Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T12:12:46.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Secondary seed dispersal by dung beetles in a Colombian rain forest: effects of dung type and defecation pattern on seed fate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2010

Carolina Santos-Heredia
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia
Ellen Andresen*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (CIECO – UNAM), Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Col. Ex Hacienda de San José de la Huerta, Morelia, C.P. 58190, Michoacán, México
Diego A. Zárate
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia
*
1Corresponding author. Email: andresen@oikos.unam.mx, eandresens@gmail.com

Abstract:

In rain forests the fate of seeds defecated by mammals is often affected by dung beetles, but these effects can vary with mammal species. In a Colombian forest, differences in Scarabaeinae assemblages attracted to spider monkey (Ateles hybridus) and howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus) defecations were assessed. In total, 791 beetles of 35 species were captured. Mean number of individuals was similar for both dung types; mean number of species was higher for Alouatta traps. The effects of dung type (Alouatta vs. Ateles) and defecation pattern (clumped vs. scattered) on the fate of 220 Rollinia edulis (Annonaceae) seeds were determined. Burial by beetles occurred for 61% of the seeds (mean depth 2.6 cm). Seeds in Alouatta dung and in clumped defecations had higher burial rates. Horizontal movement (mean 11 cm) occurred for 80% of the seeds; no significant effects of experimental factors were detected. Survival was higher for buried vs. surface seeds. In a separate experiment, no differences were detected between dung types in the proportion of seeds buried by beetles. Changes in dung texture might have been responsible for the contrasting results. When assessing the effectiveness of an endozoochorous plant–mammal interaction, secondary dispersal by dung beetles should be addressed too.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ANDRESEN, E. 1999. Seed dispersal by monkeys and the fate of dispersed seeds in a Peruvian rainforest. Biotropica 31:145158.Google Scholar
ANDRESEN, E. 2001. Effects of dung presence, dung amount, and secondary dispersal by dung beetles on the fate of Micropholis guyanensis (Sapotaceae) seeds in Central Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 17:6178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANDRESEN, E. 2002a. Primary seed dispersal by red howler monkeys and the effect of defecation pattern on the fate of dispersed seeds. Biotropica 34:261272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANDRESEN, E. 2002b. Dung beetles in a Central Amazonian rainforest and their ecological role as secondary seed dispersers. Ecological Entomology 27:257270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANDRESEN, E. 2005. Interacción entre primates, semillas y escarabajos coprófagos en bosques húmedos tropicales: un caso de diplocoria. Universidad y Ciencia Número especial II:73–84.Google Scholar
ANDRESEN, E. 2008. Short-term temporal variability in the abundance of tropical dung beetles. Insect Conservation and Diversity 1:120124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANDRESEN, E. & FEER, F. 2005. The role of dung beetles as secondary seed dispersers and their effect on plant regeneration in tropical rainforests. Pp. 331349 in Forget, P.-M., Lambert, J., Hulme, P. & Vander Wall, S. B. (eds). Seed fate: predation, dispersal and seedling establishment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANDRESEN, E. & LEVEY, D. J. 2004. Effects of dung and seed size on secondary dispersal, seed predation, and seedling establishment of rain forest trees. Oecologia 139:145154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BALCÁZAR, M. P., RANGEL, J. O. & LINARES, E. L. 2000. Diversidad florística de la Serranía de las Quinchas, Magdalena Medio (Colombia). Caldasia 22:191224.Google Scholar
CULOT, L. 2005. Influence of tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis and Saguinus mystax) behaviour and defecation pattern on the post-dispersal seed fate: predation pressure by rodents and secondary seed dispersal by dung beetles in the Amazonian forest of Peru. PhD thesis. University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.Google Scholar
CULOT, L., HUYNEN, M.-C., GÉRARD, P. & HEYMANN, E. W. 2009. Short-term post-dispersal fate of seeds defecated by two small primate species (Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis) in the Amazonian forest of Peru. Journal of Tropical Ecology 25:229238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'HONDT, B., BOSSUYT, B., HOFFMANN, M. & BONTE, D. 2007. Dung beetles as secondary seed dispersers in a temperate grassland. Basic and Applied Ecology 9:542549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ENGEL, T. R. 2000. Seed dispersal and forest regeneration in a tropical lowland biocenosis (Shimba Hills, Kenya). Logos, Berlin. 345 pp.Google Scholar
ESTRADA, A. & COATES-ESTRADA, R. 1991. Howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata), dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) and seed dispersal: ecological interactions in the tropical rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 7:459474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESTRADA, A., HALFFTER, G., COATES-ESTRADA, R. & MERITT, D. A. 1993. Dung beetles attracted to mammalian herbivore (Alouatta palliata) and omnivore (Nasua narica) dung in the tropical rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 9:4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FEER, F. 1999. Effects of dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) on seeds dispersed by howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) in the French Guianan rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15:129142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FORGET, P-M., LAMBERT, J., HULME, P. & VANDER-WALL, S. B. 2005. Seed fate. Predation, dispersal and seedling establishment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. 410 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOTELLI, N. J. & COLWELL, R. K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4:379391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HANSKI, I. & CAMBEFORT, Y. 1991. Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 463 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLDRIDGE, L. R. 1967. Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center. San José. 206 pp.Google Scholar
JANZEN, D. H. 1982. Removal of seeds from horse dung by tropical rodents: influence of habitat and amount of dung. Ecology 63:18871900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JANZEN, D. H. 1986. Mice, big mammals and seeds: it matters who defecates what where. Pp. 314338 in Estrada, A. & Fleming, T. H. (eds.). Frugivores and seed dispersal. Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
JORDANO, P. 2000. Fruits and frugivory. Pp. 125165 in Fenner, M. (ed.). Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CAB International, Wallingford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KUNZ, B. K. & LINSENMAIR, K. E. 2008. The role of the olive baboon (Papio anubis, Cercopithecidae) as seed disperser in a savanna-forest mosaic of West Africa. Journal of Tropical Ecology 24:235246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LARSEN, T. & FORSYTH, A. 2005. Trap spacing and transect design for dung beetle biodiversity studies. Biotropica 37:322325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LARSEN, T., WILLIAMS, N. M. & KREMEN, C. 2005. Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters 8:538547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LINK, A. & DI FIORE, A. 2006. Seed dispersal by spider monkeys and its importance in the maintenance of neotropical rain-forest diversity. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22:235246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCONKEY, K. R. 2005a. The influence of gibbon primary seed shadows on post-dispersal seed fate in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Central Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21:255262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCONKEY, K. R. 2005b. Influences of faeces on seed removal from gibbon droppings in a dipterocarp forest in Central Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21:117120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NICHOLS, E., SPECTOR, S., LOUZADA, J., LARSEN, T., AMEZQUITA, S., FAVILA, M. E. & THE SCARABAEINAE RESEARCH NETWORK. 2008. Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biological Conservation 141:14611474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PONCE-SANTIZO, G., ANDRESEN, E., CANO, E. & CUARÓN, A. 2006. Dispersión primaria de semillas por primates y dispersión secundaria por escarabajos coprófagos en Tikal, Guatemala. Biotropica 38:390397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RÍOS, R. & PACHECO, L. F. 2006. The effect of dung and dispersal on postdispersal seed predation of Attalea phalerata (Arecaceae) by bruchid beetles. Biotropica 38:778781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RUSSO, S. E., PORTNOY, S. & AUGSPURGER, C. K. 2006. Incorporating animal behavior into seed dispersal models: implications for seed shadows. Ecology 87:31603174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SCHUPP, E. W. 1993. Quantity, quality and the effectiveness of seed dispersal by animals. Vegetatio 107/108:1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHEPHERD, V. E. & CHAPMAN, C. 1998. Dung beetles as secondary seed dispersers: impact on seed predation and germination. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14:199215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SLADE, E. M., MANN, D. J., VILLANUEVA, J. F. & LEWIS, O. T. 2007. Experimental evidence for the effects of dung beetle functional group richness and composition on ecosystem function in a tropical forest. Journal of Animal Ecology 76:10941104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VANDER WALL, S. B. & LONGLAND, W. S. 2004. Diplochory: are two seed dispersers better than one? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:155161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VERDÚ, J. R., NUMA, C., LOBO, J. M., MARTÍNEZ-AZORÍN, M. & GALANTE, E. 2009. Interactions between rabbits and dung beetles influence the establishment of Erodium praecox. Journal of Arid Environments 73:713718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VULINEC, K. 2002. Dung beetle communities and seed dispersal in primary forest and disturbed land in Amazonia. Biotropica 34:297309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WEHNCKE, E. V. & DOMÍNGUEZ, C. A. 2007. Seed dispersal ecology of non-restricted frugivores, capuchin monkeys in three neotropical forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23:519528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WEHNCKE, E. V., VALDEZ, C. N. & DOMÍNGUEZ, C. A. 2004. Seed dispersal and defecation patterns of Cebus capucinus and Alouatta palliata: consequences for seed dispersal effectiveness. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20:535543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WICKLOW, D. T., KUMAR, R. & LLOYD, J. E. 1984. Germination of Blue Grama seeds buried by dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Environmental Entomology 13:878881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar