Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:43:04.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The prevalence and correlates of taking folic acid and vitamin supplements among adults aged ≥45 years with CVD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2010

Guixiang Zhao*
Affiliation:
Division of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop K66, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
Earl S Ford
Affiliation:
Division of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop K66, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
Chaoyang Li
Affiliation:
Division of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop K66, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
Ali H Mokdad
Affiliation:
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email GZhao@cdc.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To examine the prevalence and likelihood of taking folic acid or vitamin supplements among adults with CHD or stroke v. adults without these conditions.

Design

A cross-sectional Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System survey was conducted in twelve states of the United States and Puerto Rico in 2006. Self-reported data from participants were collected.

Setting

The United States.

Subjects

US non-institutionalised adults (n 41 792), aged ≥45 years.

Results

Of all participants, 5445 had CHD and 2076 had stroke. Significantly higher percentages of women than men reported taking folic acid or vitamin supplements. After adjustment for potential confounders, women with CHD had a significantly lower adjusted prevalence (AP) and adjusted OR (AOR) than women without CHD for taking folic acid less than one time per d (AP = 3·9 % v. 5·5 %; AOR = 0·56; 95 % CI 0·39, 0·81), for taking folic acid one to four times per d (AP = 50·0 % v. 57·5 %; AOR = 0·68; 95 % CI 0·60, 0·79), and for taking vitamin supplements (AP = 60·9 % v. 69·9 %; AOR = 0·66; 95 % CI 0·57, 0·76). Men with CHD had a significantly higher AP (50·4 % v. 46·2 %) and AOR (1·17; 95 % CI 1·02, 1·33) of taking folic acid one to four times per d than men without CHD. In both sexes, adults with stroke were as likely as those without to take these supplements.

Conclusions

Substantial variations in the prevalence and likelihood of taking folic acid or vitamin supplements exist by gender and by CHD status, but not by stroke status.

Type
Research paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Although the mortality rate of patients with CHD has decreased by 52 % in men and 49 % in women from 1980 to 2002(Reference Ford, Ajani and Croft1) and the mortality rate of stroke decreased by 24·2 % from 1994 to 2004(Reference Rosamond, Flegal and Furie2), the burden of these diseases remains high. Among US adults, the prevalence of CHD was 7·3 % and the prevalence of stroke was 2·6 % in 2005.

Hyperhomocysteinaemia is associated with an increased risk for CVD(Reference Clarke, Collins and Lewington3Reference Wald, Watt and Law5). Results from meta-analyses have shown that for a 5 μmol/l increase in serum homocysteine levels, the risk of myocardial infarction increased by 84 %(Reference Wald, Watt and Law5), the risk of CHD increased by 23–70 %(Reference Ford, Smith and Stroup4), and the risk of cerebrovascular disease increased by 58–116 %(Reference Ford, Smith and Stroup4), although prospective studies offer weaker support for this association than case–control studies(Reference Ford, Smith and Stroup4). A higher intake of folic acid or multivitamins reduces serum homocysteine levels(Reference Clarke, Frost and Sherliker6, Reference Neal, MacMahon and Ohkubo7) and is associated with reduced risk of acute coronary events and myocardial infarction(Reference Holmquist, Larsson and Wolk8Reference Tavani, Pelucchi and Parpinel11) or reduced rates of coronary restenosis and revascularisation in patients with coronary angioplasty(Reference Schnyder, Roffi and Pin12, Reference Schnyder, Roffi and Flammer13). However, other studies including recent clinical trials failed to show any beneficial effects on the risk of recurrent CVD or on total CVD or CHD mortality when using folic acid and B vitamins to lower homocyteine levels among patients with pre-existing CVD or renal disease(Reference Bazzano, Reynolds and Holder14Reference Muntwyler, Hennekens and Manson17) or among people at high risk for CVD (having a history of vascular disease, diabetes or other coronary risk factors)(Reference Albert, Cook and Gaziano18, Reference Lonn, Yusuf and Arnold19).

From 1990–1997 to 1998–2002, stroke-related mortality has decreased dramatically in the United States and Canada(Reference Yang, Botto and Erickson20). Folic acid fortification of flour and cereal grain initiated in 1998 may have contributed to this decline(21). In addition, folic acid supplementation could effectively reduce the risk of stroke in primary prevention(Reference Bazzano, He and Ogden22Reference Wang, Qin and Demirtas25); however, its role in the secondary prevention of stroke remains to be elucidated.

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data have shown that dietary supplement use increased from 23 % in NHANES I (1971–1975) to 40 % in NHANES III (1988–1994)(Reference Radimer, Bindewald and Hughes26). The 1999–2000 NHANES data also showed that 52 % of US adults reported taking dietary supplements in the past month, and 35 % reported regular use of multivitamin–multimineral supplements(Reference Radimer, Bindewald and Hughes26). However, the prevalence and correlates of taking folic acid and vitamin supplements among people with CVD are not well understood. Using a relatively large survey sample, we examined the percentage and likelihood of adults with CHD or stroke who reported taking folic acid or vitamin supplements in comparison with those observed in adults without these conditions.

Methods

Data for our analyses came from the 2006 Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a population-based telephone survey of health-related behaviours regarding the leading causes of death among non-institutionalised US adults aged ≥18 years. The survey was reviewed by the Human Research Protection Office at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and was determined to be exempt from human subject guidelines. The BRFSS survey design, sampling methods and weights have been described elsewhere(Reference Mokdad, Stroup and Giles27), and BRFSS data have consistently been found to provide valid and reliable estimates when compared with other national household surveys in the United States(Reference Mokdad, Stroup and Giles27Reference Nelson, Powell-Griner and Town29). Further information on BRFSS is available at http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/.

We analysed the data collected from survey participants aged ≥45 years in twelve states (Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New York, North Carolina, Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming) and Puerto Rico that had an optional module on folic acid and vitamin supplementation in the 2006 BRFSS. The median cooperation rate (the percentage of eligible persons contacted who completed the interview) for the 2006 BRFSS was 74·5 %.

Vitamin supplementation was assessed by asking participants whether they were currently taking any vitamin pills or supplements. Folic acid supplementation was assessed by asking participants whether and how often they were taking multivitamins or any vitamin pills/supplements that contained folic acid. Their responses were then categorised as (i) no folic acid supplements, (ii) taking folic acid supplements less than one time per d and (iii) taking folic acid supplements one to four times per d. Those who answered that they were taking folic acid supplements more than four times per d were excluded from the analyses because there were few participants in this category (<0·5 %). Self-reported supplement use of vitamins and minerals has been highly reliable and valid(Reference Satia-Abouta, Patterson and King30).

Participants’ CVD status was assessed by asking them whether they had ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that they had CHD (including heart attack or myocardial infarction, or angina pectoris) or stroke. Self-reports of physician-diagnosed CHD and stroke have an adequate validity and reliability compared with those obtained through medical records(Reference Bush, Miller and Golden31Reference Okura, Urban and Mahoney32).

The demographic variables in our analyses included age, sex, BMI (kg/m2; self-reported), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic and others), education (below high school diploma, high school graduate, some college or technical school and above college graduate) and household income (<$25 000, $25 000 to <$50 000 and ≥$50 000). In addition, participants’ status concerning smoking and alcohol consumption was included as a covariate in our analyses. For smoking status, participants were categorised as (i) current smokers (participants who had smoked 100 or more cigarettes during their lifetime and were still smoking), (ii) former smokers (participants who had smoked 100 or more cigarettes in their entire life but stopped) and (iii) never smoking (participants who had smoked less than 100 cigarettes during their lifetime). Heavy drinkers were defined as women who had one or more drinks per d or men who had two or more drinks per d.

Statistical analyses

After excluding from analyses the participants who responded ‘don’t know/not sure’, refused to answer or had missing responses for any of the study variables, a total of 41 792 participants remained in our analyses. The prevalence estimates for taking folic acid or vitamin supplements by CHD or stroke were age-adjusted to the standard 2000 US population. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the adjusted prevalence (AP; predicted marginal probability) of taking folic acid or vitamin supplements and to estimate the adjusted OR (AOR) with 95 % CI to assess associations of taking folic acid or vitamin supplements with CVD after adjustment for covariates. We used the Survey Data Analysis (SUDAAN) statistical software package release 9·0 (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) to account for the multistage, disproportionate stratified sampling design.

Results

Of all participants, a total of 5445 (12·3 % (weighted), 2756 men (15·2 %) and 2689 women (9·6 %)) had CHD and 2076 (4·4 % (weighted), 867 men (4·2 %) and 1209 women (4·5 %)) had stroke. The characteristics of participants with or without these conditions varied significantly by sociodemographics (Table 1). Overall, those who reported having CHD or stroke were more likely to be older and to have a lower household income. Significantly more men than women reported having CHD (P < 0·001), but not stroke (P = 0·238). In addition, the percentages of adults with CHD or stroke differed significantly by participants’ educational and BMI levels. A significant racial/ethnic difference existed among participants who reported having stroke (Table 1, P < 0·05).

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of study population by CHD and stroke, BRFSS, 2006

BRFSS, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

*χ 2 tests.

Overall, 3·9 % of men and 5·0 % of women reported taking folic acid supplements less than one time per d, 49·2 % of men and 58·4 % of women reported taking folic acid supplements one to four times per d and 58·8 % of men and 70·2 % of women reported taking vitamin supplements (Table 2). By states (and US territories), the prevalence of taking folic acid supplements ranged from 1·5 % in Kentucky to 6·9 % in Puerto Rico for les than one time per d and from 38·2 % in Puerto Rico to 60·3 % in Montana for one to four times per d; the prevalence of taking vitamin supplements ranged from 52·7 % in Puerto Rico to 73·0 % in Montana.

Table 2 Age-adjusted prevalence of taking any vitamins or folic acid-containing vitamins among US men and women aged ≥45 years, by selected characteristics, BRFSS, 2006

BRFSS, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

*,†P < 0·1, ‡P < 0·01, §P < 0·001, ∥P < 0·05 and for comparisons between adults with CVD and those without.

**,‡P < 0·01, ∥P < 0·05 and for comparisons between non-Hispanic whites and other racial/ethnic groups.

***,§P < 0·001 and ∥P < 0·05 for comparisons between current smokers and former smokers or those who have never smoked.

****,∥P < 0·05 for comparisons between adults who drink heavily and those who do not.

Women with CHD had a significantly lower prevalence (age-adjusted) of taking folic acid supplements or taking vitamin supplements than women without CHD (P < 0·01 for all comparisons). Among both men and women, the prevalence of taking folic acid supplements one to four times per d or taking vitamin supplements was significantly lower in those with stroke than in those without (P < 0·05 for both). In addition, in both men and women, regardless of their disease status, the percentages of adults who were taking folic acid supplements one to four times per d or taking vitamin supplements increased significantly with increases in age, educational levels and household income, but decreased when BMI levels increased. Non-Hispanic whites had the highest and current smokers had the lowest prevalence of taking folic acid supplements one to four times per d or taking vitamin supplements among the respective characteristics. Women who were heavy drinkers had a significantly higher prevalence of taking folic acid (one to four times per d) or taking vitamin supplements than women who were not heavy drinkers (Table 2).

Multivariate analyses showed a significant gender interaction on the association of taking folic acid or vitamin supplements with CHD (P < 0·01), but not with stroke. After adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, education, BMI, household income, smoking and heavy alcohol consumption, the AP and the AOR for taking folic acid supplements one to four times per d among men with CHD were significantly higher than among those without (P < 0·05 for both, Table 3). In contrast, the AP and the AOR for taking folic acid supplements among women with CHD were significantly lower than among those without (P < 0·001 for both, Table 3). In addition, women with CHD were significantly less likely to take vitamin supplements than those without CHD (P < 0·001, Table 4). Adults with stroke were as likely to take folic acid or vitamin supplements as those without stroke after multivariate adjustment (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3 Adjusted prevalence and AOR for taking folic acid-containing vitamins among US adults aged ≥45 years, by gender and by CHD or stroke, BRFSS, 2006

BRFSS, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; AOR, adjusted OR.

*Adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, education, BMI, income, smoking and heavy drinking.

P < 0·1.

P < 0·01.

§P < 0·05.

P < 0·001 for comparisons between adults with CVD and those without CVD.

Table 4 Adjusted prevalence and AOR for taking any vitamins among US adults aged ≥45 years, by gender and by coronary heart disease or stroke, BRFSS, 2006

BRFSS, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; AOR, adjusted OR.

*Adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, education, BMI, income, smoking and heavy drinking.

P < 0·001 for comparisons between adults with CVD and those without CVD.

Discussion

Our results from a large sample showed that 58·3 % of adults aged ≥45 years were taking folic acid supplements (4·4 % for taking less than one time per d and 53·9 % for taking one to four times per d) and 64·6 % were taking vitamin supplements regardless of their CVD status. When stratified by disease status, men with CHD were 17 % more likely than those without to take folic acid supplements one to four times per d after multivariate adjustments. However, women with CHD were 44 % and 32 % less likely to take folic acid supplements less than one time per d or one to four times per d, respectively, and 34 % less likely to take vitamin supplements than those without CHD. No significant differences were observed in taking folic acid or vitamin supplements between adults with stroke and those without stroke.

The early Vitamins and Lifestyle (VITAL) study reported that adults with coronary artery disease (heart attack, bypass surgery, angioplasty or angina) were 1·4 times as likely to use folic acid supplements as those without coronary artery disease(Reference Satia-Abouta, Kristal and Patterson33). The data from the 1999–2002 NHANES showed that adults with either coronary artery disease or stroke were 3·6 times as likely to use folic acid supplements as those without any of the following conditions: coronary artery disease, stroke, diabetes, hypertension or hypercholesterolaemia(Reference Buettner, Phillips and Davis34). However, in these studies, data analyses were not stratified by sex(Reference Satia-Abouta, Kristal and Patterson33, Reference Buettner, Phillips and Davis34) or by CVD status(Reference Buettner, Phillips and Davis34). Our study demonstrates a significant gender interaction when assessing the association of taking folic acid or vitamin supplements with CHD. We found that men with CHD were significantly more likely than those without CHD to take folic acid supplements one to four times per d after adjustment for potential confounding variables. However, women with CHD were significantly less likely than those without CHD to take folic acid supplements or vitamin supplements. Although the role of folic acid and multivitamin interventions in primary and secondary prevention of CHD remains to be elucidated, the potential impact of not taking folic acid and vitamin supplements on the health of women with CHD needs to be studied further. Moreover, several studies have reported that folic acid supplementation significantly reduces the risk of stroke in patients with CHD(Reference Bønaa, Njølstad and Ueland15, Reference Lonn, Yusuf and Arnold19, Reference Sepe, Adamo and Giuliano23, Reference Liem, Reynierse-Buitenwerf and Zwinderman35). Thus, our finding that men with CHD were significantly more likely to take folic acid supplements one to four times per d is of interest because this may help reduce risk of stroke in the future.

To date, studies have shown that a higher intake of folic acid from diet or supplements may help reduce risk of stroke and stroke-related mortality in primary prevention(Reference Bazzano, He and Ogden22, Reference Virtanen, Voutilainen and Happonen24, Reference Wang, Qin and Demirtas25). However, its role in preventing recurrent stroke and CHD and death in patients with a history of stroke remains unclear(Reference Lonn, Yusuf and Arnold19, Reference Toole, Malinow and Chambless36) and requires further investigation. Our study did not show any significant differences in the likelihood of taking folic acid or vitamin supplements between adults with stroke and those without.

In the United States, although most food is now fortified with folic acid or vitamins, dietary supplement use remains common(Reference Radimer, Bindewald and Hughes26). Our results also demonstrated a higher prevalence of taking vitamin supplements and a much higher prevalence of taking folic acid supplements among participants with CHD or stroke than reported previously. In the VITAL study, 9·2 % of adults aged 50–75 years with coronary artery disease and 41·9 % of adults with any CVD risk factors were taking dietary supplements; no data were reported for taking folic acid supplements among these patients(Reference Satia-Abouta, Kristal and Patterson33). In the NHANES 1999–2002, approximately 36 % of adults aged ≥40 years with either coronary artery disease or stroke were taking multivitamins, 8 % were taking B vitamins, and 5 % were taking folic acid as single supplements(Reference Buettner, Phillips and Davis34). The inconsistent results of these studies may be largely due to the varying measures of folic acid or vitamin supplementation used. Nonetheless, our results are consistent with earlier studies in that the prevalence of taking folic acid or vitamin supplements was higher in women v. men, in former smokers v. current smokers, in non-Hispanic whites v. other racial/ethnic groups, and in those with a higher educational level or a lower BMI(Reference Radimer, Bindewald and Hughes26, Reference Satia-Abouta, Kristal and Patterson33, Reference Buettner, Phillips and Davis34). The question as to whether physicians or other health-care professionals prescribed folic acid and vitamin supplements to their patients with CVD warrants further investigation.

At present, several mechanisms may help explain the possible beneficial effects of folic acid or vitamin interventions on CVD risk(Reference Moens, Vrints and Claeys37). First, folic acid or vitamin supplementation significantly reduces carotid intima-media thickness in patients with heart disease(Reference Fernandez-Miranda, Yebra and Aranda38, Reference Ntaios, Savopoulos and Hatzitolios39), a history of stroke or at risk for cerebral ischaemia(Reference Potter, Hankey and Green40, Reference Till, Rohl and Jentsch41); an increased carotid intima-media thickness serves as a predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular complications(Reference Poredos42). Second, the antioxidant capacities of folic acid and its metabolite 5-methyltetrahydrofolate or the antioxidants from multivitamins may reduce oxidative stress and superoxide production(Reference Antoniades, Shirodaria and Warrick43Reference Shirodaria, Antoniades and Lee45). Moreover, a high-dose folic acid or vitamin therapy can lower blood pressure, enhance coronary dilation in patients with coronary artery disease(Reference Tawakol, Migrino and Aziz46) and improve endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome, CHD or diabetes(Reference Antoniades, Shirodaria and Warrick43, Reference Shirodaria, Antoniades and Lee45, Reference Doshi, McDowell and Moat47Reference Title, Ur and Giddens49); these improvements are independent of homocysteine lowering. In addition, the use of multivitamins reduces C-reactive protein levels, a risk factor for CVD(Reference Church, Earnest and Wood50).

Study limitations and strengths

Our study was subjected to several limitations. First, all information including folic acid or vitamin supplementation and CVD status was self-reported, and thus subjectto recall bias. Second, although we have assessed the frequency of folic acid supplementation, the levels of folic acid and vitamin intake were unknown in the present study. In addition, data on the biomarkers of folic acid and vitamin supplementation were also unknown. Moreover, data on folic acid intake from fortified grain products were not collected in the study and therefore we were unable to adjust for this factor in our analyses. Finally, the use of medications for coronary artery disease or stroke has been shown to affect the behaviours of taking folic acid or vitamin supplements among these patients(Reference Buettner, Phillips and Davis34); however, in the present study, information on medications for CHD or stroke was not collected and therefore we were unable to conduct stratified analyses by medications. Despite these limitations, the results of the present study were strengthened by the large sample size from a population-based survey, and the analyses were stratified by sex and by diseases.

Conclusions

Among adults aged ≥45 years, substantial variations exist in the prevalence and likelihood of taking folic acid or vitamin supplements by gender and by CHD status, but not by stroke status. Men with CHD had a significantly increased likelihood of taking folic acid supplements; whereas women with CHD had a significantly decreased likelihood of take folic acid or vitamin supplements. Our results provide fundamental knowledge for clinical physicians, nutritionists and dietitians on the behaviours of taking folic acid and vitamin supplementation among patients with CHD or stroke.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the BRFSS coordinators for their work on the survey. Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sources of funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency. Authors’ contributions: Each author has contributed significantly to this work. G.Z. obtained the data from BRFSS, conducted the data analyses, interpreted the data and prepared the paper. E.S.F. supervised the data analyses and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. E.S.F, C.L. and A.H.M. revised the paper for important intellectual content. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final version of the paper. Conflict of interest declaration: The authors have no financial support or potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

1.Ford, ES, Ajani, UA, Croft, JB et al. (2007) Explaining the decrease in US deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000. N Engl J Med 356, 23882398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Rosamond, W, Flegal, K, Furie, K et al. (2008) Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 117, e25e146.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Clarke, R, Collins, R, Lewington, S et al. (2002) The homocysteine studies collaboration, homocysteine and risk of ischemic heart disease and stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA 288, 20152022.Google Scholar
4.Ford, ES, Smith, SJ, Stroup, DF et al. (2002) Homocyst(e)ine and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review of the evidence with special emphasis on case–control studies and nested case–control studies. Int J Epidemiol 31, 5970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Wald, NJ, Watt, HC, Law, MR et al. (1998) Homocysteine and ischaemic heart disease: results of a prospective study with implications regarding prevention. Arch Intern Med 158, 862867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Clarke, R, Frost, C, Sherliker, P et al. (2005) Homocysteine Lowering Trialists’ Collaboration. Dose-dependent effects of folic acid on blood concentrations of homocysteine: a meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 806812.Google Scholar
7.Neal, B, MacMahon, S, Ohkubo, T et al. (2002) Dose-dependent effects of folic acid on plasma homocysteine in a randomised trial conducted among 723 individuals with coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J 23, 15091515.Google Scholar
8.Holmquist, C, Larsson, S, Wolk, A et al. (2003) Multivitamin supplements are inversely associated with risk of myocardial infarction in men and women – Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP). J Nutr 133, 26502654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Ishihara, J, Iso, H, Inoue, M et al. (2008) Intake of folate, vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 and the risk of CHD: the Japan Public Health Centre-based Prospective Study Cohort I. J Am Coll Nutr 27, 127136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Rimm, EB, Willett, WC, Hu, FB et al. (1998) Folate and vitamin B6 from diet and supplements in relation to risk of coronary heart disease among women. JAMA 279, 359364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Tavani, A, Pelucchi, C, Parpinel, M et al. (2004) Folate and vitamin B(6) intake and risk of acute myocardial infarction in Italy. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 12661272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Schnyder, G, Roffi, M, Pin, R et al. (2001) Decreased rate of coronary restenosis after lowering of plasma homocysteine levels. N Engl J Med 345, 15931600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Schnyder, G, Roffi, M, Flammer, Y et al. (2002) Effect of homocysteine-lowering therapy with folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6 on clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: the Swiss Heart study: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 288, 973979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Bazzano, LA, Reynolds, K, Holder, KN et al. (2006) Effect of folic acid supplementation on risk of cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. JAMA 296, 27202726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Bønaa, KH, Njølstad, I, Ueland, PM et al. (2006) Homocysteine lowering and cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 354, 15781588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Ebbing, M, Bleie, Ø, Ueland, PM et al. (2008) Mortality and cardiovascular events in patients treated with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins after coronary angiography: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 300, 795804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Muntwyler, J, Hennekens, CH, Manson, JE et al. (2002) Vitamin supplement use in a low-risk population of US male physicians and subsequent cardiovascular mortality. Arch Intern Med 162, 14721476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Albert, CM, Cook, NR, Gaziano, JM et al. (2008) Effect of folic acid and B vitamins on risk of cardiovascular events and total mortality among women at high risk for cardiovascular disease: a randomised trial. JAMA 299, 20272036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Lonn, E, Yusuf, S, Arnold, MJ et al. (2006) Homocysteine lowering with folic acid and B vitamins in vascular disease. N Engl J Med 354, 15671577.Google Scholar
20.Yang, Q, Botto, LD, Erickson, JD et al. (2006) Improvement in stroke mortality in Canada and the United States, 1990 to 2002. Circulation 113, 13351343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Food and Drug Administration (1996) Food standards: amendment of standards of indentity for enriched cereal grain products to require addition of folic acid. Fed Regist 61, 87819797.Google Scholar
22.Bazzano, LA, He, J, Ogden, LG et al. (2002) Dietary intake of folate and risk of stroke in US men and women: NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Stroke 33, 11831188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Sepe, V, Adamo, G, Giuliano, MG et al. (2007) Folic acid for stroke prevention – author reply 651. Lancet 370, 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Virtanen, JK, Voutilainen, S, Happonen, P et al. (2005) Serum homocysteine, folate and risk of stroke: Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor (KIHD) Study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 12, 369375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Wang, X, Qin, X, Demirtas, H et al. (2007) Efficacy of folic acid supplementation in stroke prevention: a meta-analysis. Lancet 369, 18761882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Radimer, K, Bindewald, B, Hughes, J et al. (2004) Dietary supplement use by US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2000. Am J Epidemiol 160, 339349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Mokdad, AH, Stroup, DF & Giles, WH (2003) Public health surveillance for behavioural risk factors in a changing environment. Recommendations from the Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance Team. MMWR Recomm Rep 52, 112.Google Scholar
28.Nelson, DE, Holtzman, D, Bolen, J et al. (2001) Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Soc Prev Med 46, Suppl. 1, S3S42.Google ScholarPubMed
29.Nelson, DE, Powell-Griner, E, Town, M et al. (2003) A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System. Am J Public Health 93, 13351341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Satia-Abouta, J, Patterson, RE, King, IB et al. (2003) Reliability and validity of self-report of vitamin and mineral supplement use in the vitamins and lifestyle study. Am J Epidemiol 157, 944954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Bush, TL, Miller, SR, Golden, AL et al. (1989) Self-report and medical records report agreement of selected medical conditions in the elderly. Am J Public Health 79, 15541556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Okura, Y, Urban, LH, Mahoney, DW et al. (2004) Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure. J Clin Epidemiol 57, 10961103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Satia-Abouta, J, Kristal, AR, Patterson, RE et al. (2003) Dietary supplement use and medical conditions: the VITAL study. Am J Prev Med 24, 4351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Buettner, C, Phillips, RS, Davis, RB et al. (2007) Use of dietary supplements among United States adults with coronary artery disease and atherosclerotic risks. Am J Cardiol 99, 661666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Liem, A, Reynierse-Buitenwerf, GH, Zwinderman, AH et al. (2005) Secondary prevention with folic acid: results of the Goes extension study. Heart 91, 12131214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Toole, JF, Malinow, MR, Chambless, LE et al. (2004) Lowering homocysteine in patients with ischaemic stroke to prevent recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and death: the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) randomised controlled trial. JAMA 291, 565575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Moens, AL, Vrints, CJ, Claeys, MJ et al. (2008) Mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets for folic acid in cardiovascular disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 294, H1971H1977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Fernandez-Miranda, C, Yebra, M, Aranda, JL et al. (2007) Effect of folic acid treatment on carotid intima-media thickness of patients with coronary disease. Int J Cardiol 118, 345349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Ntaios, G, Savopoulos, C, Hatzitolios, A et al. (2009) Is there a beneficial effect of folic acid on carotid intima-media thickness? Int J Cardiol 135, 260261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Potter, K, Hankey, GJ, Green, DJ et al. (2008) The effect of long-term homocysteine-lowering on carotid intima-media thickness and flow-mediated vasodilation in stroke patients: a randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 8, 2437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Till, U, Rohl, P, Jentsch, A et al. (2005) Decrease of carotid intima-media thickness in patients at risk to cerebral ischaemia after supplementation with folic acid, vitamins B6 and B12. Atherosclerosis 181, 131135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Poredos, P (2004) Intima-media thickness: indicator of cardiovascular risk and measure of the extent of atherosclerosis. Vasc Med 9, 4654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Antoniades, C, Shirodaria, C, Warrick, N et al. (2006) 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate rapidly improves endothelial function and decreases superoxide production in human vessels: effects on vascular tetrahydrobiopterin availability and endothelial nitric oxide synthase coupling. Circulation 114, 11931201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Nakano, E, Higgins, JA & Powers, HJ (2001) Folate protects against oxidative modification of human LDL. Br J Nutr 86, 637639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Shirodaria, C, Antoniades, C, Lee, J et al. (2007) Global improvement of vascular function and redox state with low-dose folic acid: implications for folate therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 115, 22622270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.Tawakol, A, Migrino, RQ, Aziz, KS et al. (2005) High-dose folic acid acutely improves coronary vasodilator function in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 45, 15801584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Doshi, SN, McDowell, IF, Moat, SJ et al. (2002) Folic acid improves endothelial function in coronary artery disease via mechanisms largely independent of homocysteine lowering. Circulation 105, 2226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48.Setola, E, Monti, LD, Galluccio, E et al. (2004) Insulin resistance and endothelial function are improved after folate and vitamin B12 therapy in patients with metabolic syndrome: relationship between homocysteine levels and hyperinsulinemia. Eur J Endocrinol 151, 483489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Title, LM, Ur, E, Giddens, K et al. (2006) Folic acid improves endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes – an effect independent of homocysteine-lowering. Vasc Med 11, 101109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50.Church, TS, Earnest, CP, Wood, KA et al. (2003) Reduction of C-reactive protein levels through use of a multivitamin. Am J Med 115, 702707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of study population by CHD and stroke, BRFSS, 2006

Figure 1

Table 2 Age-adjusted prevalence of taking any vitamins or folic acid-containing vitamins among US men and women aged ≥45 years, by selected characteristics, BRFSS, 2006

Figure 2

Table 3 Adjusted prevalence and AOR for taking folic acid-containing vitamins among US adults aged ≥45 years, by gender and by CHD or stroke, BRFSS, 2006

Figure 3

Table 4 Adjusted prevalence and AOR for taking any vitamins among US adults aged ≥45 years, by gender and by coronary heart disease or stroke, BRFSS, 2006