Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:37:16.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agrilus sulcicollis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), a new alien species in North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Eduard Jendek  and
Vasily V. Grebennikov
Eduard Jendek*
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Laboratory, Ottawa Plant and Seed Laboratories, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, K. W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Vasily V. Grebennikov
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Laboratory, Ottawa Plant and Seed Laboratories, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, K. W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: jendeke@agr.gc.ca).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The European oak borer, Agrilus sulcicollis Lacordaire, a newly detected alien species in Canada, is reported from southern Ontario. This species is illustrated and diagnosed to facilitate its recognition among other North American species of Agrilus Curtis. Data are provided on its phylogenetic affinities, host plants, native distribution, and all North American records known to date. The other eight non-native Agrilus species known in North America (A. cuprescens (Ménétriés), A. cyanescens Ratzeburg, A. derasofasciatus Lacordaire, A. hyperici (Creutzer), A. pilosovittatus Saunders, A. planipennis Fairmaire, A. sinuatus (Olivier), and A. subrobustus Saunders) are briefly discussed.

Résumé

L’agrile européen du chêne, Agrilus sulcicollis Lacordaire, une espèce étrangère retrouvée récemment au Canada, est signalé dans le sud de l’Ontario. Nous présentons des illustrations et des diagnoses pour faciliter son identification parmi les autres Agrilus Curtis d’Amérique du Nord. Nous fournissons aussi des informations sur ses affinités phylogénétiques, ses plantes hôtes, sa répartition d’origine et l’ensemble des récoltes connues à ce jour en Amérique du Nord. Nous discutons brièvement des huit autres espèces non indigènes d’Agrilus retrouvées en Amérique du Nord (A. cuprescens (Ménétriés), A. cyanescens Ratzeburg, A. derasofasciatus Lacordaire, A. hyperici (Creutzer), A. pilosovittatus Saunders, A. planipennis Fairmaire, A. sinuatus (Olivier) et A. subrobustus Saunders).

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 141 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 236 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexeev, A.V. 1981. Opredelitel' lichinok zlatok roda Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera, Buprestidae) evropeiskoi chasti SSSR. Sbornik Trudov Zoologicheskovo Muzeya MGU, 19: 65–84.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1894. A new pear insect. Insect Life, 7: 258–260.Google Scholar
Baudyš, E. 1940. Agrilus derasofasciatus Lac. ve větvích Pistacia terebinthus L. [Agrilus derasofasciatus Lac. in branches of Pistacia terebinthus L.] Časopis České Společnosti Entomologické, 37: 27–28.Google Scholar
Bellamy, C.L. 2008. World catalogue and bibliography of the jewel beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Vol. 4. Agrilinae: Agrilina through Trachyini. Pensoft Series Faunistica No. 79, Pensoft Publishers, Sofia and Moscow. pp. 1932–2684.Google Scholar
Bílý, S. 2002. Summary of the bionomy of the buprestid beetles of Central Europe (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, Supplement 10. pp. 1–104, 16 col. pls.Google Scholar
Brechtel, F., and Kostenbader, H. 2002. Die Prachtund Hirschkäfer Baden-Württembergs. Verlag E. Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
Campbell, C.L., and McCaffrey, J.P. 1991. Population trends, seasonal phenology, and impact of Chrysolina quadrigemina, C. hyperici (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and Agrilus hyperici (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) associated with Hypericum perforatum in northern Idaho. Environmental Entomology, 20: 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, T.W. 2008. New insect evidence in continuing oak mortality. File code 3420, 4 August 2008. [online]. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Pacific Southwest Region. Available from http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/spf/fhp/socal/CnfOakMortalityBE080408.pdf [accessed 2.November 2008].Google Scholar
Curletti, G. 1994. I Buprestidi d'ltalia: catalogo tassonomico, sinonimico, biologico, geonemico. Monografie di Natura Bresciana, No. 19.Google Scholar
Evenhuis, N.L. 2009. Abbreviations for insect and spider collections of the world [online]. Available from http://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/codens/codensinst.html [accessed 19 February 2009].Google Scholar
Frost, S.W. 1922. Occurence of Agrilus coeruleus Rossi in America. The Canadian Entomologist, 54: 96.Google Scholar
Haack, R.A. 2003. Exotics, exotics, exotics: newly detected bark and wood boring beetles in the U.S. Newsletter of the Michigan Entomological Society, 48: 16–17.Google Scholar
Haack, R.A., Jendek, E., Liu, H.-P., Marchant, K.R., Petrice, T.R., Poland, T.M., and Ye, H. 2002. The emerald ash borer: a new exotic pest in North America. Newsletter of the Michigan Entomological Society, 47: 1–5.Google Scholar
Hartmann, G. 1996. Ursachenanalyse des Eichensterbens in Deutschland — Versuch einer Synthese bisheriger Befunde. Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Berlin-Dahlem, 318: 125–151.Google Scholar
Hespenheide, H.A. 1968. An immigrant Agrilus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Entomological News, 79(3): 76–80.Google Scholar
Hoebeke, E.R. 1980. A buprestid beetle, Agrilus derasofasciatus, detected in New York. United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative Plant Pest Report No. 5(33). p. 627.Google Scholar
Jendek, E. 2006. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Sarawakita Obenberger and Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae). Zootaxa, 1153: 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacordaire, M.T. 1835. Faune entomologique des environs de Paris, ou espèces général des insectes qui se trouvent dans un rayon de quinze a vingt lieues aux alentours de Paris. Tome premier [the volume on beetles]. Edited by Boisduval, J.B.A. and Lacordaire, M.T.. Méquignon-Marvis, Paris, 5 pp. [unpaginated], 17 pp., I–CII pp., pp. 103–696 + 3pls.Google Scholar
Malkin, B. 1941. A European buprestid in the United States. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society, 36: 132.Google Scholar
Mannerheim, C.G. von. 1837. Enumération des Buprestides, et description de quelques nouvelles espèces de cette tribu de la familledes Sternoxes, de la collection de M. le Comte Mannerheim. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 8: 1–126.Google Scholar
Mühle, H. 2003. Taiwanese buprestids (Coleoptera, Buprestidae). Journal of the Zoological Society Wallacea, 1: 43–48.Google Scholar
Niehuis, M. 2004. Die Prachtkäfer in Rheinland-Pfalz und im Saarland. Zugleich Beiheft 31 der Schriftenreihe “Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz”. Gesellschaft für Naturschutz und Ornithologie Rheinland-Pfalz e. V., Landau, Germany.Google Scholar
Niehuis, M., and Tezcan, S. 1993. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Agrilus-Arten der Türkei (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Mitteilungen des Internationalen Entomologischen Vereins, 18: 1–74.Google Scholar
Oszako, T. 1992. Relationship between tree vitality and fungal infections. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Recent Advances in Studies on Oak Decline, Brindisi, Italy, 13–18 September 1992. Edited by Luisi, N., Lerario, P., and Vanini, A.. Universidade de Bari, Bari. pp. 213–221.Google Scholar
Ratzeburg, J.T.C. 1837. Die Forst-Insecten oder Abbildung und Beschreibung der in den Wäldern Preufsens und der Nachbarstaaten als schädlich oder nützlich bekannt gewordenen Insekten. In systematischer Folge und mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Vertilgung der Schädlichen. Erster Theil. Die Käfer. Nicolai Buchhandlung, Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin.Google Scholar
Rikhter, A.A. 1950. 6. Semeistvo Buprestidae. In Opredelitel' nasekomykh, povrezhdayushchykh derev'ya i kustarniki polezashchitnykh polos. Opredelitel' po faune SSSR, izdavaemye Zoologicheskim Institutom Akademii Nauk SSSR. Edited by Bei-Bienko, G.Y.. Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moscow and Leningrad. pp. 152–165.Google Scholar
Schimitschek, E. 1944. Forstinsekten der Türkei und ihre Umwelt. Grundlagen der türkischen Forstentomologie. Volk und Reich Verlag Prag, Amsterdam, Berlin, and Vienna.Google Scholar
Stumpf, W., Stumpf, Y., and Hartmann, M. 2001. Lebensweise und Verbreitung der Prachtkäfergattungen Coraebus Gory & Laporte, 1839 und Agrilus Curtis, 1825 in Thüringen (Coleoptera, Bupretidae [sic]). Thüringen Faunistische Abhandlungen, 8: 185–214.Google Scholar
Szontagh, P. 1987. Die Rolle der Insektengradation im Verlauf der Krankheiten von Trauben-eichenbeständen. Österreichische Forstzeitung, 98: 19–38.Google Scholar
Weiss, H.B. 1914. Notes on three imported insects occurring in New Jersey. Journal of Economic Entomology, 7: 250–251.Google Scholar
Wellso, S.G., and Jackman, J.A. 2006. A new species of Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) Reitter (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and new North American buprestid distributional and host records. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 82: 262–268.Google Scholar
Westcott, R.L. 2007. The exotic Agrilus subrobustus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) is found in northern Georgia. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 61: 111–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar