Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T06:10:19.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Teaching the “New Middle East”: Beyond Authoritarianism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2013

Khalid Mustafa Medani*
Affiliation:
McGill University

Extract

In 2011 the protests in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) were not only unprecedented in terms of scale and political consequences for the region, they also highlighted a number of long-standing analytical and theoretical misconceptions about Arab politics. In particular, the conventional thesis privileging the idea of a “durable authoritarianism” in the Arab world was partially undermined by a cross-regional civil society that confronted the formidable security and military apparatus of the state. Although in some countries democratic transitions have continued, since they first occurred in Tunisia, other Arab states continue to witness a resilient authoritarianism and strong state repression of civil society activism. These historic events have also set the stage for a new teaching agenda in important ways. Specifically, an agenda for teaching the “new Middle East” must incorporate two important general components: first, a critical review of the influential scholarship on persistent authoritarianism with the objective of addressing past theoretical and methodological misconceptions, and second, the introduction of new conceptual and analytical frameworks relevant to contemporary political developments in the Arab world and the MENA region more generally.

Type
Symposium: Teaching about the Middle East Since the Arab Uprisings
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bayat, Asef. 2010. Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Changed the Middle East. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellin, Eva. 2004. “The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Politics 36 (2): 139157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Steven R. 2007. Ruling, but not Governing: The Military and Political Development in Egypt, Algeria and Turkey. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gause, Gregory_III. 2011. “The Middle East Academic Community and the Winter of Arab Discontent: Why Did We Miss It?” In Seismic Shift: Understanding Change in the Middle East, ed. Laipson, Ellen, 1126. Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Center.Google Scholar
Ghobashy, Mona. 2011. “The Praxis of the Egyptian Revolution.” Middle East Report 258 (Spring): 311.Google Scholar
Hertog, Steffen. 2010. Princes, Brokers and Bureaucrats: Oil and the State in Saudi Arabia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Heydeman, Steve. 2007. “Upgrading Authoritarianism,” The Saban Center for Middle East Policy, Analysis Paper Series, No. 13, October. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hinnebusch, Raymond A. 1990. Authoritarian Power and State Formation in Ba'thist Syria: Army, Party and Peasant. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael L. 2008. “Oil, Islam and Women.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlumber, Oliver, ed. 2007. Debating Arab Authoritarianism: Dynamics and Durability in Nondemocratic Regimes. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessler, Mark. 1997. “Origins of Popular Support: A Political Economy Analysis.” In Islam, Democracy and the State in North Africa, ed. Entelis, John, 93126. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Tugal, Cihan. 2009. Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiktorowicz, Quintan. 2003. Islamist Activism: A Social Movement Approach. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar