Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T19:38:37.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dairy product consumption and the metabolic syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

Leonie E. C. van Meijl
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MDMaastricht, The Netherlands
Ruth Vrolix
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MDMaastricht, The Netherlands
Ronald P. Mensink*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MDMaastricht, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: Professor Ronald P. Mensink, fax +31 43 367 09 76, email r.mensink@hb.unimaas.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The metabolic syndrome is an important risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus and CVD. Epidemiological studies have now suggested protective effects of dairy product consumption on the development of this syndrome. Here we review the physiological effects and possible mechanisms involved of three main dairy constituents (Ca, protein, fat) on important components of the metabolic syndrome. Ca supplements improve the serum lipoprotein profile, particularly by decreasing serum total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations. They also lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Insufficient evidence exists for a significant role of Ca supplements or dairy in body-weight management. Effects of Ca may be related to intestinal binding to fatty acids or bile acids, or to changes in intracellular Ca metabolism by suppressing calciotropic hormones. Dietary proteins may increase satiety in both the short and longer term, which may result in a reduced energy intake. They have also been reported to improve the serum lipoprotein profile as compared with carbohydrates. Dairy proteins are precursors of angiotensin-I-converting enzyme-inhibitory peptides, which may lower blood pressure. Such effects, however, have inconsistently been reported in human studies. Finally, conjugated linoleic acid, which effectively lowers body weight in animals, has no such effect in humans in the quantities provided by dairy products. To reduce the intake of SFA, the consumption of low-fat instead of high-fat dairy products is recommended. In conclusion, more research is warranted to better understand the physiological effects and the mechanisms involved of dairy products in the prevention and treatment of the metabolic syndrome.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

Introduction

The metabolic syndrome dramatically enhances the risk of developing CVD and type 2 diabetes mellitus. It consists of a combination of different metabolic abnormalities, such as abdominal obesity, atherogenic dyslipidaemia, elevated blood pressure, insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, impaired endothelial and haemostatic function, and a low-grade inflammatory state(Reference Grundy, Brewer and Cleeman1). The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among the adult population exceeds 20  % in many Western societies and is expected to increase in the very near future(Reference Balkau, Vernay and Mhamdi2). Without doubt, this will have important economic and health consequences, and unfortunately no straightforward approach exists to prevent or treat the metabolic syndrome.

However, it is well established that both energy restriction and dietary composition play an important role in this respect. More specifically, several studies have suggested that dairy food products have a positive impact on the prevention of the metabolic syndrome. The aim of the present review is now to briefly summarise findings from epidemiological studies on the relationship between dairy product consumption and the metabolic syndrome and to discuss the results from intervention studies on the effects of dairy products and dairy constituents on features of this syndrome. In addition, attention is paid to underlying mechanisms. We hereby focused on studies carried out during the last decade.

Dairy product consumption and the metabolic syndrome

A number of epidemiological studies have investigated the relationship between dairy product consumption and the prevalence or incidence of the metabolic syndrome. In 2000, Mennen et al. (Reference Mennen, Lafay and Feskens3) showed in a cross-sectional study that consumption of dairy products was inversely related with the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in men (aged 30–64 years), but not in women. Men who consumed more than one portion of dairy products per d had a 40 % lower prevalence of the metabolic syndrome compared with men who did not consume dairy products at all. In another cross-sectional study, Azadbakht et al. (Reference Azadbakht, Mirmiran and Esmaillzadeh4) demonstrated an inverse association between dairy product consumption and the metabolic syndrome in healthy Tehranian subjects aged 18–74 years. In the group with the highest dairy product intake ( ≥ 3·1 servings/d of milk, yogurt, cheese and milk-based desserts) the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was 7 % lower compared with the group with the lowest dairy product intake ( < 1·7 servings/d). In addition, Elwood et al. (Reference Elwood, Pickering and Fehily5) have recently found a negative relationship between milk and dairy product intake and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a study among 45- to 49-year-old men. Similar results were observed by Ruidavets et al. (Reference Ruidavets, Bongard and Dallongeville6), who showed in a cross-sectional sample of 45- to 64-year-old men that intake of dairy products (milk and cheese) was negatively related to the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome. However, a cross-sectional study by Beydoun et al. (Reference Beydoun, Gary and Caballero7) among 4519 US adults showed that the various dairy products may have different associations with the metabolic syndrome. While cheese consumption showed a positive relationship with the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome, the intake of yogurt resulted in a negative relationship. In contrast, in an elderly Dutch population, Snijder et al. (Reference Snijder, van der Heijden and van Dam8) did not find associations between dairy product consumption and the metabolic syndrome. Also, after differentiation between low-fat and high-fat dairy products, no significant associations were found. In the same population, baseline dairy product consumption was also not related to the risk of developing the metabolic syndrome in the next 6·4 years(Reference Snijder, van Dam and Stehouwer9). However, in the prospective Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study(Reference Pereira, Jacobs and Van Horn10) among more than 3000 young (aged 18–30 years) men and women, it was found that in overweight subjects dairy product consumption was inversely associated with the development of all components of the metabolic syndrome over the next 10 years. In another prospective study by Lutsey et al. (Reference Lutsey, Steffen and Stevens11), dairy product consumption was inversely associated with the incidence of the metabolic syndrome in more than 9500 US subjects (aged 45–64 years) after 9 years of follow-up.

Though not consistent, the majority of epidemiological studies do suggest that dairy products may play a role in the prevention and development of the metabolic syndrome. However, which of the components from dairy products may be responsible for these possible positive effects is not clear, neither are the mechanisms behind these effects. However, several intervention studies have been performed on the effects of single nutrients from dairy products on the different features of the metabolic syndrome. In this respect, much attention has been paid to Ca, protein and fat.

Calcium

Dairy products are an important source of Ca(Reference Fleming and Heimbach12, Reference Hulshof, Ocké and van Rossum13). High intakes of dietary Ca may be associated with a lower prevalence of the various risk markers belonging to the metabolic syndrome, as indicated by epidemiological studies(Reference Drouillet, Balkau and Charles14, Reference Liu, Song and Ford15). A number of intervention studies also showed beneficial effects of Ca on features of the metabolic syndrome.

Effects of calcium on the serum lipid profile

Ca may affect the serum lipoprotein profile. Ca provided as a food supplement has been found to increase serum HDL-cholesterol concentrations(Reference Reid, Mason and Horne16), and to decrease serum total cholesterol(Reference Ditscheid, Keller and Jahreis17) and LDL-cholesterol concentrations(Reference Shahkhalili, Murset and Meirim18). As a consequence, Ca intake also improved the HDL:LDL-cholesterol ratio, which may be an even better marker to predict cardiovascular risk than LDL or HDL per se. Reid et al. (Reference Reid, Mason and Horne16) found beneficial effects on circulating lipid levels after 12 months of Ca supplementation. Two hundred and twenty-three postmenopausal women were given 1 g Ca daily as calcium citrate or placebo. HDL-cholesterol and the HDL:LDL-cholesterol ratio significantly increased by 0·13 mmol/l and 0·06, respectively. No statistically significant decreases in total cholesterol ( − 0·18 mmol/l) and LDL-cholesterol ( − 0·29 mmol/l) were observed. In the cross-over study of Ditscheid et al. (Reference Ditscheid, Keller and Jahreis17), thirty-one healthy adults received 1 g Ca daily, supplied as pentacalcium hydroxy-triphosphate in bread, or non-supplemented bread for 4 weeks. A significant decrease in total cholesterol ( − 0·24 mmol/l), and non-significant decreases in LDL-cholesterol ( − 0·14 mmol/l) and the LDL:HDL-cholesterol ratio ( − 0·85) were found. Shahkhalili et al. (Reference Shahkhalili, Murset and Meirim18) observed significantly decreased serum LDL-cholesterol concentrations ( − 0·32 mmol/l) and a non-significant decrease in total cholesterol ( − 0·34 mmol/l). In this study, ten healthy men received Ca-supplemented chocolate (900 mg Ca per d) or non-supplemented chocolate for 2 weeks in a cross-over design. On the contrary, Bostick et al. (Reference Bostick, Fosdick and Grandits19) did not find significant effects of Ca supplementation on the serum lipoprotein profile in 193 men and women aged 30–74 years. Subjects received 1 or 2 g Ca daily, given as calcium carbonate, for 4 months. No statistically significant differences in serum total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol concentrations were found between the Ca and placebo groups.

A summary of human intervention studies on the effects of Ca supplements on the serum lipid profile is given in Table 1.

Table 1 Overview of recent intervention studies on the effects of dairy product and calcium supplementation on serum lipid profile, blood pressure and glucose metabolism

TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL-cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; AUC, area under the curve; ↓ , reduced.

* P < 0·05.

Possible mechanisms underlying the effects of calcium on the serum lipid profile

Two potential mechanisms have been proposed by which Ca might affect lipoprotein metabolism. One mechanism is the inhibition of fat absorption in the intestine (Fig. 1). Ca interacts in particular with SFA to form Ca–fatty acid soaps. The formation of these insoluble complexes increases faecal fat excretion. Evidence for this interaction comes from a number of human studies(Reference Shahkhalili, Murset and Meirim18, Reference Denke, Fox and Schulte20Reference Jacobsen, Lorenzen and Toubro22). More recently, however, Boon et al. only observed a tendency towards an increased faecal fat excretion on high-Ca (1200 or 2500 v. 400 mg) diets(Reference Boon, Hul and Stegen23). In support of a decreased fat absorption, Lorenzen et al. (Reference Lorenzen, Nielsen and Holst24) have shown that Ca from dairy products (milk and low-fat yogurt), in contrast to supplementary Ca, diminished the TAG content of chylomicrons postprandially. This suggests either an increase in chylomicron clearance, or a decrease in fat absorption. As there is no evidence in the literature suggesting that Ca interferes with chylomicron clearance, effects on fat absorption are very likely. However, the reason for the difference between the effects of dairy and supplemental Ca is not clear. The authors suggested that other properties of dairy products may be responsible for the different effects, such as the chemical form of Ca (calcium phosphate in dairy products v. calcium carbonate in supplements) or the synergistic action of other dairy components.

Fig. 1 One of the proposed mechanisms of action of dietary Ca. Ca binds to SFA or bile acids (BA) in the intestine, inhibiting their absorption. SFA raise LDL-cholesterol, probably by decreasing LDL-receptor (LDL-R) activity. Reduced absorption of SFA can therefore lower serum LDL-cholesterol. In the liver, cholesterol is converted into BA. Lowering the absorption of BA in the intestine will therefore lead to an increased conversion of cholesterol and reduced serum LDL-cholesterol levels. C, cholesterol; ↑ , increased; HMG, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl; ↓ , reduced; AcCoA, acetyl-CoA.

SFA are known to increase total and LDL-cholesterol, most probably by suppressing LDL-receptor activity(Reference Fernandez and West25). The reduced absorption of SFA may, at least in part, contribute to the LDL-cholesterol-lowering effects of Ca. Some studies have suggested that this mechanism may be less effective under high-protein conditions, because protein would increase the intestinal absorption of Ca(Reference Jacobsen, Lorenzen and Toubro22, Reference Kerstetter, O'Brien and Insogna26). Whether or not this decreases the amount of Ca that is available for binding to fatty acids has, however, not been investigated. In fact, Ca is only partially absorbed and it may be speculated that the Ca content of high-dairy diets is high enough to leave sufficient amounts of Ca in the gastrointestinal tract for binding to fatty acids. Another possible mechanism is that Ca binds to bile acids (Fig. 1). Indeed, in some human studies, Ca increased the faecal excretion of bile acids(Reference Ditscheid, Keller and Jahreis17, Reference Shahkhalili, Murset and Meirim18, Reference Van der Meer, Welberg and Kuipers27). In this way, reabsorption of bile acids into the enterohepatic circulation is inhibited, leading to an increased conversion of cholesterol to bile acids in the liver and ultimately to decreased LDL-cholesterol levels.

Effects of calcium and dairy products on body weight and fat mass

Ca may exert its effects on the metabolic syndrome by mediating body weight and fat mass. Observational as well as intervention studies suggest that high Ca intakes are associated with lower body weight and fat mass. Zemel et al. were among the first to report beneficial effects of Ca on body weight and fat mass. Furthermore, they have proposed that Ca from dairy sources exerts larger effects than Ca from non-dairy sources. In a 6-month trial(Reference Zemel, Thompson and Milstead28), thirty-two obese subjects were maintained on energy-deficit ( − 500 kJ/d) diets and randomised to control (zero to one servings of dairy products per d supplemented with placebo, providing 400–500 mg Ca per d), high-Ca (control diet supplemented with 800 mg Ca per d as calcium carbonate) or high-dairy (three servings per d supplemented with placebo, providing 1200–1300 mg Ca per d) diets. Both weight loss and fat loss were higher on the high-Ca diet than on the control diet, but even higher on the high-dairy diet. Additionally, the largest percentage of fat from the trunk was lost on the high-dairy diet, shifting the distribution of body-fat loss to a more favourable pattern. Thus, dairy products exerted a substantially larger effect on both fat loss and fat distribution compared with an equivalent amount of supplemental Ca. This has been attributed to additional bioactive compounds in dairy products that may act synergistically with Ca to modulate body weight and fat mass(Reference Zemel29). Although the macronutrient composition of the diets was similar and the diets only differed in Ca content, the observed effects might partly be due to differences in protein source, for example. The augmentation of weight loss by dairy products was also observed in another study, in which an energy-deficit yogurt diet (1100 mg Ca) was compared with an energy-deficit control (400–500 mg Ca) diet(Reference Zemel, Richards and Mathis30). While macronutrients were held constant and only Ca contents differed, it cannot be concluded whether the effects are due to Ca alone or also to other bioactive components in dairy products.

Despite these positive results(Reference Zemel, Thompson and Milstead28, Reference Zemel, Richards and Mathis30), many other studies did not provide evidence for weight- or body fat-reducing effects of Ca. Recently, Lanou & Barnard(Reference Lanou and Barnard31) thoroughly reviewed forty-nine randomised controlled trials on the effects of dairy product and Ca intake, with or without energy restriction, on body weight and adiposity. Of seventeen studies on dairy product intake, fifteen showed no effect on body weight, while two reported weight gain. Nineteen trials used Ca supplements and found no effect on weight, while one study showed weight loss and one study found a lower rate of weight gain on Ca treatment. They identified six trials using dairy products in combination with reduced energy intake, of which three reported no effects and three showed body-weight loss. Of the five studies on Ca supplementation combined with energy restriction, four found no effect and one study observed weight loss. The authors therefore concluded that the majority of the current evidence from clinical trials does not support the hypothesis that Ca or dairy product consumption promotes weight or fat loss.

There is no clear explanation for the discrepancy between the positive results from the studies by Zemel(Reference Zemel, Thompson and Milstead28, Reference Zemel, Richards and Mathis30) and the large number of studies reporting no weight-reducing effects of Ca and dairy product consumption. It has been proposed that the effects of Ca on body weight are only present in populations with low habitual intakes, and that at Ca consumption above 800 mg per d, no additive beneficial effects of increasing dietary Ca will occur(Reference Boon, Koppes and Saris32). However, Lanou & Barnard(Reference Lanou and Barnard31) also included trials among populations with suboptimal Ca intakes, which does not support this threshold hypothesis. It might also be speculated that dairy products and Ca supplements reduce body weight and fat mass only when part of an energy-restricted diet. This reasoning is, however, also not supported by the majority of studies(Reference Lanou and Barnard31).

Possible mechanisms underlying the effects of calcium on body weight and fat mass

For the effects of Ca on body weight and body composition, the ability of Ca to bind fatty acids and thereby inhibit fat absorption, as discussed above, is proposed as one possible mechanism of action. Another way by which Ca might affect body composition is by regulating intracellular Ca levels, as hypothesised by Zemel et al. (Fig. 2)(Reference Zemel29). Intracellular Ca levels are regulated by calciotropic hormones, such as parathyroid hormone and 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol). High dietary Ca depresses the levels of calcitriol, thereby decreasing intracellular Ca. This results in a stimulation of lipolysis. Additionally, low intracellular Ca inhibits the expression of fatty acid synthase, which is a key enzyme in de novo lipogenesis(Reference Zemel29, Reference Zemel33). Therefore, Ca intake may directly affect the storage and breakdown of fat in adipose tissue. This mechanism has been demonstrated in human adipocytes in vitro, in which calcitriol increased intracellular Ca concentrations and inhibited lipolysis. Additionally, in transgenic mice, a high-Ca diet reduced lipogenesis and stimulated lipolysis, resulting in reductions in body weight and adipose tissue mass(Reference Zemel, Shi and Greer34). However, this concept has not yet been shown in humans. In fact, in a series of trials performed by Boon et al., the various steps of the Zemel hypothesis could not be confirmed. Although high Ca/high dairy product intake did affect calcitriol metabolism(Reference Boon, Hul and Viguerie35), and although changes in intracellular Ca did change lipolysis(Reference Boon, Goossens and Blaak36), changes in serum calcitriol did not alter fat metabolism in vivo (Reference Boon, Hul and Viguerie35).

Fig. 2 Hypothesised mechanism of stimulation of lipolysis and inhibition of lipogenesis by dietary Ca. Increased dietary Ca intake lowers the level of the hormone 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D, thereby lowering the uptake of Ca2+ into the cell. Decreased levels of intracellular Ca stimulate lipolysis and decrease the transcription of fatty acid synthase (FAS), resulting in the inhibition of lipogenesis.

Effects of calcium on blood pressure

Epidemiological as well as intervention studies have shown an inverse relationship between Ca intake and blood pressure(Reference Bucher, Cook and Guyatt37, Reference van Mierlo, Arends and Streppel38). Several potential mechanisms may explain the positive effect of Ca on blood pressure, including reduced membrane permeability to monovalent and divalent cations, reduced intracellular Ca levels, decreased concentrations of Ca-regulating hormones, reduced sympathetic nervous system activity, and altered metabolism of other electrolytes, for example, increased Na excretion(Reference Hatton and McCarron39). Again, the effect of Ca might be mediated by suppression of the hormone calcitriol. Suppression of this hormone could lower intracellular Ca levels in vascular smooth muscle cells, thereby reducing peripheral resistance and blood pressure(Reference Zemel40). Although it has been shown that calcitriol increases intracellular Ca in arteries of rats(Reference Bian, Ishibashi and Bukoski41), and that an association exists between calcitriol and blood pressure in normotensive men(Reference Kristal-Boneh, Froom and Harari42), this hypothesised mechanism has not yet been demonstrated in humans. A summary of human intervention studies on the effects of dairy and Ca supplements on blood pressure is given in Table 1.

Effects of calcium on glucose metabolism

Finally, one study showed a significant decrease in insulin levels in subjects consuming a high-dairy diet compared with subjects on a low-dairy diet(Reference Zemel, Richards and Milstead43). Thirty-four obese African-American adults were maintained on a low-Ca (500 mg/d)/low-dairy ( < one serving per d) or a high-dairy (1200 mg Ca per d diet including three servings of dairy) diet for 24 weeks. Circulating insulin decreased by 19·7 pm in subjects on the high-dairy diet compared with the low-dairy diet (P < 0·05). Although no differences in body weight were observed, subjects on the high-dairy diet showed a decrease in body fat and an increase in lean mass, which might be related to the improved insulin sensitivity. Another report from this laboratory showed similar results in thirty-two obese adults(Reference Zemel, Thompson and Milstead28). Fasting glucose levels were unaffected by diet, but a 27 % decrease in the area under the glucose curve and a 44 % decrease in fasting plasma insulin levels was observed on the high-dairy diet, while these were unaffected on the low-dairy diet. However, in this study it was not possible to discern whether these are direct effects of the high-dairy diet, or secondary effects of the greater weight and fat loss found on this diet. Although in both studies the diets only differed in Ca content, it cannot be excluded that differences in the source of protein, for example, could have influenced the observed effects of dairy product consumption.

Table 1 shows an overview of these studies of dairy products on glucose metabolism.

Conclusion

Ca supplements improve the serum lipid profile, most likely by decreasing total and LDL-cholesterol, thereby improving the HDL:LDL-cholesterol ratio. Ca and dairy products also reduce blood pressure. While some studies have reported positive effects of dairy products and Ca on body weight and body composition, the majority of trials do not support these findings. Ca may exert its effects by intestinal binding to fatty acids and bile acids, or by depressing calciotropic hormones and changing intracellular Ca metabolism, although the evidence for the latter mechanism is limited.

Dairy protein

Dairy products are an important source of protein. Nowadays, more and more attention is paid to the role of protein in metabolic diseases.

Effects of protein on the serum lipid profile and body-weight regulation

Recent evidence suggests that protein added to the diet at the expense of carbohydrates has favourable effects on serum lipoprotein profiles. Krauss et al. found a slight increase in both LDL- and HDL-cholesterol, but a decrease in the total:HDL-cholesterol ratio by proteins replacing carbohydrates(Reference Krauss, Blanche and Rawlings44). In general, other studies also reported a decrease in the total:HDL-cholesterol ratio on high-protein diets(Reference Katan45). However, in the OmniHeart trial, a high-protein diet decreased serum total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and TAG concentrations(Reference Appel, Sacks and Carey46).

Another interesting property of protein is its role in body-weight regulation, which consists of different aspects. First, protein increases satiety, which may result in a decreased energy intake. In the short term, i.e. after an acute meal, consumption of high-protein meals (60–81 % of energy from protein) resulted in higher satiety compared with low- or moderate-protein meals(Reference Crovetti, Porrini and Santangelo47Reference Stubbs, van Wyk and Johnstone50) and a reduced energy intake(Reference Johnson and Vickers48, Reference Poppitt, McCormack and Buffenstein49, Reference Barkeling, Rossner and Bjorvell51). Also in the longer term, high-protein diets in studies lasting up to 4 d caused a continuously higher satiety throughout the day(Reference Lejeune, Westerterp and Adam52, Reference Westerterp-Plantenga, Rolland and Wilson53). In this respect, the effects of high-protein diets do not seem to depend on the type of macronutrient that is substituted. However, effects may be different for diverse types of protein. For example, it was shown that satiety was acutely increased and energy intake was decreased after a whey diet compared with a casein diet(Reference Hall, Millward and Long54).

Furthermore, high-protein diets may preserve or increase fat-free mass and reduce fat mass during weight loss and weight regain, contributing to an improved body composition and metabolic profile. Layman et al. (Reference Layman, Boileau and Erickson55) found an improved body composition during weight loss in adult women, when proteins replaced carbohydrates. In a trial by Westerterp-Plantenga et al. (Reference Westerterp-Plantenga, Lejeune and Nijs56), overweight and obese subjects who consumed 18 % of energy as protein regained less weight (1 kg) during 3 months after a weight-loss period than subjects who consumed 15 % of energy from protein (2 kg). In addition, body composition of the regained body mass was more favourable in the high-protein group, in which no fat mass, but only fat-free mass was regained, resulting in a lower percentage of body fat.

Effects of bioactive peptides on blood pressure and coagulation

Milk contains two major protein groups: caseins and whey proteins. Caseins are a mixture of related phosphoproteins, characterised as one of the most nutritive milk proteins, containing all of the common amino acids and being rich in the essential ones. They are a heterogeneous family of proteins, mainly αS1-, αS2-, β- and κ-caseins. Caseins account for almost 80 % of total protein in bovine milk and exist primarily as calcium phosphate-stabilised micellular complexes(Reference Aimutis57). Whey protein is the name for a collection of globular proteins that can be isolated from whey, a by-product of cheese manufactured from cows' milk. Whey proteins account for 20 % of total milk protein, and are also a heterogeneous group of proteins. They mainly consist of α-lactalbumin, β-lactoglobulin and serum albumin(Reference Aimutis57).

Both caseins and whey proteins are precursors of many different biologically active peptides. These peptides are inactive within the protein sequence, requiring enzymic proteolysis for release of the bioactive fragment from the protein precursor. These fragments can be released either during gastrointestinal digestion or during food processing, for example, during fermentation with bacteria such as Lactobacillus helveticus (Reference FitzGerald, Murray and Walsh58, Reference Meisel59).

