Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T15:49:35.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corruption, the resource curse and genuine saving

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2007

SIMON DIETZ
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Environment and Centre for Environmental Policy and Governance, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK
ERIC NEUMAYER
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Environment and Centre for Environmental Policy and Governance, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK
INDRA DE SOYSA
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Abstract

Genuine saving is a measure of net investment in produced, natural and human capital. It is a necessary condition for weak sustainable development that genuine saving not be persistently negative. However, according to data provided by the World Bank, resource-rich countries are systematically failing to meet this condition. Alongside the well-known resource curse on economic growth, resource abundance might have a negative effect on genuine saving. In fact, the two are closely related, as future consumption growth is limited by insufficient genuine saving now. In this paper, we apply the most convincing conclusion from the literature on economic growth – that it is institutional failure that depresses growth – to data on genuine saving. We regress gross and genuine saving on three indicators of institutional quality in interaction with an indicator of resource abundance. The indicators of institutional quality are corruption, bureaucratic quality and the rule of law. We find that reducing corruption has a positive impact on genuine saving in interaction with resource abundance. That is, the negative effect of resource abundance on genuine saving is reduced as corruption is reduced.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to Kirk Hamilton, Anastasios Xepapadeas and two anonymous referees for many helpful and constructive comments. The usual disclaimer applies. Eric Neumayer acknowledges financial assistance from the Leverhulme Trust.