Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
VAN BERKEL, RIK
and
VAN DER AA, PAUL
2012.
Activation Work: Policy Programme Administration or Professional Service Provision?.
Journal of Social Policy,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 3,
p.
493.
Weston, Katharine
2012.
Debating conditionality for disability benefits recipients and welfare reform: Research evidence from Pathways to Work.
Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 5-6,
p.
514.
WRIGHT, SHARON
2013.
On ‘Activation Workers’ Perceptions’: A Reply to Dunn (2).
Journal of Social Policy,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 4,
p.
829.
Fletcher, Del Roy
2014.
The Bureaucrat and the Poor: Encounters in French Welfare Offices by VincentDuboisAldershot: Ashgate, 2010. ISBN 978‐1‐4094‐0289‐3; £55.00 (hbk)..
Social Policy & Administration,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 1,
p.
114.
Hoyle, Louise
2014.
‘I mean, obviously you're using your discretion’: Nurses Use of Discretion in Policy Implementation.
Social Policy and Society,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
189.
JESSEN, JORUNN THERESIA
and
TUFTE, PER ARNE
2014.
Discretionary Decision-Making in a Changing Context of Activation Policies and Welfare Reforms.
Journal of Social Policy,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 2,
p.
269.
Watson, Sara
2015.
Does Welfare Conditionality Reduce Democratic Participation?.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 5,
p.
645.
Alden, Sarah
2015.
Discretion on the Frontline: The Street Level Bureaucrat in English Statutory Homelessness Services.
Social Policy and Society,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
63.
Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira Elena
2015.
Social Workers’ Training Evaluated by a Cluster-Randomized Study.
Research on Social Work Practice,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 6,
p.
643.
BREIT, ERIC
ALM ANDREASSEN, TONE
and
SALOMON, ROBERT H.
2016.
Modification of Public Policies by Street-Level Organisations: An Institutional Work Perspective.
Journal of Social Policy,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 4,
p.
709.
van Berkel, Rik
and
Knies, Eva
2016.
Performance Management, Caseloads and the Frontline Provision of Social Services.
Social Policy & Administration,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 1,
p.
59.
FUERTES, VANESA
and
LINDSAY, COLIN
2016.
PERSONALIZATION AND STREET‐LEVEL PRACTICE IN ACTIVATION: THE CASE OF THE UK'S WORK PROGRAMME.
Public Administration,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 2,
p.
526.
Nothdurfter, Urban
2016.
The street-level delivery of activation policies: constraints and possibilities for a practice of citizenship.
European Journal of Social Work,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
420.
Malmberg‐Heimonen, Ira
and
Tøge, Anne Grete
2016.
Effects of individualised follow‐up on activation programme participants' self‐sufficiency: A cluster‐randomised study.
International Journal of Social Welfare,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
27.
Baker Collins, Stephanie
2016.
The Space in the Rules: Bureaucratic Discretion in the Administration of Ontario Works.
Social Policy and Society,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 2,
p.
221.
Povey, Larissa
2017.
Where Welfare and Criminal Justice Meet: Applying Wacquant to the Experiences of Marginalised Women in Austerity Britain.
Social Policy and Society,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
271.
Edmiston, Daniel
2017.
Welfare, Austerity and Social Citizenship in the UK.
Social Policy and Society,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
261.
Terum, Lars Inge
Torsvik, Gaute
and
Øverbye, Einar
2017.
Når vilkår og aktivitetskrav brytes. Frontlinjearbeideres tilnærming til sanksjoner.
Søkelys på arbeidslivet,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 3,
p.
147.
Solvang, Ida
2017.
Discretionary approaches to social workers’ personalisation of activation services for long-term welfare recipients.
European Journal of Social Work,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
536.
Daly, Angela
2018.
Embodied Austerity: Narratives of Early Austerity from a Homelessness and Resettlement Service.
Ethics and Social Welfare,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
65.