Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T02:02:41.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of wall cooling on a compressible turbulent boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

R. L. Gran
Affiliation:
TRW Systems Group, Redondo Beach, California Present address: Flow Research, Inc., Los Angeles, California.
J. E. Lewis
Affiliation:
TRW Systems Group, Redondo Beach, California Present address: Techmate, Inc., Torrance, California.
T. Kubota
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

Abstract

Experimental results are presented for two turbulent boundary-layer experiments conducted at a free-stream Mach number of 4 with wall cooling. The first experiment examines a constant-temperature cold-wall boundary layer subjected to adverse and favourable pressure gradients. It is shown that the boundary-layer data display good agreement with Coles’ general composite boundary-layer profile using Van Driest's transformation. Further, the pressuregradient parameter βK found in previous studies to correlate adiabatic highspeed data with low-speed data also correlates the present cooled-wall high-speed data. The second experiment treats the response of a constant-pressure highspeed boundary layer to a near step change in wall temperature. It is found that the growth rate of the thermal boundary layer within the existing turbulent boundary layer varies considerably depending upon the direction of the wall temperature change. For the case of an initially cooled boundary layer flowing onto a wall near the recovery temperature, it is found that δTx whereas the case of an adiabatic boundary layer flowing onto a cooled wall gives δTx½. The apparent origin of the thermal boundary layer also changes considerably, which is accounted for by the variation in sublayer thicknesses and growth rates within the sublayer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1974 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alber, I. E. & Coats, D. E. 1969 Analytical investigation of equibrium and nonequilibrium compressible turbulent boundary layers. A.I.A.A. Paper no. 69–689.Google Scholar
Antonia, R. A. & Luxton, R. E. 1971 The response of a turbulent boundary layer to a step change in surface roughness. Part 1. Smooth to rough J. Fluid Mech. 48, 721761.Google Scholar
Antonia, R. A. & Luxton, R. E. 1972 The response of a turbulent boundary layer to a step change in surface roughness. Part 2. Rough to smooth J. Fluid Mech. 53, 737757.Google Scholar
Bird, R. B., Stewart, W. E. & Lightfoot, E. N. 1963 Transport Phenomena. Wiley.
Chen, K. K. 1972 Compressible turbulent boundary layer heat transfer to rough surfaces in pressure gradient A.I.A.A. J. 10, 623635.Google Scholar
Clauser, F. H. 1956 The turbulent boundary layer Adv. in Appl. Mech. 4, 151.Google Scholar
Coles, D. E. 1953 Measurements in the boundary layer on a smooth flat plate in supersonic flow. 1. The problem of the turbulent boundary layer. Jet Propulsion Lab. Rep. no. 20–69.Google Scholar
Coles, D. E. 1956 The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer J. Fluid Mech. 1, 191226.Google Scholar
Coles, D. E. & Hirst, E. A. 1969 Proc. Computation of Turbulent Boundary Layers, 1968 AFOSR-IFP-Stanford Conf. vol. 2. Thermosciences Division, Stanford University, Californias.
Hahn, J. S. & Lutz, R. G. 1971 Experimental investigation of turbulent boundary layers with pressure gradient and heat transfer at Mach number 4. Arnold Engng Development Centre Rep. AEDC-TR-71-3.Google Scholar
Hopkins, E. J. & Inouye, M. 1971 An evaluation of theories for predicting turbulent skin friction and heat transfer on flat plates at supersonic and hypersonic Mach numbers. A.I.A.A. J. 9, 9931003.
Lewis, J. E., Gran, R. L. & Kubota, T. 1972 An experiment on the adiabatic compressible turbulent boundary layer in adverse and favourable pressure gradients J. Fluid Mech. 51, 657672.Google Scholar
Maise, G. & McDonald, H. 1967 Mixing length and kinematic eddy viscosity in a compressible boundary layer. A.I.A.A. 5th Aerospace Sci. Meeting.
Matthews, D. C., Childs, M. E. & Paynter, G. C. 1970 Use of Coles’ universal wake function for compressible turbulent boundary layers J. Aircraft, 7, 137140.Google Scholar
Mellor, G. L. & Gibson, D. M. 1966 Equilibrium turbulent boundary layers J. Fluid Mech. 24, 225253.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1965 Self-preserving flow inside a turbulent boundary layer J. Fluid Mech. 22, 773797.Google Scholar
Van Driest, E. R. 1951 The turbulent boundary layer in compressible fluids J. Aero Sci. 18, 145160.Google Scholar
Wegner, P. P. & Mack, L. M. 1958 Adv. in Appl. Mech. 5, 307447.