Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T06:47:44.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CEO Overconfidence and International Merger and Acquisition Activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2013

Stephen P. Ferris
Affiliation:
ferriss@missouri.edu, Trulaske College of Business, University of Missouri, 404F Cornell Hall, Columbia, MO 65211;
Narayanan Jayaraman
Affiliation:
narayanan.jayaraman@mgt.gatech.edu, Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology, 800 W Peachtree NW, Atlanta, GA 30308;
Sanjiv Sabherwal
Affiliation:
sabherwal@uta.edu, College of Business, University of Texas at Arlington, Box 19449, Arlington, TX 76019.

Abstract

This study examines the role that chief executive officer (CEO) overconfidence plays in an explanation of international mergers and acquisitions during the period 2000–2006. Using a sample of CEOs of Fortune Global 500 firms over our sample period, we find that CEO overconfidence is related to a number of critical aspects of international merger activity. Overconfidence helps to explain the number of offers made by a CEO, the frequencies of nondiversifying and diversifying acquisitions, and the use of cash to finance a merger deal. Although overconfidence is an international phenomenon, it is most extensively observed in individuals heading firms headquartered in Christian countries that encourage individualism while de-emphasizing long-term orientation in their national cultures.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A.; Jaffe, J.; and Mandelker, G. N.The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-Examination of an Anomaly.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 16051621.Google Scholar
Asquith, P.; Bruner, R.; and Mullins, D.The Gains to Bidding Firms from Merger.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (1983), 121139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B., and Odean, T.Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (2001), 261292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beugelsdijk, S., and Frijns, B.A Cultural Explanation of the Foreign Bias in International Asset Allocation.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 34 (2010), 21212131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwman, C.; Fuller, K.; and Nain, A.Market Valuation and Acquisition Quality: Empirical Evidence.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 633679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M.; Desai, A.; and Kim, E.Synergistic Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and Their Division between the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 21 (1988), 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, R. F. “Does M&A Pay? A Survey of Evidence for the Decision-Maker.” Journal of Applied Finance, 12 (2002), 4868.Google Scholar
Campbell, T.; Gallmeyer, M.; Johnson, S.; Rutherford, J.; and Stanley, B.CEO Optimism and Forced Turnover.” Journal of Financial Economics, 101 (2011), 695712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chui, A.; Titman, S.; and Wei, K. C.Individualism and Momentum around the World.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 361392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, J. “Religion and Gambling in Sin-City: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Religion and Gambling Patterns in Las Vegas Residents.” Social Science Journal, 37 (2000), 453458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doidge, C.; Karolyi, G.; and Stulz, R.Why Do Countries Matter So Much for Corporate Governance?Journal of Financial Economics, 86 (2007), 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doukas, J., and Petmezas, D.Acquisitions, Overconfident Managers and Self-Attribution Bias.” European Financial Management, 13 (2007), 531577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.Industry Costs of Equity.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), 153193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, J.; Harris, R.; and Titman, S.The Postmerger Share-Price Performance of Acquiring Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 29 (1991), 8196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, K.; Netter, J.; and Stegemoller, M.What Do Returns to Acquiring Firms Tell Us? Evidence from Firms that Make Many Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 17631793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, X., and Landier, A.Why Has CEO Pay Increased So Much?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123 (2008), 49100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J.; Harvey, C.; and Puri, M.Managerial Attitudes and Corporate Actions.” Working Paper, Duke University (2009).Google Scholar
Griffin, D.; Lai, K.; Yue, H.; and Zhao, L.Cultural Values and Corporate Risk Taking.” Working Paper, University of British Columbia (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halek, M., and Eisenhauer, J.Demography of Risk Aversion.” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68 (2001), 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, M., and Hambrick, D. C.Explaining the Premiums Paid for Large Acquisitions: Evidence of CEO Hubris.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1997), 103127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilary, G., and Hui, K. W.Does Religion Matter in Corporate Decision Making in America?Journal of Financial Economics, 93 (2009), 474489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshleifer, D.; Low, A.; and Teoh, S. H.Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators?Journal of Fi-nance, 67 (2012), 14571498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications (1980).Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations, 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (2001).Google Scholar
Hope, O. “Disclosure Practices, Enforcement of Accounting Standards, and Analysts’ Forecast Accuracy: An International Study.” Journal of Accounting Research, 41 (2003), 235272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M., and Ruback, R.The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (1983), 550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R.Law and Finance.” Journal of Political Economy, 52 (1998), 11131155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R.Corporate Ownership around the World.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 471517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R.Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, M.; Li, K.; and Zhang, F.Deal or No Deal: Hormones and the M&A Game.” Working Paper, University of British Columbia (2009).Google Scholar
Loughran, T., and Vijh, A.Do Long-Term Shareholders Benefit from Corporate Acquisitions?Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 17651790.Google Scholar
Malmendier, M., and Tate, G.Does Overconfidence Affect Corporate Investment? CEO Overconfidence Measures Revisited.” European Financial Management, 11 (2005), 649659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmendier, M., and Tate, G.Who Makes Acquisitions? CEO Overconfidence and the Market’s Reaction.” Journal of Financial Economics, 89 (2008), 2043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A., and Hoffman, J.Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34 (1995), 6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morck, R.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.Do Managerial Objectives Drive Bad Acquisitions?Journal of Finance, 45 (1990), 3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osoba, B. “Risk Preferences and the Practice of Religion: Evidence from Panel Data.” Working Paper, West Virginia University (2003).Google Scholar
Paredes, T. A.Too Much Pay, Too Much Deference: Behavioral Corporate Finance, CEOs and Corporate Governance.” Florida State University Law Review, 32 (2005), 673762.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. “Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 435480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rau, P. R., and Vermaelen, T.Glamour, Value, and the Post-Acquisition Performance of Acquiring Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 49 (1998), 223253.Google Scholar
Roll, R. “The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers.” Journal of Business, 59 (1986), 197216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stulz, R., and Williamson, R.Culture, Openness and Finance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 70 (2003), 313349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar