Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:43:21.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The d2 Test of Attention: Construct validity and extensions in scoring techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2004

MARSHA E. BATES  and
EDWARD P. LEMAY
MARSHA E. BATES
Affiliation:
Center of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey
EDWARD P. LEMAY
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The internal consistency and convergent and discriminant validity of the d2 Test, a cancellation test of attention and concentration, was examined in a sample of 364 U.S. adults. Test-taking strategy, new process scores for assessing performance constancy, and relations to gender and education were explored. Results suggested that the d2 Test is an internally consistent and valid measure of visual scanning accuracy and speed. Overall performance scores were related to a proxy measure of test-taking strategy in the expected direction, and new acceleration and deterioration measures exhibited convergent validity. Suggested directions for future research include discrimination of attentional processes that support immediate and sustained visual scanning accuracy and speed, further examination of the impact of test-taking strategies on overall performance measures, and additional construct validity examinations for the new process measures. (JINS, 2004, 10, 392–400.)

Keywords

d2 testAttentionLearningNeuropsychological assessment
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , May 2004 , pp. 392 - 400
Copyright
© 2004 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barkley, R.A. (1991). The ecological validity of laboratory and analogue assessment methods of ADHD symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19, 149–178.Google Scholar
Bates, M.E. & Tracy, J.I. (1990). Cognitive functioning in young “social drinkers:” Is there impairment to detect? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 242–249.Google Scholar
Brickenkamp, R. (1962). Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test (Test d2). [The d2 Test of attention.] (1st ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Brickenkamp, R. & Zillmer, E. (1998). The d2 Test of Attention. Seattle, Washington: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Davis, K.L. & Zillmer, E.A. (1998). Contrasts between the d2 test of attention and intelligent measures from a normative sample. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, Washington, DC.
DeFillippis, N.A. & McCampbell, E. (1991). The Booklet Category Test: Research and clinical form manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.Google Scholar
Halperin, J.M., Sharma, V., Greenblatt, E., & Schwartz, S.T. (1991). Assessment of the Continuous Performance Test: Reliability and validity in a nonreferred sample. Psychological Assessment, 3, 603–608.Google Scholar
Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Luck, S.J. & Vecera, S.P. (2002). Attention. In S. Yantis (Ed.), Steven's handbook of experimental psychology (3rd ed.): Sensation and perception (pp. 235–286). New York: Wiley.
Mateer, C.A. & Mapou, R. (1996). Understanding, evaluating and managing attention disorders following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11, 1–16.Google Scholar
Michela, J.L. (1990). Within-person correlational design and analysis. In C. Hendrick & M.S. Clark (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 279–311). London, England: Sage.
Mitrushina, M.N., Boone, K.B., & D'Elia, L.F. (1999). Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford.
Pandina, R.J., Labouvie, E.W., & White, H.R. (1984). Potential contributions of the life span developmental approach to the study of adolescent alcohol and drug use: The Rutgers health and human development project, a working model. Journal of Drug Issues, 14, 253–268.Google Scholar
Posner, M.I. & Petersen, S.E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.Google Scholar
Reitan, R. & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological battery: Theory and clinical implications. Tucson, Arizona: Neuropsychology Press.
Russell, E.W. & Levy, M. (1987). Revision of the Halstead Category Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 898–901.Google Scholar
Sagi, D. & Julesz, B. (1984). Detection versus discrimination of visual orientation. Perception, 13, 619–628.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1973). Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Los Angeles, California: Western Psychological Services.
Smith, K.J., Valentino, D.A., & Arruda, J.E. (2002). Measures of variations in performance during a sustained attention task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 828–839.Google Scholar
Spreen, O. & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Thurstone, L.L. & Thurstone, T.G. (1947). SRA Primary Abilities. Chicago, Illinois: Science Research Associates.
Treisman, A.M. & Gelade, G. (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.Google Scholar
U.S.Bureau of the Census (1981). Current population survey: Money, income, and poverty status of families and persons in the United States: 1980. Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 127.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale–revised. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
White, H.R., Bates, M.E., & Buyske, S. (2001). Adolescence-limited versus persistent delinquency: Extending Moffitt's hypothesis into adulthood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 600–609.Google Scholar
Zachary, R.A. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale: Revised Manual. Los Angeles, California: Western Psychological Services.