Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T06:42:43.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Namba mountains: new hope for Afromontane forest birds in Angola

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2012

MICHAEL S. L. MILLS*
Affiliation:
A. P. Leventis Ornithological Research Institute, University of Jos, PO Box 13404, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
MARTIM MELO
Affiliation:
DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa; Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos (CIBIO/UP), Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal.
ALEXANDRE VAZ
Affiliation:
Av. Almirante Reis 197, 4º Esq., 1000-048 Lisboa, Portugal.
*
*Author for correspondence; e-mail: michael@birdingafrica.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Afromontane forest is the most localised and threatened habitat type in Angola. For the past 40 years the estimate of the area covered by this habitat in Angola has been c.200 ha. At present, 85 ha remain at Mt Moco, the most important known site to date. This habitat holds 20 bird taxa of conservation significance but some are now rare or absent at Mt Moco. Given the small extent of forest, its high conservation value and the severe human impacts on it, finding new areas of Afromontane forest is a high conservation priority. With this objective, we visited the Namba mountains in July 2010, where c.100 ha was thought to remain in the 1970s, to establish the extent and condition of forest there and to conduct bird surveys. We found closed-canopy Afromontane forest with an abundance of Podocarpus latifolius and little human disturbance. We recorded 89 bird species, 56 in or adjacent to forest and including all 20 priority taxa and a significant population of the Endangered Swierstra’s Francolin Pternistis swierstrai. On-screen digitising of forest patches using Google Earth indicates that the larger patches are an order of magnitude larger than at Mt Moco and that there is currently > 590 ha of forest in the Namba mountains, more than trebling the previous national estimate. The site qualifies as a new Important Bird Area and is a high priority for inclusion in Angola’s protected area network.

Resumo

Resumo

A floresta de montanha é o habitat mais localizado de Angola. Até ao presente estudo, estimava-se que apenas cerca de 200 ha permaneciam no país, com a maior área (85 ha) localizada no Monte Moco. Este tipo de floresta alberga populações de 20 espécies de aves prioritárias para a conservação, algumas das quais que parecem ser agora raras ou extintas no Monte Moco. Tendo em conta a sua reduzida área, a sua importância para a conservação e as enormes pressões humanas a que estão sujeitas, considerou-se uma prioridade esclarecer qual a situação das florestas de montanha em Angola e em particular na Serra de Namba onde, em 1970, julgava-se que ainda persistiam cerca de 100 ha. Com este objectivo, em Julho de 2010 fizemos levantamentos da extensão e tipo de florestas e das aves presentes na Serra de Namba. A nossa amostragem revelou a existência de floresta de montanha de copa fechada com a presença abundante de Podacarpus latifolius e com reduzida perturbação humana. No total foram registadas 89 espécies de aves, 56 das quais presentes na floresta ou nas suas margens. Estas incluem as 20 espécies prioritárias para a conservação, com destaque para uma população importante do Francolim de Swiestra Pternistis swiestrai, classificado como ‘Em Perigo’. A digitalização dos fragmentos de floresta a partir das imagens do Google Earth permitem estimar em mais de 590 ha a área de floresta existente na Serra de Namba, valor este que mais do que triplica a área de floresta de montanha conhecida até hoje para Angola. Para além disso, os maiores fragmentos de floresta de Namba são dez vez maiores que os da floresta do Moco. As florestas de Namba reúnem os requisitos para serem classificadas como uma Área de Importância para as Aves (IBA: Important Bird Area) e constituem uma prioridade para inclusão no sistema de áreas protegidas de Angola.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © BirdLife International 2012 

Introduction

Afromontane forest is the most localised habitat in Angola and a key habitat of the Western Angola Endemic Bird Area (EBA) (Huntley and Matos Reference Huntley and Matos1994, Stattersfield et al. Reference Stattersfield, Crosby, Long and Wege1998). It occurs in small patches above 1,800 m altitude in the highlands of west-central Angola (Barbosa Reference Barbosa1970, Collar and Stuart Reference Collar and Stuart1988). By the early 1970s, only 200 ha of Afromontane forest was estimated to remain, mainly at Mount Moco (hereafter Moco and perhaps in the Namba mountains (hereafter Nambas) where most forest was thought to be degraded by logging (Barbosa Reference Barbosa1970, Huntley Reference Huntley1974). Current forest cover at Moco is c.85 ha (Mills et al. Reference Mills, Olmos, Melo and Dean2011), but the situation in the Nambas is unknown. Despite the limited extent of Afromontane forest in Angola, threats to it from human activities and its high biodiversity value, none of it is formally protected, putting it at risk of becoming the first Afromontane centre of endemism to be lost (Huntley Reference Huntley1974, Dean Reference Dean, Fishpool and Evans2001, Mills et al. Reference Mills, Olmos, Melo and Dean2011).

The Angolan Afromontane centre of endemism is the most isolated, being separated by > 2,000 km from other Afromontane centres (White Reference White1981, Reference White1983, Huntley Reference Huntley1974). Its isolation has led to the evolution of distinct biological communities. The avifauna includes 64 bird taxa that are endemic or near-endemic species, endemic subspecies or isolated populations (White Reference White and Werger1978, Grimshaw Reference Grimshaw2001), 20 of which are associated with forest and thicket habitats (we add Thick-billed Seedeater Crithagra burtoni to the list of Mills et al. [Reference Mills, Olmos, Melo and Dean2011]).

All 20 of these taxa were recorded at Moco prior to 1970, but several are now rare or absent, including Orange Ground Thrush Zoothera gurneyi (no records), Bar-tailed Trogon Apaloderma vittatum (one record, MSLM unpublished data), Laura’s Woodland Warbler Phylloscopus laurae (one record) and Naked-faced Barbet Gymnobucco calvus vernayi (no records). The most threatened species is the ‘Endangered’ Swierstra’s Francolin Pternistis swierstrai, with > 75 pairs at Moco (Mills et al. Reference Mills, Olmos, Melo and Dean2011). In addition, Margaret’s Batis Batis margaritae, Bar-tailed Trogon and Orange Ground Thrush are known in Angola only from Moco, Laura’s Woodland Warbler only from Moco and Chipepe, and Ruwenzori Nightjar Caprimulgus ruwenzorii, Evergreen Forest Warbler Bradypterus lopezi and Thick-billed Seedeater from Moco and two other sites each (Dean Reference Dean2000, Mills and Dean Reference Mills and Dean2007, Mills et al. Reference Mills, Olmos, Melo and Dean2011). These species face a serious threat of extinction in Angola.

Confirming the current extent and condition of forest in the Nambas and finding new Afromontane forest with intact bird communities is a high conservation priority. Newly available Google Earth (2010) satellite imagery revealed significant patches of potential Afromontane forest on the north-western side of the Nambas (Mills et al. Reference Mills, Olmos, Melo and Dean2011). Our aims here are to provide a preliminary but up-to-date description of the forest type, quantity, distribution and condition in the Nambas, and the associated bird communities.

Methods

Study area

The Nambas (2,100–2,390 m) are located in the south of the Cuanza Sul province of west-central Angola between c.11.834˚S and 11.911˚S, and 14.710˚E and 14.869˚E, 30 km west of Cassongue town (11.854˚S 15.049˚E) and immediately north-west of Namba town (11.912˚S 14.874˚E) (Fig. 1). They form part of the Marginal Mountain Chain (mostly 1,600–1,850 m) which rises above the extensive Old Plateau to the east (Huntley Reference Huntley1974), the highest points of which are formed by residual land surfaces of Gondwana age (King Reference King1963 in Huntley Reference Huntley1974) and may include the Nambas. The Nambas rise c.300–550 m above the surrounding areas.

Figure 1. A Google Earth (2010) satellite image of the Namba mountains study area, showing all forest patches > 2.5 ha in extent as white polygons, and the settlements of Kanhala, Cassesse and Namba, as well as the location of our camp site. White lines indicate our access route to the north, and the main Cassongue-Atome road to the south. The black polygons identify areas > 2,000 m altitude.

