yr olds. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278, E620E626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Rooyackers, OE, Adey, DB, Ades, PA et al. (1996). Effect of age on in vivo rates of mitochondrial protein synthesis in human skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 1536415369.Google Scholar
28.Welle, S, Thornton, C, Jozefowicz, R et al. (1993) Myofibrillar protein synthesis in young and old men. Am J Physiol 264(5 Pt 1), E693E698.Google Scholar
29.Welle, S, Thornton, C & Statt, M (1995) Myofibrillar protein synthesis in young and old human subjects after three months of resistance training. Am J Physiol 268(3 Pt 1), E422E427.Google Scholar
30.Yarasheski, KE, Welle, S & Nair, KS (2002) Muscle protein synthesis in younger and older men. Jama 287(3), 317318.Google Scholar
31.Yarasheski, KE, Zachwieja, JJ & Bier, DM (1993). Acute effects of resistance exercise on muscle protein synthesis rate in young and elderly men and women. Am J Physiol 265(2 Pt 1), E210E214.Google Scholar
32.Cuthbertson, D, Smith, K, Babraj, J et al. (2005) Anabolic signaling deficits underlie amino acid resistance of wasting, aging muscle. Faseb J 19, 422424.Google Scholar
33.Katsanos, CS, Kobayashi, H, Sheffield-Moore, M et al. (2005) Aging is associated with diminished accretion of muscle proteins after the ingestion of a small bolus of essential amino acids. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 10651073.Google Scholar
34.Katsanos, CS, Kobayashi, H, Sheffield-Moore, M et al. (2006) A high proportion of leucine is required for optimal stimulation of the rate of muscle protein synthesis by essential amino acids in the elderly. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 291, E381E387.Google Scholar
35.Paddon-Jones, D, Sheffield-Moore, M, Zhang, XJ et al. (2004) Amino acid ingestion improves muscle protein synthesis in the young and elderly. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286, E321E328.Google Scholar
36.Volpi, E, Mittendorfer, B, Rasmussen, BB et al. (2000) The response of muscle protein anabolism to combined hyperaminoacidemia and glucose-induced hyperinsulinemia is impaired in the elderly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85, 44814490.Google Scholar
37.Volpi, E, Mittendorfer, B, Wolf, SE et al. (1999) Oral amino acids stimulate muscle protein anabolism in the elderly despite higher first-pass splanchnic extraction. Am J Physiol 277(3 Pt 1), E513E520.Google Scholar
38.Volpi, E, Sheffield-Moore, M, Rasmussen, BB et al. (2001) Basal muscle amino acid kinetics and protein synthesis in healthy young and older men. JAMA 286, 12061212.Google Scholar
39.Kumar, V, Selby, A, Rankin, D et al. (2009) Age-related differences in the dose-response relationship of muscle protein synthesis to resistance exercise in young and old men. J Physiol 587(Pt 1), 211217.Google Scholar
40.Tipton, KD (2001) Muscle protein metabolism in the elderly: influence of exercise and nutrition. Can J Appl Physiol 26, 588606.Google Scholar
41.Trappe, T, Williams, R, Carrithers, J et al. (2004) Influence of age and resistance exercise on human skeletal muscle proteolysis: a microdialysis approach. J Physiol 554(Pt 3), 803813.Google Scholar
42.Lynch, NA, Metter, EJ, Lindle, RS et al. (1999) Muscle quality. I. Age-associated differences between arm and leg muscle groups. J Appl Physiol 86, 188194.Google Scholar
43.Rasmussen, BB, Fujita, S, Wolfe, RR et al. (2006) Insulin resistance of muscle protein metabolism in aging. Faseb J 20, 768769.Google Scholar
44.Koopman, R, Saris, WH, Wagenmakers, AJ et al. (2007) Nutritional interventions to promote post-exercise muscle protein synthesis. Sports Med 37, 895906.Google Scholar
45.Guillet, C, Prod'homme, M, Balage, M et al. (2004) Impaired anabolic response of muscle protein synthesis is associated with S6K1 dysregulation in elderly humans. Faseb J 18, 15861587.Google Scholar
46.Rennie, MJ (2009) Anabolic resistance: the effects of aging, sexual dimorphism, and immobilization on human muscle protein turnover. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 34, 377381.Google Scholar
47.Wilkinson, SB, Phillips, SM, Atherton, PJ et al. (2008) Differential effects of resistance and endurance exercise in the fed state on signalling molecule phosphorylation and protein synthesis in human muscle. J Physiol 586(Pt 15), 37013717.Google Scholar
48.Evans, WJ (1995) Effects of exercise on body composition and functional capacity of the elderly. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 50, 147150.Google Scholar
49.Rennie, MJ & Tipton, KD (2000) Protein and amino acid metabolism during and after exercise and the effects of nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr 20, 457483.Google Scholar
50.Nair, KS, Halliday, D & Griggs, RC (1988) Leucine incorporation into mixed skeletal muscle protein in humans. Am J Physiol 254(2 Pt 1), E208E213.Google Scholar
51.Volpi, E, Ferrando, AA, Yeckel, CW et al. (1998) Exogenous amino acids stimulate net muscle protein synthesis in the elderly. J Clin Invest 101, 20002007.Google Scholar
52.Phillips, SM, Tipton, KD, Aarsland, A et al. (1997) Mixed muscle protein synthesis and breakdown after resistance exercise in humans. Am J Physiol 273(1 Pt 1), E99–E107.Google ScholarPubMed
53.Tang, JE, Perco, JG, Moore, DR et al. (2008) Resistance training alters the response of fed state mixed muscle protein synthesis in young men. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 294, R172R178.Google Scholar
54.MacDougall, JD, Tarnopolsky, MA, Chesley, A et al. (1992) Changes in muscle protein synthesis following heavy resistance exercise in humans: a pilot study. Acta Physiol Scand 146, 403404.Google Scholar
55.Biolo, G, Maggi, SP, Williams, BD et al. (1995) Increased rates of muscle protein turnover and amino acid transport after resistance exercise in humans. Am J Physiol 268(3 Pt 1), E514E520.Google Scholar
56.Laurent, GJ, Sparrow, MP & Millward, DJ (1978) Turnover of muscle protein in the fowl. Changes in rates of protein synthesis and breakdown during hypertrophy of the anterior and posterior latissimus dorsi muscles. Biochem J 176, 407417.Google Scholar
57.Bodine, SC, Stitt, TN, Gonzalez, M et al. (2001) Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 3, 10141019.Google Scholar
58.Bolster, DR, Kubica, N, Crozier, SJ et al. (2003) Immediate response of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated signalling following acute resistance exercise in rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol 553(Pt 1), 213220.Google Scholar
59.Dreyer, HC, Fujita, S, Cadenas, JG et al. (2006) Resistance exercise increases AMPK activity and reduces 4E-BP1 phosphorylation and protein synthesis in human skeletal muscle. J Physiol 576(Pt 2), 613624.Google Scholar
60.Kimball, SR, Farrell, PA & Jefferson, LS (2002) Invited Review: Role of insulin in translational control of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by amino acids or exercise. J Appl Physiol 93, 11681180.Google Scholar
61.Drummond, MJ, Dreyer, HC, Pennings, B et al. (2008) Skeletal muscle protein anabolic response to resistance exercise and essential amino acids is delayed with aging. J Appl Physiol 104, 14521461.Google Scholar
62.Koopman, R, Zorenc, AH, Gransier, RJ et al. (2006) The increase in S6K1 phosphorylation in human skeletal muscle following resistance exercise occurs mainly in type II muscle fibers. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 290, E1245E1252.Google Scholar
63.Drummond, MJ, Fry, CS, Glynn, EL et al. (2009) Rapamycin administration in humans blocks the contraction-induced increase in skeletal muscle protein synthesis. J Physiol 587(Pt 7), 15351546.Google Scholar
64.Baar, K & Esser, K (1999) Phosphorylation of p70(S6k) correlates with increased skeletal muscle mass following resistance exercise. Am J Physiol 276(1 Pt 1), C120C127.Google Scholar
65.Terzis, G, Georgiadis, G, Stratakos, G et al. (2008) Resistance exercise-induced increase in muscle mass correlates with p70S6 kinase phosphorylation in human subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 102, 145152.Google Scholar
66.Fujita, S, Rasmussen, BB, Cadenas, JG et al. (2007) Aerobic exercise overcomes the age-related insulin resistance of muscle protein metabolism by improving endothelial function and Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling. Diabetes 56, 16151622.Google Scholar
67.Sheffield-Moore, M, Yeckel, CW, Volpi, E et al. (2004) Postexercise protein metabolism in older and younger men following moderate-intensity aerobic exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287, E513E522.Google Scholar
68.Hameed, M, Orrell, RW, Cobbold, M et al. (2003) Expression of IGF-I splice variants in young and old human skeletal muscle after high resistance exercise. J Physiol 547(Pt 1), 247254.Google Scholar
69.Raue, U, Slivka, D, Jemiolo, B et al. (2007) Proteolytic gene expression differs at rest and after resistance exercise between young and old women. J Gerontol A: Biol Sci Med Sci 62, 14071412.Google Scholar
70.Rennie, MJ, Edwards, RH, Halliday, D et al. (1982) Muscle protein synthesis measured by stable isotope techniques in man: the effects of feeding and fasting. Clin Sci (Lond) 63, 519523.Google Scholar
71.Paddon-Jones, D, Sheffield-Moore, M, Katsanos, CS et al. (2006) Differential stimulation of muscle protein synthesis in elderly humans following isocaloric ingestion of amino acids or whey protein. Exp Gerontol 41, 215219.Google Scholar
72.Tipton, KD, Gurkin, BE, Matin, S et al. (1999) Nonessential amino acids are not necessary to stimulate net muscle protein synthesis in healthy volunteers. J Nutr Biochem 10, 8995.Google Scholar
73.Volpi, E, Kobayashi, H, Sheffield-Moore, M et al. (2003) Essential amino acids are primarily responsible for the amino acid stimulation of muscle protein anabolism in healthy elderly adults. Am J Clin Nutr 78, 250258.Google Scholar
74.Smith, K, Barua, JM, Watt, PW et al. (1992) Flooding with L-[1–13C]leucine stimulates human muscle protein incorporation of continuously infused L-[1–13C]valine. Am J Physiol 262(3 Pt 1), E372E376.Google Scholar
75.Norton, LE & Layman, DK (2006) Leucine regulates translation initiation of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle after exercise. J Nutr 136, 533S537S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76.Bohe, J, Low, A, Wolfe, RR et al. (2003) Human muscle protein synthesis is modulated by extracellular, not intramuscular amino acid availability: a dose-response study. J Physiol 552(Pt 1), 315324.Google Scholar
77.Borsheim, E, Cree, MG, Tipton, KD et al. (2004) Effect of carbohydrate intake on net muscle protein synthesis during recovery from resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol 96, 674678.Google Scholar
78.Greenhaff, PL, Karagounis, LG, Peirce, N et al. (2008) Disassociation between the effects of amino acids and insulin on signaling, ubiquitin ligases, and protein turnover in human muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 295, E595E604.Google Scholar
79.Wilkes, EA, Selby, AL, Atherton, PJ et al. (2009) Blunting of insulin inhibition of proteolysis in legs of older subjects may contribute to age-related sarcopenia. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 13431350.Google Scholar
80.Wilkes, E, Selby, A, Patel, R et al. (2008) Blunting of insulin-mediated proteolysis in leg muscle of elderly subjects may contribute to age-related sarcopenia (Abstract). Proc Nutr Society 67(OCE5), E153.Google Scholar
81.Fujita, S, Rasmussen, BB, Cadenas, JG et al. (2006) Effect of insulin on human skeletal muscle protein synthesis is modulated by insulin-induced changes in muscle blood flow and amino acid availability. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 291, E745E754.Google Scholar
82.Boirie, Y, Dangin, M, Gachon, P et al. (1997) Slow and fast dietary proteins differently modulate postprandial protein accretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 1493014935.Google Scholar
83.Dangin, M, Boirie, Y, Garcia-Rodenas, C et al. (2001) The digestion rate of protein is an independent regulating factor of postprandial protein retention. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 280, E340E348.Google Scholar
84.Beaufrere, B, Dangin, M & Boirie, Y (2000) The ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ protein concept. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Clin Perform Program 3, 121131; discussion 31–3.Google Scholar
85.Boirie, Y, Gachon, P, Corny, S et al. (1996) Acute postprandial changes in leucine metabolism as assessed with an intrinsically labeled milk protein. Am J Physiol 271(6 Pt 1), E1083E1091.Google Scholar
86.Dangin, M, Boirie, Y, Guillet, C et al. (2002) Influence of the protein digestion rate on protein turnover in young and elderly subjects. J Nutr 132, 3228S3233S.Google Scholar
87.Boirie, Y, Fauquant, J, Rulquin, H et al. (1995). Production of large amounts of [13C]leucine-enriched milk proteins by lactating cows. J Nutr 125, 9298.Google Scholar
88.Koopman, R, Walrand, S, Beelen, M et al. (2009) Dietary protein digestion and absorption rate and the subsequent muscle protein synthetic response are not different between young and elderly men. J Nutr 139, 17071713.Google Scholar
89.Koopman, R, Verdijk, LB, Manders, RJF et al. (2006) Co-ingestion of protein and leucine stimulates muscle protein synthesis rates to the same extent in young and elderly lean men. Am J Clin Nutr 84, 623632.Google Scholar
90.Symons, TB, Sheffield-Moore, M, Wolfe, RR et al. (2009) A moderate serving of high-quality protein maximally stimulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis in young and elderly subjects. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 15821586.Google Scholar
91.Symons, TB, Schutzler, SE, Cocke, TL et al. (2007) Aging does not impair the anabolic response to a protein-rich meal. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 451456.Google Scholar
92.Dangin, M, Guillet, C, Garcia-Rodenas, C et al. (2003) The rate of protein digestion affects protein gain differently during aging in humans. J Physiol 549(Pt 2), 635644.Google Scholar
93.Koopman, R, Crombach, N, Gijsen, AP et al. (2009) Ingestion of a protein hydrolysate is accompanied by an accelerated in vivo digestion and absorption rate when compared with its intact protein. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 106115.Google Scholar
94.Arnal, MA, Mosoni, L, Boirie, Y et al. (2000) Protein feeding pattern does not affect protein retention in young women. J Nutr 130, 17001704.Google Scholar
95.Arnal, MA, Mosoni, L, Boirie, Y et al. (1999) Protein pulse feeding improves protein retention in elderly women. Am J Clin Nutr 69, 12021208.Google Scholar
96.Koopman, R, Verdijk, L, Manders, RJ et al. (2006) Co-ingestion of protein and leucine stimulates muscle protein synthesis rates to the same extent in young and elderly lean men. Am J Clin Nutr 84(3), 623632.Google Scholar
97.Fiatarone, MA, Marks, EC, Ryan, ND et al. (1990) High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians. Effects on skeletal muscle. Jama 263, 30293034.Google Scholar
98.Frontera, WR, Meredith, CN, O'Reilly, KP et al. (1988) Strength conditioning in older men: skeletal muscle hypertrophy and improved function. J Appl Physiol 64, 10381044.Google Scholar
99.Campbell, WW, Trappe, TA, Jozsi, AC et al. (2002) Dietary protein adequacy and lower body versus whole body resistive training in older humans. J Physiol 542(Pt 2), 631642.Google Scholar
100.Campbell, WW, Johnson, CA, McCabe, GP et al. (2008) Dietary protein requirements of younger and older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 88(5), 13221329.Google Scholar
101.Rieu, I, Balage, M, Sornet, C et al. (2006) Leucine supplementation improves muscle protein synthesis in elderly men independently of hyperaminoacidaemia. J Physiol 575(Pt 1), 305315.Google Scholar
102.Koopman, R, Verdijk, LB, Beelen, M et al. (2008) Co-ingestion of leucine with protein does not further augment post-exercise muscle protein synthesis rates in elderly men. Br J Nutr 99, 571580.Google Scholar
103.Verhoeven, S, Vanschoonbeek, K, Verdijk, LB et al. (2009) Long-term leucine supplementation does not increase muscle mass or strength in healthy elderly men. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 14681475.Google Scholar
104.Ades, PA, Ballor, DL, Ashikaga, T et al. (1996) Weight training improves walking endurance in healthy elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 124, 568572.Google Scholar
105.Bamman, MM, Hill, VJ, Adams, GR et al. (2003) Gender differences in resistance-training-induced myofiber hypertrophy among older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58, 108116.Google Scholar
106.Fiatarone, MA, O'Neill, EF, Ryan, ND et al. (1994) Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people. N Engl J Med 330, 17691775.Google Scholar
107.Frontera, WR, Hughes, VA, Krivickas, LS et al. (2003) Strength training in older women: early and late changes in whole muscle and single cells. Muscle Nerve 28, 601608.Google Scholar
108.Frontera, WR, Meredith, CN, O'Reilly, KP et al. (1990) Strength training and determinants of VO2max in older men. J Appl Physiol 68, 329333.Google Scholar
109.Lexell, J, Downham, DY, Larsson, Y et al. (1995) Heavy-resistance training in older Scandinavian men and women: short- and long-term effects on arm and leg muscles. Scand J Med Sci Sports 5, 329341.Google Scholar
110.Vincent, KR, Braith, RW, Feldman, RA et al. (2002) Resistance exercise and physical performance in adults aged 60 to 83. J Am Geriatr Soc 50, 11001107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
111.Brose, A, Parise, G & Tarnopolsky, MA (2003) Creatine supplementation enhances isometric strength and body composition improvements following strength exercise training in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58, 1119.Google Scholar
112.Ferri, A, Scaglioni, G, Pousson, M et al. (2003) Strength and power changes of the human plantar flexors and knee extensors in response to resistance training in old age. Acta Physiol Scand 177, 6978.Google Scholar
113.Godard, MP, Williamson, DL & Trappe, SW (2002) Oral amino-acid provision does not affect muscle strength or size gains in older men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34, 11261131.Google Scholar
114.Iglay, HB, Thyfault, JP, Apolzan, JW et al. (2007) Resistance training and dietary protein: effects on glucose tolerance and contents of skeletal muscle insulin signaling proteins in older persons. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 10051013.Google Scholar
115.Kosek, DJ, Kim, JS, Petrella, JK et al. (2006) Efficacy of 3 days/wk resistance training on myofiber hypertrophy and myogenic mechanisms in young vs. older adults. J Appl Physiol 101, 531544.Google Scholar
116.Martel, GF, Roth, SM, Ivey, FM et al. (2006) Age and sex affect human muscle fibre adaptations to heavy-resistance strength training. Exp Physiol 91, 457464.Google Scholar
117.Verdijk, LB, Jonkers, RAM, Gleeson, BG et al. (2009) Protein supplementation before and after exercise does not further augment skeletal muscle hypertrophy following resistance training in elderly men. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 608616.Google Scholar
118.Haub, MD, Wells, AM, Tarnopolsky, MA et al. (2002) Effect of protein source on resistive-training-induced changes in body composition and muscle size in older men. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 511517.Google Scholar
119.Verdijk, LB, Gleeson, BG, Jonkers, RAM et al. (2009) Skeletal muscle hypertrophy following resistance training is accompanied by a fiber type-specific increase in satellite cell content in elderly men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 64, 332339.Google Scholar
120.Short, KR, Vittone, JL, Bigelow, ML et al. (2003) Impact of aerobic exercise training on age-related changes in insulin sensitivity and muscle oxidative capacity. Diabetes 52, 18881896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
121.Dedkov, EI, Borisov, AB, Wernig, A et al. (2003) Aging of skeletal muscle does not affect the response of satellite cells to denervation. J Histochem Cytochem 51, 853863.Google Scholar
122.Shefer, G, Van de Mark, DP, Richardson, JB et al. (2006) Satellite-cell pool size does matter: defining the myogenic potency of aging skeletal muscle. Dev Biol 294, 5066.Google Scholar
123.Thornell, LE, Lindstrom, M, Renault, V et al. (2003) Satellite cells and training in the elderly. Scand J Med Sci Sports 13, 4855.Google Scholar
124.Kadi, F, Schjerling, P, Andersen, LL et al. (2004) The effects of heavy resistance training and detraining on satellite cells in human skeletal muscles. J Physiol 558(Pt 3), 10051012.Google Scholar
125.Kadi, F & Thornell, LE (2000) Concomitant increases in myonuclear and satellite cell content in female trapezius muscle following strength training. Histochem Cell Biol 113, 99–103.Google Scholar
126.Petrella, JK, Kim, JS, Cross, JM et al. (2006) Efficacy of myonuclear addition may explain differential myofiber growth among resistance-trained young and older men and women. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 291(5), E937–E946.Google Scholar
127.Olsen, S, Aagaard, P, Kadi, F et al. (2006) Creatine supplementation augments the increase in satellite cell and myonuclei number in human skeletal muscle induced by strength training. J Physiol 573(Pt 2), 525534.Google Scholar
128.Snijders, T, Verdijk, LB & van Loon, LJ (2009) The impact of sarcopenia and exercise training on skeletal muscle satellite cells. Ageing Res Rev 8, 328338.Google Scholar
129.Campbell, WW & Evans, WJ (1996) Protein requirements of elderly people. Eur J Clin Nutr 50 Suppl 1, S180–S183; discussion S3–5.Google Scholar
130.Morais, JA, Chevalier, S & Gougeon, R (2006) Protein turnover and requirements in the healthy and frail elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 10, 272283.Google Scholar
131.Campbell, WW & Leidy, HJ (2007) Dietary protein and resistance training effects on muscle and body composition in older persons. J Am Coll Nutr 26, 696S703S.Google Scholar
132.Rand, WM, Pellett, PL & Young, VR (2003) Meta-analysis of nitrogen balance studies for estimating protein requirements in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr 77(1), 109127.Google Scholar
133.Trumbo, P, Schlicker, S, Yates, AA et al. (2002) Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 16211630.Google Scholar
134.Campbell, WW, Trappe, TA, Wolfe, RR et al. (2001) The recommended dietary allowance for protein may not be adequate for older people to maintain skeletal muscle. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56, M373–M380.Google Scholar
135.Walrand, S, Short, KR, Bigelow, ML et al. (2008) Functional impact of high protein intake on healthy elderly people. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 295, E921–E928.Google Scholar
136.Campbell, WW, Crim, MC, Young, VR et al. (1995) Effects of resistance training and dietary protein intake on protein metabolism in older adults. Am J Physiol 268(6 Pt 1), E1143–E1153.Google Scholar
137.Freyssenet, D, Berthon, P, Denis, C et al. (1996) Effect of a 6-week endurance training programme and branched-chain amino acid supplementation on histomorphometric characteristics of aged human muscle. Arch Physiol Biochem 104, 157162.Google Scholar
138.Meredith, CN, Frontera, WR, O'Reilly, KP et al. (1992) Body composition in elderly men: effect of dietary modification during strength training. J Am Geriatr Soc 40, 155162.Google Scholar
139.Welle, S & Thornton, CA (1998) High-protein meals do not enhance myofibrillar synthesis after resistance exercise in 62- to 75-yr-old men and women. Am J Physiol 274(4 Pt 1), E677–E683.Google Scholar
140.Esmarck, B, Andersen, JL, Olsen, S et al. (2001) Timing of postexercise protein intake is important for muscle hypertrophy with resistance training in elderly humans. J Physiol 535(Pt 1), 301311.Google Scholar
141.Beelen, M, Koopman, R, Gijsen, AP et al. (2008) Protein coingestion stimulates muscle protein synthesis during resistance-type exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 295(1), E70–E77.Google Scholar
142.Tipton, KD, Rasmussen, BB, Miller, SL et al. (2001) Timing of amino acid-carbohydrate ingestion alters anabolic response of muscle to resistance exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281, E197–E206.Google Scholar
143.Fiatarone Singh, MA, Bernstein, MA, Ryan, AD et al. (2000) The effect of oral nutritional supplements on habitual dietary quality and quantity in frail elders. J Nutr Health Aging 4, 5–12.Google Scholar
144.Timmerman, KL & Volpi, E (2008) Amino acid metabolism and regulatory effects in aging. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 11, 4549.Google Scholar
145.Henderson, GC, Irving, BA & Nair, KS (2009) Potential application of essential amino Acid supplementation to treat sarcopenia in elderly people. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94, 15241526.Google Scholar
146.Verdijk, LB, van Loon, L, Meijer, K et al. (2009) One-repetition maximum strength test represents a valid means to assess leg strength in vivo in humans. J Sports Sci 27, 5968.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Muscle fibre cross-sectional area in young (about 20 year) and elderly (about 76 year) men (A). Note the smaller type-II muscle fibres in the elderly men compared with the young controls (adapted from (14)). (B) Correlation between age and one-repetition maximum (1RM) leg press strength (adapted from(146)).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Whole-body protein synthesis rates, calculated over 3 h or 6 h periods, following the ingestion of 35 g of casein protein in young (about 23 year, n 10) and elderly (about 64 year, n 10) men. Whole-body protein synthesis rates, calculated per kg body weight, are significantly lower in the elderly compared to the young controls (*P<0·05). Adapted from Koopman et al.(88).