Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T19:47:38.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bounds for heat transport in a porous layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

V. P. Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota Present address: The Mitre Corporation, McLean, Virginia 22101, U.S.A.
D. D. Joseph
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota

Abstract

Strongly nonlinear heat transport across a porous layer is studied using Howard's (1963) variational method. The analysis explores a bifurcation property of Busse's (1969) multi-a solution of this variational problem and complements the 1972 study of Busse & Joseph by further restricting the fields which are allowed to compete for the maximum heat transported a t a given temperature difference. The restriction arises, as in the case of infinite Prandtl number convection studied by Chan (1971), from letting a parameter tend to infinity from the outset; here, however, the parameter which is assumed infinitely large (the Prandtl-Darcy number) is actually seldom smaller than O(107).

The theoretical bounding heat-transport curve is computed numerically. The maximizing Nusselt number (Nu) curve is given a t first by a functional of the single-a solution; then this solution bifurcates and the Nusselt number functional is maximized for an interval of Rayleigh numbers (R) by the two-a solution. The agreement between the numerical analysis and recent experiments is striking. The theoretical heat-transport curve is found to be continuously differentiable but has piecewise discontinuous second derivatives.

The results of an asymptotic (R → ∞) analysis following Chan (1971) are in qualitative agreement with the results of numerical analysis and give the asymptotic law Nu = 0.016R. This law is consistent with the result of the porous version of the well-known dimensional argument leading to the one-third power law for regular convection. The asymptotic results, however, do not appear to be in good quantitabive agreement with the numerical results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1973 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beavers, G. & Sparrow, E. 1969 Non-Darcy flow through fibrous porous media. J. Appl. Mech. 36, 711714.Google Scholar
Bellman, R. E. & Kalaba, R. E. 1965 Modern Analytical and Computational Methods in Science and Mathematics. Elsevier.
Buretta, R. & Berman, A. S. 1973 Convective heat transfer in a liquid-saturated porous layer. (To appear.)
Busse, F. 1969 On Howard.s upper bound for heat transport in turbulent convection. J. Fluid Mech. 37, 457.Google Scholar
Busse, F. & Joseph, D. D. 1972 Bounds for heat transport in a porous layer. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 521.Google Scholar
Chan, S. 1971 Infinite Prandtl number turbulent convection. Studies in Appl. Math. 50 (1), 1349.Google Scholar
Combailnous, M. & Lefur, B. 1969 Transfert de chaleur par convection naturelle dans une couche poreuse horizontale. Comptes Rendus, 269, 10091012.Google Scholar
Conte, S. D. 1966 The numerical solution of linear boundary value problems. SIAM Rev. 8, 309.Google Scholar
Elder, J. W. 1967 Steady free convection in a, porous medium heated from below. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 2948.Google Scholar
Fife, P. & Joseph, D.D. 1969 Existence of convective solutions of the generalized Bénard problem which are analytic in their norm. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 33, 116138.Google Scholar
Fohchheimer, P. H. 1901 Wasserbewegun durch Boden. 2. ver. dtsch. Ing. 45, 17821788.Google Scholar
Gupta, V. P. 1972 Upper bound on heat transfer across a porous fluid layer heated from below. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota.
Heinrici, P. 1964 Elements of Numerical Analysis. Wiley.
Howard, L. N. 1963 Heat transport in turbulent convection. J. Fluid Mech. 17, 405432.Google Scholar
Irmay, S. 1958 On the theoretical derivation of Darcy and Forchheimer formulas. Trans. Am. Geophys. Un. 39, 702707.Google Scholar
Joseph, D. D. & Sattinger, D. H. 1972 Bifurcating time periodic solutions and their stability. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 45, 79109.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, R. 1970a. On the transition to turbulent convection. Part 1. J. Fluid Mech. 42, 295.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, R. 1970b. On the transition to turbulent convection. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 42, 309.Google Scholar
Lapwood, E. R. 1948 Convection of a fluid in a porous medium. Proc. Carnb. Phil. Soc. 44, 508521.Google Scholar
Malkus, W. V. R. 1954a Discrete transitions in turbulent convection. Proc. Roy. SOC. A 225, 185.Google Scholar
Malkus, W. V. R. 1954b The heat transport and spectrum of thermal turbulence. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 225, 196.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. J. 1963 Investigation of the influence of free thermal convection on heat transfer through granular material. 11th Int. Gong. of Refrigeration (Munich), paper, 11–4.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. J. & Saunders, O. A. 1938 On the instability of a, fluid when heated from below. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 165, 216.Google Scholar
Ward, J. C. 1964 Turbulent flow in porous media. J. Hydraul. Div., Proc. A.S.C.E. 90 (HY5), 112.Google Scholar
Westbrook, D. R. 1969 The stability of convective flow in a porous medium. Phys. Fluids, 12, 1547.Google Scholar