Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:23:28.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Imposing a Networked Vibrotactile Communication System for Improvisational Suggestion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

Lauren Hayes*
Affiliation:
Department of Music, University of Edinburgh, 12 Nicolson Square, Edinburgh, UK EH8 9DF
Christos Michalakos*
Affiliation:
Department of Music, University of Edinburgh, 12 Nicolson Square, Edinburgh, UK EH8 9DF

Abstract

This paper describes the implementation of NeVIS, a local network system that establishes communication between individual performers, as well as between laptop and performers. Specifically, this is achieved by making use of vibrotactile feedback as a signalling tool within an improvisational setting. A discussion of the current developments regarding the use of networks within improvisation is presented, followed by an outline of the benefits of utilising the haptic feedback channel as a further sensory information pathway when performing digital music. We describe a case study of the system within the context of our computer-mediated improvisational duo Můstek, involving piano, percussion and live electronics. Here, a cueing system or framework is imposed over the improvisation and is transmitted directly to the skin of the performers via tiny vibrations. Additionally, performers may make use of simple vibrotactile signals to enhance traditional visual cues that are often employed within performance. A new work, Socks and Ammo, was created using NeVIS, and was presented at various international conferences and festivals. We also tested the system itself within a group of postgraduate researchers and composers. Qualitative evaluation of the musical outcomes as experienced both by the performers and by the listeners at these events is offered, as well as implications about the nature of collaborative music-making.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bavelas, J.B, Chovil, N. 2006. Hand Gestures and Facial Displays as Part of Language Use in Face-to-Face Dialogue. In V. Manusov and M. Patterson (eds) Handbook of Nonverbal Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://web.uvic.ca/psyc/bavelas/2006hand.pdf (accessed 25 August 2011).Google Scholar
Cáceres, J.-P., Hamilton, R., Iyer, D., Chafe, C., Wang, G. 2008. To the Edge with China: Explorations in Network Performance. ARTECH 2008: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Digital Arts. Porto, Portugal, 61–6. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/groups/soundwire/publications/papers/caceres-2008ARTECH-china.pdf (accessed 20 August 2011).Google Scholar
Cadoz, C., Lisowski, L., Florens, J.-L. 1990. A Modular Feedback Keyboard Design. Computer Music Journal 14(2): 4751. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3679711 (accessed 25 August 2011).Google Scholar
Davidson, P.W. 1976. Haptic Perception. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 1(3): 2125. http://jpepsy.oxfordjournals.org/content/1/3/21.full.pdf (accessed 20 August 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edimpro (University of Edinburgh Free Improvisation Orchestra) [ensemble]. 2009. https://www.wiki.ed.ac.uk/display/Edimprov (accessed 3 August 2011).Google Scholar
Edwards, M. 2010. Electric Cowboy Cacophony: A Project for Cross-Genre Free Improvisation. The International Journal of the Arts in Society 4(5): 5160.Google Scholar
Gunther, E., O'Modhrain, S. 2003. Cutaneous Grooves: Composing for the Sense of Touch. Journal of New Music Research 32: 368381. http://www.ericgunther.info/docs/JNMR_cutaneousGrooves.pdf (accessed 3 August 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, L 2011. Vibrotactile Feedback-Assisted Performance. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Oslo. http://www.nime2011.org/proceedings/papers/B12-Hayes.pdf (accessed 20 September 2011).Google Scholar
Healey, P., Leach, J., Bryan-Kinns, N. 2005. Inter-Play: Understanding Group Music Improvisation as a Form of Everyday Interaction. Paper presented at the conference Less is More: Simple Computing in an Age of Complexity. Cambridge: Microsoft Research. http://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~nickbk/papers/interplay_final.pdf (accessed 1 June 2011).Google Scholar
La Berge, A., van Heumen, R. 2006. Shackle [ensemble]. http://www.hardhatarea.com/shackle (accessed 22 July 2011).Google Scholar
La Berge, A., van Heumen, R. 2010. Converging Objects. Workshop at the University of Edinburgh. http://www.hardhatarea.com/convergingobjects (accessed 22 July 2011).Google Scholar
LLEAPP (Laboratory of Laptop and Electronic Audio Performance Practice). 2009. [workshop]. http://lleapp.blogspot.com (accessed 22 July 2011).Google Scholar
Lyon, E. 2011. Selected Noise Quartets. Programme note for the International Computer Music Conference 2011. Huddersfield: ICMA.Google Scholar
Marshall, M.T., Wanderley, M.M. 2011. Examining the Effects of Embedded Vibrotactile Feedback on the Feel of a Digital Musical Instrument. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Oslo. http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/Publications/Papers/2001361.pdf (accessed 20 August 2011).Google Scholar
Parker, M. 2006. Circular Breathing [performance]. http://www.tinpark.com/2006/07/t-u-b-e (accessed 1 August 2011).Google Scholar
Rovan, J., Hayward, V. 2000. Typology of Tactile Sounds and their Synthesis in Gesture-Driven Computer Music Performance. In M. Wanderley and M. Battier (eds) Trends in Gestural Control of Music. Paris: Editions IRCAM, http://www.cim.mcgill.ca/~haptic/pub/BR-VH-IRCAM-00.pdf (accessed 22 July 2011).Google Scholar
Schroeder, F., Renaud, A., Rebelo, P., Gualdas, F. 2007. Addressing the Network: Performative Strategies for Playing Apart. Proceedings of the 2007 International Computer Music Conference. Copenhagen: ICMA. http://www.somasa.qub.ac.uk/~fschroeder/docs/SchroederRenaudRebeloGualda.pdf (accessed 1 August 2011).Google Scholar
Seddon, F.A. 2005. Modes of Communication During Jazz Improvisation. British Journal of Music Education 22: 4761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sound Lab Edinburgh (University of Edinburgh music, performance and technology group) [research group]. 2007. http://sites.ace.ed.ac.uk/sdresearch/ (accessed 20 August 2011).Google Scholar
Sudnow, David. 1978. Ways of the Hand: The Organization of Improvised Conduct. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Trueman, D., Cook, P., Smallwood, S., Wang, G. 2006. PLOrk: The Princeton Laptop Orchestra, Year 1. Proceedings of the 2006 International Computer Music Conference. New Orleans: ICMA. http://soundlab.cs.princeton.edu/publications/plork_icmc2006.pdf (accessed 25 August 2011).Google Scholar
Weinberg, G. 2005. Interconnected Musical Networks: Toward a Theoretical Framework. Computer Music Journal 29(2) http://opera.media.mit.edu/gil_w_theorynetworks05.pdf (accessed 1 August 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DISCOGRAPHY

Stockhausen, K. 1995. Helikopter-Streichquartett. Arditti String Quartet and ‘The Grasshoppers’ Helicopters. Stockhausen Complete Edition. Compact Disc 53 A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes and Michalakos supplementary material

Sound example 1.aac

Download Hayes and Michalakos supplementary material(Audio)
Audio 29.7 MB