Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:50:26.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global stability of the rotating-disc boundary layer with an axial magnetic field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2013

Christian Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Christopher Davies*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4AG, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: DaviesC9@cardiff.ac.uk

Abstract

A numerical study is conducted to investigate the influence of a uniform axial magnetic field on the global linear stability of the rotating-disc boundary layer. Simulation results obtained using a radially homogenized base flow were found to be in excellent agreement with an earlier linear stability analysis, which indicated that an axial magnetic field can locally suppress both convective and absolute instabilities. However, the numerical results obtained for the genuine, radially inhomogeneous, flow indicate that a global form of instability develops for sufficiently large magnetic fields. The qualitative nature of the global instability is similar to that which was observed in a previous study, where mass suction was applied at the rotating disc surface. It is shown that, just as for the case with mass suction, it is possible to explain the promotion of global instability by considering a model that includes detuning effects, which are associated with the radial variation of locally defined absolute temporal frequencies. The recurrence of the same type of instability behaviour when two distinct flow control strategies are implemented, one using suction and the other an axial magnetic field, indicates that the phenomena described by the model may be considered generic.

Type
Papers
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davies, C. & Carpenter, P. W. 2001 A novel velocity–vorticity formulation of the Navier–Stokes equations with applications to boundary layer disturbance evolution. J. Comput. Phys. 172, 119165.Google Scholar
Davies, C. & Carpenter, P. W. 2003 Global behaviour corresponding to the absolute instability of the rotating-disc boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 486, 287329.Google Scholar
Davies, C., Thomas, C. & Carpenter, P. W. 2007 Global stability of the rotating disc boundary layer. J. Engng Maths 57, 219236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faller, A. J. & Kaylor, R. E. 1966 A numerical study of the instability of the laminar Ekman boundary-layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 23, 466480.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, W. E. 1952 The nature of the boundary layer at the nose of a swept back wing. Unpublished, Min Aviation, London.Google Scholar
Gregory, N., Stuart, J. T. & Walker, W. S. 1955 On the stability of three-dimensional boundary-layers with application to the flow due to a rotating disk. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 248, 155199.Google Scholar
Healey, J. J. 2010 Model for unstable global modes in the rotating-disk boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 148159.Google Scholar
Hicks, T. W. & Riley, N. 1989 Boundary layers in magnetic Czochralski crystal growth. J. Cryst. Growth 96, 957968.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. E. & Crighton, D. G. 1991 Instability of flows in spatially developing media. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 435, 109128.Google Scholar
Imayama, S., Alfredsson, P. H. & Lingwood, R. J. 2013 An experimental study of edge effects on rotating-disk transition. J. Fluid Mech. 716, 638657.Google Scholar
Jasmine, H. A. & Gajjar, J. S. B. 2005 Convective and absolute instability in the incompressible boundary layer on a rotating disk in the presence of a uniform magnetic field. J. Engng Maths 52, 337353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Kármán, T. 1921 Über laminare und turbulente Reibung. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 1, 233252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S. K., Thacker, W. I. & Watson, L. T. 1987 Magnetohydrodynamic flow past a porous rotating disk in a circular magnetic field. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 8, 659669.Google Scholar
Lingwood, R. J. 1995 Absolute instability of the boundary-layer on a rotating-disk. J. Fluid Mech. 299, 1733.Google Scholar
Lingwood, R. J. 1997 On the effects of suction and injection on the absolute instability of the rotating-disk boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 9, 13171328.Google Scholar
Mack, L. M. 1985 The wave pattern produced by point source on a rotating disk. AIAA Paper 85-0490.Google Scholar
Organ, A. E. & Riley, N. 1987 Oxygen transport in magnetic Czochralski growth of silicon. J. Cryst. Growth 82, 465476.Google Scholar
Othman, H. & Corke, T. 2006 Experimental investigation of absolute instability of a rotating-disk boundary-layer. J. Fluid Mech. 565, 6394.Google Scholar
Pao, H. P. 1968 Magnetohydrodynamic flows over a rotating disk. AIAA J. 6, 12851291.Google Scholar
Saric, W. S., Reed, H. L. & White, E. B. 2003 Stability and transition of three-dimensional boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 413440.Google Scholar
Sparrow, E. M. & Cess, R. D. 1962 Magnetohydrodynamic and heat transfer about a rotating disk. Trans: ASME J. Appl. Mech. 29, 181187.Google Scholar
Suryaprakasarao, U. & Gupta, A. S. 1966 Hydromagnetic flow due to a rotating disc subjected to large suction. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 21, 23902400.Google Scholar
Thacker, W. I., Watson, L. T. & Kumar, S. K. 1990 Magnetohydrodynamic free convection from a disc rotating in a vertical plane. Appl. Math. Model. 14, 527535.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 2007 Numerical simulations of disturbance development in rotating boundary-layers. PhD thesis, Cardiff University.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Bassom, A. P. & Davies, C. 2010 The linear stability of a Stokes layer with an imposed axial magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 662, 320328.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. & Davies, C. 2010 The effects of mass transfer on the global stability of the rotating-disk boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 401433.Google Scholar