Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T07:19:48.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Metazoan Meiofauna in Its Biogeochemical Environment: The Case of an Antarctic Coastal Sediment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

S. Vanhove ,
H.J. Lee ,
M. Beghyn ,
D. Van Gansbeke ,
S. Brockington  and
M. Vincx
S. Vanhove*
Affiliation:
University of Gent, Department of Morphology, Systematics and Ecology, Marine Biology Section, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.
H.J. Lee
Affiliation:
University of Gent, Department of Morphology, Systematics and Ecology, Marine Biology Section, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.
M. Beghyn
Affiliation:
University of Gent, Department of Morphology, Systematics and Ecology, Marine Biology Section, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.
S. Brockington
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OET.
M. Vincx
Affiliation:
University of Gent, Department of Morphology, Systematics and Ecology, Marine Biology Section, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.
*
‡Correspondence: sandra.vanhove@rug.ac.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The metazoan meiobenthos was investigated in an Antarctic coastal sediment (Factory Cove, Signy Island, Antarctica). The fine sands contained much higher abundances compared to major sublittoral sediments worldwide. Classified second after Narrangansett Bay (North Atlantic) they reached numbers of 13 × 106 ind m-2. The meiofauna was highly abundant in the surface layers, but densities decreased sharply below 2 cm. Vertical profiles mirrored steep gradients of microbiota, chloropigments and organic matter and were coincident with chemical stratification. Spatial patchiness manifested especially in the surface layer. Nematodes dominated (up to 90%), and Aponema, Chromctdorita, Diplolaimella, Daptonema, Microlaimus and Neochromadora constituted almost the entire community. Overall, the nematode fauna showed a strong similarity with fine sand communities elsewhere. The dominant trophic strategies were epistrarum and non-selective deposit feeding, but the applied classification for feeding guild structure of the nematodes of Factory Cove is discussed. High standing stock, low diversity and shallow depth distribution may have occurred because of the high nutritive (chlorophyll exceeded lOOOmgm-2 and constituted almost 50% of the organic pool) and reductive character of the benthic environment. These observations must have originated from the substantial input of fresh organic matter from phytoplankton and microphytobenthic production, typical for an Antarctic coastal ecosystem during the austral summer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , May 1998 , pp. 411 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Admiraal, W., Bouwman, L.A., Hoekstra, L. & Romeyn, K., 1983. Qualitative and quantitative interactions between microphytobenthos and herbivorous meiofauna on a brackish intertidal mudflat. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie, 68, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arntz, W.E., Brey, T. & Gallardo, V.A., 1994. Antarctic zoobenthos. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review, 32, 241–304.Google Scholar
Blanchard, G.F., 1990. Overlapping microscale dispersion patterns of meiofauna and microphytobenthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 74, 99–107.Google Scholar
Bouvy, M., 1988. Contribution of the bacterial and microphytobenthic microflora in the energetic demand of the meiobenthos in an intertidal muddy sediment (Kerguelen Archipelago). Marine Ecology, 9, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovée, F. De, 1975. La nématofaune des vases autopolluées des lies Kerguelen (Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises). Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 16, 711–720.Google Scholar
Bovée, F. De & Soyer, J., 1975. Le méiobenthos de l'Archipel de Kerguelen. Premières données quantitatives. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 280, 2369–2372.Google Scholar
Clarke, A., Holmes, L.J. & White, M.G., 1988. The annual cycle of temperature, chlorophyll and major nutrients at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, 1969–1982. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, 80, 65–86.Google Scholar
Clarke, A. & Leakey, R.J.G., 1996. The seasonal cycle of phytoplankton, macronutrients and the microbial community in a nearshore Antarctic marine ecosystem. Limnology and Oceanography, 41, 1281–1294.Google Scholar
Danovaro, R., Femino, A. & Fabiano, M., 1994. Comparison of different methods for bacterial counting in marine sediments. Bollettino dei Musei e degli Istituti Biologici della Universitd di Genova, 58/59, 143–152.Google Scholar
Dayton, P.K., Watson, D., Palmisano, A., Barry, J.P., Oliver, J.S. & Rivera, D., 1986. Distribution patterns of the benthic microalgal standing stock at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 6, 206–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmgren, R., 1975. Benthic meiofauna as indicator of oxygen conditions in the Northern Baltic proper. Merentutkimuslaitoksen Julkaisu. Helsinki, 239, 265–271.Google Scholar
Elmgren, R., Rosenberg, R. & Andersen, A.B., 1983. Benthic macro- and meiofauna in the Gulf of Bothnia (northern Baltic). Finnish Marine Research, 250, 3–18.Google Scholar
Findlay, S.E.G., 1981. Small-scale spatial distribution of meiofauna on a mud and sandflat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 12, 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giere, O., 1993. Meiobenthology. The microscopic fauna in aquatic sediments. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N.S., 1991a. Primary production by benthic microalgae in near-shore marine sediments of Signy Island, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 11, 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, N.S., 1991b. Microphytobenthic seasonality in near-shore marine sediments at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, Antarctica. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 33, 89–104.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N.S., 1991c. Ecology of the phytomicrobenthos in nearshore marine sediments at Signy Island, Antarctica. PhD thesis, Council for National Academic Awards, British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heip, C., 1995. Eutrophication and zoobenthos dynamics. In Proceedings of the international symposium on nutrient dynamics in coastal and estuarine environments, Denmark, 13–16 October 1993 (ed. K., Muus), pp. 113–136. Denmark: Ophelia Publications, Marine Biological Laboratory, Helsingør. [Ophelia, vol. 41, special issue.]Google Scholar
Heip, C., Vincx, M. & Vranken, G., 1985. The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review, 23, 399–489.Google Scholar
Heip, C., Warwick, R.M., Carr, M.R., Herman, P.M.J., Huys, R., Smol, N. & Van Holsbeke, K., 1988. Analysis of community attributes of the benthic meiofauna of Frierfjord/ Langesundfjord. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 46, 171–180.Google Scholar
Higgins, R.P. & Thiel, H., 1988. Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, P., 1982. Diatom-feeding behaviour of the free-living marine nematode Chromadorita tenuis. Nematologica, 28, 71–76.Google Scholar
Jonge, V.N. De, 1980. Fluctuations in the organic carbon to chlorophyll-a ratios for estuarine benthic diatom populations. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juario, J.V., 1975. Nematode species composition and seasonal fluctuation of a sublittoral meiofauna community in the German Bight. Veroffentlichungen des Instutsfiir Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven, 15, 283–337.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A.D., 1993. Minimal predation upon meiofauna by endobenthic macrofauna in the Exe Estuary, SW England. Marine Biology, 117, 311–319.Google Scholar
Leakey, R.J.G., Fenton, N. & Clarke, A., 1994. The annual cycle of planktonic ciliates in nearshore waters at Signy Island, Antarctica. Journal of Plankton Research, 16, 841–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzen, S., 1978. The system of the Monhysteroidea (nematodes) – a new approach. Zoologischer Jahresbericht des Systematik, 105, 515–536.Google Scholar
Lund, J.W.G., Kipling, C. & Lecren, E.D., 1958. The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimation by counting. Hydrobiologia, 11, 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantoura, R.F.C. & Llewellyn, C.A., 1983. The rapid determination of algal chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments and their breakdown products in natural waters by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Analytica Chimica Ada, 151, 297–314.Google Scholar
Matheke, G.E.M. & Horner, R., 1974. Primary productivity of the benthic microalgae in the Chukchi Sea near Barrow, Alaska. journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 31, 1779–1786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moens, T. & Vincx, M., 1997. Observations on the feeding ecology of estuarine nematodes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 77, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagna, P.A., 1982. Sampling design and enumeration statistics for bacteria from marine sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 43, 1366–1372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montagna, P.A., Coull, B.C., Herring, T.L. & Dudley, W., 1983. The relationship between abundance of meiofauna and their suspected microbial food (diatoms and bacteria). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 17, 381–394.Google Scholar
Ndaro, S.G.M., Sjøling, S. & Ólafsson, E., 1995. Small-scale variation in major meiofaunal taxa and sediment chemistry in tropical sediments. Ambio, 24, 470–474.Google Scholar
Nedwell, D.B. & Walker, T.R., 1995. Sediment-water fluxes of nutrients in an Antarctic coastal environment: influence of bioturbation. Polar Biology, 15, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedwell, D.B., Walker, T.R., Ellis-Evans, J.C. & Clarke, A., 1993. Measurement of seasonal rates and annual budgets of organic carbon fluxes in an Antarctic coastal environment at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, suggest a broad balance between production and decomposition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59, 3989–3995.Google Scholar
Palmisano, A.C., Lizotte, M.P., Smith, G.A., Nichols, P.D., White, D.C. & Sullivan, C.W., 1988. Changes in photosynthetic carbon assimilation in Antarctic sea ice diatoms during a spring bloom: variation in synthesis of lipid classes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 116, 1–13.Google Scholar
Pearson, T.H. & Rosenberg, R., 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review, 16, 229–311.Google Scholar
Platt, H.M., 1979. Sedimentation and the distribution of organic matter in a sub-Antarctic marine bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 9, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, H.M. & Warwick, R.M., 1988. Free living marine nematodes. Part II. British chromadorids. London: E.J. Bull.Google Scholar
Platt, T. & Irwin, B., 1973. Caloric content of phytoplankton. Limnology and Oceanography, 18, 306–310.Google Scholar
Romeyn, K. & Bouwman, L.A., 1983. Food selection and consumption by estuarine nematodes. Hydrobiological Bulletin, 17, 103–109.Google Scholar
Rudnick, D.T., 1989. Time lags between the deposition and meiobenthic assimilation of phytodetritus. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 50, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudnick, D.T., Elmgren, R. & Frithsen, J.B., 1985. Meiofaunal prominence and benthic seasonality in a coastal marine ecosystem. Oecologia, 67, 157–168.Google Scholar
Santos, P.J.P., Castel, J. & Souza-Santos, L.P., 1995. Microphytobenthic patches and their influence on meiofaunal distribution. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 36, 133–139.Google Scholar
Seinhorst, J., 1959. A rapid method for the transfer of nematodes from fixative to anhydrous glycerin. Nematologica, 4, 67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snelgrove, P.V.R. & Butman, C.A., 1994. Animal-sediment relationships: cause versus effect. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review, 32, 111–177.Google Scholar
Soetaert, K. & Heip, C., 1990. Sample-size dependence of diversity indices and the determination of sufficient sample size in a high-diversity deep-sea environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 59, 305–307.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J., 1981. Biometry. The principles and practices of statistics in biological research, 2nd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Sørensen, J. & Jørgensen, B.B., 1987. Early diagenesis in sediments from Danish coastal waters: microbial activity and Mn-Fe-S geochemistry. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 51, 1583–1590.Google Scholar
Stonehouse, B., 1989. Polar ecology. Tertiary level biology. New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, B., Fleeger, J.W. & Carney, R.S., 1993. Sediment microtopography and the small-scale spatial distribution of meiofauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 167, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietjen, J.H., 1980. Microbial-meiofaunal interrelationships: a review. Microbiology, 1980, 335–338.Google Scholar
Tietjen, J.H. & Lee, J.J., 1975. Axenic culture and uptake of dissolved organic substances by the marine nematode, Rhabditis marina Bastian. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 16, 685–693.Google Scholar
Tyson, R.V., 1995. Sedimentary organic matter. Organic fades and palynofacies. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Vanreusel, A., 1990. Ecology of the free-living marine nematodes from the Voordelta (Southern Bight of the North Sea). I. Species composition and structure of the nematode communities. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 31, 439–462.Google Scholar
Vincx, M., 1989. Free-living marine nematodes from the Southern Bight of the North Sea. Academiae Analecta, 51, 39–70.Google Scholar
Walker, T.R., 1993. Benthic microbial activity in an Antarctic coastal sediment. MPhil thesis, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T.M., 1977. Sea ice habitats of Signy Island (South Orkneys) and their primary productivity. In Adaptations within Antarctic ecosystems (ed. G.A., Llano), pp. 75–82. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T.M., 1982. Primary production of phytoplankton off Signy Island, South Orkneys, the Antarctic. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 214, 169–189.Google Scholar
Wieser, W., 1953. Die Beziehung zwischen Mundhöhlengestalt, Ernährungsweise und Vorkommen bei freilebenden marinen Nematoden. Eine ökologisch-morphologische. Arkiv för Zoologi, 4, 439–484.Google Scholar
Wittoeck, J., 1991. Ecologische studie van het meiobenthos van West-Groenland (Disko Island). MSc thesis, University of Gent, Belgium.Google Scholar