Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T16:43:30.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Survival of the Ideas that Fit: An Evolutionary Analogy for the Use of Evidence in Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2007

Alex Stevens
Affiliation:
European Institute of Social Services, School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, Keynes College, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NP E-mail: a.w.stevens@kent.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper explores bias in the use of evidence in policy. It argues that existing models of the evidence–policy relationship neglect the tendency for attention to be paid only to that evidence helpful to the interests of powerful social groups. An evolutionary analogy is used to explain how this bias arises, without the need for irrationality or conspiracy on the part of policy makers. Examples are given in the fields of drug, asylum and other policies, and the possible responses by researchers to the biased use of research evidence are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)