Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T12:06:53.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

intuitions, heuristics, and utilitarianism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2005

peter singer
Affiliation:
university center for human values, princeton university, princeton, nj 08544 and centre for applied philosophy and public ethics, university of melbourne, victoria 3010, australiapsinger@princeton.edu

Abstract

a common objection to utilitarianism is that it clashes with our common moral intuitions. understanding the role that heuristics play in moral judgments undermines this objection. it also indicates why we should not use john rawls' model of reflective equilibrium as the basis for testing normative moral theories.

Type
open peer commentary
Copyright
2005 cambridge university press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)