Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T02:01:06.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Body fat measurements in children as predictors for the metabolic syndrome: focus on waist circumference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2007

H. David McCarthy
Affiliation:
Institute for Health Research & Policy, London Metropolitan University, Holloway Road, LondonN7 8DB, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The global epidemic of obesity in children will see a rise in the number of cases of metabolic syndrome, which is a clustering of CVD risk factors, including atherogenic levels of blood lipids, hyperinsulinaemia and raised blood pressure. Rather than excess general fatness (assessed by BMI), more specifically it is excess abdominal fatness, quantified by waist circumference measurement, which is a better measure of risk for these metabolic abnormalities in children of all ages. Insulin resistance, a consequence of excess visceral fat, is understood to be the driving force underpinning the metabolic syndrome. Consequently, assessment of abdominal fatness in children is proving to be more clinically useful. Waist circumference centile charts have now been developed for the UK and other paediatric populations to assist in this process. Furthermore, studies in the UK and elsewhere have shown that abdominal fatness has increased in infants, children and adolescents to a greater extent than overall fatness over the past 10–20 years, suggesting that obesity prevalence may be underestimated when based entirely on BMI. Additionally, ethnic differences in fat distribution have been demonstrated in children, with those from south Asian backgrounds having a greater abdominal distribution compared with Caucasian children and consequently having a much greater risk for type 2 diabetes. The information that can be provided by waist circumference measurement in children, as in adults, together with the recent changes in body fat distribution should provide the impetus for its measurement to be standardised and routinely taken in clinical and epidemiological settings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2006

Abbreviations:
ALSPAC

Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

MS

metabolic syndrome

WC

waist circumference

WHtR

WC:height ratio

It is well established that there is an epidemic of overweight and obesity in both the adult and childhood populations within the UK and globally (Bundred et al. Reference Bundred, Kitchiner and Buchan2001; Chinn & Rona, Reference Chinn and Rona2001; Lobstein et al. Reference Lobstein, James and Cole2003). These data are based on BMI as the measure for overweight and obesity. The exact data are continually being updated, but those for England from the Health Survey for England (Sproston & Primatesta, Reference Sproston and Primatesta2002) put the percentages for both overweight and obese categories at approximately 22 for boys and 28 for girls. The prevalence in the Republic of Ireland is not much different from that for the UK. Observers claim that this dramatic rise in obesity prevalence in children is fuelling a major public health crisis (Lobstein et al. Reference Lobstein, Baur and Uauy2004).

Obesity increases the risk for related morbidities, particularly the metabolic syndrome (MS; Must, Reference Must1996; Kopelman & Albon, Reference Kopelman and Albon1997), which is defined as a clustering of CVD risk factors, including impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. Obesity, especially abdominal obesity (in which lipid deposition in visceral adipose tissue is increased) is fundamental to the MS. Insulin resistance, a consequence of abdominal obesity, is understood to be the driving force of MS (Weiss & Caprio, Reference Weiss and Caprio2005). Across increasing body-weight categories there is a rising and significant trend for the metabolic variables associated with the MS, including plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, increasing triacylglycerol levels, decreasing HDL levels, increased impaired glucose tolerance test and increased systolic blood pressure (P for trend <0·001; Weiss et al. Reference Weiss, Dziura, Burgert, Tamborlane, Taksali and Yeckel2004). Consequently, it has been reported that the MS is one of the most pressing diet-related public health issues to affect future generations, as risk for MS has been shown to originate early in life.

Most often in a clinical situation it will be the child's BMI that will initiate further examination for comorbidities. BMI represents the sum of fat-free mass and fat mass. BMI charts for clinical use in children have been available for some time (Cole et al. Reference Cole, Freeman and Preece1995, Reference Cole, Bellizzi, Flegal and Dietz2000; Dietz & Bellizzi, Reference Dietz and Bellizzi1999; National Center for Health Statistics, 2000). In relation to the use of BMI in children, it may well be that this type of measurement does not fully capture all those children who may be at risk for the MS. This situation is in part a result of its sensitivity and specificity. Whilst BMI is able to correctly identify the fattest children in a sample (high specificity, low false positive rate), because of its low sensitivity (moderate–high false negative rate) it can misclassify large numbers of children with a high body fat content (Reilly et al. Reference Reilly, Dorosty and Emmett2000). Furthermore, BMI is unable to distinguish between gains in fat-free mass and gains in fat mass. In an epidemiological context, as BMI is used to monitor trends in overweight and obesity in children, its known limitations can therefore be particularly problematic for public health applications such as surveillance of obesity (Ellis et al. Reference Ellis, Abrams and Wong1999; Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Sarria, Fleta, Rodriguez and Bueno2000).

Another major drawback with BMI is that its measurement gives no indication of body fat distribution. It has been known for some time that a central distribution of body fat, particularly an excess accumulation of fat intra-abdominally rather than a more peripheral distribution, carries a higher risk for obesity-related ill health. Waist circumference (WC) measurement in adults can quantify abdominally-accumulated fat and is used as a clinical measure for CVD risk (Lean et al. Reference Lean, Has and Morrison1995). Other measures such as the WC:height ratio (WHtR) and waist:hip ratio can also be used to indicate abdominal obesity and its related risk (Ashwell et al. Reference Ashwell, LeJeune and McPherson1996).

There has been an assumption that intra-abdominal (or visceral) fat accumulation is a phenomenon associated mainly with adulthood and hence adult risk for CVD. Thus, for a long time visceral fat remained unmeasured in the childhood population. Furthermore, the technology available at the time for quantifying visceral fat (computerised tomography) was thought to be prohibitive to its use in children because of the radiation risk. As a result, for some time the metabolic risk of intra-abdominal adipose tissue accumulation in children was overlooked and so the use of WC as a measure of body fat distribution in children was ignored. De Ridder et al. (Reference de Ridder, De Boer, Seidell, Nieuwenhoff, Jeneson, Bakker, Zonderland and Erich1992) and Fox et al. (Reference Fox, Peters, Armstrong, Sharpe and Bell1993) were among the first investigators to examine intra-abdominal fat deposition in children. Both studies used nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in 11-year-old children and late pubertal girls. Essentially, in both studies it was found that whilst intra-abdominal or visceral fat is present in children, its amount is highly variable between individuals and the percentage of cross-sectional area taken up by visceral fat is less than that found in normal-weight adults. In addition, in these children subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue was found to be predominant compared with intra-abdominal adipose tissue. However, a proportion of the children were found to have intra-abdominal:subcutaneous abdominal fat values that have been associated with higher health risks in obese adults. These findings would suggest that the partitioning of dietary energy (as triacylglycerol) between the intra-abdominal depot and subcutaneous depot in childhood is a regulated process that is incompletely understood. The process by which excess fat can accumulate intra-abdominally in children must relate, in part, to the biology of adipose tissue growth and different physiological mechanisms must exist for the acquisition of subcutaneous and intra-abdominal adipose tissue mass (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Johnson, Figueroa-Colon, Dwyer and Goran2001). As a measure of intra-abdominal fat deposition in these children, waist to hip ratio was not found to be a useful marker, whereas WC alone was found to be a good predictor of abdominal fatness. It should be noted that these observations were conducted before the current obesity epidemic and, given the increases seen in WC in UK children (see p. 388), a repeat of those earlier magnetic resonance imaging studies may prove more illuminating. Later research using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry has confirmed that the strongest correlate of fat distribution in children and adolescents is WC and it is also the correlate least affected by gender, ethnicity, age and overall fatness (Daniels et al. Reference Daniels, Khoury and Morrison2000; Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Jones, Williams and Goulding2000).

Given the association between excess abdominal fat in adults and morbidity, is the same true for children? It is indeed the case, as a number of studies have demonstrated. In a group of obese children aged 10–15 years intra-abdominal adipose tissue mass was shown to be positively and significantly (P<0·04) related to both total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, and triacylglycerol levels (Brambilla et al. Reference Brambilla, Manzoni, Sironi, Simone, Del Maschio, di Natale and Chiumello1994). A separate study in obese adolescent girls has shown that cardiovascular risk factors including plasma triacylglycerol and HDL-cholesterol concentrations and systolic and diastolic blood pressure are directly related to the amount of intra-abdominal fat (Caprio et al. Reference Caprio, Hyman, McCarthy, Lange, Bronson and Tamborlane1996). Similar findings have also been reported for obese children aged 7–11 years (Owens et al. Reference Owens, Gutin, Ferguson, Allison, Karp and Le1998). In relation to insulin sensitivity and risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus, intra-abdominal adipose tissue (assessed by magnetic resonance imaging) has been shown to be highly correlated with basal insulin secretion, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in obese adolescent girls (Caprio et al. Reference Caprio, Hyman, Limb, McCarthy, Lange, Sherwin, Shulman and Tamborlane1995). Studies reviewed by Goran & Gower (Reference Goran and Gower1999) have shown the clinical relevance of intra-abdominal adipose tissue in children and adolescents, including its effects on dyslipidaemia and glucose tolerance.

Whilst these measurements of intra-abdominal adipose tissue in children by imaging techniques correlate with risk for CVD and MS, it must be remembered that the intra-abdominal adipose mass is only one component of the WC, and WC measurement in children relates to both subcutaneous abdominal fat and intra-abdominal fat. Thus, it is also important to determine whether WC rather than intra-abdominal fat relates to CVD risk in children. A study of a group of 12–14-year-old obese children (Flodmark et al. Reference Flodmark, Sveger and Nilsson-Ehle1994) has shown that after adjusting for puberty and gender WC is significantly correlated with HDL-cholesterol (P<0·05) and plasma triacylglycerol (P<0·01) levels, indicating that for this group of obese children, abdominal obesity is related to an adverse blood lipid profile and that WC measurement is a convenient and informative indicator of obesity-related metabolic alterations. Further to these observations, the Bogalusa Heart Study (Freedman et al. Reference Freedman, Serdula, Srinivasan and Berenson1999) has examined the relationship between WC and measures of lipid and insulin concentrations in 5–17-year-olds. Again, it was found that, independently of age, height, weight, gender and ethnicity, increasing WC is associated with increasing fasting insulin concentration (indicative of insulin resistance) together with adverse concentrations of plasma triacylglycerols and LDL- and HDL-cholesterol. From the latter study it was further concluded that information on body fat distribution, particularly WC measurement, may help to identify those children who are likely to have adverse blood concentrations of insulin and lipids. More recently, an important finding from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) project (see p. 389) has demonstrated raised plasma cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations in preschool children with the highest WC (Cowin et al. Reference Cowin and Emmett2000).

Evidence for a relationship between WC and blood pressure in children is not as abundant, although using data from ALSPAC an increase has been observed in systolic blood pressure in 4- and 5-year-olds with increasing WC (HD McCarthy, KV Jarrett, PM Emmett, I Rogers and the ALSPAC Study Team, unpublished results). In prepubertal children systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as well as apoA1:apoB, total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol have been shown to be significantly associated with WC, independently of age, gender and BMI (P<0·01; Maffeis et al. Reference Maffeis, Pietrobelli, Grezzani, Provera and Tato2001). Furthermore, children identified with a WC in the top 10% of the age- and gender-related distribution are more likely to have multiple risk factors than children with a WC in the remaining 90% of the WC distribution. In pubertal children positive relationships between systolic and diastolic blood pressure and trunk fat (determined by both WC measurement and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and adjusted for total fat) have been found in boys but not in girls (He et al. Reference He, Horlick, Fedun, Wang, Pierson, Heshka and Gallagher2002a). Thus, a broad range of evidence in children of all ages suggests that WC is strongly associated with obesity-related morbidity and is a useful measurement to identify those children most at risk, and one which is easy to undertake with an acceptable extent of reproducibility (see p. 390).

Waist circumference percentile charts

Given the findings of the research into intra-abdominal fat accumulation in children, its association with metabolic risk factors and the ability of WC to predict abdominal fatness, WC centile charts should prove to be a useful addition or alternative to BMI centile charts in the clinical assessment of childhood obesity. Compared with BMI, WC would better identify children with high abdominal fatness and hence risk for MS. This premise is especially true given the known limitations of BMI and BMI centile charts in children for identifying those who may be at risk for the MS. Up until 2001, there had been no obesity-related reference data for WC in UK children, but WC centile charts had been developed for the Italian (aged 6–14 years; Zannolli & Morgese, Reference Zannolli and Morgese1996) and Spanish (aged 6–15 years; Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Fleta, Mur, Rodriguez, Sarria and Bueno1999) paediatric populations. Waist:hip ratio centiles had also been developed for Cuban children and adolescents (Martinez et al. Reference Martinez, Devesa, Bacallao and Amador1994). For equivalent UK charts it was essential that historical data were utilised and collected before the emergence of the current obesity epidemic. If contemporary data had been used, then comparison with the UK references for height, weight and BMI would be difficult (Cole et al. Reference Cole, Freeman and Preece1995). One key issue in the development of the WC centile chart and the use of WC measurement in paediatric obesity research is that there is no universal agreement on the definition of the WC landmark. Most research groups have taken the WC as being mid-way between the 10th rib and the top of the iliac crest (for example, see Freedman et al. Reference Freedman, Serdula, Srinivasan and Berenson1999; Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Fleta, Mur, Rodriguez, Sarria and Bueno1999). Others, such as those who developed the Italian charts, have measured WC at the level of the umbilicus (Zannolli & Morgese, Reference Zannolli and Morgese1996). This disparity makes comparisons between populations difficult.

Data used for the development of the UK WC centile charts were collected in 1977 for boys and 1987 for girls and the measurement site was the midpoint between the 10th rib and the top of the iliac crest (British Standards Institute, 1990). Using the LMS curve-fitting software developed by Cole and colleagues (Cole, Reference Cole1990), gender-specific and age-related smoothed centile charts have been constructed (McCarthy et al. Reference McCarthy, Jarrett and Crawley2001). In this dataset there is an age-related increase in mean WC up to age 17 years. Gender differences are evident from age 9 years onwards, with boys having the greater mean WC at each age; the difference in mean WC between boys and girls at age 17 years is 6·3 cm. At present, the published WC centile charts cover the age-range between 3 and 17 years, and include the standard nine centile lines, with a channel width of 0·66 sd score. The 91st and 98th centiles are used to define overweight and obese, in line with the UK BMI charts.

Since the development of WC centile charts for UK children, other nations have produced similar charts, including Cyprus (ages 6–17 years; Savva et al. Reference Savva, Kourides, Tornaritis, Epiphaniou-Savva, Tafouna and Kafatos2001), USA (ages 2–18 years; Fernandez et al. Reference Fernandez, Redden, Pietrobelli and Allison2004), Canada (ages 11–18 years; Katzmarzyk, Reference Katzmarzyk2004), Australia (ages 7–15 years, Eisenmann, Reference Eisenmann2005), The Netherlands (ages birth to 21 years; Fredriks et al. Reference Fredriks, van Buuren, Fekkes, Verloove-Vanhorick and Wit2005) and Mexico (ages 6–10 years; Gomez-Diaz et al. Reference Gomez-Diaz, Martinez-Harnandez, Aquilar-Salinas, Violante, Alarcon, Villarruel, Rodarte and Solorzano-Santos2005). However, there is variation between these studies in the landmark used to define the waist, again leading to potential difficulties when attempting to make cross-cultural comparisons. Furthermore, most of the WC data were collected from contemporary children and in countries with known increased prevalences of overweight and obesity.

When BMI–WC relationships in children and adolescents are examined, a strong positive relationship between these two variables exists. However WC can vary greatly for a given BMI at a particular age. As a result, this relationship can give an insight into how combining age-related BMI and WC measurements could improve the identification of those children most at risk of MS, and conversely how it could assist in avoiding the incorrect classification of some children. Table 1 illustrates this issue in four boys of approximately similar age, and the BMI–WC relationships highlighted can be demonstrated across all ages and in both genders.

Table 1. Combining age-related BMI and waist circumference (WC) measurements could assist in avoiding the incorrect classification of some children, as illustrated for four boys of similar ageFootnote *

Approx, approximately.

* Child A can be considered a reference child with an average BMI for age and gender. Child B, based on BMI would also be considered average for age. However, when WC is taken into account, this child would be classified as obese. The latter is an example of where there is not excess body mass, but excess central body fat accumulation (furthermore, it is likely that this child would be shorter than child A). Child C would be considered overweight based on his BMI, but his WC is average. This example could be a case where the child is more muscular (and possibly taller, leading to a greater fat-free mass) for his age. Finally, child D is considered obese based on his BMI and obese based on his WC.

As two separate measures of fatness BMI and WC interact in a complex fashion, especially in childhood, and are both influenced by age, gender and pubertal stage. In a recent cross-sectional study in 474 healthy adolescents aged 17 years (Neovius et al. Reference Neovius, Linne and Rossner2005) both BMI and WC have been shown to perform well as diagnostic tests for fatness (air-displacement plethysmography was used as the reference method and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated through receiver operating characteristics). However, as measures of risk for obesity-related morbidity, age- and gender-related BMI and WC can lead to different interpretations. As a result, it may be more useful in clinical practice (and possibly in epidemiological studies) to perform both measurements and to make an evaluation on the child based on the combined observations. Indeed, such a recommendation has been supported by findings in children for whom outcome measures of HDL-cholesterol level, triacylglycerol level, high glucose level, high insulin level and high blood pressure were predicted from age-specific BMI and WC values (Katzmarzyk et al. Reference Katzmarzyk, Srinivasan, Chen, Malina, Bouchard and Berenson2004; Janssen et al. Reference Janssen, Katzmarzyk, Srinivasan, Chen, Malina, Bouchard and Berenson2005). From these studies the authors have concluded that a combination of BMI and WC should be recommended for use clinically to predict risk factor clustering and elevated health risk among children and adolescents.

Secular changes in abdominal fatness in children

Reference data for WC and hence abdominal fatness in UK children exists. Thus, in view of the escalation in childhood overweight and obesity, it was important to determine whether abdominal fatness has increased in British children, thus increasing the numbers at risk for the metabolic consequences of abdominal obesity and the MS. This issue was resolved by comparing the WC reference data (McCarthy et al. 2001) with that collected 10 and 20 years later for 11–16-year-old children participating in the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (Gregory & Lowe, Reference Gregory and Lowe2000). This survey was the first contemporary nationally-representative children's survey in which WC measurements had been collected. Fortunately, the landmark used for WC measurement was the same as that for the earlier survey. In the analysis (McCarthy et al. Reference McCarthy, Ellis and Cole2003) WC was expressed as a standard deviation score, using the first survey (British Standards Institute, 1990) as the reference. Changes in BMI were analysed in the same way but using the UK data as the reference (Cole et al. Reference Cole, Freeman and Preece1995). Overweight and obesity were defined as measurements >91st and 98th centile respectively. The key finding from this study is the sharp increase in WC over the 10-year period in girls (6·2 cm, 1·02 sd score; P<0·0001) and over the 20-year period in boys (6·9 cm, 0·84 sd score; P<0·0001). In centile terms, the increase was found to be greater for girls than for boys. For BMI, the extent of the increase was smaller and was similar for boys and girls (mean 1·5 and 1·6 BMI units respectively, or 0·47 and 0·53 sd score; P<0·0001). In the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (Gregory & Lowe, Reference Gregory and Lowe2000) sample WC was found to exceed the 91st centile in 28% of boys and 38% of girls, with 14% and 17% of boys and girls respectively exceeding the 98th centile (P<0·0001). By comparison, for BMI 17% of boys and 21% of girls were found to exceed the 91st centile in the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (Gregory & Lowe, Reference Gregory and Lowe2000) sample, with the corresponding rates for the 98th centile being 10% for boys and 8% for girls. These findings clearly demonstrate that increases in central fatness over the past 10–20 years (measured by WC) have exceeded increases in overall fatness (measured by the BMI) and that BMI is a poor proxy for central fatness. These findings also indicate that obesity prevalence has been systematically underestimated by measurements based on height and weight. As indicated earlier, BMI measures the sum of fat mass and fat-free mass (Maynard et al. Reference Maynard, Wisemandle, Roche, Chumlea, Guo and Siervogel2001; Wells et al. Reference Wells, Coward, Cole and Davies2002), and it is impossible to know the contribution of each compartment to these increases in BMI in this study. The increase in WC is unlikely to be entirely a result of increases in visceral adipose tissue, and probably reflects subcutaneous and hence total fatness. Taken together, these findings suggest that body composition (and hence body shape) has changed over this period of time, with the increase in (central) fat mass being obscured by decreases in fat-free (and hence probably skeletal muscle) mass. Whether this possible skeletal muscle issue is related to decreases in physical activity levels is unclear at this time. It is known that in obese adolescents excess fat accumulates predominantly in the upper body region rather than in the peripheral region (Brambilla et al. Reference Brambilla, Manzoni, Sironi, Simone, Del Maschio, di Natale and Chiumello1994; Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Fleta, Mur, Sarria and Bueno1998). These findings have important implications for risk of MS, given the fact that children in the upper distribution of the WC values have a more atherogenic blood lipid profile and raised fasting insulin concentrations. These secular increases in WC and abdominal fatness in adolescents have also been demonstrated outside the UK, but over a shorter period of time, indicating the reproducibility of this phenomenon in other populations (Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Sarria, Fleta, Marcos and Bueno2005). Also, an earlier study of Spanish children (Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Fleta, Sarria, Rodriguez and Bueno2001b) has shown that between 1980 and 1995 there was a shift towards a central distribution of fat patterning in children as young as 6 years of age. These observations were based on ratios of skinfold thicknesses at the periphery and trunk and were independent of trends in BMI. Furthermore, conversion of these children's skinfold thickness measurements into predicted percentage body fatness indicates a secular increase in total percentage body fat of between 2·5 and 6·0% that is greater than the increase in BMI, again suggesting a change in body composition over the 15-year period (Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Fleta, Sarria, Rodriguez and Bueno2001a).

Following on from the novel findings in adolescents (McCarthy et al. Reference McCarthy, Ellis and Cole2003), the next question to be asked was whether these body fatness findings were present in younger children. This question was answered using data from the ALSPAC study. ALSPAC is a longitudinal cohort study being conducted in the West of England, which was initiated in the early 1990s and comprises approximately 14 000 children (Golding et al. Reference Golding, Pembrey and Jones2001). A subset of these children, comprising approximately 1000 children, has been studied in more detail (known as Children in Focus). WC and BMI between the ages of 2 and 5 years were compared with values for similar-aged children measured in 1987. The essential finding of this study is a significantly greater mean WC in the ALSPAC children at equivalent ages compared with those measured in the earlier study (P<0·05; McCarthy et al. Reference McCarthy, Jarrett, Emmett and Rogers2005). Whilst mean BMI was also found to be higher in the contemporary ALSPAC cohort, the proportional increase in WC was again greater than that for BMI. These findings mirror those in the older children, suggesting a greater rate of increase in abdominal fatness than in general fatness, and the occurrence of excess central fat deposition at a very young age. Again, this study demonstrates the shortcomings of BMI measurement, indicating that it can mask the true obesity-related risk in young children.

Longitudinal studies of both total fatness and abdominal fatness in children are scarce. The Nepean study (Garnett et al. Reference Garnett, Cowell, Baur, Shrewsbury, Chan, Crawford, Salmon, Campbell and Boulton2005), which has examined both factors in detail between 7–8 years of age and 12–13 years of age, has found an increase of 0·74 for the mean WC sd score, but an increase 0·18 for BMI sd score. These findings suggest a greater rate of increase in abdominal fatness than in overall fatness in this contemporary cohort of children.

Abdominal fatness, ethnicity and health risk

The findings discussed so far have related almost exclusively to Caucasian children. However, the prevalence of overweight and obesity and its health consequences can be greater for children from other ethnic groups, especially those from south Asian and African and Caribbean backgrounds. A recent UK study (Saxena et al. Reference Saxena, Ambler, Cole and Majeed2004) has demonstrated that British Afro-Caribbean and Pakistani girls have an increased risk of being obese, while Indian and Pakistani boys have an increased risk of being overweight. These findings suggest that these individuals may be at a greater risk of obesity-related morbidity. Studies in the USA (Goran et al. Reference Goran, Nagy, Treuth, Trowbridge and Dezenberg1997; He et al. Reference He, Horlick, Thornton, Wang, Pierson, Heshka and Gallagher2002b) have demonstrated ethnic differences in fat distribution among Asian, African-American and Caucasian prepubertal children. Generally, the relative distribution of adipose tissue in the intra-abdominal region compared with the subcutaneous abdominal region is significantly lower in children from African-American backgrounds compared with Caucasian children. The relationship between intra-abdominal fat and insulin response in African-American children appears to be highly complex (Gower et al. Reference Gower, Nagy, Trowbridge, Dezenberg and Goran1998), although more recent findings in this ethnic group (Lee et al. Reference Lee, Bacha, Gungor and Arslanian2006) have shown that WC is able to predict insulin resistance independently of BMI. The authors further suggest that the prediction of health risks associated with obesity is improved by including WC measurement alongside BMI measurement. They also emphasise the importance of including WC measurement routinely in the assessment of childhood obesity in order to identify those children at increased metabolic risk because of excess abdominal fat. Although data is less abundant that that for Caucasian children, nevertheless the findings generally concur, in that a more central distribution of fat profoundly affects CVD risk factor levels, including HDL, LDL, triacylglycerol levels and systolic and diastolic blood pressure in black boys (Morrison et al. Reference Morrison, Barton, Biro, Daniels and Sprecher1999a) and black girls (Morrison et al. Reference Morrison, Sprecher, Barton, Waclawiw and Daniels1999b).

In relation to insulin resistance and risk for type 2 diabetes in children of south Asian background, recent findings from the UK (Ehtisham et al. Reference Ehtisham, Crabtree, Clark, Shaw and Barrett2005) have demonstrated that south Asian children are less insulin sensitive than white Europeans and have significantly more body fat, with a greater central fat distribution (P<0·005). It was concluded that children from south Asian backgrounds are fourteen times more likely that white European children to develop type 2 diabetes. Further work is required to examine the development of central body fat accumulation in UK children from other ethnic groups, especially those from a south Asian background and African and Caribbean backgrounds. However, British south Asian children as young as 8 years of age have been shown to have higher fasting and glucose-stimulated insulin concentrations and higher triacylglycerol levels, which may reflect an increased sensitivity to adiposity (Whincup et al. Reference Whincup, Gilg, Papacosta, Seymour, Miller, Alberti and Cook2002). Although not observed in the latter study, recent findings have shown that a more truncal distribution of fat is present at birth and in early childhood in south Indian children (Krishnaveni et al. Reference Krishnaveni, Hill, Veena, Leary, Saperia, Chachyarnma, Karat and Fall2005) and that this pattern of fatness may be the forerunner of a diabetogenic adult phenotype.

Waist circumference alone or in combination with height?

The evidence thus far indicates that WC can provide vital information in children in relation to measurement of abdominal fatness and risk for obesity-related ill health. One matter of concern, however, is the influence of stature on WC in both children and adults. There is a strong positive correlation between height and WC throughout growth, throughout childhood and into adulthood, although the precise influence of height on WC remains quantitatively unclear. It has been suggested that a measure of WC in combination with height may partly correct for the effect of height on WC. Thus, WHtR has been proposed as a simple indicator of excess abdominal fat accumulation, with a cut-off or boundary value of WHtR ≥0·50 defining those with excess abdominal fatness (Ashwell et al. Reference Ashwell, LeJeune and McPherson1996). This measure has been proposed to be equally appropriate for use in adults and children, in both boys and girls and at all ages >5 years. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated the WHtR to be superior in its ability to predict CVD risk factors compared with BMI or percentage body fat (Savva et al. Reference Savva, Tornaritis, Savva, Kourides, Panagi, Silikiotou, Georgiou and Kafatos2000; Hara et al. Reference Hara, Saito, Iwata, Okada and Harada2002; Kahn et al. Reference Kahn, Imperatore and Cheng2005). A recent examination of WHtR in British children (McCarthy & Ashwell, Reference McCarthy and Ashwell2006) has shown that the percentage of children with a WHtR above the boundary value of 0·50 has increased in recent years (boys 17 and girls 12 v. 5 and 1·5 respectively 10–20 years earlier).

Too many measures of central obesity in children could be confusing, but the concept of WHtR may be one that is easily grasped by the public, with a simple public health message to ‘keep you waist circumference to less than half your height’. Additional work in this area should help to clarify the 0·50 boundary value and the usefulness of this ratio.

Waist circumference and the metabolic syndrome in children

As stated earlier, the MS is one of the most important public health issues affecting future generations around the world. In order to be able to readily identify those children who are most at risk of developing this disorder a simple and effective screening tool is required, and the WC appears to best fit the requirements of such a tool. While it is generally agreed that obesity is the predominant correlate of risk for MS among the young (Goodman et al. Reference Goodman, Dolan, Morrison and Daniels2005), an increasing number of studies are showing that WC is the best measure for identifying children with insulin resistance and hypertriacylglycerolaemia, and hence those most at risk for MS (Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Pineda, Rodriguez, Fleta, Sarria and Bueno2002; Hirschler et al. Reference Hirschler, Aranda, Calcagno, Maccalini and Jadzinsky2005; Esmaillzadeh et al. Reference Esmaillzadeh, Mirmiran and Azizi2006). WC has been found to perform better than BMI in this context, and these studies have recommended that WC should be used in paediatric clinical settings. Furthermore, when determining the prevalence of MS in prepubertal children, the classification of MS in children depends strongly on whether hyperinsulinaemia is central to the MS classification (Golley et al. Reference Golley, Magarey, Steinbeck, Baur and Daniels2006). The authors have concluded that there is a need for the establishment of normal insulin ranges in childhood and adolescence and a consistent definition of MS.

Standardisation of waist circumference

WC now appears to be fundamental in determining risk of MS and related disorders in both childhood and adulthood. There is, therefore, an important need for WC to be measured routinely in the clinical setting, and in epidemiological research in which obesity is a component of predictive or outcome measures. At the same time, there is an urgent need for a consensus on the definition of the WC measurement site (Wang, Reference Wang2006). In adults WC measurement certainly differs, depending on the chosen landmark and gender, and there is likely to be a similar difference in children (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Thornton, Bari, Williamson, Gallagher and Heymsfield2003; Bigaard et al. Reference Bigaard, Spanggaard, Lykke, Overvad and Tjonneland2005). Furthermore, whilst WC can be considered a simple measurement technique, this very characteristic can result in erroneous measurements. There is a need for health professionals to become proficient in WC measurement through appropriate training, practice and experience. With increasing experience, measurement error can be reduced (Ulijaszek & Kerr, Reference Ulijaszek and Kerr1999) to an acceptable extent, thus allowing comparison between centres to be more reliable and valid, and for individual children to be confidently assessed in the clinical situation.

Conclusions

Research has shown that abdominal fatness is as important in children as it is in adults. Excess abdominal fatness in children results in metabolic alterations associated with features of the MS and hence risk for CVD in later life. Its measurement can add more information to that provided by BMI measurement in the paediatric clinical setting, and WC centile charts are available for clinical use in the UK. It is now time that all health professionals working in the field of childhood obesity should routinely perform WC measurement as part of a clinical assessment. Further research should demonstrate whether a WC measurement alone will be sufficient to identify those children at greatest risk for obesity-related ill health and the need for weight management.

References

Ashwell, MA, LeJeune, SRE & McPherson, B (1996) Ratio of waist circumference to height may be better indicator of need for weight management. British Medical Journal 312, 377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigaard, J, Spanggaard, I, Lykke, Thomsen B, Overvad, K & Tjonneland, A (2005) Self-reported and technician measured waist circumferences differ in middle-aged men and women. Journal of Nutrition 135, 22632270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brambilla, P, Manzoni, P, Sironi, S, Simone, P, Del Maschio, A, di Natale, B & Chiumello, G (1994) Peripheral and abdominal adiposity in childhood obesity. International Journal of Obesity 18, 795800.Google ScholarPubMed
British Standards Institute (1990) Body Measurements of Boys and Girls from Birth up to 16·9 Years, BS7321. London: British Standards Institute.Google Scholar
Bundred, P, Kitchiner, D & Buchan, I (2001) Prevalence of overweight and obese children between 1989 and 1998: population based series of cross sectional studies. British Medical Journal 322, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caprio, S, Hyman, LD, Limb, C, McCarthy, S, Lange, R, Sherwin, RS, Shulman, G & Tamborlane, WV (1995) Central adiposity and its metabolic correlates in obese adolescent girls. American Journal of Physiology 269, E118E126.Google ScholarPubMed
Caprio, S, Hyman, LD, McCarthy, S, Lange, R, Bronson, M & Tamborlane, WV (1996) Fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in obese adolescent girls: importance of the intra-abdominal fat depot. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 64, 1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, S & Rona, R (2001) Prevalence and trends in overweight and obesity in three cross-sectional studies of British children, 1974–94. British Medical Journal 322, 2425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, TJ (1990) The LMS method for constructing normalized growth standards. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 44, 4560.Google ScholarPubMed
Cole, TJ, Bellizzi, C, Flegal, KM & Dietz, WH (2000) Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. British Medical Journal 320, 12401253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, TJ, Freeman, JV & Preece, MA (1995) Body Mass Index reference curves for the UK, 1990. Archives of Disease in Childhood 73, 2529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowin, I, Emmett, P & the ALSPAC Study Team (2000) Cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, birthweight and central obesity in pre-school children. International Journal of Obesity 24, 330339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, SR, Khoury, PR & Morrison, JA (2000) Utility of different measures of body fat distribution in children and adolescents. American Journal of Epidemiology 152, 11791184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Ridder, CM, De Boer, RW, Seidell, JC, Nieuwenhoff, CM, Jeneson, JA, Bakker, CJ, Zonderland, ML & Erich, WB (1992) Body fat distribution in pubertal girls quantified by magnetic resonance imaging. International Journal of Obesity 16, 443449.Google ScholarPubMed
Dietz, WH & Bellizzi, MC (1999) Introduction: the use of body mass index to assess obesity in children. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 70, 123125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehtisham, S, Crabtree, N, Clark, P, Shaw, N & Barrett, T (2005) Ethnic differences in insulin resistance and body composition in United Kingdom adolescents. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 90, 39633969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenmann, JC (2005) Waist circumference percentiles for 7- to 15-year old Australian children. Acta Paediatrica 94, 11821185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, KJ, Abrams, SA & Wong, WW (1999) Monitoring childhood obesity: Assessment of the weight/height(2) index. American Journal of Epidemiology 150, 939946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esmaillzadeh, A, Mirmiran, P & Azizi, F (2006) Clustering of metabolic abnormalities in adolescents with the hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 83, 3646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, JR, Redden, DT, Pietrobelli, A & Allison, DB (2004) Waist circumference percentiles in nationally representative samples of African-American, European-American and Mexican-American children and adolescents. Journal of Pediatrics 145, 439444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flodmark, CE, Sveger, T & Nilsson-Ehle, P (1994) Waist measurement correlates to a potentially atherogenic lipoprotein profile in obese 12–14 year old children. Acta Paediatrica 83, 941945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, K, Peters, D, Armstrong, N, Sharpe, P & Bell, M (1993) Abdominal fat deposition in 11 y old children. International Journal of Obesity 17, 1116.Google Scholar
Fredriks, AM, van Buuren, S, Fekkes, M, Verloove-Vanhorick, SP & Wit, JM (2005) Are age references for waist circumference, hip circumference and waist-hip ratio in Dutch children useful for clinical practice? European Journal of Paediatrics 164, 216222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, DS, Serdula, MK, Srinivasan, SR & Berenson, GS (1999) Relation of circumferences and skinfold thicknesses to lipid and insulin concentrations in children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 69, 308317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnett, SP, Cowell, CT, Baur, LA, Shrewsbury, VA, Chan, A, Crawford, D, Salmon, J, Campbell, K & Boulton, TJ (2005) Increasing central adiposity: the Nepean longitudinal study of young people aged 7–8 to 12–13 y. International Journal of Obesity 29, 13531360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golding, J, Pembrey, M, Jones, R & ALSPAC Study Team (2001) ALSPAC – The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. I. Study methodology. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 15, 7487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golley, RK, Magarey, AM, Steinbeck, KS, Baur, LA & Daniels, LA (2006) Comparison of metabolic syndrome prevalence using six different definitions in overweight pre-pubertal children enrolled in a weight management study. International Journal of Obesity 30, 853860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez-Diaz, RA, Martinez-Harnandez, AJ, Aquilar-Salinas, CA, Violante, R, Alarcon, ML, Villarruel, MJ, Rodarte, NW & Solorzano-Santos, F (2005) Percentile distribution of the waist circumference among Mexican pre-adolescents of a primary school in Mexico City. Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism 7, 716721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, E, Dolan, LM, Morrison, JA & Daniels, SR (2005) Factor analysis of clustered cardiovascular risks in adolescence – obesity is the predominant correlate among youth. Circulation 111, 19701977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goran, MI, Nagy, TR, Treuth, MS, Trowbridge, C & Dezenberg, C (1997) Visceral fat in white and African American pre-pubertal children. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 65, 17031708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goran, MI & Gower, BA (1999) Relation between visceral fat and disease risk in children and adolescents. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 70, Suppl., 149S156S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gower, BA, Nagy, TR, Trowbridge, CA, Dezenberg, C & Goran, MI (1998) Fat distribution and insulin response in pre-pubertal African American and white children. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 67, 821827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, J & Lowe, S (2000) National Diet and Nutrition Survey, Young People Aged 4 to 18 Years. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hara, M, Saito, E, Iwata, F, Okada, T & Harada, K (2002) Waist-to-height ratio is the best predictor of cardiovascular disease risk factors in Japanese schoolchildren. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis 9, 127132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, Q, Horlick, M, Fedun, B, Wang, J, Pierson, R, Heshka, S & Gallagher, D (2002a) Trunk fat and blood pressure in children through puberty. Circulation 105, 10931098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, Q, Horlick, M, Thornton, J, Wang, J, Pierson, RN, Heshka, S & Gallagher, D (2002b) Sex and race differences in fat distribution among Asian, African-American and Caucasian pre-pubertal children. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 87, 21642170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschler, V, Aranda, C, Calcagno, MD, Maccalini, G & Jadzinsky, M (2005) Can waist circumference identify children with the metabolic syndrome? Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 159, 740744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, TTK, Johnson, MS, Figueroa-Colon, R, Dwyer, JH & Goran, MI (2001) Growth of visceral fat, subcutaneous abdominal fat and total body fat in children. Obesity Research 9, 283289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssen, I, Katzmarzyk, PT, Srinivasan, SR, Chen, W, Malina, RM, Bouchard, C & Berenson, GS (2005) Combined influence of body mass index and waist circumference on coronary artery disease risk factors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics 115, 16231630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, HS, Imperatore, G & Cheng, YJ (2005) A population-based comparison of BMI percentiles and waist-to-height ratio for identifying cardiovascular risk in youth. Journal of Pediatrics 146, 482488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katzmarzyk, PT (2004) Waist circumference percentiles for Canadian youth aged 11–18 y of age. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 58, 10111015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzmarzyk, PT, Srinivasan, SR, Chen, W, Malina, RM, Bouchard, C & Berenson, GS (2004) Body mass index, waist circumference and clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in a biracial sample of children and adolescents. Pediatrics 114, 198205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopelman, PG & Albon, L (1997) Obesity, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome. British Medical Bulletin 53, 322340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishnaveni, GC, Hill, JC, Veena, SR, Leary, SD, Saperia, J, Chachyarnma, KJ, Karat, SC & Fall, CHD (2005) Truncal adiposity is present at birth and in early childhood in south Indian children. Indian Pediatrics 42, 527538.Google ScholarPubMed
Lean, ME, Has, TS & Morrison, CE (1995) Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. British Medical Journal 311, 158161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S, Bacha, F, Gungor, N & Arslanian, SA (2006) Waist circumference is an independent predictor of insulin resistance in black and white youths. Journal of Paediatrics 148, 188194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lobstein, T, Baur, L & Uauy, Rfor the IASO International Obesity Task Force (2004) Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obesity Reviews 5, Suppl. 1, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobstein, TJ, James, WPT & Cole, TJ (2003) Increasing levels of excess weight among children in England. International Journal of Obesity 27, 11361138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, HD & Ashwell, M (2006) A study of central fatness using waist:height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple message – ‘keep your waist circumference to less than half your height’. International Journal of Obesity 30, 988992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, HD, Ellis, SM & Cole, TJ (2003) Dramatic increases in central overweight and obesity in British children aged 11–16 year: cross-sectional surveys of waist circumference. British Medical Journal 326, 624627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, HD, Jarrett, KV & Crawley, HF (2001) The development of waist circumference percentiles in British children aged 5·0–16·9 years. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 55, 902907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, HD, Jarrett, KV, Emmett, PM, Rogers, I & The ALSPAC Study Team (2005) Trends in waist circumference in young British children: a comparative study. International Journal of Obesity 29, 157162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maffeis, C, Pietrobelli, A, Grezzani, A, Provera, S & Tato, L (2001) Waist circumference and cardiovascular risk factors in prepubertal children. Obesity Research 9, 179187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez, E, Devesa, M, Bacallao, J & Amador, M (1994) Percentiles of the waist-hip ratio in Cuban scholars aged 4·5–20·5 years. International Journal of Obesity 18, 557560.Google ScholarPubMed
Maynard, LM, Wisemandle, W, Roche, AF, Chumlea, WC, Guo, SS & Siervogel, RM (2001) Childhood body composition in relation to body mass index. Pediatrics 107, 344350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, LA, Fleta, J, Mur, L, Rodriguez, G, Sarria, A & Bueno, M (1999) Waist circumference values in Spanish children – gender related differences. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 53, 429433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, LA, Fleta, J, Mur, L, Sarria, A & Bueno, M (1998) Fat distribution in obese and non-obese children and adolescents. Journal of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 27, 176180.Google Scholar
Moreno, LA, Fleta, J, Sarria, A, Rodriguez, G & Bueno, M (2001a) Secular increases in body fat percentage in male children of Zaragoza, Spain, 1980–1995. Preventive Medicine 33, 357363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, LA, Fleta, J, Sarria, A, Rodriguez, G, Gil, C & Bueno, M (2001b) Secular changes in body fat patterning in children and adolescents of Zaragoza (Spain), 1980–1995. International Journal of Obesity 25, 16561660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, LA, Pineda, I, Rodriguez, G, Fleta, J, Sarria, A & Bueno, M (2002) Waist circumference for the screening of the metabolic syndrome in children. Acta Paediatrica 91, 13071312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, LA, Sarria, A, Fleta, J, Marcos, A & Bueno, M (2005) Secular trends in waist circumference in Spanish adolescents, 1995 to 2000–02. Archives of Disease in Childhood 90, 818819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, LA, Sarria, A, Fleta, J, Rodriguez, G & Bueno, M (2000) Trends in body mass index and overweight prevalence among children and adolescents in the region of Aragon (Spain) from 1985 to 1995. International Journal of Obesity 24, 925931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, JA, Barton, BA, Biro, FM, Daniels, SR & Sprecher, DL (1999a) Overweight, fat patterning and cardiovascular disease risk factors in black and white boys. Journal of Paediatrics 135, 451457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, JA, Sprecher, DL, Barton, BA, Waclawiw, MA & Daniels, SR (1999b) Overweight, fat patterning and cardiovascular disease risk factors in black and white girls: The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. Journal of Paediatrics 135, 458464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Must, A (1996) Morbidity and mortality associated with elevated body weight in children and adolescents. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 63, Suppl., 445S447S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Center for Health Statistics (2000) Pediatric growth charts. www.cdc.gov/growthchartsGoogle Scholar
Neovius, M, Linne, Y & Rossner, S (2005) BMI, waist-circumference and waist-hip-ratio as diagnostic tests for fatness in adolescents. International Journal of Obesity 29, 163169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owens, S, Gutin, B, Ferguson, M, Allison, J, Karp, W & Le, NA (1998) Visceral adipose tissue and cardiovascular risk factors in obese children. Journal of Pediatrics 133, 4145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reilly, JJ, Dorosty, AR, Emmett, PM & the ALSPAC Study Team (2000) Identification of the obese child: adequacy of the body mass index for clinical practice and epidemiology. International Journal of Obesity 24, 16231627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savva, SC, Kourides, Y, Tornaritis, M, Epiphaniou-Savva, M, Tafouna, P & Kafatos, A (2001) Reference growth curves for Cypriot children 6 to 17 years of age. Obesity Research 9, 754762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savva, SC, Tornaritis, M, Savva, ME, Kourides, Y, Panagi, A, Silikiotou, N, Georgiou, C & Kafatos, A (2000) Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children than body mass index. International Journal of Obesity 24, 14531458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxena, S, Ambler, G, Cole, TJ & Majeed, A (2004) Ethnic differences in overweight and obese children and young people in England: cross sectional survey. Archives of Diseases in Childhood 89, 3036.Google Scholar
Sproston, K & Primatesta, P(editors) (2002) Health Survey for England. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Taylor, RW, Jones, IE, Williams, SM & Goulding, A (2000) Evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and the conicity index as screening tools for high trunk fat mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in children aged 3–19 years. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 72, 490495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulijaszek, SJ & Kerr, DA (1999) Anthropometric error and the assessment of nutritional status. British Journal of Nutrition 82, 165177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J (2006) Standardization of waist circumference reference data. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 83, 34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J, Thornton, JC, Bari, S, Williamson, B, Gallagher, D, Heymsfield, SBet al. (2003) Comparisons of waist circumference measured at 4 sites. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 77, 379383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, R & Caprio, S (2005) The metabolic consequences of childhood obesity. Best Practice and Research Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 19, 405419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, R, Dziura, J, Burgert, TS, Tamborlane, WV, Taksali, SE, Yeckel, CWet al. (2004) Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. New England Journal of Medicine 350, 23622374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, JCK, Coward, WA, Cole, TJ & Davies, PSW (2002) The contribution of fat and fat-free tissue to body mass index in contemporary children and the reference child. International Journal of Obesity 26, 13231328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whincup, PH, Gilg, JA, Papacosta, O, Seymour, C, Miller, GJ, Alberti, KGMM & Cook, DG (2002) Early evidence of ethnic differences in cardiovascular risk: cross sectional comparison of British South Asian and white children. British Medical Journal 324, 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zannolli, R & Morgese, G (1996) Waist percentiles: a simple test for atherogenic disease. Acta Paediatrica 85, 13681369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Combining age-related BMI and waist circumference (WC) measurements could assist in avoiding the incorrect classification of some children, as illustrated for four boys of similar age*