One class of bioactive peptides derived from dairy protein is the group of the angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory proteins. ACE is a multifunctional enzyme that plays a key physiological role in the regulation of peripheral blood pressure. Associated with the renin–angiotensin system, ACE converts angiotensin I to the highly potent vasoconstrictor angiotensin II. Inhibition of this enzyme prevents the formation of angiotensin II and will therefore result in reduced blood pressure. ACE-inhibitory peptides are present in the amino acid sequences of caseins, as well as in whey proteins(Reference Meisel59, Reference FitzGerald and Meisel60). In this way, blood pressure is one feature of the metabolic syndrome that could be affected by dairy protein (Fig. 3). However, most studies on the ACE-inhibitory effects of milk peptides have been performed in vitro, and the number of human studies is limited. Aihara et al. (Reference Aihara, Kajimoto and Hirata61) performed a 4-week trial with forty subjects with high-normal blood pressure and forty mild hypertensive subjects, receiving either powdered fermented milk tablets (12 g) or placebo tablets. They found decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures by 3·2 mmHg (non-significant) and 5·0 mmHg (P < 0·05), respectively, in the high-normal subjects. In the mild hypertensive subjects, systolic blood pressure was decreased by 11·2 mmHg (P < 0·05) and diastolic pressure by 6·5 mmHg (P = 0·055). In the study of Mizuno et al. (Reference Mizuno, Matsuura and Gotou62), forty-eight subjects with high-normal blood pressure and eighty-three mild hypertensive subjects received casein hydrolysate (3·6 mg/d) or placebo tablets for 6 weeks. In the high-normal group, non-significant changes in both systolic ( − 3·1 mmHg) and diastolic ( − 0·3 mmHg) blood pressure were observed. Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly by 11·8 mmHg in the mildly hypertensive subjects, while diastolic blood pressure was decreased by 2·9 mmHg. In a trial with thirty-nine hypertensive patients performed by Seppo et al. (Reference Seppo, Jauhiainen and Poussa63), skimmed milk fermented with Lactobacillus helveticus (150 ml/d) seemed to cause a reduction in blood pressure after 21 weeks, compared with skimmed milk fermented with Lactococcus sp. However, after intention-to-treat analysis, no significant differences between the test-product group and control group were observed. In addition, in a recent placebo-controlled trial in 135 mildly hypertensive subjects by Engberink et al. no effects of milk-derived peptides on blood pressure, ACE activity or plasma angiotensin II concentrations were found after 8 weeks of treatment(Reference Engberink, Schouten and Kok64). Also, bioavailability of these peptides is questionable(Reference FitzGerald, Murray and Walsh58), although one study has demonstrated the uptake of intact lactotripeptides(Reference Foltz, Meynen and Bianco65). Finally, the amount of ACE-inhibitory peptides in non-enriched dairy products may simply be too low to play a significant role in blood pressure regulation. Taken together, human studies do currently not provide unequivocal evidence that bioactive peptides from dairy protein lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure.

Fig. 3 Inhibition of conversion from angiotensin I to angiotensin II by bioactive peptides derived from milk proteins. These peptides block the action of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and may, in this way, lower blood pressure.

Additionally, bioactive peptides in dairy protein can exert beneficial effects on the prothrombotic state characterising the metabolic syndrome. A large number of similarities between blood clotting and milk clotting exist, including sequence identities between fibrinogen and some milk proteins, and some functional similarities. Casoplatelins are peptides derived from κ-casein that display anti-thrombotic activity. They show some sequence similarity to the interacting region of the fibrinogen γ-chain in platelet aggregation. Their inhibitory effect is probably due to the competition between anti-thrombotic peptides and the fibrinogen γ-chain for platelet receptors(Reference Meisel59, Reference Jolles, Levy Toledano and Fiat66). Again, much of this anti-thrombotic activity has been measured in vitro, which does not necessarily imply anti-thrombotic activity in vivo. Human studies are lacking, but in vivo anti-thrombotic activity of milk peptides has been shown in some animal studies(Reference Rutherfurd and Gill67).

An overview of the effects of dairy protein on metabolic syndrome components found in human studies is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Overview of recent intervention studies on the effects of fermented dairy products or dairy protein on components of the metabolic syndrome

HN, high-normal blood pressure subjects; MH, mild hypertensive subjects; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

* P < 0·05.

Conclusion

In conclusion, protein can play a role in body-weight regulation by increasing satiety, resulting in reduced energy intake. In body-weight loss and regain, protein may improve body composition by preserving or increasing fat-free mass and reducing fat mass. It also affects the serum lipid profile when compared with carbohydrates by decreasing both LDL- and HDL-cholesterol, but it improves the total:HDL ratio. Furthermore, dairy proteins are precursors of bioactive peptides, which can inhibit ACE activity and thereby reduce blood pressure, but evidence for such effects is currently not provided by human studies.

Dairy fat

The Western diet provides approximately 90 g fat per d. Of this daily fat consumption, a substantial proportion is supplied by dairy products(Reference Hulshof, Ocké and van Rossum13). High-fat dairy products are relatively rich in SFA, especially in myristic (14 : 0), palmitic (16 : 0) and stearic (18 : 0) acids(Reference German and Dillard68). While stearic acid has little effect on the serum lipoprotein profile, myristic and palmitic acids are known to increase serum LDL- and HDL-cholesterol concentrations. Intervention studies have also shown that replacing SFA by cis-unsaturated fatty acids lowers the risk of CVD(Reference Sacks and Katan69). To improve an atherogenic lipoprotein profile, the current recommendation is to reduce the intake of SFA.

It is hypothesised that fat in milk, butter and cheese affects blood lipids differently due to matrix effects. Tholstrup et al. could not confirm different effects of fat in milk and butter, but found a moderately lower LDL-cholesterol concentration after a cheese diet compared with a butter diet(Reference Tholstrup, Hoy and Andersen70). Biong et al. (Reference Biong, Muller and Seljeflot71) observed significantly lower total cholesterol concentrations after a cheese diet than after a butter diet, while the difference in LDL-cholesterol almost reached statistical significance. These observations could be related to the fact that the diets differed in Ca content, with the highest Ca intake from the cheese diet. Similar results were found by Nestel et al. (Reference Nestel, Chronopulos and Cehun72) in mildly hypercholesterolaemic subjects. The macronutrient composition of the diets was similar, but no data on Ca contents were given.

Effects of conjugated linoleic acid

Recently, much attention has been paid to conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). CLA is a positional and geometric conjugated isomer of linoleic acid. Two common isomers of CLA exist, trans-10, cis-12-CLA (t10, c12-CLA) and cis-9, trans-11-CLA (c9, t11-CLA), which may have distinct metabolic effects. The c9, t11 isomer accounts for over 90 % of the total CLA intake from food. Milk fat is relatively rich in c9, t11-CLA, although levels are still low (less than 0·5 % of total milk fat). Many animal studies have shown positive effects of CLA on body weight and fat deposition(Reference Larsen, Toubro, Astrup and Astrup73, Reference Wang and Jones74). In addition, some animal trials reported cholesterol-lowering effects of CLA(Reference Terpstra75). However, results of human studies are less consistent. In a recent meta-analysis, it was found that, given at a dose of 3·2 g/d, CLA produces a modest loss in body fat in human subjects(Reference Whigham, Watras and Schoeller76). In contrast, a number of reviews concluded that CLA is not effective in reducing body weight and plasma cholesterol concentrations in humans, and that especially t10, c12-CLA may actually adversely affect human health, for example, by inducing insulin resistance(Reference Ditscheid, Keller and Jahreis17). In addition, effects, if any, are only observed at high intakes (>3 g/d). Therefore, the amount of CLA in dairy fat is too low to play a significant role in the prevention of the metabolic syndrome.

Conclusion

To reduce cardiovascular risk, it is important to limit the intake of SFA. Therefore, the consumption of low-fat instead of high-fat dairy products is strongly recommended. While different responses to fat from different dairy products have not been confirmed, other dairy constituents, such as Ca, seem to influence the effects. It is not likely that CLA, in the amounts present in dairy products, has any risk-reducing effects.

Overall conclusion

Several epidemiological studies have suggested that the consumption of dairy products contributes to a decreased risk of developing the metabolic syndrome. If so, an important question is which components of dairy products are actually responsible for the favourable effects. Ca and protein have been reported to positively affect several components of the metabolic syndrome. The fat fraction of dairy products does not seem to contain any bioactive compounds in this respect. The different components may act synergistically, leading to augmented beneficial effects, but this certainly warrants further investigation. Without doubt, the intake of SFA should be limited. Therefore, it is important to focus on low-fat instead of high-fat dairy products.

Taken together, evidence exists that dairy products may play a role in the prevention and treatment of the metabolic syndrome. However, most of the studies focused on single features of the metabolic syndrome. In addition, not all features of the syndrome (for example, the inflammatory and prothrombotic state) have been studied in depth. Furthermore, most research focused on single dairy constituents, while studies on the effects of dairy products mainly had an observational design. Therefore, as yet, there is insufficient evidence to decisively conclude that dairy products play a role in the development of the metabolic syndrome. Hence, more experimental research is needed to fully elucidate the physiological effects of an increased consumption of dairy products as related to the metabolic syndrome, as well as the mechanisms involved.

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that none of them had any conflict of interest. The present study was supported by a grant from the Dutch Dairy Association (NZO).

References

1Grundy, SM, Brewer, HB Jr, Cleeman, JI, et al. . (2004) Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation 109, 433438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Balkau, B, Vernay, M, Mhamdi, L, et al. . (2003) The incidence and persistence of the NCEP (National Cholesterol Education Program) metabolic syndrome. The French D.E.S.I.R. study. Diabetes Metab 29, 526532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Mennen, LI, Lafay, L, Feskens, EJM, et al. . (2000) Possible protective effect of bread and dairy products on the risk of the metabolic syndrome. Nutr Res 20, 335347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Azadbakht, L, Mirmiran, P, Esmaillzadeh, A, et al. . (2005) Dairy consumption is inversely associated with the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Tehranian adults. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 523530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Elwood, PC, Pickering, JE & Fehily, AM (2007) Milk and dairy consumption, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome: the Caerphilly prospective study. J Epidemiol Community Health 61, 695698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Ruidavets, JB, Bongard, V, Dallongeville, J, et al. . (2007) High consumptions of grain, fish, dairy products and combinations of these are associated with a low prevalence of metabolic syndrome. J Epidemiol Community Health 61, 810817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Beydoun, MA, Gary, TL, Caballero, BH, et al. . (2008) Ethnic differences in dairy and related nutrient consumption among US adults and their association with obesity, central obesity, and the metabolic syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 19141925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Snijder, MB, van der Heijden, AA, van Dam, RM, et al. . (2007) Is higher dairy consumption associated with lower body weight and fewer metabolic disturbances? The Hoorn Study. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 989995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Snijder, MB, van Dam, RM, Stehouwer, CD, et al. . (2008) A prospective study of dairy consumption in relation to changes in metabolic risk factors: the Hoorn Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16, 706709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Pereira, MA, Jacobs, DR Jr, Van Horn, L, et al. . (2002) Dairy consumption, obesity, and the insulin resistance syndrome in young adults: the CARDIA Study. JAMA 287, 20812089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Lutsey, PL, Steffen, LM & Stevens, J (2008) Dietary intake and the development of the metabolic syndrome: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Circulation 117, 754761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Fleming, KH & Heimbach, JT (1994) Consumption of calcium in the U.S.: food sources and intake levels. J Nutr 124, Suppl. 8, 1426S1430S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Hulshof, KFAM, Ocké, MC, van Rossum, CTM, et al. (2004) Results of the National Food Consumption Survey 2003. Bilthoven/Zeist: RIVM/TNO.Google Scholar
14Drouillet, P, Balkau, B, Charles, MA, et al. . (2007) Calcium consumption and insulin resistance syndrome parameters. Data from the Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR). Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 17, 486492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Liu, S, Song, Y, Ford, ES, et al. . (2005) Dietary calcium, vitamin D, and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and older U.S. women. Diabetes Care 28, 29262932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Reid, IR, Mason, B, Horne, A, et al. . (2002) Effects of calcium supplementation on serum lipid concentrations in normal older women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med 112, 343347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Ditscheid, B, Keller, S & Jahreis, G (2005) Cholesterol metabolism is affected by calcium phosphate supplementation in humans. J Nutr 135, 16781682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Shahkhalili, Y, Murset, C, Meirim, I, et al. . (2001) Calcium supplementation of chocolate: effect on cocoa butter digestibility and blood lipids in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 73, 246252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Bostick, RM, Fosdick, L, Grandits, GA, et al. . (2000) Effect of calcium supplementation on serum cholesterol and blood pressure. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Arch Fam Med 9, 3139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Denke, MA, Fox, MM & Schulte, MC (1993) Short-term dietary calcium fortification increases fecal saturated fat content and reduces serum lipids in men. J Nutr 123, 10471053.Google ScholarPubMed
21Govers, MJ, Termont, DS, Lapre, JA, et al. . (1996) Calcium in milk products precipitates intestinal fatty acids and secondary bile acids and thus inhibits colonic cytotoxicity in humans. Cancer Res 56, 32703275.Google ScholarPubMed
22Jacobsen, R, Lorenzen, JK, Toubro, S, et al. . (2005) Effect of short-term high dietary calcium intake on 24-h energy expenditure, fat oxidation, and fecal fat excretion. Int J Obes (Lond) 29, 292301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Boon, N, Hul, GB, Stegen, JH, et al. . (2007) An intervention study of the effects of calcium intake on faecal fat excretion, energy metabolism and adipose tissue mRNA expression of lipid-metabolism related proteins. Int J Obes (Lond) 31, 17041712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Lorenzen, JK, Nielsen, S, Holst, JJ, et al. . (2007) Effect of dairy calcium or supplementary calcium intake on postprandial fat metabolism, appetite, and subsequent energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 678687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Fernandez, ML & West, KL (2005) Mechanisms by which dietary fatty acids modulate plasma lipids. J Nutr 135, 20752078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Kerstetter, JE, O'Brien, KO & Insogna, KL (1998) Dietary protein affects intestinal calcium absorption. Am J Clin Nutr 68, 859865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Van der Meer, R, Welberg, JW, Kuipers, F, et al. . (1990) Effects of supplemental dietary calcium on the intestinal association of calcium, phosphate, and bile acids. Gastroenterology 99, 16531659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Zemel, MB, Thompson, W, Milstead, A, et al. . (2004) Calcium and dairy acceleration of weight and fat loss during energy restriction in obese adults. Obes Res 12, 582590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Zemel, MB (2003) Mechanisms of dairy modulation of adiposity. J Nutr 133, 252S256S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Zemel, MB, Richards, J, Mathis, S, et al. . (2005) Dairy augmentation of total and central fat loss in obese subjects. Int J Obes (Lond) 29, 391397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Lanou, AJ & Barnard, ND (2008) Dairy and weight loss hypothesis: an evaluation of the clinical trials. Nutr Rev 66, 272279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Boon, N, Koppes, LL, Saris, WH, et al. . (2005) The relation between calcium intake and body composition in a Dutch population: The Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study. Am J Epidemiol 162, 2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Zemel, MB (2003) Role of dietary calcium and dairy products in modulating adiposity. Lipids 38, 139146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Zemel, MB, Shi, H, Greer, B, et al. . (2000) Regulation of adiposity by dietary calcium. FASEB J 14, 11321138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Boon, N, Hul, GB, Viguerie, N, et al. . (2005) Effects of 3 diets with various calcium contents on 24-h energy expenditure, fat oxidation, and adipose tissue message RNA expression of lipid metabolism-related proteins. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 12441252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Boon, N, Goossens, GH, Blaak, EE, et al. . (2007) The effects of hydralazine on lipolysis in subcutaneous adipose tissue in humans. Metabolism 56, 17421748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Bucher, HC, Cook, RJ, Guyatt, GH, et al. . (1996) Effects of dietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 275, 10161022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38van Mierlo, LA, Arends, LR, Streppel, MT, et al. . (2006) Blood pressure response to calcium supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hum Hypertens 20, 571580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Hatton, DC & McCarron, DA (1994) Dietary calcium and blood pressure in experimental models of hypertension. A review. Hypertension 23, 513530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Zemel, MB (2001) Calcium modulation of hypertension and obesity: mechanisms and implications. J Am Coll Nutr 20, Suppl. 5, 428S435S, discussion 440S–442S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Bian, K, Ishibashi, K & Bukoski, RD (1996) 1,25(OH)2D3 modulates intracellular Ca2+ and force generation in resistance arteries. Am J Physiol 270, H230H237.Google ScholarPubMed
42Kristal-Boneh, E, Froom, P, Harari, G, et al. . (1997) Association of calcitriol and blood pressure in normotensive men. Hypertension 30, 12891294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Zemel, MB, Richards, J, Milstead, A, et al. . (2005) Effects of calcium and dairy on body composition and weight loss in African-American adults. Obes Res 13, 12181225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Krauss, RM, Blanche, PJ, Rawlings, RS, et al. . (2006) Separate effects of reduced carbohydrate intake and weight loss on atherogenic dyslipidemia. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 10251031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Katan, MB (2006) Alternatives to low-fat diets. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 989990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Appel, LJ, Sacks, FM, Carey, VJ, et al. . (2005) Effects of protein, monounsaturated fat, and carbohydrate intake on blood pressure and serum lipids: results of the OmniHeart randomized trial. JAMA 294, 24552464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Crovetti, R, Porrini, M, Santangelo, A, et al. . (1998) The influence of thermic effect of food on satiety. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 482488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Johnson, J & Vickers, Z (1993) Effects of flavor and macronutrient composition of food servings on liking, hunger and subsequent intake. Appetite 21, 2539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Poppitt, SD, McCormack, D & Buffenstein, R (1998) Short-term effects of macronutrient preloads on appetite and energy intake in lean women. Physiol Behav 64, 279285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Stubbs, RJ, van Wyk, MC, Johnstone, AM, et al. . (1996) Breakfasts high in protein, fat or carbohydrate: effect on within-day appetite and energy balance. Eur J Clin Nutr 50, 409417.Google ScholarPubMed
51Barkeling, B, Rossner, S & Bjorvell, H (1990) Effects of a high-protein meal (meat) and a high-carbohydrate meal (vegetarian) on satiety measured by automated computerized monitoring of subsequent food intake, motivation to eat and food preferences. Int J Obes 14, 743751.Google Scholar
52Lejeune, MP, Westerterp, KR, Adam, TC, et al. . (2006) Ghrelin and glucagon-like peptide 1 concentrations, 24-h satiety, and energy and substrate metabolism during a high-protein diet and measured in a respiration chamber. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 8994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Westerterp-Plantenga, MS, Rolland, V, Wilson, SA, et al. . (1999) Satiety related to 24 h diet-induced thermogenesis during high protein/carbohydrate vs high fat diets measured in a respiration chamber. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 495502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54Hall, WL, Millward, DJ, Long, SJ, et al. . (2003) Casein and whey exert different effects on plasma amino acid profiles, gastrointestinal hormone secretion and appetite. Br J Nutr 89, 239248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Layman, DK, Boileau, RA, Erickson, DJ, et al. . (2003) A reduced ratio of dietary carbohydrate to protein improves body composition and blood lipid profiles during weight loss in adult women. J Nutr 133, 411417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Westerterp-Plantenga, MS, Lejeune, MP, Nijs, I, et al. . (2004) High protein intake sustains weight maintenance after body weight loss in humans. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28, 5764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57Aimutis, WR (2004) Bioactive properties of milk proteins with particular focus on anticariogenesis. J Nutr 134, 989S995S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58FitzGerald, RJ, Murray, BA & Walsh, DJ (2004) Hypotensive peptides from milk proteins. J Nutr 134, 980S988S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59Meisel, H (2005) Biochemical properties of peptides encrypted in bovine milk proteins. Curr Med Chem 12, 19051919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60FitzGerald, RJ & Meisel, H (1999) Lactokinins: whey protein-derived ACE inhibitory peptides. Nahrung 43, 165167.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61Aihara, K, Kajimoto, O, Hirata, H, et al. . (2005) Effect of powdered fermented milk with Lactobacillus helveticus on subjects with high-normal blood pressure or mild hypertension. J Am Coll Nutr 24, 257265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Mizuno, S, Matsuura, K, Gotou, T, et al. . (2005) Antihypertensive effect of casein hydrolysate in a placebo-controlled study in subjects with high-normal blood pressure and mild hypertension. Br J Nutr 94, 8491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63Seppo, L, Jauhiainen, T, Poussa, T, et al. . (2003) A fermented milk high in bioactive peptides has a blood pressure-lowering effect in hypertensive subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 326330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64Engberink, MF, Schouten, EG, Kok, FJ, et al. . (2008) Lactotripeptides show no effect on human blood pressure: results from a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Hypertension 51, 399405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65Foltz, M, Meynen, EE, Bianco, V, et al. . (2007) Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from a lactotripeptide-enriched milk beverage are absorbed intact into the circulation. J Nutr 137, 953958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66Jolles, P, Levy Toledano, S, Fiat, AM, et al. . (1986) Analogy between fibrinogen and casein. Effect of an undecapeptide isolated from κ-casein on platelet function. Eur J Biochem 158, 379382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67Rutherfurd, KJ & Gill, HS (2000) Peptides affecting coagulation. Br J Nutr 84, Suppl. 1, S99S102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68German, JB & Dillard, CJ (2006) Composition, structure and absorption of milk lipids: a source of energy, fat-soluble nutrients and bioactive molecules. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 46, 5792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69Sacks, FM & Katan, M (2002) Randomized clinical trials on the effects of dietary fat and carbohydrate on plasma lipoproteins and cardiovascular disease. Am J Med 113, Suppl. 9B, 13s24s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70Tholstrup, T, Hoy, CE, Andersen, LN, et al. . (2004) Does fat in milk, butter and cheese affect blood lipids and cholesterol differently? J Am Coll Nutr 23, 169176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71Biong, AS, Muller, H, Seljeflot, I, et al. . (2004) A comparison of the effects of cheese and butter on serum lipids, haemostatic variables and homocysteine. Br J Nutr 92, 791797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72Nestel, PJ, Chronopulos, A & Cehun, M (2005) Dairy fat in cheese raises LDL cholesterol less than that in butter in mildly hypercholesterolaemic subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 10591063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73Larsen, TM, Toubro, S, Astrup, A & Astrup, A (2003) Efficacy and safety of dietary supplements containing CLA for the treatment of obesity: evidence from animal and human studies. J Lipid Res 44, 22342241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74Wang, YW & Jones, PJ (2004) Conjugated linoleic acid and obesity control: efficacy and mechanisms. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28, 941955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75Terpstra, AH (2004) Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on body composition and plasma lipids in humans: an overview of the literature. Am J Clin Nutr 79, 352361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76Whigham, LD, Watras, AC & Schoeller, DA (2007) Efficacy of conjugated linoleic acid for reducing fat mass: a meta-analysis in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 12031211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
77Appel, LJ, Moore, TJ, Obarzanek, E, et al. . (1997) A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 336, 11171124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Overview of recent intervention studies on the effects of dairy product and calcium supplementation on serum lipid profile, blood pressure and glucose metabolism

Figure 1

Fig. 1 One of the proposed mechanisms of action of dietary Ca. Ca binds to SFA or bile acids (BA) in the intestine, inhibiting their absorption. SFA raise LDL-cholesterol, probably by decreasing LDL-receptor (LDL-R) activity. Reduced absorption of SFA can therefore lower serum LDL-cholesterol. In the liver, cholesterol is converted into BA. Lowering the absorption of BA in the intestine will therefore lead to an increased conversion of cholesterol and reduced serum LDL-cholesterol levels. C, cholesterol; ↑ , increased; HMG, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl; ↓ , reduced; AcCoA, acetyl-CoA.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Hypothesised mechanism of stimulation of lipolysis and inhibition of lipogenesis by dietary Ca. Increased dietary Ca intake lowers the level of the hormone 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D, thereby lowering the uptake of Ca2+ into the cell. Decreased levels of intracellular Ca stimulate lipolysis and decrease the transcription of fatty acid synthase (FAS), resulting in the inhibition of lipogenesis.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Inhibition of conversion from angiotensin I to angiotensin II by bioactive peptides derived from milk proteins. These peptides block the action of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and may, in this way, lower blood pressure.

Figure 4

Table 2 Overview of recent intervention studies on the effects of fermented dairy products or dairy protein on components of the metabolic syndrome