Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:09:15.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface nanocrystallization induced by shot peening and its effect on corrosion resistance of 6061 aluminum alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2014

Bin Chen*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of China; and State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of China
Binxiang Huang
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of China
Hai Liu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of China
Xiaoling Li
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of China
Mengtian Ni
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of China
Chen Lu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: steelboy@sjtu.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

The effects of the different shot peening parameters on the 6061 alloy specimens' surface have been investigated. It is found that the compressive residual stresses and the surface roughness of the surface layer for all shot-peened specimens are improved greatly. The maximum stress value and the maximum roughness are obtained by the shot flow rate of 5.5 lbs/min and air pressure of 20 psi. The microstructure observation results indicate that a nanostructured layer with an average grain size below 100 nm has been created on the top surface layer of each specimen. In the top surface nanostructured layer, the microhardness is enhanced. It is resulted from the grain refinement and the strain hardening. The results of electrochemical measurements, surface corrosion morphology observation, and EDS analysis indicate that the corrosion susceptibility of the 6061 alloy could be significantly enhanced by means of the shot-peening-induced surface nanocrystallization.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Inoue, A., Kawamura, Y., Matsushita, M., Hayashi, K., and Koike, J.: Novel hexagonal structure and ultrahigh strength of magnesium solid solution in the Mg–Zn–Y system. J. Mater. Res. 16(07), 1894 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y.J., Chai, Y.C., Roven, H.J., Gireesh, S.S., Yu, Y.D., and Hjelen, J.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-xMg alloys processed by room temperature ECAP. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 545, 139 (2012).Google Scholar
Tao, N., Sui, M., Lu, J., and Lua, K.: Surface nanocrystallization of iron induced by ultrasonic shot peening. Nanostruct. Mater. 11(4), 433 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, G., Lu, J., and Lu, K.: Surface nanocrystallization of 316L stainless steel induced by ultrasonic shot peening. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 286(1), 91 (2000).Google Scholar
Wang, T., Yu, J., and Dong, B.: Surface nanocrystallization induced by shot peening and its effect on corrosion resistance of 1Cr18Ni9Ti stainless steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 200(16), 4777 (2006).Google Scholar
Lee, H-S., Kim, D-S., Jung, J-S., Pyoun, Y-S., and Shin, K.: Influence of peening on the corrosion properties of AISI 304 stainless steel. Corros. Sci. 51(12), 2826 (2009).Google Scholar
Bagherifard, S. and Guagliano, M.: Fatigue behavior of a low-alloy steel with nanostructured surface obtained by severe shot peening. Eng. Fract. Mech. 81, 56 (2012).Google Scholar
Cho, K.T., Song, K., Oh, S.H., Lee, Y-K., Lim, K.M., and Lee, W.B.: Surface hardening of aluminum alloy by shot peening treatment with Zn based ball. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 543, 44 (2012).Google Scholar
Hou, L-F., Wei, Y-H., Shu, X-F., and Xu, B-F.: Nanocrystalline structure of magnesium alloys subjected to high energy shot peening. J. Alloys Compd. 492(1), 347 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., Sheng, G., and Hu, G.: Nanostructured surface layer of Ti–4Al–2V by means of high energy shot peening. ISIJ Int. 48(2), 218 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, L., Jiang, C., Lu, W., Chen, Y., and Huang, J.: Effect of stress peening on surface layer characteristics of (TiB+ TiC)/Ti–6Al–4V composite. Mater. Des. 33, 64 (2012).Google Scholar
Drechsler, A., Dörr, T., and Wagner, L.: Mechanical surface treatments on Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al for improved fatigue resistance. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 243(1), 217 (1998).Google Scholar
Ochi, Y., Masaki, K., Matsumura, T., and Sekino, T.: Effect of shot-peening treatment on high cycle fatigue property of ductile cast iron. Int. J. Fatigue 23(5), 441 (2001).Google Scholar
Liu, K.K. and Hill, M.R.: The effects of laser peening and shot peening on fretting fatigue in Ti–6Al–4V coupons. Tribol. Int. 42(9), 1250 (2009).Google Scholar
Raja, K., Namjoshi, S., and Misra, M.: Improved corrosion resistance of Ni–22Cr–13Mo–4W Alloy by surface nanocrystallization. Mater. Lett. 59(5), 570 (2005).Google Scholar
Mao, X., Li, D., Fang, F., Tan, R., and Jiang, J.: Application of a simple surface nanocrystallization process to a Cu–30Ni alloy for enhanced resistances to wear and corrosive wear. Wear 271(9), 1224 (2011).Google Scholar
Xiao, Z., Fok, W.C., and Tint, L.D.: Parametric study of residual stress due to shot peening. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 39(3), 469 (1993).Google Scholar
Xiao, Z., Fok, W., and Lwin, D.: Effects of air-blast pressure and exposure time on the shot-peening process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 39(1), 13 (1993).Google Scholar
Rodopoulos, C.A. and Bridges, J.: The use of ultrasonic impact treatment to extend the fatigue life of integral aerospace structures. In Engineering Against Fracture (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2009), p. 421.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Santana, U., Rubio-González, C., Gomez-Rosas, G., Ocana, J., Molpeceres, C., Porro, J., and Morales, M.: Wear and friction of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy treated by laser shock processing. Wear 260(7), 847 (2006).Google Scholar
Grinspan, A.S. and Gnanamoorthy, R.: Surface modification by oil jet peening in Al alloys, AA6063-T6 and AA6061-T4: Part 2: Surface morphology, erosion, and mass loss. Appl. Surf. Sci. 253(2), 997 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjipanayis, G.C. and Siegel, R.R.W.: Nanophase Materials - Synthesis, Properties, Applications: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Corfu, Greece, June 20-July 2, 1993 (Kluwer, Norwell, MA, 1994).Google Scholar
Saif, M., Zhang, S., Haque, A., and Hsia, K.: Effect of native Al2O3 on the elastic response of nanoscale Al films. Acta Mater. 50(11), 2779 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, K.P. and Alkire, R.C.: Local chemistry and growth of single corrosion pits in aluminum. J. Electrochem. Soc. 137(10), 3010 (1990).Google Scholar
Liao, C-M. and Wei, R.P.: Galvanic coupling of model alloys to aluminum—A foundation for understanding particle-induced pitting in aluminum alloys. Electrochim. Acta 45(6), 881 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Gao, M., and Wei, R.: Microconstituent-induced pitting corrosion in aluminum alloy 2024-T3. Corrosion 52(1), 8 (1996).Google Scholar