We visited the Nambas from 23 to 26 July 2010, reaching them from the village of Kanhala (Kanhara) (11.829˚S 14.750˚E; 1,890 m) on their north-western flank. From here it was a 2.2 km walk to the edge of the most accessible forest patch (Patch 7; see Table 1) on top of the plateau at c.2,100 m. Due to the difficulty of traversing the terrain – dense undergrowth, steep slopes and an abundance of large boulders – we were confined to exploring this single forest patch and surrounding grasslands and mountain slopes, an area of c.24 ha (Fig. 1).

Table 1. A list of the 24 forest patches in the Namba mountains larger than 2.5 ha, as measured from Google Earth (2010) imagery from 2003. Forest Patch 10 was found to be 2 ha in area and is hence excluded. ‘‘Perimeter (km)’’ and ‘‘Area (ha)’’ give, respectively, the length of the perimeter of and the area covered by each patch of forest. These measurements were calculated from polygon shape files (.kmz) created for each forest patch by on-screen digitising in Google Earth. ‘‘Area/Edge ratio’’ is calculated as ‘‘Area’’/’’Perimeter’’. ‘‘% forest’’ is the visually-estimated percentage of the polygon covered by closed-canopy forest, to the nearest 5%. ‘‘Area of forest’’ = ‘‘Area’’ x ‘‘% forest’’ / 100.

Forest cover and condition

In order to assess spatial distribution and characteristics of forest patches (area, perimeter, % forest) we used cloud-free, high-resolution images from 2003 available on Google Earth (2010). We traced the perimeter of each forest patch larger than 2.5 ha to create a .kml polygon file and calculate its perimeter length (km), area (ha) and area/edge ratio. Perimeter length and area were measured to one decimal place, but are reported as rounded to whole numbers due to an unknown level of accuracy in our methods. The percentage of closed-canopy forest cover (as opposed to scattered trees, shrubbery or bracken beds) within each patch was visually estimated to the nearest 5%, to calculate the amount of forest in each patch. Methods are identical to those used at Moco (Mills et al. Reference Mills, Olmos, Melo and Dean2011) and results are compared using Student’s t-Tests (Zar Reference Zar1999).

Avifauna

Bird communities were sampled by (i) general observations summarised in daily lists, (ii) compiling x-species lists (McKinnon and Phillips Reference McKinnon and Phillips1993, Bibby et al. Reference Bibby, Burgess, Hill and Mustoe2000) and (iii) mist-netting birds. We follow the nomenclature of Gill et al. (Reference Gill, Wright and Donsker2009).

We compiled 26 x-species lists during exploratory walks in and immediately adjacent to the forest, avoiding overlap as much as possible and following the recommendations of c.30 lists (Fjeldså Reference Fjeldså1999) and of 15 species per list for montane forests of Africa (Bibby et al. Reference Bibby, Burgess, Hill and Mustoe2000). This method was favoured over time-limited, fixed-radius point counts because of the difficulty in reaching different independent points within the forest and because they can be compiled throughout the day, even during periods of low bird activity, making them efficient when survey time is limited (Fjeldså Reference Fjeldså1999, Bibby et al. Reference Bibby, Burgess, Hill and Mustoe2000).

Results

Forest cover and condition

The densely vegetated habitat of the Nambas was found to consist of mature, closed-canopy Afromontane forest with Podocarpus latifolius as the dominant tree. The forest appeared to be in near-pristine condition and had limited trail access, although a few large trees had recently been felled. Our local guides also reported that mammals were trapped and hunted. A grassland fire had burned right to the edge of the forest and entered the margin of the forest at a few places.

We identified 24 forest patches > 2.5 ha (Table 1), 19 of which held 10 ha or more of forest and nine > 25 ha. These forests are all situated on the western half of the Nambas (Fig. 1). In total we estimate that there is 592 ha of forest in patches > 2.5 ha, with a cumulative perimeter of 92 km, an area of 633 ha, an average percentage forest cover of 94.2 and an average area/edge ratio of 6.14 ha/km.

Compared with the 30 largest patches at Moco (> 0.5 ha), the 24 largest patches in the Nambas (> 2.5 ha; Table 1) were significantly larger, on average (26.4 ha), than those at Moco (2.9 ha) (t-test: t = 3.867, df = 52, P < 0.0005). Compared with the single patch > 10 ha at Moco, the Nambas held 17 patches > 10 ha in size. Forest patches in the Nambas (6.14 ha/km) also had significantly larger area/edge ratios (t = 8.535, df = 52, P< 0.00001) than those at Moco (2.13 ha/km).

Avifauna

A total of 89 bird species was recorded (Table 2), 56 of which in and adjacent to the forest during x-species counts. All 20 Angolan Afromontane forest-associated taxa were recorded during the surveys, 15 of which were among the 20 most often recorded species (Table 2). These included several that are now rare or absent at Moco, such as Bar-tailed Trogon, Orange Ground Thrush, Laura’s Woodland Warbler and Naked-faced Barbet. Swierstra’s Francolin was also found to be fairly common at the forest edge and in adjacent thickets, with seven different groups located within 1 km of our camp site. Unlike at Moco where forest patches are much narrower, they were never recorded from the forest interior.

Table 2. The list of the 89 bird species recorded in the Namba mountains 23-26 July 2010, giving the number of 15-species lists from which each species was recorded (out of a total of 26), the rank order of the 20 species recorded on most 15-species lists, and approximate daily totals of each species recorded on 24 July, 25 July and 26 July, respectively. ‘‘h’’ denotes heard only. The 20 endemic or near-endemic species, endemic subspecies or isolated populations associated with the highlands of western Angola and associated with forest and thicket habitats, are highlighted with ‘‘*’’ (Mills et al. Reference Mills, Olmos, Melo and Dean2011). Biome-restricted species are denoted by ‘‘a’’ for Afrotropical Highlands biome species and ‘‘z’’ for Zambezian biome species. Nomenclature follows Gill et al. (Reference Gill, Wright and Donsker2009).

Other montane specialists recorded include Margaret’s Batis, African Hill Babbler Pseudoalcippe abyssinica, Evergreen Forest Warbler, Angola Slaty Flycatcher Dioptrornis brunneus, Thick-billed Seedeater, Ruwenzori Nightjar, Rock-loving Cisticola Cisticola emini bailunduensis, Angola Cave Chat Xenocopsychus ansorgei, Mountain Wheatear Oenanthe monticola nigricauda and Dusky Twinspot Euschistospiza cinereovinacea cinereovinacea. Other records of note include the following. Lemon Dove Aplopelia larvata was both heard and seen, and recordings made of its calls; this is only the third record from the country, and the first away from Kumbira Forest (Mills and Dowd Reference Mills and Dowd2007). Grey-striped Francolin Pternistis griseostriatus was recorded well above its previous altitudinal limit and to the east of its previously-known distribution (Mills et al. in press). Hartert’s Camaroptera Camaroptera harterti was recorded away from the escarpment forests for the first time, as were Red-faced Crimsonwing Cryptospiza reichenovii, Pink-footed Puffback Dryoscopus angolensis and Black-throated Apalis Apalis jacksoni (Dean Reference Dean2000). The entry "Kumbira Swift" refers to the unidentified swifts that look similar to African Swift Apus barbatus but call like Little Swift A. affinus (Mills Reference Mills2009); this was the first record of these birds away from Kumbira Forest.

Discussion

The Nambas hold > 590 ha of Afromontane forest, making them home of the largest area of Afromontane forest in Angola, previously thought to be Moco with c.85 ha (Mills et al. Reference Mills, Olmos, Melo and Dean2011). This brings the national estimate to c.700 ha, 3.5 times the previous estimate of 200 ha (Huntley Reference Huntley1974). Compared with the forest at Moco, individual forest patches in the Nambas are larger and have greater area/edge ratios, making these patches less susceptible to edge effects and human impacts. Besides this, the forest patches in the Nambas are in better condition, showing fewer signs of human disturbance. This is likely to be a consequence of the ruggedness of the terrain, and its unsuitability for establishment of human communities.

Previously the only site in Angola at which all 20 forest-associated Afromontane taxa had been recorded was Moco. However, during brief surveys at the Nambas we found all 20 species, including several species that are now rare or extinct at Moco, many of them common. While we make no estimates of the densities or population sizes of these birds in the Nambas, based on their general abundance and the nearly seven-fold greater area of forest compared with Moco, it is likely that the Nambas hold the largest populations of each of these 20 species, including the ‘Endangered’ Swierstra’s Francolin. This makes the Nambas the most important site for Afromontane forest bird conservation in Angola.

The Nambas deserve national and international recognition for their conservation importance, and along with Moco are among the highest priorities for the establishment of new conservation areas in Angola. The Nambas qualify as a new Important Bird Area (IBA), satisfying the following global criteria for selection of an IBA (Fishpool and Evans Reference Fishpool and Evans2001): A1 Species of global conservation concern, by holding a significant population of the Endangered Swierstra’s Francolin, A2 Assemblage of restricted-range species, by holding populations of the Grey-striped Francolin, Swierstra’s Francolin, Angola Cave Chat, Angola Slaty Flycatcher and Ludwig’s Double-collared Sunbird Cinnyris ludovicensis, range-restricted species of the Western Angola EBA (Stattersfield et al. Reference Stattersfield, Crosby, Long and Wege1998), and A3 Assemblage of biome-restricted species, by holding 15 of 17 Afrotropical Highlands biome species and five of 49 Zambezian biome species found in Angola (see Table 1).

Further field surveys are required to establish the population sizes of key bird taxa, especially for Swierstra’s Francolin, and the overall bird diversity, and to determine the importance of the area for the conservation of other taxonomic groups. A survey of human populations and activities in surrounding areas would be useful in guiding conservation recommendations for the establishment of a new protected area, and to identify main threats to the area biodiversity of the area.

Acknowledgements

Funding for this field trip came from the generosity of Mr. Tasso Leventis of the A. P. Leventis Ornithological Research Institute and The Clancey Fund of the Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology. We would like to thank the Environment Ministry of Angola and Brian Huntley for their continued support for this work. John Mendelsohn kindly produced a polygon of areas in Angola > 2,000 m altitude, which aided in searching for these forests. Robert Dowsett and Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire provided a rigorous review of the manuscript; their comments helped to improve it greatly.

References

Barbosa, L. A. G. (1970) Carta fitogeográfica de Angola. Luanda: Instituto de Investigação Científica de Angola.Google Scholar
Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Hill, D. A. and Mustoe, S. H. (2000) Bird census techniques. Second Edition. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collar, N. J. and Stuart, S. N. (1988) Key forests for threatened birds in Africa. Cambridge, UK: International Council for Bird Preservation. (ICBP Monograph No 3).Google Scholar
Dean, W. R. J. (2000) The birds of Angola. Tring, UK: British Ornithologists’ Union. (BOU Checklist series 18).Google Scholar
Dean, W. R. J. (2001) Angola. Pages 7191 in Fishpool, L. D. C. and Evans, M. I., eds. Important Bird Areas in Africa and associated islands: priority sites for conservation. Newbury and Cambridge, UK: Pisces Publications and BirdLife International. (BirdLife Conservation Series No. 11).Google Scholar
Fishpool, L. D. C. and Evans, M. I. (2001) Important Bird Areas in Africa and associated islands: priority sites for conservation. Newbury and Cambridge, UK: Pisces Publications and BirdLife International. (BirdLife Conservation Series No. 11).Google Scholar
Fjeldså, J. (1999) The impact of human forest disturbance on the endemic avifauna of the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 9: 4762.Google Scholar
Gill, F., Wright, M. and Donsker, D. (2009) IOC world bird names (version 2.0). http://www.worldbirdnames.org. Cited 20 Mar 2009.Google Scholar
Google Earth (2010) Google Earth 5.1. http://earth.google.com/ Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. M. (2001) What do we really know about the Afromontane archipelago? Syst. Geogr. Pl. 71: 949957.Google Scholar
Huntley, B. J. (1974) Outlines of wildlife conservation in Angola. J. S. Afr. Wildl. Managet. Assoc. 5: 157166.Google Scholar
Huntley, B. J. and Matos, E. M. (1994) Botanical diversity and its conservation in Angola. Strelitzia 7: 5374.Google Scholar
King, L. D. (1963). South African scenery. Third edition. London: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
McKinnon, J. and Phillips, K. (1993) A field guide to the birds of Borneo, Sumatra, Java and Bali. Oxford, UK: Oxford Universitya Press.Google Scholar
Mills, M. S. L. (2009) Vocalisations of Angolan birds: new descriptions and other notes. Bull. ABC 16: 150166.Google Scholar
Mills, M. S. L. and Dean, W. R. J. (2007) Notes on Angolan birds: new country records, range extensions and taxonomic questions. Ostrich 78: 5563.Google Scholar
Mills, M. S. L. and Dowd, A. D. (2007) First records of Lemon Dove Aplopelia larvata for Angola. Bull ABC 14: 7778.Google Scholar
Mills, M. S. L., Olmos, F., Melo, M. and Dean, W. R. J. (2011) Mount Moco: its importance to the conservation of Swierstra’s Francolin Pternistis swierstrai and the Afromontane avifauna of Angola. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 21: 119133.Google Scholar
Mills, M. S. L, Vaz Pinto, P. and Haber, S. (In press) Grey-striped Francolin Pternistes griseostriatus: specimens, distribution and morphometrics. Bull. Afr. Bird Club.Google Scholar
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D. C. (1998) Endemic Bird Areas of the world. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. (BirdLife Conservation Series No. 7).Google Scholar
White, F. (1978) The Afromontane region. Pp. 463513 in Werger, M. J. A., ed. Biogeography and ecology of southern Africa. The Hague: Junk.Google Scholar
White, F. (1981) The history of the Afromontane archipelago and the scientific need for its conservation. Afr. J. Ecol. 19: 3354.Google Scholar
White, F. (1983) The vegetation of Africa. A descriptive memoir to accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO Vegetation Map of Africa (3 Plates, Northwestern Africa, Northeastern Africa, and Southern Africa, 1:5,000,000). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Fourth edition. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. A Google Earth (2010) satellite image of the Namba mountains study area, showing all forest patches > 2.5 ha in extent as white polygons, and the settlements of Kanhala, Cassesse and Namba, as well as the location of our camp site. White lines indicate our access route to the north, and the main Cassongue-Atome road to the south. The black polygons identify areas > 2,000 m altitude.

Figure 1

Table 1. A list of the 24 forest patches in the Namba mountains larger than 2.5 ha, as measured from Google Earth (2010) imagery from 2003. Forest Patch 10 was found to be 2 ha in area and is hence excluded. ‘‘Perimeter (km)’’ and ‘‘Area (ha)’’ give, respectively, the length of the perimeter of and the area covered by each patch of forest. These measurements were calculated from polygon shape files (.kmz) created for each forest patch by on-screen digitising in Google Earth. ‘‘Area/Edge ratio’’ is calculated as ‘‘Area’’/’’Perimeter’’. ‘‘% forest’’ is the visually-estimated percentage of the polygon covered by closed-canopy forest, to the nearest 5%. ‘‘Area of forest’’ = ‘‘Area’’ x ‘‘% forest’’ / 100.

Figure 2

Table 2. The list of the 89 bird species recorded in the Namba mountains 23-26 July 2010, giving the number of 15-species lists from which each species was recorded (out of a total of 26), the rank order of the 20 species recorded on most 15-species lists, and approximate daily totals of each species recorded on 24 July, 25 July and 26 July, respectively. ‘‘h’’ denotes heard only. The 20 endemic or near-endemic species, endemic subspecies or isolated populations associated with the highlands of western Angola and associated with forest and thicket habitats, are highlighted with ‘‘*’’ (Mills et al.2011). Biome-restricted species are denoted by ‘‘a’’ for Afrotropical Highlands biome species and ‘‘z’’ for Zambezian biome species. Nomenclature follows Gill et al. (2009).