Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T21:10:35.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identifying ‘at risk’ women and the impact of maternal obesity on National Health Service maternity services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2011

Nicola Heslehurst*
Affiliation:
Health and Social Care Institute, Parkside West Offices, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3NN, UK
*
Corresponding author: Dr Nicola Heslehurst, fax +44 1642 342758, email n.heslehurst@tees.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Obesity is a public health concern worldwide, arising from multifaceted and complex causes that relate to individual choice and lifestyle, and the influences of wider society. In addition to a long-standing focus on both childhood and adult obesity, there has been more recent concern relating to maternal obesity. This review explores the published evidence relating to maternal obesity incidence and associated inequalities, the impact of obesity on maternity services, and associated guidelines. Epidemiological data comprising three national maternal obesity datasets within the UK have identified a significant increase in maternal obesity in recent years, and reflect broad socio-demographic inequalities particularly deprivation, ethnicity and unemployment. Obese pregnancies present increased risk of complications that require more resource intensive antenatal and perinatal care, such as caesarean deliveries, gestational diabetes, haemorrhage, infections and congenital anomalies. Healthcare professionals also face difficulties when managing the care of women in pregnancy as obesity is an emotive and stigmatising topic. There is a lack of good-quality evidence for effective interventions to tackle maternal obesity. Recently published national guidelines for the clinical management and weight management of maternal obesity offer advice for professionals, but acknowledge the limitations of the evidence base. The consequence of these difficulties is an absence of support services available for women. Further evaluative research is thus required to assess the effectiveness of interventions with women before, during and after pregnancy. Qualitative work with women will also be needed to help inform the development of more sensitive risk communication and women-centred services.

Type
70th Anniversary Conference on ‘Nutrition and health: from conception to adolescence’
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2011

Abbreviation:
CMACE

Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries

Determinants of obesity

Obesity is a growing public health concern in most developed countries worldwide. The WHO estimates that at least 300 million people worldwide are obese(1). Obesity arises from multifaceted and complex causes. The Foresight report ‘Tackling Obesity: Future Choices’ broadly groups the determinants of obesity as being physiological factors, eating habits, activity levels and psychosocial influences(1). There is also a strong emphasis within the report on the wider societal influences on the increasing levels of obesity seen today, over and above personal responsibility(1). The authors argue that advances in technology have exceeded human evolution, leading to inevitable weight gain through exposure to modern lifestyles:

‘People in the UK today don't have less willpower and are not more gluttonous than previous generations. Nor is their biology significantly different to that of their forefathers. Society, however, has radically altered over the past five decades, with major changes in work patterns, transport, food production and food sales. These changes have exposed an underlying biological tendency, possessed by many people, to both put on weight and retain it’(1)

Increasing national focus on maternal obesity in the UK

There has been an increasing public health focus on obesity over the past two decades within the UK. The primary focus within this time frame has been tackling childhood obesity, a known pre-cursor to adult obesity. This is seen with the ‘Choosing Health’ White Paper, which stated that ‘halting the growth in childhood obesity is our prime objective’(2). Healthy lifestyles for children and young people were considered a priority, with potential interventions targeted towards families and schools(2). Maternity services were also featured within the children and young people chapter of the white paper in relation to smoking during pregnancy, domestic violence and teenage pregnancy. However, maternal obesity was not identified as a priority and was therefore absent from the white paper's objectives.

In recent years, there has been an elevated interest in maternal obesity in the UK. The Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE) recently described maternal obesity as ‘arguably the biggest challenge facing maternity services today. It is a challenge not only because of the magnitude of the problem … but also because of the impact that obesity has on women's reproductive health and that of their babies’(3).

The recent concern over maternal obesity is not surprising considering the increased national focus on the topic over the past decade. Maternal obesity has featured in over twenty national reports and guidelines within the UK since 2003 (Table 1), the earliest of which was the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Antenatal Care Guidelines for Healthy Pregnancies published in 2003(4). These guidelines acknowledged that women who were obese at their booking appointment would require additional care outside of the guidelines (defined as a BMI >35 kg/m2). However, there was no indication within these guidelines as to what the additional care requirements were(4). Since the publication of these guidelines maternal obesity has increasingly been included in national guidelines and reports including those published by National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence(510); the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists(11, 12) and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and CMACE(13). National reports have included those published by Foresight(1) and by the Department of Health(14). CMACE (formerly the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health) also began the regular publication of maternal obesity statistics within their maternal and perinatal mortality reports in 2004 and 2007, respectively(1521), and published a dedicated report on obesity in pregnancy in 2010(3).

Table 1. The increasing focus on maternal obesity among national reports and guidelines within the UK

NICE, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; CEMACH, Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health; DH, Department of Health; RCOG, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; DH, Department of Health; CMACE, Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries.

Although numerous guidelines and reports have included reference to maternal obesity, there was an absence of maternal obesity-specific guidelines prior to 2010. In this year, CMACE and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist published joint clinical guidelines for the management of obesity in pregnancy(13); and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence published public health guidelines for weight management before, during and after pregnancy(10). The recent publication of these guidelines offers long-awaited advice for maternity services, public health services and healthcare professionals for the management of maternal obesity and support for women, which had been described as being ad hoc and inconsistent(Reference Heslehurst, Lang and Rankin22). However, the guidelines also acknowledge the limitations of the evidence on which they are based due to a lack of good-quality UK evidence on effectiveness of maternal obesity interventions(10). Current UK guidelines for maternal obesity also do not include recommendations for appropriate gestational weight gain for women who are obese before pregnancy. The lack of guidelines for gestational weight gain has been highlighted by health care professionals in the UK as a barrier to consistent practice(Reference Heslehurst, Moore and Rankin23). The Institute of Medicine in the US recently updated their guidelines for gestational weight gain according to early pregnancy BMI status(24), originally published in 1990(25). These guidelines state that women who are obese during pregnancy should gain between 5 and 9 kg over the course of their pregnancy (0·5–2 kg in trimester 1 and 0·22 kg/week in trimesters 2 and 3)(24). However, there has been criticism of the appropriateness of using observational evidence to develop gestational weight gain guidelines, and that the translation of observational evidence to intended weight gain restriction may not produce equivalent benefits(Reference Poston, Harthoon and Van der Beek26). The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence have called for further research in the UK to explore the appropriateness of these guidelines for UK populations(10).

Defining maternal obesity

Despite the recent increased focus on maternal obesity, there are no internationally agreed definitions for clinically ‘diagnosing’ maternal weight status and associated risks. Maternal BMI is most frequently used in international research and guidelines to determine weight status, including UK guidelines(10, 13). However, there are no evidence-based BMI categories specifically for use in pregnancy to determine risk, and the WHO BMI categories for the general population are usually used. The WHO categories are: BMI >30 kg/m2 to define obesity; and sub-classifications of moderate obesity (BMI 30·0–34·9 kg/m2), severe obesity (BMI 35·0–39·9 kg/m2) and morbid obesity (BMI >40·0 kg/m2)(27). These measurements are applied to early pregnancy as a proxy for pre-pregnancy weight status, as evidence shows that there is minimal weight gain in the first trimester of pregnancy(Reference Abrams, Carmichael and Selvin28, Reference Carmichael, Abrams and Selvin29). The majority of the evidence-base for obesity-associated risks is also based on early pregnancy BMI classified according to the WHO definitions due to difficulties in ascertaining accurate pre-pregnancy BMI.

As BMI was developed based on evidence of risk among a non-pregnant population, there are limitations to its use in later stages of pregnancy. During pregnancy there is a naturally incurred weight gain, which includes the weight of the fetus, fluids and the placenta in addition to fat mass(10), and there is no evidence to determine what a ‘healthy’ or ‘unhealthy’ BMI is when this weight gain is taken into consideration. Current UK guidelines state that weight and height should be measured at the booking appointment (the first antenatal appointment with a healthcare professional), and it is this early pregnancy measurement on which subsequent recommendations in the guidelines are made(7, 10, 13).

In the UK, an additional BMI category is often used, which is not an internationally agreed definition. Women with a booking BMI >50 kg/m2 are considered to have a significantly increased risk during pregnancy. This has been defined as ‘super morbid obesity’ or ‘extreme obesity’ in the absence of an internationally agreed definition(13, Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30, Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31).

UK population trends in maternal obesity

For a number of years, healthcare professionals working in maternity services have reported an increasing trend towards obesity in early pregnancy. However, there has been a long-standing absence of national data to support these anecdotal claims. The Health Survey for England has shown that obesity among women of childbearing age has been increasing over time(32). Published data from local maternity units have also shown an increasing trend towards maternal obesity in regions of Middlesbrough in England(Reference Heslehurst, Ells and Simpson33), Glasgow in Scotland(Reference Kanagalingam, Forouhi and Greer34) and Cardiff in Wales(Reference Usha Kiran, Hemmadi and Bethel35) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. A comparison of published local maternal obesity data(Reference Heslehurst, Ells and Simpson33Reference Usha Kiran, Hemmadi and Bethel35) and Health Survey for England (HSE) data(32).

In 2010, three national-level maternal obesity datasets were published in the UK; one retrospective study and two prospective studies (Table 2). Heslehurst et al.(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30) carried out retrospective analysis of routinely collected electronic data from maternity units in England. This longitudinal dataset identified a significant increase in first-trimester maternal obesity (defined as BMI >30 kg/m2) over two decades(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30). By 2007, the incidence of maternal obesity within this population had doubled to 15·6% from 7·6% in 1989. Two-thirds of women who were classified as obese during pregnancy were moderately obese (BMI 30·0–34·9 kg/m2), and the incidence was shown to decrease as the category of obesity increased(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Trends in maternal obesity subgroups in England. Data from Heslehurst et al.(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30).

Table 2. National data on maternal obesity in the UK

CMACE, Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries; UKOSS, UK Obstetric Surveillance System.

CMACE(3) carried out a prospective cohort study, using a notification system. Maternity units throughout the UK completed notification forms for all women meeting the eligibility criteria. This study identified a similar trend for decreasing obesity incidence as the level of obesity increased (Table 2). The CMACE dataset also identified UK regional differences in maternal obesity, with Wales and the Crown Dependencies having the highest incidence of obesity (6·5% and 6·2%, respectively), whereas England had the lowest (4·9%)(3). Knight et al.(Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31) also carried out a prospective cohort study. This study identified women with extreme obesity BMI >50 kg/m2 through the UK Obstetric Surveillance System, which represents 100% of all births in the 226 eligible UK hospitals(Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31), showing similar results (Table 2).

Maternal obesity and associated inequalities

Obesity in the UK general population is associated with broad socio-demographic inequalities(1). Maternal obesity largely reflects these inequalities, particularly relating to deprivation, ethnic group and unemployment(3, Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30, Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31).

National data have identified a significant association between area of residence deprivation and maternal obesity(3, Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30). These studies categorised area of residence deprivation using Index of Multiple Deprivation scores for maternal postcode, mapped to quintiles for England. The quintiles ranged from least deprived to most deprived areas of residence, according to multiple determinants (including the level of income deprivation, employment deprivation, health deprivation and disability, education, skills and training deprivation, barriers to housing and services, living environment deprivation and crime)(36).

Following adjustment for potential socio-demographic confounders, Heslehurst et al. identified that obese women in England were more than twice as likely to be living in areas of most deprivation compared with those women living in areas of least deprivation(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30). This association increased as the obesity classification increased, and women with extreme obesity were almost five times as likely to be living in areas of most deprivation compared with least deprivation (Table 3). The CMACE dataset also identified an over-representation of obese pregnant women residing in areas of most deprivation compared with all pregnant women in England (P<0·0001)(3) (Table 3).

Table 3. Association between maternal obesity and residing in areas of most deprivation in England according to the index of multiple deprivation

AOR, adjusted OR; CMACE, Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries.

* Baseline data: least deprived quintile.

Adjusted for age, parity, ethnic group and employment.

England only data. Per cent compared with deprivation among all maternities in England according to the Office of National Statistics: 15·7% (least deprived quintile), 27·6% (most deprived quintile).

Two of the national datasets also explored the relationship between maternal employment and obesity(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30, Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31). Heslehurst et al. identified that obese women were more likely to be employed compared with the other employment categories explored (including unemployed, full-time housewife or carer, higher education or school age/in education under 18 years)(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30). However, analysis within obesity classifications revealed that women with extreme obesity were significantly more likely to be unemployed; and women with extreme or morbid obesity were significantly more likely to be full-time housewives or carers (Table 4). Knight et al. also identified that women with extreme obesity were significantly more likely to be in non-managerial or professional employment(Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31) (Table 4).

Table 4. Association between maternal obesity and employment status in England, and the UK

* OR adjusted for age, parity, ethnic group and area of residence deprivation.

All three national datasets reported the relationship between maternal obesity and ethnic group(3, Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30, Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31). Heslehurst et al. reported that Black women were significantly more likely to be obese in pregnancy (BMI >30 kg/m2) compared with White women; whereas all other ethnic groups were significantly less likely to be obese compared with White women(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30) (Table 5). Analysis within obesity classifications identified that this relationship with Black ethnic group was significant for moderate obesity adjusted OR (AOR) 1·95, 95% CI 1·85, 2·06), severe obesity (AOR 1·60, 95% CI 1·47, 1·74) and morbid obesity (AOR 1·51, 95% CI 1·34, 1·72)(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30). Although the odds remained increased for extreme obesity, this was no longer significant (AOR 1·45, 95% CI 0·96, 2·18)(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30). Knight et al. reported similar findings for ethnic group and extreme obesity (BMI >50 kg/m2), where White women were significantly more likely to have a BMI >50 kg/m2 compared with Black and Minority Ethnic Groups(Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31). CMACE also reported a significantly reduced proportion of non-white women among their obese cohort in comparison with all maternities in England(3) (Table 5).

Table 5. Association between maternal obesity and ethnic group in England, and the UK

AOR, adjusted OR; BME, Black and Minority Ethnic; CMACE, Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries.

* Adjusted for age, parity, employment and area of residence deprivation.

Maternal obesity is significantly associated with increasing maternal age (Table 6). Increasing maternal age was found to be significant for all BMI groups following adjustment for confounding socio-demographic variables by Heslehurst et al.(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30), with extreme obesity showing the strongest relationship. CMACE reported a decreased association with maternal age below 20 years for all obesity categories, and an increased association with maternal age over 35 for both morbid and extreme obesity categories(3). The strongest relationship was again shown for women within the extreme obesity group. A similar trend was reported by Knight et al., who identified that maternal age below 20 years was significantly negatively associated with extreme obesity(Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31). This study also identified a relationship between maternal age over 35 and extreme obesity; however, this was not statistically significant(Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31) (Table 6).

Table 6. Association between maternal obesity and maternal age in England, and the UK

CMACE, Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries.

* Adjusted for parity, ethnic group, employment and deprivation.

Percent compared with age group among all maternities in England according to the Office of National Statistics: 6·3% (younger tan 20 years), 73·7% (20–34 years), 20% (35 or older).

A significant relationship between increasing parity and maternal obesity was reported by Heslehurst et al. for all obesity classifications with the exception of extreme obesity(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30) (Table 7). Knight et al. found a significant relationship between extreme obesity and a parity of 3 or more compared with a parity of 0, but no significance for a parity of 1–2(Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31) (Table 7).

Table 7. Association between maternal obesity and parity in England, and the UK

AOR, adjusted OR.

* Adjusted for age, ethnic group, area of residence deprivation and employment.

Maternal obesity complications and the impact on maternity services

Obese pregnancies present increased risk of complications, with multiple long- and short-term adverse health implications for both women and their infants. Maternal implications include mortality(Reference Lewis16), cardiac disease(Reference Lewis16), spontaneous first trimester and recurrent miscarriage(Reference Lewis16, Reference Tennant, Rankin and Bell37, Reference Lashen, Fear and Sturdee38), pre-eclampsia(Reference Lewis16, Reference O'Brien, Ray and Chan39, Reference Rajasingam, Seed and Briley40), gestational diabetes (and subsequent development of type 2 diabetes)(Reference Lewis16, Reference Torloni, Betrán and Horta41), thromboembolism(Reference Lewis16), caesarean and instrumental deliveries(Reference Rajasingam, Seed and Briley40, Reference Heslehurst, Simpson and Ells42, Reference Poobalan, Aucott and Gurung43), induction of labour and failure to progress(Reference Heslehurst, Simpson and Ells42), infections(Reference Lewis16, Reference Heslehurst, Simpson and Ells42) and postpartum haemorrhage(Reference Lewis16, Reference Heslehurst, Simpson and Ells42). Implications for the infant include low breast-feeding rates(Reference Lewis16), stillbirth and neonatal death(18, Reference Tennant, Rankin and Bell37), congenital anomalies(18, Reference Stothard, Tennant and Bell44, Reference Rankin, Tennant and Stothard45), low- and high-birth weight(Reference Rajasingam, Seed and Briley40, Reference Heslehurst, Simpson and Ells42), sub-optimal gestational age (both prematurity and postdate)(18, Reference Rajasingam, Seed and Briley40, Reference Heslehurst, Simpson and Ells42, Reference Torloni, Betran and Daher46), fetal distress(Reference Heslehurst, Simpson and Ells42) and neonatal intensive care(3, Reference Heslehurst, Simpson and Ells42). Maternal weight status is also thought to influence the development of childhood obesity, and subsequent adult obesity through fetal exposure to maternal obesity influencing appetite, metabolism and activity levels(Reference Oken and Gillman47Reference Parsons, Power and Manor49). However, more robust evidence is required to support this fetal programming theory(Reference Poston, Harthoon and Van der Beek26).

Although these numerous adverse outcomes have a significant impact on maternal and infant health, the prevention and management of such complications also require more resource intensive maternity care. Some of the additional resource requirements are straightforward to quantify, such as induction of labour, mode of delivery and intensive care use. These outcomes alone have a high impact on maternity service resources, and all have a significant association with maternal obesity (Table 8).

Table 8. Association between maternal obesity and pregnancy outcomes with a high impact on maternity services

AOR, adjusted OR; CMACE, Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries.

* Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Adjusted for age, socio-economic group, parity, ethnicity, and smoking.

Maternal Intensive Care Unit.

§ All maternities in England obtained from the Hospital Episode Statistics.

However, there are also additional resource implications that are more problematic to determine. Healthcare professionals have reported difficulties with ultrasonography and external electronic fetal monitoring when mothers are obese, due to excess adipose tissue limiting the capabilities of these methods of assessment(Reference Heslehurst, Lang and Rankin22, Reference Heslehurst, Moore and Rankin23, Reference Ramsay, Greer and Sattar50, Reference Chu, Bachman and Callaghan51). Therefore, the resource implications may be longer ultrasound scan appointments, repeated ultrasound scans and alternative screening and monitoring procedures such as serum screening for nuchal translucency or fetal scalp electrodes to monitor fetal heart rate(7, Reference Heslehurst, Lang and Rankin22, Reference Chu, Bachman and Callaghan51). There are also issues with equipment provision within maternity units that can restrict clinical practice. This is a particular issue when equipment has a maximum weight or expansion capacity, such as delivery beds, theatre tables, scales, blood pressure cuffs and spinal needles(Reference Heslehurst, Lang and Rankin22, Reference Ramsay, Greer and Sattar50, Reference Schmied, Duff and Dahlen52). Surgery and anaesthesia can also be more difficult technically, requiring more staff to be present during delivery, including multiple senior health care professionals(13, Reference Heslehurst, Lang and Rankin22, Reference Poston, Harthoon and Van der Beek26, Reference Ramsay, Greer and Sattar50).

Non-clinical implications for maternal obesity management among health care professionals

When considering the impact of maternal obesity management on maternity services, the non-clinical implications for healthcare professionals should also be considered. National guidelines state that women's BMI should be measured at booking, and an explanation given to women about why the measurement is being taken, how it will be used to plan their care and the risks associated with obesity in pregnancy(10). Although healthcare professionals understand their responsibility to explain potential risks and complications to women during pregnancy, this in itself is a difficult task(Reference Heslehurst, Moore and Rankin23). Obesity is an emotive and stigmatised topic(Reference Brown, Jones and Thompson53Reference Rogge, Greenwald and Golden55), and healthcare professionals have described their difficulties in broaching the topic with women during pregnancy(Reference Heslehurst, Lang and Rankin22, Reference Heslehurst, Moore and Rankin23, Reference Oteng-Ntim, Pheasant and Khazaezadeh56). Midwives have described their concerns about labelling women as obese, the need for more sensitive risk communication and apprehension about raising the issue due to past experiences of complaints from women(Reference Heslehurst, Lang and Rankin22, Reference Heslehurst, Moore and Rankin23, Reference Schmied, Duff and Dahlen52):

‘Sonographers will often say how to diplomatically talk to women saying “well actually I can't quite see that, the image is not so good when you've got a little bit of extra body weight” and the women complain … “what are you saying, I'm too fat?” but … we're being honest and saying “there are limitations to what this machine can tell you because of this”’ (Midwife)(Reference Heslehurst, Moore and Rankin23)

Obesity communication issues are also identified by obese pregnant women and non-pregnant obese patients. Healthcare professionals have been described by obese patients (including pregnant and non-pregnant populations) as being insulting, demeaning, discriminating, judgmental, blame-inducing, patronising and derogatory in their care(Reference Brown, Thompson and Tod57Reference Wiles, Wilkinson and Kitzinger61). Pregnant women have described avoiding confronting healthcare professionals about humiliating treatment relating to their obesity, due to the fear of jeopardising their maternity care(Reference Nyman, Prebensen and Flensner62). Avoidance is also reflected in the non-pregnant obese population, where previous negative experiences with healthcare professionals have led to patients avoiding or delaying seeking health care(Reference Heslehurst, Moore and Rankin23, Reference Brown, Thompson and Tod57, Reference Merrill and Grassley58).

‘When I was delivering my son … I think I weighed 215 pounds when he was born and I just felt huge … I can remember in the delivery room the doctor saying something to me … during the birthing process. He said, “Just relax and just envision yourself on a beach like a big ole whale beached” … That hurt me so much because already I felt big’. (Doris)(Reference Merrill and Grassley58)

Healthcare professionals' own weight concerns can also influence their discussions with pregnant women (and non-pregnant populations) about their weight, in both a positive and negative way(Reference Schmied, Duff and Dahlen52, Reference Brown and Thompson63).

‘Like I'm overweight. You know, how can I sit there and tell this lady about her weight when I'm overweight?’ (Midwife)(Reference Schmied, Duff and Dahlen52)

‘I've always found it's a little bit easier to address it when you are overweight than if you're this gorgeous skinny looking thing saying well you're a bit chubby there’ (Healthcare Professional Not Specified)(Reference Schmied, Duff and Dahlen52)

There is also a call from maternity service healthcare professionals for more support services for women as they feel they ‘can't do it alone’, with some midwives having concerns about increasing social stigma among women if they highlight the risks associated with maternal obesity without any support mechanisms in place(Reference Heslehurst, Moore and Rankin23, Reference Schmied, Duff and Dahlen52). The level of support required has been compared with antenatal smoking cessation services, where there has been more national-level support, resources and infrastructure to support healthcare professionals as well as women, which has raised awareness among healthcare professionals and their subsequent engagement with this aspect of care(Reference Heslehurst, Moore and Rankin23, Reference Oteng-Ntim, Pheasant and Khazaezadeh56).

Summary

National data within the UK have identified an increasing trend towards obesity among women of childbearing age, as well as within the pregnant population(Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30, 32). Data also suggest strong associations between maternal obesity and area of residence deprivation; and evidence of associations with unemployment, ethnic group, increasing maternal age and increasing parity for some obesity sub-groups(3, Reference Heslehurst, Rankin and Wilkinson30, Reference Knight, Kurinczuk and Spark31). However, there is a degree of variation between the datasets for some of these socio-demographic inequalities. Potential explanations for the differences observed could be the different BMI classifications used, data analysis methods such as adjustment for confounding variables, sample sizes and the comparison groups used in the studies.

The relationship between socio-demographic inequalities and maternal obesity is of paramount importance not only in relation to the need for public health intervention, but also more directly to the multiple associations between maternal inequalities and pregnancy risk. There is a wealth of evidence which equates maternal obesity with health implications for mothers and infants. These implications also have a direct impact on maternity services’ resources, and how well equipped they are to prevent and manage maternal obesity. Healthcare professionals face additional difficulties in communicating risk to obese pregnant women due to the sensitive and emotive nature of obesity.

Despite an increasing national focus on maternal obesity over the past decade, there remains an absence of good-quality evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to support women, and to manage obesity pre-conception, during pregnancy and postnatally. The consequence of the lack of evidence, in addition to the difficulties healthcare professionals face, is an absence of support services available for women. Further evaluative research is thus required to assess the effectiveness of interventions for women before, during and after pregnancy. More research is also required with obese women to help inform the development of more sensitive risk communication and women-centred services.

Acknowledgements

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

1.Foresight (2007) Tackling Obesities: Future Choices – Project Report. Government Office for Science, Department of Innovation Universities and Skills.Google Scholar
2.Department of Health (2004) Choosing Health – Making Healthy Choices Easier. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
3.Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE) (2010) Maternal Obesity in the UK: Findings from a National Project. London: CMACE.Google Scholar
4.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2003) Antenatal Care: Routine Care for the Healthy Pregnant Woman. London: RCOG.Google Scholar
5.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006) Obesity: the Prevention, Identification, Assessment and Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults and Children. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
6.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2007) Behaviour Change at Population, Community and Individual Levels. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
7.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008) Antenatal Care: Routine Care for the Healthy Pregnant Woman. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
8.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008) Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management of Diabetes and its Complications from Pre-Conception to the Postnatal Period. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
9.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008) Improving the Nutrition of Pregnant and Breastfeeding Mothers and Children in Low-Income Households. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
10.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2010) Weight Management Before, During and After Pregnancy. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
11.Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2006) Statement No. 4. Exercise in Pregnancy. London: RCOC.Google Scholar
12.Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2009) Green-top Guideline No. 37a. Reducing the Risk of Thrombosis and Embolism During Pregnancy and Puerperium. London: RCOC.Google Scholar
13.CMACE-RCOG (2010) Management of Women with Obesity in Pregnancy. Jointly published by the Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Google Scholar
14.Department of Health (2009) Healthy Child Programme: Pregnancy and the First Five Years of Life. London: DH/DCSF.Google Scholar
15.Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (2004) Why Mothers Die 2000–2002. London: RCOG.Google Scholar
16.Lewis, G (2007) The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer – 2003–2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH.Google Scholar
17.Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (2011) Saving Mothers’ Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–08. The eighth report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 118, Suppl. 1, 1203.Google Scholar
18.Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (2007) Perinatal Mortality 2005. London: CEMACH.Google Scholar
19.Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (2008) Perinatal Mortality 2006. London: CEMACH.Google Scholar
20.Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (2009) Perinatal Mortality 2007. London: CEMACH.Google Scholar
21.Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (2010) Perinatal Mortality 2008. London: CMACE.Google Scholar
22.Heslehurst, N, Lang, R, Rankin, J et al. (2007) Obesity in pregnancy: a study of the impact of maternal obesity on NHS maternity services. BJOG 114, 334342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Heslehurst, N, Moore, H, Rankin, J et al. (2010) How can maternity services be developed to effectively address maternal obesity? A qualitative study. Midwifery; doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.01.007. Epublication ahead of print.Google ScholarPubMed
24.Institute of Medicine (2009) Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Re-examining the Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
25.Institute of Medicine (1990) Nutrition During Pregnancy, Subcommittee on Nutritional Status and Weight Gain During Pregnancy. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
26.Poston, L, Harthoon, LF, Van der Beek, EM et al. . (2011) Obesity in pregnancy: implications for the mother and lifelong health of the child. A consensus statement. Pediatr Res 69, 175180.Google Scholar
27.World Health Organisation (2000) Obesity; Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
28.Abrams, B, Carmichael, S & Selvin, S (1995) Factors associated with the pattern of maternal weight gain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol 86, 170176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Carmichael, S, Abrams, B & Selvin, S (1997) The pattern of maternal weight gain in women with good pregnancy outcomes. Am J Public Health 87, 19841988.Google Scholar
30.Heslehurst, N, Rankin, J, Wilkinson, JR et al. (2010) A nationally representative study of maternal obesity in England, UK: trends in incidence and demographic inequalities in 619 323 births, 1989–2007. Int J Obes 34, 420428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Knight, M, Kurinczuk, JJ, Spark, P et al. (2010) Extreme obesity in pregnancy in the United Kingdom. Obstet Gynecol 115, 989997.Google Scholar
32.Information Centre (2009) Health Survey for England 2008. London: The Health and Social Care Information Centre.Google Scholar
33.Heslehurst, N, Ells, LJ, Simpson, H et al. (2007) Trends in maternal obesity incidence rates, demographic predictors, and health inequalities in 36 821 women over a 15-year period. BJOG 114, 187194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Kanagalingam, MG, Forouhi, NG, Greer, IA et al. (2005) Changes in booking body mass index over a decade: retrospective analysis from a Glasgow Maternity Hospital. BJOG 112, 14311433.Google Scholar
35.Usha Kiran, TS, Hemmadi, S, Bethel, J et al. (2005) Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index. BJOG 112, 768–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Index of Multiple Deprivation (2007) The English Indices of Deprivation. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
37.Tennant, PWG, Rankin, J & Bell, R (2011) Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal and infant death; a cohort study from the North of England. Hum Reprod. Epublication ahead of print.Google Scholar
38.Lashen, H, Fear, K & Sturdee, DW (2004) Obesity is associated with increased risk of first trimester and recurrent miscarriage: matched case-control study. Hum Reprod 19, 16441646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.O'Brien, TE, Ray, JG & Chan, WS (2003) Maternal body mass index and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic overview. Epidemiology 14, 368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Rajasingam, D, Seed, PT, Briley, AL et al. (2009) A prospective study of pregnancy outcome and biomarkers of oxidative stress in nulliparous obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200, 395.e1395.e9.Google Scholar
41.Torloni, MR, Betrán, AP, Horta, BL et al. (2008) Prepregnancy BMI and the risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Obes Rev 10, 194203.Google Scholar
42.Heslehurst, N, Simpson, H, Ells, LJ et al. (2008) The impact of maternal BMI status on pregnancy outcomes with immediate short-term obstetric resource implications: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev 9, 635683.Google Scholar
43.Poobalan, AS, Aucott, LS, Gurung, T et al. (2008) Obesity as an independent risk factor for elective and emergency caesarean delivery in nulliparous women – systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Obes Rev 10, 2835.Google Scholar
44.Stothard, KJ, Tennant, PWG, Bell, R et al. (2009) Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 301, 636650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Rankin, J, Tennant, P, Stothard, K et al. (2010) Maternal obesity and congenital anomaly risk: a cohort study. Int J Obes 34, 13711380.Google Scholar
46.Torloni, MR, Betran, AP, Daher, S et al. (2009) Maternal BMI and preterm birth: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 22, 957970.Google Scholar
47.Oken, E & Gillman, MW (2003) Fetal origins of obesity. Obes Res 11, 496506.Google Scholar
48.Oken, E (2009) Maternal and child obesity: the causal link. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 36, 361377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Parsons, TJ, Power, C & Manor, O (2001) Fetal and early life growth and body mass index from birth to early adulthood in 1958 British cohort: longitudinal study [see comment]. BMJ 323, 1331.Google Scholar
50.Ramsay, JE, Greer, I & Sattar, N (2006) Obesity and reproduction. BMJ 333, 11591162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51.Chu, SY, Bachman, DJ, Callaghan, WM et al. (2008) Association between obesity during pregnancy and increased use of health care. New Engl J Med 358, 1444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52.Schmied, VA, Duff, M, Dahlen, HG et al. (2010) ‘Not waving but drowning’: a study of the experiences and concerns of midwives and other health professionals caring for obese childbearing women. Midwifery; doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.02.010. Epublication ahead of print.Google ScholarPubMed
53.Brown, I, Jones, G, Thompson, J et al. (2006) Obesity stigma and quality of life. Int J Interdisciplinary Soc Sci 1, 169178.Google Scholar
54.Puhl, RM & Heuer, CA (2009) The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 17, 941964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55.Rogge, MM, Greenwald, M & Golden, A (2004) Obesity, stigma, and civilised oppression. Adv Nurs Sci 27, 301315.Google Scholar
56.Oteng-Ntim, E, Pheasant, H, Khazaezadeh, N et al. (2010) Developing a community-based maternal obesity intervention: a qualitative study of service providers’ views. BJOG 117, 16511655.Google Scholar
57.Brown, I, Thompson, J, Tod, AM et al. (2006) Primary care support for tackling obesity: a qualitative study of the perceptions of obese patients. Br J Gen Pract 56, 666672.Google ScholarPubMed
58.Merrill, E & Grassley, J (2008) Women's stories of their experiences as overweight patients. J Adv Nurs 64, 139146.Google Scholar
59.Wadden, TA & Didie, E (2003) What's in a name? patients' preferred terms for describing obesity. Obes Res 11, 11401146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60.Keenan, J & Stapleton, H (2010) Bonny babies? Motherhood and nurturing in the age of obesity. Health, Risk Soc 12, 369383.Google Scholar
61.Wiles, R (1994) I'm not fat, I'm pregnant. In Women and Health: Feminist Perspectives, pp. 3348 [Wilkinson, S and Kitzinger, C, editors]. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
62.Nyman, VMK, Prebensen, AK & Flensner, GEM (2010) Obese women's experiences of encounters with midwives and physicians during pregnancy and childbirth. Midwifery 26, 424429.Google Scholar
63.Brown, I & Thompson, J (2007) Primary care nurses' attitudes, beliefs, and own body size in relation to obesity management. J Adv Nurs 60, 535543.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. The increasing focus on maternal obesity among national reports and guidelines within the UK

Figure 1

Fig. 1. A comparison of published local maternal obesity data(3335) and Health Survey for England (HSE) data(32).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Trends in maternal obesity subgroups in England. Data from Heslehurst et al.(30).

Figure 3

Table 2. National data on maternal obesity in the UK

Figure 4

Table 3. Association between maternal obesity and residing in areas of most deprivation in England according to the index of multiple deprivation

Figure 5

Table 4. Association between maternal obesity and employment status in England, and the UK

Figure 6

Table 5. Association between maternal obesity and ethnic group in England, and the UK

Figure 7

Table 6. Association between maternal obesity and maternal age in England, and the UK

Figure 8

Table 7. Association between maternal obesity and parity in England, and the UK

Figure 9

Table 8. Association between maternal obesity and pregnancy outcomes with a high impact on maternity services