Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:00:19.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Competence, reflective equilibrium, and dual-system theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Wesley Buckwalter
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY 10016-4309. jbuckwalter@gc.cuny.eduhttps://wfs.gc.cuny.edu/JBuckwalter/index.html
Stephen Stich
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1107. sstich@ruccs.rutgers.eduhttp://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~stich/

Abstract

A critique of inferences from “is” to “ought” plays a central role in Elqayam & Evans' (E&E's) defense of descriptivism. However, the reflective equilibrium strategy described by Goodman and embraced by Rawls, Cohen, and many others poses an important challenge to that critique. Dual-system theories may help respond to that challenge.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cohen, L. J. (1981) Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:317–70.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1965) Fact, fiction, and forecast. Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1999) Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Elrbaum.Google Scholar
Stich, S. (1981) Inferential competence: Right you are if you think you are. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4(3):353–54.Google Scholar
Stich, S. (1990) The fragmentation of reason: Preface to a pragmatic theory of cognitive evaluation. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stich, S. (2001) Plato's method meets cognitive science. Free Inquiry 21(2):3638.Google Scholar