Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T03:45:44.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The California Plan: A 21st Century Method for Nominating Presidential Candidates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2004

Thomas Gangale
Affiliation:
OPS-Alaska and San Francisco State University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Features
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleman Eric M. 2000The Rest of the Primarieshttp://www.gwu.edu/~action/chrnothp.html (December 24, 2002).Google Scholar
Brock William E. 2000Nominating Future Presidents: Report of the Advisory Commission on the Presidential Nominating Processhttp://www.rnc.org/media/pdfs/brockreport.pdf (February 13, 2003).Google Scholar
Center for Governmental Studies 2001Report of the National Symposium on Presidential Selectionhttp://www.centerforpolitics.org/reform/nssreport_entire.pdf (February 1, 2003).Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1960How Delegates to National Conventions are ChosenFebruary 12, 225.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1960bSixteen Presidential Primaries Scheduled for 1960March 4, 348Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1968aDemocratic Presidential PrimariesJune 14, 1480.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1968bRepublican Presidential PrimariesJune 14, 1481.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1968cGOP Delegates: One-Fifth '64 Returnees, Few NegroesJuly 26, 19782000Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1968dRepublican Presidential PrimariesAugust 16, 2147.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1968eCredential Challenges Set Record at ConventionAugust 23, 22452254Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1976aCarter Coasts to Nomination in 30 PrimariesJuly 10, 18061807Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1976bCaucuses: Light Turnout, Many UncommittedJuly 10, 18091811Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1976cA Quick ‘Who's Who’ of GOP DelegationsAugust 14, 21882196Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988aOpening Round Primaries and Caucuses … Fragmented ElectorateMarch 5, 570571Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988bPresidential Primary/Caucus CalendarMarch 5, 574Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988c1988 Democratic Primary Results.July 9, 1894.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988d1988 Democratic First-Round Caucus Results.July 9, 1895.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988e1988 Republican Primary Results.July 9, 1896.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988f1988 Republican First-Round Caucus Results.July 9, 1897.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1992a “Primary Turnout.” March 28, 823.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1992bClinton Left Behind in Caucuses.Apr. 4, 899.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1992cRemaining Primaries, Caucuses.Apr 11, 967.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1992dRemaining Primaries, Caucuses.May 2, 1188.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 19961996 Presidential Primary… and Caucus Calendar.January 13, 9899.Google Scholar
Gorton Slade, and Joseph Lieberman. 1999Regional Presidential Selection Act of 1. 1999.http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:s.1789: (April 8, 2003).Google Scholar
Gorton Slade. 2000Testimony of Senator Slade Gorton (WA) Before the Committee on Rules and Administration, United States Senate, March 29, 2000.http://rules.senate.gov/hearings/2000/032900gorton.htm (January 25, 2003).Google Scholar
Hirsch J. M. 2000Smith Releases Plan to Keep New Hampshire's Primary First.July 6. http://smith.senate.gov/Releases/Releases/07062000.HTM (January 4, 2003).Google Scholar
Klett Rooney Lieber, & Schorling. 2003Richard A. Forsten. Biography.http://www.klettrooney.com/attorneys/alpha/f/forstenra.html (February 13 2003).Google Scholar
Lester Will. 2000GOP Abandons Plan to Overhaul Primary Schedule.Associated Press, July 28. http://archive.nandotimes.com/election2000/story/0,3977,500233467-500339806-501946106-0-nandotimes,00.html (January 4, 2003).Google Scholar
Levin Sander. 2000Interregional Presidential Primary and Caucus Act of 2000.http://thomas.loc.gov/cgibin/query/z?c106:h.r.4014: (April 8, 2003).Google Scholar
Lieberman Joseph. 1999Gorton, Lieberman Call for Presidential Selection Overhaul.Press release, October 26. http://www.senate.gov/member/ct/lieberman/general/r102699a.html (January 4, 2003).Google Scholar
Lieberman Joseph. 2000Testimony on Regional Presidential Selection Act of 1999.http://www.senate.gov/member/ct/lieberman/general/r032900a.html (January 25, 2003).Google Scholar
National Association of Secretaries of State. 1999Model Presidential Primary Legislation.http://www.gwu.edu/~action/nass.html (April 28, 2003).Google Scholar
National Association of Secretaries of State. 2000Presidential Primary Plan.http://www.nass.org/issues.html (December 23, 2002).Google Scholar
Parshall Lisa K., and Franco Mattei. 2002Parties and the Presidential Nomination Process: Political and Constitutional Implications of ‘Front-Loading.’Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia.Google Scholar
Smith Robert. 2000Senator Bob Smith's ‘Fairness in Primaries’ Plan.http://www.gwu.edu/~action/smithplan.htm (February 1, 2003).Google Scholar
Patterson Thomas E. 2000Public Involvement and the 2000 Nominating Campaign: Implications for Electoral Reform.The Vanishing Voter Project, April 27. http://www.vanishingvoter.org/releases/04-27-00prim-4.shtml (February 1, 2003).Google Scholar
Washington Post. 1999Regional Primary Plan Approved.February 13. http://wwwwp7.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/primary021399.htm (April 1, 1999).Google Scholar
Walsh Susan. 2000Primary Reform Clears GOP Hurdle.CBSNews.com, 26 July. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/07/27/politics/main219401.shtml (February 13, 2003).Google Scholar