Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T21:29:09.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Aristotelian Enthymeme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

R. C. Seaton
Affiliation:
Reigate

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 113 note 1 Blackwood's Magazine, December, 1828.

page 113 note 2 I say ‘almost’ because the enthymeme of later times was not limited to a syllogism ‘from likelihoods or signs,’ as Cope would of course have limited Aristotle's.

page 113 note 3 Ancient Classics for English Readers: Aristotle, p. 81.

page 114 note 1 Laws of Thought, pp. 247, 248.

page 114 note 2 Rhet., 1. 2. 14.

page 114 note 3 V. 10., §§ 1, 2.

page 114 note 4 E.g., Whately, Thomson, Jevons, Joseph.

page 114 note 5 Or, instead of one premiss, the conclusion may be suppressed.

page 114 note 6 Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric, p. 103 and note.

page 115 note 1 Logic, by R. F. Clarke, p. 357.

page 115 note 2 Rhet. i. 2. 18.

page 116 note 1 Classical Review, i., p. 98 f.

page 116 note 2 Anal. Post., i. 10. 7.

page 117 note 1 Cope, loc. cit., pp. 164, 165 ; Ar. Rhet. i. 2. 18.

page 117 note 2 Rhet. ad Alex., c. 10.

page 117 note 3 Topica, § 55. See Reid on pro Sulla, § 32.

page 118 note 1 V. 10. 1.

page 118 note 2 Ed. Vatic, i., p. 141.

page 118 note 3 Vol. ii., p. 289.

page 118 note 4 Mansel's Aldrich, Appendix F.