Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T03:51:46.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Newell's program, like Hilbert's, is dead; let's move on

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2004

Yingrui Yang  and
Selmer Bringsjord
Yingrui Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY12180
Selmer Bringsjord*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY12180http://www.rpi.edu/~brings
*
yangyri@rpi.edu
selmer@rpi.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We draw an analogy between Hilbert's program (HP) for mathematics and Newell's program (NP) for cognitive modeling. The analogy reveals that NP, like HP before it, is fundamentally flawed. The only alternative is a program anchored by an admission that cognition is more than computation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , October 2003 , pp. 627
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)