Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T09:13:45.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The equine intestinal microbiome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2012

Marcio C. Costa
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G2W1, Canada
J. Scott Weese*
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G2W1, Canada Centre for Public Health and Zoonoses, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G2W1, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jsweese@uoguelph.ca

Abstract

The equine intestinal tract contains a complex microbial population (microbiota) that plays an important role in health and disease. Despite the undeniable importance of a ‘normal’ microbiota, understanding of the composition and function of this population is currently limited. As methods to characterize the microbiota and its genetic makeup (the microbiome) have evolved, the composition and complexity of this population are starting to be revealed. As is befitting a hindgut fermenter, members of the Firmicutes phylum appear to predominate, yet there are significant populations of numerous other phyla. The microbiome appears to be profoundly altered in certain disease states, and better understanding of these alterations may offer hope for novel preventive and therapeutic measures. The development and increasing availability of next generation sequencing and bioinformatics methods offer a revolution in microbiome evaluation and it is likely that significant advances will be made in the near future. Yet, proper use of these methods requires further study of basic aspects such as optimal testing protocols, the relationship of the fecal microbiome to more proximal locations where disease occurs, normal intra- and inter-horse variation, seasonal variation, and similar factors.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al Jassim, RAM and Andrews, FM (2009). The bacterial community of the horse gastrointestinal tract and its relation to fermentative acidosis, laminitis, colic, and stomach ulcers. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 25: 199215.Google Scholar
Cohen, ND and Peloso, JG (1996). Risk factors for history of previous colic and for chronic, intermittent colic in a population of horses. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 208: 697703.Google Scholar
Collinder, E, Lindholm, A, Midtvedt, T and Norin, E (2000). Six intestinal microflora-associated characteristics in sport horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 32: 222227.Google Scholar
Costa, M, Sturgeon, A, Arroyo, LG, Staempfli, HR and Weese, JS (2011). The horse's 2nd genome; metagenomic investigation of the equine intestinal microbiome. In: Annual Forum of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2011, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Crawford, C, Sepulveda, MF, Elliott, J, Harris, PA and Bailey, SR (2007). Dietary fructan carbohydrate increases amine production in the equine large intestine: implications for pasture-associated laminitis. Journal of Animal Science 85: 29492958.Google Scholar
Daly, K and Shirazi-Beechey, SP (2003). Design and evaluation of group-specific oligonucleotide probes for quantitative analysis of intestinal ecosystems: their application to assessment of equine colonic microflora. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 44: 243252.Google Scholar
Daly, K, Proudman, CJ, Duncan, SH, Flint, HJ, Dyer, J and Shirazi-Beechey, SP (2011). Alterations in microbiota and fermentation products in equine large intestine in response to dietary variation and intestinal disease. British Journal of Nutrition 107, 989995.Google Scholar
Daly, K, Stewart, CS, Flint, HJ and Shirazi-Beechey, SP (2001). Bacterial diversity within the equine large intestine as revealed by molecular analysis of cloned 16S rRNA genes. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 38: 141151.Google Scholar
De Fombelle, A, Varloud, M, Goachet, AG, Jacotot, E, Philippeau, C, Drogoul, C and Julliand, V (2003). Characterization of the microbial and biochemical profile of the different segments of the digestive tract in horses given two distinct diets. Animal Science 77: 293304.Google Scholar
Endo, A, Futagawa-Endo, Y and Dicks, L (2009). Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium diversity in horse feces, revealed by PCR-DGGE. Current Microbiology 59: 651655.Google Scholar
Endo, A, Okada, S and Morita, H (2007). Molecular profiling of Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Bifidobacterium species in feces of active racehorses. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 53: 191200.Google Scholar
Furet, J-P, Firmesse, O, Gourmelon, M, Bridonneau, C, Tap, J, Mondot, S, Doré, J and Corthier, G (2009). Comparative assessment of human and farm animal faecal microbiota using real-time quantitative PCR. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 68: 351362.Google Scholar
Garner, HE, Moore, JN, Johnson, JH, Clark, L, Amend, JF, Tritschler, LG, Coffmann, JR, Sprouse, RF, Hutcheson, DP and Salem, CA (1978). Changes in the caecal flora associated with the onset of laminitis. Equine Veterinary Journal 10: 249252.Google Scholar
Garrett, LA, Brown, R and Poxton, IR (2002). A comparative study of the intestinal microbiota of healthy horses and those suffering from equine grass sickness. Veterinary Microbiology 87: 8188.Google Scholar
Gough, E, Shaikh, H and Manges, AR (2011). Systematic review of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecal bacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases 53: 994–1002.Google Scholar
Grønvold, A-MR, L'abée-Lund, TM, Sørum, H, Skancke, E, Yannarell, AC and Mackie, RI (2010). Changes in fecal microbiota of healthy dogs administered amoxicillin. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 71: 313326.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, A, Båverud, V, Franklin, A, Gunnarsson, A, Ogren, G and Ingvast-Larsson, C (1999). Repeated administration of trimethoprim/sulfadiazine in the horse–pharmacokinetics, plasma protein binding and influence on the intestinal microflora. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 22: 2026.Google Scholar
Hastie, PM, Mitchell, K and Murray, J-AMD (2008). Semi-quantitative analysis of Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Streptococcus bovis in the equine large intestine using real-time polymerase chain reaction. British Journal of Nutrition 100: 561568.Google Scholar
Hudson, JM, Cohen, ND, Gibbs, PG and Thompson, JA (2001). Feeding practices associated with colic in horses. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 219: 14191425.Google Scholar
Kim, LM, Morley, PS, Traub-Dargatz, JL, Salman, MD and Gentry-Weeks, C (2001). Factors associated with Salmonella shedding among equine colic patients at a veterinary teaching hospital. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 218: 740748.Google Scholar
Mackie, RI and Wilkins, CA (1988). Enumeration of anaerobic bacterial microflora of the equine gastrointestinal tract. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 54: 21552160.Google Scholar
Mcgorum, BC, Dixon, PM and Smith, DG (1998). Use of metronidazole in equine acute idiopathic toxaemic colitis. The Veterinary Record 142: 635638.Google Scholar
Milinovich, GJ, Burrell, PC, Pollitt, CC, Klieve, AV, Blackall, LL, Ouwerkerk, D, Woodland, E and Trott, DJ (2008). Microbial ecology of the equine hindgut during oligofructose-induced laminitis. ISME Journal 2: 10891100.Google Scholar
Milinovich, GJ, Trott, DJ, Burrell, PC, Croser, EL, Al Jassim, RAMMorton, JMVan Eps, AW and Pollitt, CC (2007). Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of hindgut bacteria associated with the development of equine laminitis. Environmental Microbiology 9: 20902100.Google Scholar
Milinovich, GJ, Trott, DJ, Burrell, PC, Van Eps, AW, Thoefner, MB, Blackall, LL, Al Jassim, RAM, Morton, JM and Pollitt, CC (2006). Changes in equine hindgut bacterial populations during oligofructose-induced laminitis. Environmental Microbiology 8: 885898.Google Scholar
Morris, DD, Moore, JN and Ward, S (1989). Comparison of age, sex, breed, history and management in 229 horses with colic. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement June (7): 129132.Google Scholar
Muhonen, S, Julliand, V, Lindberg, JE, Bertilsson, J and Jansson, A (2009). Effects on the equine colon ecosystem of grass silage and haylage diets after an abrupt change from hay. Journal of Animal Science 87: 22912298.Google Scholar
O'sullivan, DJ (2000). Methods for analysis of the intestinal microflora. Current Issues in Intestinal Microbiology 1: 3950.Google Scholar
Parraga, ME, Spier, SJ, Thurmond, M and Hirsh, D (1997). A clinical trial of probiotic administration for prevention of Salmonella shedding in the postoperative period in horses with colic. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 11: 3641.Google Scholar
Perkins, GA, Den Bakker, HC, Burton, AJ, Erb, HN, Mcdonough, SP, Mcdonough, PL, Parker, J, Rosenthal, RL, Wiedmann, M, Dowd, SE and Simpson, KW (2012). The equine stomach harbors an abundant and diverse mucosal microbiota. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78: 25222532.Google Scholar
Respondek, F, Goachet, AG and Julliand, V (2008). Effects of dietary short-chain fructooligosaccharides on the intestinal microflora of horses subjected to a sudden change in diet. Journal of Animal Science 86: 316323.Google Scholar
Schoster, A, Arroyo, LG, Staempfli, HR, Shewen, PE, Sigismondo, L, Reid-Smith, R, Janecko, N and Weese, JS (2011). Longitudinal study of Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella and Escherichia coli in healthy horses. In Annual Forum of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Sekirov, I, Russell, SL, Antunes, LCM and Finlay, BB (2010). Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiological Reviews 90: 859904.Google Scholar
Shepherd, ML, Swecker, WS, Jensen, RV and Ponder, MA (2012). Characterization of the fecal bacteria communities of forage-fed horses by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA V4 gene amplicons. FEMS Microbiology Letters 326: 6268.Google Scholar
Staempfli, HR, Prescott, JF, Carman, RJ and Mccutcheon, LJ (1992). Use of bacitracin in the prevention and treatment of experimentally-induced idiopathic colitis in horses. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 56: 233236.Google Scholar
Suchodolski, JS, Ruaux, CG, Steiner, JM, Fetz, K and Williams, DA (2005). Assessment of the qualitative variation in bacterial microflora among compartments of the intestinal tract of dogs by use of a molecular fingerprinting technique. American Journal of Veterinary Research 66: 15561562.Google Scholar
Varloud, M, Fonty, G, Roussel, A, Guyonvarch, A and Julliand, V (2007). Postprandial kinetics of some biotic and abiotic characteristics of the gastric ecosystem of horses fed a pelleted concentrate meal. Journal of Animal Science 85: 25082516.Google Scholar
Weese, JS (2002). Microbiologic evaluation of commercial probiotics. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 220: 794797.Google Scholar
Weese, JS and Martin, H (2011). Assessment of commercial probiotic bacterial contents and label accuracy. Canadian Veterinary Journal 52: 4346.Google Scholar
Weese, JS and Rousseau, J (2005). Evaluation of Lactobacillus pentosus WE7 for prevention of diarrhea in neonatal foals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226: 20312034.Google Scholar
White, G and Prior, SD (1982). Comparative effects of oral administration of trimethoprim/sulphadiazine or oxytetracycline on the faecal flora of horses. Veterinary Record 111: 316318.Google Scholar
Willing, B, Vörös, A, Roos, S, Jones, C, Jansson, A and Lindberg, JE (2009). Changes in faecal bacteria associated with concentrate and forage-only diets fed to horses in training. Equine Veterinary Journal 41: 908914.Google Scholar
Zoetendal, EG, Rajilic-Stojanovic, M and De Vos, WM (2008). High-throughput diversity and functionality analysis of the gastrointestinal tract microbiota. Gut 57: 16051615.Google Scholar