Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content
 
Home> The Cambridge Law Journal> Top 10 Most-Cited Articles

 

Log In

Browse Journals

Special Sales

Cambridge Journals Digital Archive

Click here for details about our archive digitisation project. more details

2009 Journals Catalogue

Click here to download a PDF of our latest catalogue; a comprehensive guide to all of our journals. more details

CJO Now Includes:

567,269 articles from 321 leading journals.

Customize Your Search Toolbar

Top 10 Most-Cited Articles


These are the top 10 most-cited articles for this title. Most-cited rankings are updated on a monthly basis and provided by CrossRef.

  • Subscription Access
  • Free Access
  • Trial Access
  • Full Text HTML as well as PDF Articles Available
  • Note: Abstract, PDF and HTML open in a new window
  Article Description Save / Export / View citation Add to Basket
  Select all
 

ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR: LOCAL AUTHORITY RESPONSIBILITY AND THE VOICE OF THE VICTIM

Susan Bright and Chara Bakalis

The Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 62, Issue 02, Jul 2003, pp 305-334
doi: 10.1017/S0008197303006330 (About doi), Published online by Cambridge University Press 11 Aug 2003
 

FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF RAPE

Philip N.S. Rumney

The Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 65, Issue 01, Mar 2006, pp 128-158
doi: 10.1017/S0008197306007069 (About doi), Published online by Cambridge University Press 19 Apr 2006
 

PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL AND PROPERTY RIGHTS

Susan Bright and Ben McFarlane

The Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 64, Issue 02, Jul 2005, pp 449-480
doi: 10.1017/S0008197305006926 (About doi), Published online by Cambridge University Press 07 Jul 2005
 

THE REASONABLENESS PRINCIPLE: REASSESSING ITS PLACE IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE

T.R. Hickman

The Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 63, Issue 01, Mar 2004, pp 166-198
doi: 10.1017/S0008197304006543 (About doi), Published online by Cambridge University Press 14 Apr 2004
 

PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL AND THIRD PARTIES AFTER THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002

Ben McFarlane

The Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 62, Issue 03, Nov 2003, pp 661-696
doi: 10.1017/S0008197303006445 (About doi), Published online by Cambridge University Press 24 Nov 2003
 

THE CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW: CONCEPTUAL CONUNDRUM OR INTERPRETATIVE INQUIRY?

T.R.S. Allan

The Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 61, Issue 01, Mar 2002, pp 87-125
doi: 10.1017/S000819730200154X (About doi), Published online by Cambridge University Press 19 Apr 2002
 

THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 AND THE STANDARD OF SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW

Mark Elliott

The Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 60, Issue 02, Jul 2001, pp 301-336
doi: 10.1017/S0008197301000137 (About doi), Published online by Cambridge University Press 25 Jul 2001
 

THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY IN THE COMMUNITY CONTEXT: P, GRANT, KALANKE AND MARSCHALL: FOUR UNEASY BEDFELLOWS?

CATHERINE BARNARD

The Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 57, Issue 02, Jul 1998, pp 352-373
doi: 10.1017/S0008197398000063 (About doi), Published online by Cambridge University Press 30 Mar 2001
 

PRIVACY, CONFIDENCE AND HORIZONTAL EFFECT: “HELLO” TROUBLE

Jonathan Morgan

The Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 62, Issue 02, Jul 2003, pp 444-473
doi: 10.1017/S0008197303006378 (About doi), Published online by Cambridge University Press 11 Aug 2003
 

RESCUING REMEDIALISM IN UNJUST ENRICHMENT LAW: WHY REMEDIES ARE RIGHT

KIT BARKER

The Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 57, Issue 02, Jul 1998, pp 301-327
doi: 10.1017/S000819739800004X (About doi), Published online by Cambridge University Press 30 Mar 2001
  Select all
  Article Description Save / Export / View citation Add to Basket

Back to Journal Homepage
Cambridge University Press