Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:35:48.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring the Effectiveness of Psychosocial Interventions in Pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Ann Oakley
Ann Oakley
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Questions about the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in pregnancy are important in any overall evaluation of antenatal care. This article reviews the evidence as to the positive benefit on a range of pregnancy outcomes provided by 35 published and unpublished randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions.

Type
Screening for Phychosocial risk Factors
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Supplement S1 , January 1992 , pp. 129 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Berkman, L.Assessing the physical health effects of social networks and social support. American Journal of Public Health, 1984, 5, 413–32.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Chalmers, I., Enkin, M., & Keirse, M.J.N.C. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
3.Dance, J. A social intervention by linkworkers to Pakistani women and pregnancy outcome. Unpublished, East Birmingham Hospital, 1987.Google Scholar
4.Elbourne, D., & Oakley, A. In Berendez, H. W., Kessel, S., and Yaffe, S. (eds.), Advances in the Prevention of Low Birthweight. Washington DC: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1991.Google Scholar
5.Elbourne, D., Oakley, A., & Chalmers, I. Social and psychological support during pregnancy. In Chalmers, I.Enkin, M. & Keirse, M.j.n.c. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
6.Flint, C., & Poulengeris, P.The “Know your midwife scheme.” Unpublished report, St. George's Hospital, London, 1987.Google Scholar
7.Levinson, G., & Schnider, S. M.Catecholamines: The effects of maternal fear and its treatment on uterine function and circulation. Birth and the Family Journal, 1979, 6, 167–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Oakley, A.Social support: The ‘soft’ way to improve birthweight? Social Science and Medicine, 1985, 21, 1259–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Oakley, A.Is social support good for the health of mothers and babies? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 1988, 6, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Oakley, A., Chalmers, I., & Elbourne, D. The effects of social interventions in pregnancy. In Papiernik, E.Breart, G. & Spira, N. (eds.), Prevention of preterm birth: New goals and new practices in prenatal care. Paris: Inserm, 1986.Google Scholar
11.Oakley, A., Macfarlane, A., & Chalmers, I. Social class, stress and reproduction. In Rees, A. R. & Purcell, H. (eds.), Disease and the environment. Chichester: John Wiley, 1982.Google Scholar
12.Oakley, A., Rajan, L., & Grant, A.Social support and pregnancy outcome. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990, 97, 155–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Tatelbaum, R., & Chamberlain, R.Improving the delivery of prenatal care and outcomes of pregnancy: A randomized trial of home nurse visitation. Pediatrics, 1986, 77, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Reading, A. E., Campbell, S., Cox, D. N., & Sledmere, C. M. Health beliefs and health care behaviour in pregnancy. Psychological Medicine, 1982, 379–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Susser, M.Epidemiology, health and society: Selected papers. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987, 235.Google Scholar
16.Taylor, R.Medicine out of control. Melbourne: Sun Books, 1979, 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar