Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:36:10.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction of finite-amplitude waves with vertically sheared current fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2009

OKEY G. NWOGU*
Affiliation:
Deparment of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: onwogu@umich.edu

Abstract

A computationally efficient numerical method is developed to investigate nonlinear interactions between steep surface gravity waves and depth-varying ocean currents. The free-surface boundary conditions are used to derive a coupled set of equations that are integrated in time for the evolution of the free-surface elevation and tangential component of the fluid velocity at the free surface. The vector form of Green's second identity is used to close the system of equations. The closure relationship is consistent with Helmholtz's decomposition of the velocity field into rotational and irrotational components. The rotational component of the flow field is given by the Biot–Savart integral, while the irrotational component is obtained from an integral of a mixed distribution of sources and vortices over the free surface. Wave-induced changes to the vorticity field are modelled using the vorticity transport equation. For weak currents, an explicit expression is derived for the wave-induced vorticity field in Fourier space that negates the need to numerically solve the vorticity transport equation. The computational efficiency of the numerical scheme is further improved by expanding the kernels of the boundary and volume integrals in the closure relationship as a power series in a wave steepness parameter and using the fast Fourier transform method to evaluate the leading-order contribution to the convolution integrals. This reduces the number of operations at each time step from O(N2) to O(NlogN) for the boundary integrals and O[(NM)2] to O(NlogN) for the volume integrals, where N is the number of horizontal grid points and M is the number of vertical layers, making the model an order of magnitude faster than traditional boundary/volume integral methods. The numerical model is used to investigate nonlinear wave–current interaction in depth-uniform current fields and the modulational instability of gravity waves in an exponentially sheared current in deep water. The numerical results demonstrate that the mean flow vorticity can significantly affect the growth rate of extreme waves in narrowband sea states.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, G. R., Meiron, D. I. & Orszag, S. A. 1982 Generalized vortex methods for free-surface flow problems. J. Fluid Mech. 123, 477501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. R., Meiron, D. I. & Orszag, S. A. 1989 Generalized vortex methods for free-surface flow problems. Part 2. Radiating waves. J. Sci. Comp. 4, 237259.Google Scholar
Banner, M. L. & Tian, X. 1998 On the determination of the onset of breaking for modulating surface gravity water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 367, 107137.Google Scholar
Baumstein, A. I. 1998 Modulation of gravity waves with shear in water. Stud. Appl. Math. 100, 365390.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1962 The solitary wave on a stream with an arbitrary distribution of vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 12, 97116.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. & Feir, J. E. 1967 The disintegration of wave trains on deep water. Part 1. Theory. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 417430.Google Scholar
Biesel, F. 1950 Etude theorique de la houle en eau courante. Houille Blan. 5, 279285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliven, L. F., Huang, N. E. & Long, S. R. 1986 Experimental study of the influence of wind on Benjamin–Feir sideband instability. J. Fluid Mech. 162, 237260.Google Scholar
Brevik, I. 1979 Higher-order waves propagating on constant vorticity currents in deep water. Coastal Engng 2, 237259.Google Scholar
Chen, L. & Vorus, W. S. 1992 Application of a vortex method to free surface flows. Intl J. Num. Meth. Fluids 14, 12891310Google Scholar
Choi, W. 1995 Nonlinear evolution equations for two-dimensional surface waves in a fluid of finite depth. J. Fluid Mech. 295, 381394.Google Scholar
Clamond, D., Fructus, D., Grue, J. & Kristiansen, O. 2005 An efficient model for three-dimensional surface wave simulations. Part 2. Generation and absorption. J. Comput. Phys. 205, 686705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clamond, D. & Grue, J. 2001 A fast method for fully nonlinear water-wave computations. J. Fluid Mech. 447, 337355.Google Scholar
Craig, W. & Sulem, C. 1993 Numerical simulation of gravity waves. J. Comput. Phys. 108, 7383.Google Scholar
Crapper, G. D. 1972 Nonlinear gravity waves on steady non-uniform currents. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 713724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, D. R., Lake, B. M., Saffman, P. G. & Yuen, H. C. 1981 Stability of weakly nonlinear deep-water waves in two and three dimensions. J. Fluid Mech. 105, 177191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dold, J. W. 1992 An efficient surface-integral algorithm applied to unsteady gravity waves. J. Comput. Phys. 103, 90115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, R. A. 1974 A finite amplitude wave on a linear shear current. J. Geophys. Res. 79, 44984504.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, R. A. 1977 A numerical model for periodic finite amplitude waves on a rotational fluid. J. Comput. Phys. 24, 2944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dommermuth, D. G. & Yue, D. K. P. 1987 A high-order spectral method for the study of nonlinear gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 184, 267288.Google Scholar
Dysthe, K., Krogstad, H. E. & Muller, P. 2008 Oceanic rogue waves. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 287310.Google Scholar
Freeman, N. C. & Johnson, R. S. 1970 Shallow water waves on shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 42, 401409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fructus, D., Clamond, D., Grue, J. & Kristiansen, O. 2005 An efficient model for three-dimensional surface wave simulations. Part 1. Free space problems. J. Comput. Phys. 205, 665685.Google Scholar
Gerber, M. 1987 The Benjamin–Feir instability of a deep-water Stokes wavepacket in the presence of a non-uniform medium. J. Fluid Mech. 176, 311332.Google Scholar
Hou, T. Y., Hu, G. & Zhang, P. 2003 Singularity formation in three-dimensional vortex sheets. Phys. Fluids. 15, 147172.Google Scholar
Jonsson, I. G. 1990 Wave–current interactions. In The Sea (ed. Mehaute, B. Le and Hanes, D. M.), pp. 65120. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. T. & Chen, T. M. 1989 Surface waves on vertically sheared flows: approximate dispersion relations. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 10131027.Google Scholar
Kishida, N. & Sobey, R. J. 1988 Stokes theory for waves on a linear shear current. J. Engng Mech. 114, 13171334.Google Scholar
Kharif, C. & Pelinovsky, E. 2003 Physical mechanisms of the rogue wave phenomenon. Eur. J. Mech. B 22, 603634.Google Scholar
Ko, J. & Krauss, W. 2008 Effect of vorticity on steady water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 608, 197215.Google Scholar
Landrini, M., Oshri, O., Waseda, T. & Tulin, M. P. 1998 Long time evolution of gravity wave systems. In Proc. 13th Intl Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Li, J. C., Hui, W. H. & Donelan, M. A. 1988 Effects of velocity shear on the stability of surface deep water wave trains. In Nonlinear Water Waves (ed. Horikawa, K. & Maruo, H.), pp. 213220. Springer.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1975 Integral properties of periodic gravity waves of finite amplitude. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 342, 157174.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Cokelet, E. D. 1976 The deformation of steep surface waves on water. Part 1. A numerical method of computation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 350, 126.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Stewart, R. W. 1961 The changes in amplitude of short gravity waves on steady non-uniform currents. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 529549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, P. A., Bingham, H. B. & Liu, H. 2002 A new Boussinesq method for fully nonlinear waves from shallow to deep water. J. Fluid Mech. 462, 130.Google Scholar
McDonald, B. E. & Witting, J. M. 1984. A conservation law related to Kelvin's circulation theorem. J. Comput. Phys. 56, 237243.Google Scholar
Morino, L., Salvatore, F. & Gennaretti, M. 1999 A new velocity decomposition for viscous flows: Lighthill's equivalent-source method revisited. Comp. Meth. App. Mech. Engng 173, 317336Google Scholar
Morse, P. M. & Feshbach, H. 1953 Methods of Theoretical Physics. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Nwogu, O. 1993 Alternative form of Boussinesq equations for nearshore wave propagation. J. Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Engng ASCE 119, 618638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. 1976 Interaction of water waves and currents. Adv. Appl. Mech. 16, 9117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. & Thomas, G. P. 1979 Finite-amplitude deep-water waves on currents. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 292, 371390.Google Scholar
Shen, C. Y. 2001 Constituent Boussinesq equations for waves and currents. J. Phys. Ocean. 31, 850859.Google Scholar
Shrira, V. I. 1993 Surface waves on shear currents: solution of the boundary-value problem. J. Fluid Mech. 252, 565584.Google Scholar
Simmen, J. A. & Saffman, P. G. 1985 Steady deep-water waves on a linear shear current. Stud. Appl. Math. 75, 3557.Google Scholar
Skop, R. A. 1987 An approach to the analysis of the interaction of surface waves with depth-varying current fields. App. Math. Modelling. 11, 432437.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. H. & Joy., J. W. 1974 HF radio measurements of surface currents. Deep Sea Res. 21, 10391049.Google Scholar
Swan, C., Cummins, I. P. & James, R. L. 2001 An experimental study of two-dimensional surface water waves propagating on depth-varying currents. Part 1. Regular waves. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 273304.Google Scholar
Swan, C. & James, R. L. 2001 A simple analytical model for surface water waves on a depth-varying current. Appl. Ocean Res. 22, 331347Google Scholar
Teles Da Silva, A. F. & Peregrine, D. H. 1988 Steep surface waves on water of finite depth with constant vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 281302.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. P. 1990 Wave–current interactions: an experimental and numerical study. Part 2. Nonlinear waves. J. Fluid Mech. 216, 505536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. D. 1949 The propagation of small surface disturbances through rotational flow. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 51, 463474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsao, S. 1959 Behaviour of surface waves on a linearly varying flow. Tr. Mosk. Fiz.-Tekh. Inst. Issled. Mekh. Prikl. Mat. 3, 6684.Google Scholar
Vinje, T. & Brevig, P. 1981 Numerical simulation of breaking waves. Adv. Water Res. 4, 7782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waseda, T. & Tulin, M. P. 1999 Experimental study of the stability of deep-water wave trains including wind effects. J. Fluid Mech. 401, 5584.Google Scholar
Wehausen, J. V. & Laitone, E. V. 1960 Surface waves. In Handbuch der Physik, vol. 9, pp. 446778. Springer.Google Scholar
Wei, G., Kirby, J. T. & Sinha, A. 1999 Generation of waves in Boussinesq models using a source function method. Coastal Engng 36, 271299.Google Scholar
West, B. J., Brueckner, K. A., Janda, R. S., Milder, D. M. & Milton, R. L. 1987 A new numerical method for surface hydrodynamics. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 1180311824.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1965 A general approach to linear and nonlinear dispersive waves using a Lagrangian. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 273283.Google Scholar
Wu, J. C. 1984 Fundamental solutions and numerical methods for flow problems. Intl J. Num. Meth. Fluids 4, 185201.Google Scholar
Zakharov, V. E. 1968 Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid. Zh. Prikl. Mekh. Tekh. Fiz. 9, 8694.Google Scholar
Zakharov, V. E., Dyachenko, A. I. & Vasilyev, O. A. 2002 New method for numerical simulation of a nonstationary potential flow of incompressible fluid with a free surface. Eur. J. Mech. B 21, 283291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaroodny, S. J. & Greenberg, M. D. 1973 On a vortex sheet approach to the numerical calculation of water waves. J. Comput. Phys. 11, 440446.Google Scholar