Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:20:43.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robert Boyle and Mathematics: Reality, Representation, and Experimental Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Steven Shapin
Steven Shapin
Affiliation:
Science Studies UnitEdinburgh University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is a study of the role of language in scientific activity. It recommends that language be viewed as a community's means of patterning its affairs. Language represents where the boundaries of the community are and who is entitled to speak within it, and it displays the structures of authority in the community. Moreover, language precipitates the community's view of what the world is like, such that linguistic usages can be taken as referring to that world. Thus, language connects on the one side to a community's practical life, and, on the other, to the reality on which it “reports.”

The example treated is Robert Boyle's view of the language proper for experimental practice, and his arguments against the value and legitimacy of mathematical representations within the experimental community. Boyle argued that the use of mathematics was inappropriate because (i) it would restrict the number of potential participants; (ii) it would give rise to unwarranted expectations of the certainty and accuracy to be expected of real physical inquiries; (iii) it would suggest views of natural law and God's relations with the natural world which were incorrect and possibly dangerous; and because (iv) the world upon which the experimentalist operated was not such as was represented by mathematical idealizations. I try to establish that decision about the appropriate language for the experimental community was a moral choice.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , Spring 1988 , pp. 23 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassi, Joseph, 1977. “Who Discovered Boyle's Law?’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 8: 189–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Peter, 1985. Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles: Locke and Boyle on the External World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Wilda C., 1984. Between the Library and the Laboratory: The Language of Chemistry in Eighteenth-Century France. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, 1857–1858. “The History of Dense and Rare,” in The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon. ed. Spedding, James, Ellis, Robert Leslie and Heath, Douglas Denon, 5 vols. London, 5: 338–400.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A., 1982. The Mathematical Science of Christopher Wren. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Birch, Thomas, 1772. “The Life of the Honourable Robert Boyle,” in Boyle 1772, 1: vi–clxxi.Google Scholar
Bloor, David, 1983. Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas [Hall], Marie, 1952. “The Establishment of the Mechanical Philosophy,” Osiris. 10: 412–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas [Hall], Marie, 1958. Robert Boyle and Seventeenth-Century Chemistry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boas [Hall], Marie, 1959. “Structure of Matter and Chemical Theory in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries,” in Clagett 1959. 499–514.Google Scholar
Bods Hall, Marie, 1978. “Matter in Seventeenth-Century Science,” in McMullin. 1978. 76–99.Google Scholar
Bochner, Salomon, 1966. The Role of Mathematics in the Rise of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert, 1772. The Works. ed. Birch, Thomas, 6 vols. London.Google Scholar
Tractates from Boyle, 1772. cited in the paper:Google Scholar
Excerpts from “Considerations on the Style of the Scriptures,” 1: xlix.Google Scholar
“New Experiments Physico-Mechanical, touching the Spring of the Air and its Effects,” 1: 1–117.Google Scholar
“A Defence of the Doctrine touching the Spring and Weight of the Air … against the Objections of Franciscus Linus,” 1: 118–85.Google Scholar
“An Examen of Mr.T.Hobbes His Dialogus Physicus de Natura Aëris,” 1: 186–242.Google Scholar
“A Proëmial Essay… with Some Considerations touching Experimental Essays in General,” 1: 299–318.Google Scholar
“Two Essays, Concerning the Unsuccessfulness of Experiments,” 1: 318–53.Google Scholar
“The Sceptical Chymist…,” 1: 458–586.Google Scholar
“Some Considerations Touching the Usefulness of Experimental Natural Philosophy,” 2: 1–201.Google Scholar
“Hydrostatical Paradoxes, made out by New Experiments,” 2: 738–97.Google Scholar
“The Origin of Forms and Qualities, According to the Corpuscular Philosophy”, 3: 1–112.Google Scholar
“Of the Usefulness of Mathematicks to Natural Philosophy. Or, that the Empire of Man may be promoted by the Naturalist's Skill in Mathematicks, (as well pure, as mixed),” 3: 425–54; this is part of “Some Considerations Touching the Usefulness of Experimental Natural Philosophy … The Second Tome,” 3: 392–456.Google Scholar
“The Excellency of Theology, compared with Natural Philosophy,” 4: 1–66.Google Scholar
“About the Excellency and Grounds of the Mechanical Hypothesis,” 4: 67–78.Google Scholar
“Suspicions about Some Hidden Qualities in the Air,” 4: 85–96.Google Scholar
“Of the Mechanical Origin of Heat and Cold,” 4: 236–59.Google Scholar
“A Discourse of Things above Reason,” 4: 406–69.Google Scholar
“A Continuation of New Experiments, Physico-Mechanical … The Second Part,” 4: 505–93.Google Scholar
“Short Memoirs for the Natural Experimental History of Mineral Waters,” 4: 794–821.Google Scholar
“Of the Reconcileableness of Specific Medicines to the Corpuscular Philosophy,” 5: 76–108.Google Scholar
“Of the High Veneration Man's Intellect Owes to God, peculiarly for His Wisdom and Power,” 5: 130–57.Google Scholar
“A Free Inquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature,” 5: 158–254.Google Scholar
“Medicina Hydrostatica: or, Hydrostatics Applied to the Materia Medica,” 5: 453–89.Google Scholar
“A Previous Hydrostatical Way of Estimating Ores,” 5: 489–507.Google Scholar
“The General History of the Air,” 5: 609–743.Google Scholar
“Appendix to the First Part of the Christian Virtuoso,” 6: 673–715.Google Scholar
“The Christian Virtuoso. The Second Part,” 6: 717–96.Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen G, 1983. Statistical Physics and the Atomic Theory of Matter, from Boyle and Newton to Landau and Onsager. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buck, Peter, 1977. “Seventeenth-Century Political Arithmetic: Civil Strife and Vital Statistics,” Isis 68: 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnet, Gilbert, 1742. Select Sermons … and a Sermon at the Funeral of the Honourable Robert Boyle. Glasgow.Google Scholar
Burtt, E. A., 1954. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. revised ed. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Cantor, G. N., 1979. “Revelation and the Cyclical Cosmos of John Hutchinson,” in Jordanova and Porter 1979, 3–22.Google Scholar
Cantor, G. N., 1984. “Berkeley's The Analyst Revisited,” Isis 75: 668–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, G. N., 1985. “Light and Enlightenment: An Exploration of Mid-Eighteenth-Century Modes of Discourse,” in Lindberg and Cantor 1985. 67–106.Google Scholar
Cantor, G. N. 1985a. “Reading the Book of Nature: The Relation between Faraday's Religion and His Science,” in Gooding and James 1985. 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy, 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centore, F. E., 1970. Robert Hooke's Contributions to Mechanics: A Study in Seventeenth Century Natural Philosophy. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Clagett, Marshall, ed., 1959 Critical Problems in the History of Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard, 1980. The Newtonian Revolution. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, William, 1970. “Bateson and Chromosomes: Conservative Thought in Science,” Centaurus 15: 228–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, H. M., 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Conant, James Bryant, ed., 1970. Harvard Case Histories in Experimental Science. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, James Bryant, 1970a. “Robert Boyle's Experiments in Pneumatics,” in Conant 1970. 1: 1–63.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter, 1985. “Totius in verba: Rhetoric and Authority in the Early Royal Society,” Isis. 76: 145–61.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter 1987. “Jesuit Mathematical Science and the Reconstitution of Experience in the Early Seventeenth Century,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18: 133–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J., 1961. The Mechanization of the World Picture. trans. Dikshoorn, C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dillenberger, John, 1960. Protestant Thought and Natural Science: A Historical Study. Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman See Galileo, 1957.Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman 1985. “Galileo's Accuracy in Measuring Horizontal Projections,” Annali dell'Istituto e Museo di Storia delta Scienza di Firenze. 10: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugas, R. and Costabel, P., 1964. “The Birth of a New Science: Mechanics,” in Taton 1964, 236–67.Google Scholar
Eamon, William, 1984. “Arcana Discovered: The Advent of Printing, the Books of Secrets Tradition and the Development of Experimental Science in the Sixteenth Century,” History of Science. 22: 111–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eamon, William, 1985. “Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Science,” Sudhoffs Archiv 69: 26–49.Google ScholarPubMed
Eisenstein, Elizabeth L., 1980. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feingold, Mordechai, 1984. The Mathematicians' Apprenticeship: Science, Universities and Society in England, 1560–1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan, 1985. “The Mechanical Philosophy and Its Problems: Mechanical Explanations Impenetrability, and Perpetual Motion,” in Pitt 1985, 9–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, 1933. Dialogues concerning Two New Sciences. trans. Grew, Henry and de Salvio, Alfonso New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, 1953. Dialogue on the Great World Systems. ed. de Santillana, Giorgio, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, 1957. Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. trans, and ed. Drake, Stillman Garden City N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, 1957. “The Assayer [excerpts],” in Galileo 1957. 217–80.Google Scholar
Garrison, James W., 1986. “Husserl, Galileo, and the Processes of Idealization,” Synthese 66: 329–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascoigne, John, 1985. “The Universities and the Scientific Revolution: The Case of Newton and Restoration Cambridge,” History of Science. 23: 391–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen, ed., 1980. Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Gillispie, Charles Coulston, 1960. The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph, 1661. The Vanity of Dogmatizing. London.Google Scholar
Golinski, Jan Victor, 1984. “Language, Method and Theory in British Chemical Discourse, c. 1660–1770.” Unpubl Ph.D. thesis. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Gooding, David and James, Frank A. L., eds., 1985. Faraday Rediscovered: Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday, 1791–1867. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosart, Alexander B., ed., 1887. The Lismore Papers, 2d series. 5 vols. London.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian, 1975. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert and Hall, Marie Boas, 1964. “Philosophy and Natural Philosophy: Boyle and Spinoza,” in Taton and Cohen 1964. 241–56.Google Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert and Hall, Marie Boas eds., 1965–86. The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, 13 vols. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. London: Mansell; London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Hannaway, Owen, 1975. The Chemists and the Word: The Didactic Origins of Chemistry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, 1970. The Principles of Scientific Thinking. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John, 1986. “Occult Qualities and the Experimental Philosophy: Active Principles in Pre-Newtonian Matter Theory,” History of Science. 24: 335–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooke, Robert, 1665. Micrographia. London.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. trans. Evanston, David Carr. III.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, J. R., 1977. Robert Boyle and the English Revolution: A Study in Social and Intellectual Change. New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar
Jacob, J. R., 1978. “Boyle's Atomism and the Assault on Pagan Naturalism,” Social Studies of Science. 8: 211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Richard Foster, 1961. Ancients and Moderns: A Study of the Rise of the Scientific Movement in Seventeenth-Century England. 2d ed. St. Louis: Washington University Press.Google Scholar
Jordanova, L. J. and Porter, Roy S., eds., 1979. Images of the Earth: Essays in the History of the Environmental Sciences. BSHS Monographs, No. 1. Chalfont St. Giles: British Society for the History of Science.Google Scholar
Kargon, Robert H., 1971. “The Testimony of Nature: Boyle, Hooke and Experimental Philosophy,” Albion 3: 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsland, Sharon E., 1986. “Mathematical Figments, Biological Facts: Population Ecology in the Thirties,” Journal of the History of Biology. 19: 235–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klaaren, Eugene M., 1977. Religious Origins of Modern Science: Belief in Creation in Seventeenth-Century Thought. Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre, 1968. Metaphysics and Measurement: Essays in the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre, 1968a. “Pascal Savant,” in Metaphysics and Measurement: Essays in the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1968, chap. 6.Google Scholar
Koyre, Alexandre, 1968b. “Galileo and Plato,” in Metaphysics and Measurement: Essays in the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1968, chap. 2.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., 1952. “Robert Boyle and Structural Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century,” Isis 43: 12–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977a. “Mathematical versus Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science,” in The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1977, 31–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977b. “The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science,” in The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1977 178–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Richard E., 1935. The Backgrounds and Foundations of Modern Science Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Lee, Richard E., 1935. The Backgrounds and Foundations of Modern Science Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David C. and Cantor, G. N. 1985. The Discourse of light from the Middle Ages to Enlightenment. Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E. “Boyle's Conception of Nature,” Journal of the History of Ideas 33: 523–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mach, Ernst, 1960. The Science of Mechanics. trans. McCormack, Thomas J., 6th ed., La Salle, 111.: Open Court.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan, ed., 1978. The Concept of Matter in Modern Philosophy. Notre Dame. Ind.: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan, 1985. “Galilean Idealization,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 16: 247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, R. E. W., 1969. The Life of the Honourable Robert Boyle. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Michael S., 1980. “The Beginnings of Algebraic Thought in the Seventeenth Century, in Gaukroger 1980. 141–55.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Michael S. 1984. “Changing Canons of Mathematical and Physical Intelligibility in the Later 17th Century,” Historia Mathematica. 1: 417–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Maurice, 1964. Philosophy, Science and Sense Perception: Historical and Critical Studies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Maurice, 1964a. “Newton and Boyle and the Problem of ‘Transdiction’,” in Mandelbaum 1964. 61–117.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K., 1970. Science, Technology & society in Seventtenth-Century England, 2d ed. New york: Harper Torchbook.Google Scholar
Moran, Bruce T., 1981. German Prince-Practitioners: Aspects in the Development of Courtly Science, Technology, and Procedures in the Renaissance,” Technology and Culture 22: 253–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
More, Louis Trenchard, 1944. The Life and Works of the Honourable Rober Boyle. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Naylor, Ronald, 1976. “Galileo: Real Experiment and Didactic Demonstration,” Isis 67: 398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Francis, 1984. Omnipotence, Covenant, & Order: An Excursion in the History of Ideas from Abelard to Leibniz Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Paracelsus, , 1951. Selected Writings. ed. Jacobi, Jolande, trans. Norbert Guterman, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pitt, J. C., ed., 1985. Change and Progress in Modern Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Power, Henry, 1664. Experimental Philosophy. London.Google Scholar
Pugliese, Patri Jones 1982. “The Scientific Achievement of Robert Hooke: Method and Mechanics.” Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ravetz, J. R., 1971. Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Royal Society, Boyle Papers.Google Scholar
Ruby, Jane E., 1986. “The Origins of Scientific ‘Law’,” Journal of the History of Ideas 47: 341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven, 1984. “Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology,” Social Studies of Science 14: 481–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon, 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara J., 1983. Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationships between Natural. Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Peter, ed., 1738. The Philosophical Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle Esq.…, 2d ed., 3 vols. London.Google Scholar
Shaw, Peter, 1738a. “A General Preface to the Abridgment of Mr. Boyle's Philosophical Works,” in Shaw 1738. 1: i–xxi.Google Scholar
Sloan, Phillip R., 1976. “The Buffon-Linnaeus Controversy,” Isis 67: 356–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stieb, Ernst W., 1964. “Robert Boyle's Medicina Hydrostatica and the Detection of Adulteration,” in Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of the History of Science, Ithaca, 1962, 2 vols., 2: 841–45. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Stock, John T., 1969. The Development of the Chemical Balance. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Stubbe, Henry, 1670. A Specimen of Some Animadversions upon a Book, Entituled, Plus Ultra, … written by MrGlanvill, Joseph, London.Google Scholar
Taton, René, ed., 1964. The Beginnings of Modern Science. From 1450 to 1800. London: Thames and HudsonGoogle Scholar
Taton, René and Cohen, I. Bernard eds., 1964. Mélanges Alexandre Koyré Vol. II: L'aventure de l'esprit. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Turner, A. J., 1973. “Mathematical Instruments and the Education of Gentlemen,” Annals of Science. 30: 51–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, John, 1693–95. “Tractatus duo. Prior, De Cycloide …,” in Opera mathe-matica 2 vols., 1: 489–541. Oxford.Google Scholar
Webster, Charles, 1965. “The Discovery of Boyle's Law, and the Concept of Elasticity of Air in the Seventeenth Century,” Archive for History of the Exact Sciences. 2: 441–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. 1973 Science and Religion in Seventeenth-Century England. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1976. Philosophical Investigations. trans. Anscombe, G.E.M.., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zetterberg, J. Peter, 1976. “‘Mathematicall Magick’ in England: 1550–1650.” Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar