Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:13:47.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why the dynamical hypothesis cannot qualify as a law of qualitative structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1998

Nick Braisby
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, London Guildhall University, London E1 7NT braisby@lgu.ac.uk
Richard Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Birkbeck College, London WC1E 7HX r.cooper@psyc.bbk.ac.uk
Bradley Franks
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE, Englandb.frank@lse.ac.uk

Abstract

Van Gelder presents the dynamical hypothesis as a novel law of qualitative structure to compete with Newell and Simon's (1976) physical symbol systems hypothesis. Unlike Newell and Simon's hypothesis, the dynamical hypothesis fails to provide necessary and sufficient conditions for cognition. Furthermore, imprecision in the statement of the dynamical hypothesis renders it unfalsifiable.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)