Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T21:18:35.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Propagation of weak shocks through a random medium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

Lambertus Hesselink
Affiliation:
Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Present address: Departments of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4035, USA
Bradford Sturtevant
Affiliation:
Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Abstract

The propagation of weak shock waves (Ms = 1.007, 1.03 and 1.1) through a statistically uniform random medium has been investigated experimentally in a shock tube. The wave-from geometry, rise time and amplitude of initially plane shocks which have propagated through a random mixture of helium and refrigerant 12 are measured. The effect of shock propagation on the properties of the random medium is visualized with schlieren and shadow photography. The pressure histories of the distorted shock waves reflecting from a normal end wall are observed to be both peaked and rounded. In the rounded case the perturbed shock is found to be made up of a succession of weak, slightly curved fronts with a total effective rise time orders of magnitude greater than the classical Taylor thickness. The radius of curvature of the weakest shocks after propagating through the random medium is inferred from observations at two downstream stations to be about 7 times the integral scale of the gas inhomogeneities. It is concluded that the observed distortions of the wave fronts can best be explained in terms of random focusing and defocusing of the front by the inhomogeneities in the medium. A ray-tracing calculation has been used to interpret the experimental observations. It is found that geometrical considerations are sufficient to account for many of the effects observed on the shocks.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anyiwo, J. C. & Bushnell, D. M. 1982 Turbulence amplification in shock-wave boundary-layer interaction. J. AIAA 20, 893.Google Scholar
Brown, G. L. & Rebollo, M. R. 1972 A small, fast-response probe to measure composition in a binary gas mixture. AIAA J. 10, 649.Google Scholar
Candel, S. M. 1979a Numerical solution of wave scattering problems in the parabolic approximation. J. Fluid Mech. 90, 465.Google Scholar
Candel, S. M. 1979b Propagation of sound and ultra sound in non-homogeneous media. ONERA Rep. TP 1979–68.Google Scholar
Chu, B. T. & Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1957 Non-linear interactions in a viscous heat-conducting compressible gas. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 494.Google Scholar
Clarebout, J. F. 1976 Fundamentals of Geophysical Data Processing. McGraw-Hill.
Crow, S. C. 1969 Distortion of sonic bangs by atmospheric turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 37, 529.Google Scholar
Dettleff, G., Thompson, P. A., Meier, G. E. A. & Speckmann, H.-D. 1979 An experimental study of liquefaction shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 95, 279.Google Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Howe, M. S. 1973 On the possibility of turbulent thickening of weak shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 58, 461.Google Scholar
Friedlander, F. G. 1958 Sound Pulses. Cambridge University Press.
Haas, J.-F. & Sturtevant, B. 1987 Interaction of weak shock waves with cylindrical and spherical gas inhomogeneities. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 41.Google Scholar
Hesselink, L. 1976 Propagation of weak waves through a random medium. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 2, 21, 1226.Google Scholar
Hesselink, L. 1977 An experimental investigation of propagation of weak shock waves in a random medium. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
Hesselink, L. & White, B. S. 1983 Digital image processing of flow visualization photographs. Appl. Opt. 22, 1454.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. P. 1973 Vibrational relaxation effects in weak shock waves in air and the structure of sonic bangs. J. Fluid Mech. 58, 187.Google Scholar
Howe, M. S. 1973 Corrigendum: Multiple scattering of sound by turbulence and other inhomogeneities. J. Sound Vib. 29, 398.Google Scholar
Keller, J. B. 1962 Hydrodynamic Instability, p. 227. American Mathematical Society, Providence.
Kravtsov, Yu. A. 1969 The geometric optics approximation in the general case of inhomogeneous and nonstationary media with frequency and spatial dispersion. Sov. Phys. JETP 28, 769.Google Scholar
Kulkarny, V. A. & White, B. 1982 Focusing of waves in turbulent inhomogeneous media. Phys. Fluids 25, 1770.Google Scholar
Ghthill, M. J. 1953 Interaction of turbulence with sound or shock waves. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 49, 531.Google Scholar
Maglieri, D. J. & Parrot, T. L. 1963 Lateral spread sonic-boom ground-pressure measurements from airplanes at altitudes to 75000 ft and at Mach numbers to 2. NASA Tech. Note D-2021.Google Scholar
Markstein, G. H. 1957a Flow disturbances induced near a slightly wavy contact surface, or flame front, traversed by a shock wave. J. Aero. Sci. 24, 238.Google Scholar
Markstein, G. H. 1957b A shock tube study of flame front-pressure wave interactions. 6th Intl Symp. Combustion, p. 387. Reinhold.
Meshkov, Y. Y. 1970 Instability of a shock wave accelerated interface between two gases. NASA TT F-13, 074.
Meyer, K. A. & Blewett, P. J. 1972 Numerical investigation of the stability of a shock accelerated interface between two fluids. Phys. Fluids 15, 753.Google Scholar
Picone, J. M., Oran, E. S., Boris, J. P. & Young, T. R. Jr. 1984 Theory of vorticity generation by shock wave and flame interactions. NRL Memo. Rep. 5366.Google Scholar
Pierce, A. D. 1968 Spikes on sonic-boom pressure waveforms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 1052.Google Scholar
Plotkin, K. J. & George, A. R. 1972 Propagation of weak shock waves through turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 449.Google Scholar
Ribner, H. S. 1954 Shock–turbulence interaction and the generation of noise. NACA Tech. Note 3255.Google Scholar
Richtmyer, R. D. 1960 Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 23, 297.Google Scholar
Rudinger, G. 1958 Shock wave and flame interactions. In Combustion and Propulsion, pp. 15382. Third AGARD Coll. London. Pergamon.
Rudinger, G. & Somers, L. 1960 Behaviour of small regions of different gases carried in accelerated gas flows. J. Fluid Mech. 7, 161.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, B. & Kulkarny, V. A. 1976 The focusing of weak shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 651.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1950 The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their plane. I. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 201, 192.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, Chap. 3. Cambridge University Press.
Wanner, J. C., Valee, J., Vivier, C. & Thiery, C. 1972 Theoretical and experimental studies of the focus of sonic booms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 13.Google Scholar
Werner, J. E. 1961 Unsteady interaction of a shock wave with a cellular vortex field. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 195.Google Scholar
White, B. S. 1987 Random rays and stochastic caustics. In Random Media (ed. G. Papanicolaou), The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Application, vol. 7, p. 311. Springer.
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley.
Winkler, K.-H. A., Chalmers, J. W., Hodson, S. W., Woodward, P. R. & Zabusky, N. J. 1987 A numerical laboratory. Physics Today, October, p. 28.
Zwillinger, D. I. & White, B. S. 1985 Propagation of initially plane waves in the region of random caustics. Wave Motion 7, 207.Google Scholar