Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T06:56:43.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Diversity of Extrasolar Terrestrial Planets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Jade C. Bond
Affiliation:
Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E Fort Lowell Rd, Tucson AZ 85719 email: jbond@psi.edu
Dante S. Lauretta
Affiliation:
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1629 E. University Blvd., Tucson AZ 85721
David P. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E Fort Lowell Rd, Tucson AZ 85719 email: jbond@psi.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Extrasolar planetary host stars are enriched in key planet-building elements. These enrichments have the potential to drastically alter the building blocks available for terrestrial planet formation. Here we report on the combination of dynamical models of late-stage terrestrial planet formation within known extrasolar planetary systems with chemical equilibrium models of the composition of solid material within the disk. This allows us to constrain the bulk elemental composition of extrasolar terrestrial planets. A wide variety of resulting planetary compositions exist, ranging from those that are essentially “Earth-like”, containing metallic Fe and Mg-silicates, to those that are dominated by graphite and SiC. This implies that a diverse range of terrestrial planets are likely to exist within extrasolar planetary systems.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Armitage, P. J. 2003, ApJ, 582, L47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., & Sauval, A.J. 2005, ASPC, 336, 25Google Scholar
Beirão, P., Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., & Mayor, M. 2005, A&A, 438, 251Google Scholar
Bond, J. C. et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, 1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, J. C., O'Brien, D. P, & Lauretta, D. S. 2009, Icarus, In press.Google Scholar
Drake, M. J. & Campins, H. 2006, Proc. IAU, 381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecuvillon, A. et al. 2004, A&A, 426, 619Google Scholar
Ecuvillon, A. et al. 2004, A&A, 426, 629Google Scholar
Ecuvillon, A. et al. 2006, A&A, 445, 633Google Scholar
Duncan, M. J., Levison, H. F., & Lee, M. H. 1998, AJ, 116, 2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilli, G., Israelian, G., Ecuvillon, A., Santos, N. C., & Mayor, M. 2006, A&A, 449, 723Google Scholar
Mandell, A. M., Raymond, S. N., & Sigurdsson, S. 2007, ApJ, 660, 823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcy, G. W. & Butler, R. P. 2000, ASPC, 213Google Scholar
Raymond, S. N. & Barnes, R. 2005, ApJ, 619, 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, S. N., Quinn, T., & Lunine, J. I. 2005, Icarus, 177, 256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, S. N., Barnes, R., & Kaib, N. A. 2006, ApJ, 644, 1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar