Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T17:20:13.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A microtitre plate assay for characterizing insensitive acetylcholinesterase genotypes of insecticide-resistant insects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Graham D. Moores
Affiliation:
Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ, UK
Alan L. Devonshire
Affiliation:
Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ, UK
Ian Denholm
Affiliation:
Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ, UK

Abstract

A rapid technique is described for characterizing and monitoring, in single insects, the insensitivity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) to organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides. Ninety-six insects are homogenized simultaneously in a microtitre plate and portions (e.g. 0·05 for Musca domestica L.) assayed colorimetrically with acetylthiocholine in the presence and absence of diagnostic concentrations of insecticide. Reactions are monitored by a kinetic microplate reader linked to a microcomputer that determines mean AChE activities automatically by linear regressions of absorbance-time data. Mean inhibited activity is then expressed as a percentage of uninhibited activity. Several inhibitors can be tested against the same insect to yield an ‘insensitivity profile‘ of individuals and strains. In tests on M. domestica adults of known AChE genotype, the assay clearly distinguished not only between a sensitive and two slightly (3-15-fold) insensitive AChE variants but between all six genotypic combinations of these three alleles.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashani, Y. & Catravas, G. N. (1980). Highly reactive impurities in Triton X-100 and Brij 35: partial characterization and removal.—Analyt. Biochem. 109, 5562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, T. M. & Brogdon, W. G. (1987). Improved detection of insecticide resistance through conventional and molecular techniques.—A. Rev. Ent. 32, 145162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C. F. (1985). Theoretical models of the use of insecticide mixtures for the management of resistance.—Bull. ent. Res. 75, 259265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devonshire, A. L. (1980). Insecticide resistance caused by decreased sensitivity of acetylcholinesterase to inhibition.—pp. 473–480 in Insect neurobiology and pesticide action (Neurotox 79).—517 pp. London, Soc. Chem. Ind.Google Scholar
Devonshire, A. L. (1987). Biochemical studies of organophosphorus and carbamate resistance in houseflies and aphids.—pp. 239–255 in Ford, M. G., Hollomon, D. W., Khambay, B. P. S. & Sawicki, R. M. (Eds). Combating resistance to xenobiotics: biological and chemical approaches.—320 pp. Chichester, UK, Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Devonshire, A. L. & Moores, G. D. (1984 a). Characterisation of insecticide-insensitive acetylcholinesterase: microcomputer-based analysis of enzyme inhibition in homogenates of individual house fly (Musca domestica) heads.—Pestic. Biochem. & Physiol. 21, 341348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devonshire, A. L. & Moores, G. D. (1984 b). Different forms of insensitive acetylcholinesterase in insecticide-resistant house flies (Musca domestica).—Pestic. Biochem. & Physiol. 21, 336340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellman, G. L., Courtney, K. D., Andres, V. & Featherstone, R. M. (1961). A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity.—Biochem. Pharmac. 7, 8895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farnham, A. W. (1973). Genetics of resistance of pyrethroid-selected houseflies, Musca domestica L.—Pestic. Sci. 4, 513520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ffrench-Constant, R. H. & Devonshire, A. L. (1987). A multiple homogeniser for rapid sample preparation in immunoassays and electrophoresis.—Biochem. Genet. 25, 493499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hama, H. (1983). Resistance to insecticides due to reduced sensitivity of acetylcholinesterase.—pp. 299–331 in Georghiou, G. P. & Saito, T. (Eds). Pest resistance to pesticides.-809 pp. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Hemingway, J., Smith, C., Jayawardena, K. G. I. & Herath, P. R. J. (1986). Field and laboratory detection of the altered acetylcholinesterase resistance genes which confer organophosphate and carbamate resistance in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 76, 559565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenoorth, F. J., Smissaert, H. R., Welling, W., van der Pas, L. J. T. & Hitman, K. T. (1977). Insensitive acetylcholinesterase, high glutathione-S-transferase, and hydrolytic activity as resistance factors in a tetrachlorvinphos-resistant strain of house fly.—Pestic. Biochem. & Physiol. 7, 3447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, M., Fournier, D., Berge, J., Cuany, A., Bride, J. M. & Pasteur, N. (1985). Single-mosquito test to determine genotypes with an acetylcholinesterase insensitive to inhibition to propoxur insecticide.—J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1, 425427.Google ScholarPubMed
Ross, G. J. S. (1987). Maximum Likelihood Program (MLP 3.08 User Manual).— Oxford, UK, Numerical Algorithms Group.Google Scholar
Sawicki, R. M. (1974). Genetics of resistance of a dimethoate-selected strain of houseflies (Musca domestica L.) to several insecticides and methylenedioxyphenyl synergists.—J. agric. Fd Chem. 22, 344349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawicki, R. M. & Denholm, I. (1987). Management of resistance to pesticides in cotton pests.—Trop. Pest Management 33, 262272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, R. K. & O'Brien, R. D. (1973). Insensitivity of acetylcholinesterase as a factor in resistance of houseflies to the organophosphate Rabon.—Pestic. Biochem. & Physiol. 3, 495498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R. J. & Mani, G. S. (1981). The effective dominance of resistance genes in relation to the evolution of resistance.—Pestic. Sci. 12, 573581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar