Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-6f5p8 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-04-15T05:27:07.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of cereals in the aetiology of nutritional rickets: the lesson of the Irish National Nutrition Survey 1943–8

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Iris Robertson ,
J. A. Ford ,
W. B. McIntosh  and
M. G. Dunnigan
Iris Robertson
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
J. A. Ford
Affiliation:
Paediatric Unit, Rutherglen Maternity Hospital, Glasgow
W. B. McIntosh
Affiliation:
Departments of Biochemistry and Medicine, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow
M. G. Dunnigan
Affiliation:
Departments of Biochemistry and Medicine, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Review of the evidence of the Irish Nutrition Survey concerning a marked rise in the incidence of rickets in Dublin in 1942 concludes that a rise in the extraction rate of the national flour from 70 to 100% was principally responsible.

2. This rise and subsequent decrease in incidence as the extraction rate of flour was reduced is not explained by changes in the proportion of children protected by vitamin D supplements or by small changes in dietary vitamin D intake.

3. The evidence suggests that nutritional rickets in man cannot be explained on the basis of deficient vitamin D intake alone, whether derived from diet or U.V. radiation.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 17 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1981

References

Amirhakimi, O. H. (1973). Clin. Pediat. 12, 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaud, S. B., Goldsmith, R. S., Lambert, P. W. & Go, V. L. W. (1975). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 149, 570.Google Scholar
Belsey, R. E., DeLuca, H. C. & Potts, J. T. (1974). J. clin. Endocr. Metab. 38, 1046.Google Scholar
Compston, J. (1979). Br. med. J. ii, 612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conely, J., Sumner, D., McKinlay, A., McIntosh, W. B. & Dunnigan, M. G. (1977). Br. med. J. ii, 1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunnigan, M. G. (1977). Child Nutrition and its Relation to Mental and Physical Development, p. 57. Manchester: Kellog Company of Great Britain Ltd.Google Scholar
Dunnigan, M. G., Childs, W. C., Smith, C. M., McIntosh, W. B. & Ford, J. A. (1975). Scot. med. J. 20, 217.Google Scholar
Dunnigan, M. G. & Ford, J. A. (1977). Lancet ii, 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwood, M. A. & Hamilton, D. (1968). Biochim. biophys. Acta. 152, 165.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A., Colhoun, E. M., McIntosh, W. B. & Dunnigan, M. G. (1972). Br. med. J. ii, 446.Google Scholar
Holmes, A. M., Enoch, B. A., Taylor, J. L. & Jones, M. E. (1973). Q. Jl. Med. 42, 125.Google Scholar
Haddad, J. G. & Hahn, T. J. (1973). Nature, Lond. 244, 515.Google Scholar
Jessop, W. J. E. (1950). Br. J. Nutr. 4, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellanby, E. (1949). J. Physiol., Lond. 109, 488.Google Scholar
Pettifor, J. M., Ross, P., Wang, J., Moodley, G. & Couper-Smith, J. (1978). J. Pediat. 92, 320.Google Scholar
Pietrek, J., Windo, J. & Preece, M. A. (1976). Lancet i, 1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poskitt, E. M. E., Cole, T. J. & Lawson, D. E. M. (1979). Br. med. J. i, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheinhold, J. G. (1971). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 24, 1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preece, M. A., Tomlinson, S., Ribot, C. A., Pietrek, J., Korn, H. T., Davies, D. M., Ford, J. A., Dunnigan, M. G. & o'Riordan, J. L. A. (1975). Q. Jl. Med. 44, 575.Google Scholar
Rheinhold, J. G. (1976). Lancet ii, 1132.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, C. J., Hill, L. F. & Stanbury, S. W. (1972). Clin. Sci. 43, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, I. H., Sitrin, M. D. & Bolt, M. J. G. (1979). Vitamin D, Basic Research and its Clinical Application p. 487. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. C. (1931). Lancet ii, 10.Google Scholar