Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T15:39:35.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acts of control in schizophrenia: dissociating the components of inhibition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2017

J. C. BADCOCK
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, University of Western Australia/Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, Graylands Hospital; Department of Psychology, University of Western Australia; and Osborne Clinic, North Metropolitan Mental Health Service, Perth, WA, Australia
P. T. MICHIE
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, University of Western Australia/Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, Graylands Hospital; Department of Psychology, University of Western Australia; and Osborne Clinic, North Metropolitan Mental Health Service, Perth, WA, Australia
L. JOHNSON
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, University of Western Australia/Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, Graylands Hospital; Department of Psychology, University of Western Australia; and Osborne Clinic, North Metropolitan Mental Health Service, Perth, WA, Australia
J. COMBRINCK
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, University of Western Australia/Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, Graylands Hospital; Department of Psychology, University of Western Australia; and Osborne Clinic, North Metropolitan Mental Health Service, Perth, WA, Australia

Abstract

Background. Inhibitory deficits have been frequently reported in schizophrenia. Such deficits are usually associated with activities of prefrontal cortex and related networks. An understanding of intentional inhibitory control requires knowledge of how actions are planned and initiated and the components involved in stopping these actions.

Methods. Patients with schizophrenia, a psychosis comparison group and a healthy control group participated in a visual choice reaction time (go) task and attempted to inhibit their responses to the go task when an auditory ‘stop’ signal was heard.

Results. Schizophrenia patients demonstrated significantly slower response execution but the estimated speed of inhibition was not significantly different from that of healthy controls. Both patient groups were impaired in their ability to inhibit a response across a range of stop-signal delays. The poorer performance of schizophrenia patients only was related to a difficulty in reliably triggering the inhibitory response.

Conclusions. Impaired response inhibition is not unique to schizophrenia. However, the nature of their problem is markedly different from that of other psychopathological groups. Possible neural mechanisms underpinning difficulties in triggering inhibitory responses and in the voluntary initiation of actions in schizophrenia are considered.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)