Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:33:10.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tensile Deformation and Fatigue Crack Growth in Bulk Nanocrystalline Al-7.5Mg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

P.S. Pao
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375, U.S.A.
H.N. Jones
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375, U.S.A.
S.J. Gill
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375, U.S.A.
C. R. Feng
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The fatigue crack growth kinetics and tensile deformation of bulk nanocrystalline Al-7.5Mg were investigated. Nanocrystalline particulates were first prepared by mechanically ball milling spray atomized Al-7.5Mg powders in liquid nitrogen. These particulates were then degassed, consolidated by hot isostatic pressing, and extruded into rods. Bulk nanocrystalline Al-7.5Mg has significantly higher fatigue crack growth rates and lower fatigue crack growth thresholds than those of ingot-processed 7050-T7451. The fatigue crack growth thresholds exhibit only a weak stress ratio dependency and can be identified as having a Class I behavior when using the fatigue classification proposed by Vasudevan and Sadananda. In 3.5% NaCl solution, fatigue crack growth rates of bulk nanocrystalline Al-7.5Mg are as much as three times higher than those obtained in air. Tensile fracture of bulk nanocrystalline Al-7.5Mg is preceded by the formation of a localized shear band. In contrast to the low dislocation density in the as-extruded material, the gage section and the shear band region both exhibited a high dislocation density and dislocation cell structure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hayes, R., Tellkamp, V., and Lavernia, E., Scripta Materialia 41, 743 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Tellkamp, V.L. and Lavernia, EJ., Nanostruct. Mater. 12, 249 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Rawers, J., Slavens, G., and Krabbe, R., Nanostruct. Mater. 9, 197 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Perez, RJ., Jiang, H.G., and Lavernia, EJ., Nanostruct. Mater. 9, 71 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Lau, M J., Jiang, H.G., Perez, R. J., Juarez-Islas, J., and Lavernia, EJ., Nanostruct. Mater. 9, 157 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Perez, RJ., Huang, B., and Lavernia, EJ., Nanostruct. Mater. 7, 565 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Pao, P.S., Gill, S J., Feng, CR., and Sankaran, K.K., Scripta Materialia 45, 605 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Pao, P.S., Imam, M.A., Cooley, L.A., and Yoder, GR., Corrosion 45, 530 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Vasudevan, A.K. and Sadananda, K., Metall. Trans. 26A, 1221 (1995).Google Scholar