Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:16:12.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What's in it for me? The utility of psychiatric treatments from the perspective of the person in recovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of this contribution is to explore how different treatments are experienced from the perspective of individu-als with mental illnesses. We used data drawn from qualitative, narrative interviews. When asked to discuss their lives, people rarely discuss their psychiatric treatment. When asked about treatment, they describe hospitalization and medication but not out-patient care. What is described as most helpful are relationships with others, especially in 24-hour centers, clubhouses, and user-run organizations; places where they report feeling that they are accepted, understood, and cared about. Also important are experiences of “giving back” to others and employment as ways of increasing participants’ sense of self-worth and value. Participants also indicated the importance of med-ication, but described protracted processes of having to find the right prescriber, the right medication, at the right dosage, and taking the medication long enough to derive its benefits. For others, symptoms were described as being an integral part of who they were and not something they wanted to eliminate. Traditional treatments (e.g., medication), if given by a practitioner who understands the person and is willing to try to find the right medication and dosage, may serve as a foundation for instrumental experiences of being accepted, understood, valued, and being able to give back to others.

Type
Editorials
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

References

Becker, D.R. & Drake, R.E. (1994). Individual placement and sup-port: A community mental health center approach to vocational reha-bilitation. Community Mental Health Journal 30, 193206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L. (2003). Living Outside Mental Illness: Qualitative Studies of Recovery in Schizophrenia. New York University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Davidson, L., Stayner, D.A., Nickou, C., Styron, T.H., Rowe, M. & Chinman, M.L. (2001). “Simply to be let in”: Inclusion as a basis for recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 24, 375388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deegan, P.E. (1993). Recovering our sense of value after being labeled mentally ill. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 31(4), 711.Google ScholarPubMed
Deegan, P.E. (2005). The importance of personal medicine: A qual-itative study of resilience in people with psychiatric disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 33, Suppl 66, 2935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deegan, P.E. & Drake, R.E. (2006). Shared decision making and medication management in the recovery process. Psychiatric Services 57(11), 16361639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drake, R.E., Becker, D.R., Clark, R.E. & Mueser, K.T. (1999). Research on the individual placement and support model of supported employment. Psychiatric Quarterly 70, 289301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, J.H. & Carpenter-Song, E. (2006). The new paradigm of recovery from schizophrenia: Cultural conundrums of improvement without cure. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 29, 379413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J.H., Strauss, M.E., Carpenter, E.A., Miller, D.Floersch, J. & Sajatovic., M. (2005). Subjective experience of recovery from schizo-phrenia- related disorders and atypical antipsychotics. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 51(3), 211227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupa, T. (2004). Employment, recovery, and schizophrenia: Integrating health and disorder at work. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 18(1), 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, J.S. & Davidson, L. (1996). Mental disorder, work and choice. In Mental Disorder, Work Disability, and the Law (ed. Bonnie, R. and Monahan, J.), pp. 105130. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar