Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T02:10:44.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutions, rules and equilibria: a commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2014

KEN BINMORE
KEN BINMORE*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, Bristol University, Bristol, BS8 1TN, UK
*
*Email: k.binmore@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This brief note is a commentary on Hendriks and Guala's (2014) unification of the institutional theories of Lewis, North, and Searle. It argues that the equilibrium theory of Lewis is fundamental and that the kind of equilibrium best suited in this role remains the orthodox notion of Nash.

Type
Article Commentary
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 493 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aumann, R. (1976), ‘Agreeing to Disagree’, Annals of Statistics, 4: 1236–1239.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. (2005), Natural Justice, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. (2008), ‘Do Conventions Need to be Common Knowledge?’, Topoi, 27: 17–27.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. (2010), ‘Game Theory and Institutions’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 38: 245–252.Google Scholar
Brandenburger, A. (2014), The Language of Game Theory: Putting Epistemics into the Mathematics of Games, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Friedell, M. (1969), ‘On the structure of shared awareness’, Behavioral Science, 14: 28–39.Google Scholar
Greif, A. and Kingston, C. (2011), ‘Institutions: Rules or Equilibria?’, in Schofield, N. and Caballero, G. (eds.), Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy and Voting, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Guala, F. (2012), ‘Reciprocity: Weak or Strong? What Punishment Experiments do (and do not) Demonstrate’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35: 1–15.Google Scholar
Hindriks, F. and Guala, F. (2014), ‘Institutions, Rules, and Equilibria: A Unified Theory’, Journal of Institutional Economics, Published online: 16 October 2014, DOI: 10.1017/S174413744000496.Google Scholar
Hofbauer, J. and Sigmund, K. (1998), Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1739/1978), A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969), Conventions: A Philosophical Study, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1982), Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, L. (1997), Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. (1960), The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1995), The Construction of Social Reality, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Young, P. (2001), Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar