Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:24:45.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Annealing temperature-dependent crystallinity and photocurrent response of anodic nanoporous iron oxide film

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2016

Monna Rozana*
Affiliation:
Green Electronics Nanomaterials Group, Science and Engineering of Nanomaterials Team, School of Materials and Mineral Resources, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 14300, Malaysia
Khairunisak Abdul Razak
Affiliation:
Green Electronics Nanomaterials Group, Science and Engineering of Nanomaterials Team, School of Materials and Mineral Resources, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 14300, Malaysia
Cheong Kuan Yew
Affiliation:
Green Electronics Nanomaterials Group, Science and Engineering of Nanomaterials Team, School of Materials and Mineral Resources, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 14300, Malaysia
Zainovia Lockman*
Affiliation:
Green Electronics Nanomaterials Group, Science and Engineering of Nanomaterials Team, School of Materials and Mineral Resources, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 14300, Malaysia
Go Kawamura
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Aichi 441-8580, Japan
Atsunori Matsuda
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Aichi 441-8580, Japan
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: zainovia@usm.my
Get access

Abstract

The effects of annealing temperatures on the structure and photocurrent response of nanoporous iron oxide film prepared by anodization of iron foil in an ethylene glycol, NH4F, and H2O electrolyte were studied. The as-anodized anodic film was found to be rather amorphous and crystallized to predominantly α-Fe2O3 upon annealing in nitrogen. Nitrogen was used as to reduce the thickening of the barrier layer which affects the photocurrent response of the oxide. However, annealing must be done above 300 °C to produce crystalline oxide but must be kept lower than 500 °C since high temperature promotes grain growth, destroying the nanoporous structure and also thickens the barrier layer, which significantly reduce the photocurrent of the film. Sample annealed at 450 °C in nitrogen has the highest photocurrent of 1.04 mA/cm2 (0.5 V versus Ag/AgCl in 1 M NaOH) compared to 0.13 mA/cm2 at 0.5 V for air-annealed sample.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barroso, M., Pendlebury, S.R., Cowan, A.J., and Durrant, J.R.: Charge carrier trapping, recombination and transfer in hematite (α-Fe2O3) water splitting photoanodes. Chem. Sci. 4, 27242734 (2013).Google Scholar
Kennedy, J.H. and Frese, K.W.: Photooxidation of water at α-Fe2O3 electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 125, 709714 (1978).Google Scholar
Shen, S.: Toward efficient solar water splitting over hematite photoelectrodes. J. Mater. Res. 29(01), 2946 (2014).Google Scholar
Nishikiori, H., Qian, W., El-Sayed, M.A., Tanaka, N., and Fujii, T.: Change in titania structure from amorphousness to crystalline increasing photoinduced electron-transfer rate in dye-titania system. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 90089011 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uekawa, N. and Kaneko, K.: Nonstoichiometric properties of nanoporous iron oxide films. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 87198724 (1998).Google Scholar
Albu, S.P., Ghicov, A., and Schmuki, P.: High aspect ratio, self-ordered iron oxide nanopores formed by anodization of Fe in ethylene glycol/NH4F electrolytes. Phys. Status Solidi RRL 3, 6466 (2009).Google Scholar
Habazaki, H., Konno, Y., Aoki, Y., Skeldon, P., and Thompson, G.E.: Galvanostatic growth of nanoporous anodic films on iron in ammonium flouride-ethylene glycol electrolytes with different water contents. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 1885318859 (2010).Google Scholar
Jagminas, A., Mazeika, K., Bernotas, N., Klimas, V., Selskis, A., and Baltrunas, D.: Compositional and structural characterization of nanoporous produced by iron anodizing in ethylene glycol. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 38933897 (2011).Google Scholar
Konno, Y., Tsuji, E., Skeldon, P., Thompson, G.E., and Habazaki, H.: Factors influencing the growth behaviour of nanoporous anodic films on iron under galvanostatic anodizing. J. Solid State Electrochem. 16, 38873896 (2012).Google Scholar
Prakasam, H.E., Varghese, O.K., Paulose, M., Mor, G.K., and Grimes, C.A.: Synthesis and photoelectrochemical properties of nanoporous iron (III) oxide by potentiostatic anodization. Nanotechnology 17, 42854291 (2006).Google Scholar
Cheng, H., Zheng, L., Tsang, C.K., Zhang, J., Wang, H.E., Dong, Y., Li, H., Liang, F., Zapien, J.A., and Li, Y.Y.: Electrochemical fabrication and optical properties of periodically structured porous Fe2O3 films. Electrochem. Commun. 20, 178181 (2012).Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Hossain, M.F., and Takahashi, T.: Fabrication of shape-controlled α-Fe2O3 nanostructures by sonoelectrochemical anodization for visible light photocatalytic application. Mater. Lett. 64, 435438 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozana, M., Azhar, M.A., Anwar, D.M., Kawamura, G., Khairunisak, A.R., Matsuda, A., and Lockman, Z.: Effect of applied voltage on the formation of self-organized iron oxide nanoporous film in organic electrolyte via anodic oxidation process and their photocurrent performance. Adv. Mater. Res. 1024, 99103 (2014).Google Scholar
Schwertmann, U. and Cornell, R.: The Iron Oxides (Wiley-VCH GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinhem, 2003).Google Scholar
Lee, C.Y., Wang, L., Kado, Y., Killian, M.S., and Schmuki, P.: Anodic nanotubular/porous hematite photoanode for solar water splitting: Substantial effect of iron substrate purity. ChemSusChem 7, 934940 (2014).Google Scholar
Nagayama, M.I. and Cohen, M.: The anodic oxidation of iron in a neutral solution: I. The nature and composition of the passive film. J. Electrochem. Soc. 109, 781790 (1962).Google Scholar
Szklarska-Smialowska, Z.: Mechanism of pit nucleation by electrical breakdown of the passive film. Corros. Sci. 44, 11431149 (2002).Google Scholar
Regonini, D., Bowen, C.R., Jaroenworaluck, A., and Stevens, R.: A review of growth mechanism, structure and crystallinity of anodized TiO2 nanotubes. Mater. Sci. Eng., R 74, 377406 (2013).Google Scholar
Schmuki, P.: From Bacon to barriers: A review on the passivity of metals and alloys. J. Solid State Electrochem. 6, 145164 (2002).Google Scholar
Yasuda, K., Macak, J.M., Berger, S., Ghicov, A., and Schmuki, P.: Mechanistic aspects of the self-organization process for oxide nanotube formation on valve metals. J. Electrochem. Soc. 154, C472C478 (2007).Google Scholar
Chen, R.Y. and Yeun, W.Y.D.: Review of the high-temperature oxidation of iron and carbon steels in air or oxygen. Oxid. Met. 59, 433468 (2003).Google Scholar
Bersani, D., Lottici, P.P., and Montenero, A.: Micro-Raman investigation of iron oxide films and powders produced by sol–gel syntheses. J. Raman Spectrosc. 30, 355360 (1999).3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Faria, D.L.A., Venâncio Silva, S., and de Oliveira, M.T.: Raman microspectroscopy of some iron oxides and oxyhydroxides. J. Raman Spectrosc. 28, 873878 (1997).Google Scholar
Hanesch, M.: Raman spectroscopy of iron oxides and (oxy)hydroxides at low laser power and possible applications in environmental magnetic studies. Geophys. J. Int. 177, 941948 (2009).Google Scholar
Nieuwoudt, M.K., Comins, J.D., and Cukrowski, I.: The growth of the passive film on iron in 0.05 M NaOH studied in situ by Raman micro-spectroscopy and electrochemical polarisation. Part I: Near-resonance enhancement of the Raman spectra of iron oxide and oxyhydroxide compounds. J. Raman Spectrosc. 42, 13351339 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, S., Cook, D.C., and Townsend, H.E.: Characterization of iron oxides commonly formed as corrosion products on steel. Hyperfine Interact. 112, 5966 (1998).Google Scholar