Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T18:11:29.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

German pitches in English: Production and perception of cross-varietal differences in L2*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

CHRISTIANE ULBRICH
CHRISTIANE ULBRICH*
Affiliation:
Philipps University Marburg, Germany & University of Ulster, Northern Ireland
*
Address for correspondence: Institute of German Linguistics, Philipps University Marburg, Deutschhausstrasse 3, D-35032 Marburg, Germanychristiane.ulbrich@staff.uni-marburg.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study examines the effect of cross-varietal prosodic characteristics of two German varieties, Northern Standard German (NG) and Swiss German (SG), on the production and perception of foreign accent in L2 Belfast English. The analysis of production data revealed differences in the realisation of nuclear pitch accents in L1 German and L2 English produced by the two groups of speakers. Foreign accent ratings of L2 English sentences produced by NG speakers with no or extensive experience, native Belfast English speakers and SG speakers were obtained from native Belfast English listeners. The findings showed that segmental and prosodic characteristics play a role in the perception of foreign accent. In addition, they can be more similar across languages than across varieties of the same language. This in turn affects which and how cross-varietal differences in L1 impact on the degree of perceived foreign accentedness. The results are consistent with a usage-based account.

Keywords

acquisitionprosodycross-variationGermanEnglish
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Computational Modeling of Bilingualism , April 2013 , pp. 397 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments that greatly contributed to improving the final version of the paper. This research was supported by the U.K. British Academy (BA) through grant no. SG4501 to University of Ulster. This support is gratefully acknowledged. I thank the University of Ulster for the use of the Phonetics Laboratory, and all subjects for their participation.

References

Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, K., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of non-native pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, J., & Koehler, K. (1988). The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning, 38, 561–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D. (1999). Sociocultural perspectives on language change in diaspora: Soviet immigrants in the United States. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Atterer, M., & Ladd, D. R. (2004). On the phonetics and phonology of “segmental anchoring” of f0: Evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 177–197.Google Scholar
Baker, W., & Smith, L. C. (2010). The impact of L2 dialect on learning French vowels: Native English speakers learning Quebecois and European French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66 (5), 711–738.Google Scholar
Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2006). Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R., & Langman, J. (2004). Variation in the group and the individual: Evidence from second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42, 303–319.Google Scholar
Bayley, R., & Regan, V. (2004). Introduction: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8 (3), 323–338.Google Scholar
Benus, S., Gravano, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2007). Prosody, emotions, and. . . “whatever”. In Interspeech, Antwerp, 2629–2632.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of crosslanguage speech perception. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, pp. 171–204. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listeners’ native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109 (2), 775–792.Google Scholar
Biersack, S. (2002). Systematische Aussprachefehler deutscher Muttersprachler im Englischen – Eine phonetisch-phonologische Bestandaufnahme [Systematic pronunciation mistakes of German natives speaking English]. In Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München (FIPKM), 39, 37–130. [M.A. thesis.]Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In Healy, A., Kosslyn, S. & Shiffrin, R. (eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (vol. 2), pp. 35–67. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. E. (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5120). [Computer program.]Google Scholar
Bombien, L., Mooshammer, C., Hoole, P., Kühnert, B., & Schneeberg, J. (2006). An EPG study of /kl/ clusters in varying prosodic conditions in German. In H. Yehia, C, Demolin, D. & Laboissière, R. (eds.), Proceedings of 7th International Seminar on Speech Production, pp. 35–42.Google Scholar
Boula de Mareuil, P., & Vieru-Dimulescu, B. (2006). The contribution of prosody to the perception of foreign accent, Phonetica, 63 (4), 247–267.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/, IV: Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2299–2310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brahimi, B., Boula de Mareuil, P., & Gendrot, C. (2004). Role of segmental and suprasegmental cues in the perception of maghrebian-acented French. Interspeech, pp. 341–344.Google Scholar
Brière, E. (1966). An investigation of phonological interferences. Language, 42, 768–795.Google Scholar
Byrd, D. (1996). Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 209–244.Google Scholar
Byrd, D., & Choi, S. (2006). At the juncture of prosody, phonology, and phonetics – the interaction of phrasal and syllable structure in shaping the timing of consonant gestures. In Fougeron, C., Kuehnert, B., Imperio, M. & Vallee, N. (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 10, pp. 31–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Case, P., Tuller, B., Ding, M., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Evaluation of a dynamical model of speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 977–988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, J., & Trudgill, P. (1998). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, T., & Keating, P. (2009). Effects of initial position versus prominence in English. Journal of Phonetics, 37 (4), 466–485.Google Scholar
Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P. (1999). Variations and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 207–229.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. G. (1995). The German language in a changing Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crothers, J. (1978). Typology and universals of vowel systems. In Greenberg, J. H., Ferguson, C. A. & Moravcsik, E. A. (eds.), Universals of human language (vol. 2): Phonology, pp. 93–152. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, L. (2006). Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influence on the production of non-native sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 104–137.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 313–348. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. (2004). Retention or omission of the ne in advanced French interlanguage: The variable effect of extralinguistic factors. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8 (3), 333–350.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 85–107.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2007). Educational settings and second language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 9, 11–27.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Aquisition, 26, 551–585.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1968). Les occlusives franfaises et danoises dun sujet bilingue. Word, 24, 112–153.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick-Cole, J. (1999). The alpine intonation of Bern Swiss German. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 1999, pp. 941–944.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1981). The phonological basis of foreign accent. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 443–455.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in crosslanguage research, pp. 233–273. Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2002). Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In Burmeister, P., Piske, T. & Rohde, A. (eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode, pp. 217–244. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher .Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Tsukada, K. (2006). Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 153–175.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987). Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of English. Speech Communication, 6, 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2973–2987.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P., & Docherty, G. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34 (4), 409–438.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., Sramko, V., Ostry, D. J., Rowland, S. A., & Halle, P. (2008). Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French–English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 649–663.Google Scholar
Fox, R. A., Flege, J. E., & Munro, M. J. (1995). The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 2540–2551.Google Scholar
Fujimura, O. (2000). The C/D model and prosodic control of articulatory behavior. Phonetica, 57, 128–138.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9 (2), 198–217.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (eds.) (1992). Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F. (2000). Introduction: Syntactic aspects of bilingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 167–172.Google Scholar
Gilles, P. (2005). Regionale Prosodie im Deutschen Variabilität in der Intonation von Abschluss und Weiterweisung (Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 6). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gilles, P., & Peters, J. (eds.) (2004). Regional variation in intonation (Linguistische Arbeiten 492). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Grabe, E. (1998). Comparative intonational phonology: English and German (MPI Series in Psycholinguistics 7). Wageningen: Ponsen en Looien.Google Scholar
Grabe, E. (2002). Variation adds to prosodic typology. In Speech Prosody 2002, Aix-en-Provence, pp. 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, E. (2004). Intonational variation in urban dialects of English spoken in the British Isles. In Gilles & Peters (eds.), pp. 9–31.Google Scholar
Grice, M., & Bauman, S. (2007). An introduction to intonation: Functions and models. In Trouvain & Gut (eds.), pp. 25–52.Google Scholar
Gooskens, C. (1997). On the role of prosodic and verbal information in the perception of Dutch and English varieties. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual's language modes. In Nicol, J. (ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilinguals language processing, pp. 1–22. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gut, U. (2009). Non-native speech. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. (2007). Foreign accent: Speaker classification I. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4343, 75–87.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S., & Watson, C. I. (2000). Does the Queen speak Queen's English. Nature, 408, 927–928.Google Scholar
Hazan, V. (2007). Second language acquisition and exemplar theory. 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, pp. 39–42.Google Scholar
Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A. (1998). Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holm, S. (2008). Intonational and durational contributions to the perception of foreign-accented Norwegian: An experimental phonetic investigation. Ph.D. dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Ikeno, A., & Hansen, J. H. L. (2006). The effect of listener accent background on accent perception and comprehension. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, Volume 2007, Article ID 76030, 8 pages.Google Scholar
Ingram, J. C. L., & Park, S.-G. (1997). Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isemonger, I. M. (2007). Operational Definitions of explicit and implicit knowledge: Response to R. Ellis (2005) and some recommendations for future research in this area. Studies in Second Language Aquisition, 29, 101–118.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 28). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jilka, M. (2000). The contribution of intonation to the perception of foreign accent. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Jilka, M. (2007). Different manifestations and perceptions of foreign accent in intonation. In Trouvain & Gut (eds.), pp. 76–96.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: an exemplar model. In Johnson, K. & Mullenix, J. (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing, pp. 145–166. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A. (2006). Prosodic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1986). Crosslinguistic influence on second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kelso, J. A. S., Saltzman, E. L., & Tuller, B. (1986). The dynamical perspective on speech production: data and theory. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 29–59.Google Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 459–490.Google Scholar
Kim, S., & Cho, T. (2009). The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: Evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125 (5), 3373–3386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krakow, R. A. (1999). Physiological organization of syllables: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93–107.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1996). Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2425–2438.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational phonology (2nd edn.). Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P., & Cho, T. (2001). Linking linguistic contrasts to reality: The case of VOT. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 98, 1–9.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world's languages. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakshmanan, U. (1994). Child second language acquisition of syntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 301–329.Google Scholar
Leeuw de, E., Schmid, M., & Mennen, I. (2010). The effects of contact on native language pronunciation in an L2 migrant context. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 33–40.Google Scholar
Lepetit, D. (1987). Cross-linguistic influence in intonation. French/Japanese and French/English. Language Learning, 39, 397–413.Google Scholar
Lowry, O. (2002). The stylistic variation of nuclear patterns in Belfast English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 32 (1), 33–42.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F. (1998). The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 499–546.Google Scholar
Magen, H. (1998). The perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 381–400.Google Scholar
Major, R. C. (1992). Losing English as a first language. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 190–208.Google Scholar
Major, R. C. (1993). Sociolinguistic factors in loss and acquisition of phonology. In Hyltenstam, K. & Viberg, A. (eds.), Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives, pp. 463–478. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Major, R. C. (2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Major, R. C. (2004). Gender and stylistic variation in second language phonology. Language Variation and Change, 16, 169–188.Google Scholar
Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S. F., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C. (2002). The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 173–190.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1978). Second-language acquisition in childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2001). The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. In Cenoz, J. & Genesee, F. (eds.), Trends in bilingual acquisition, pp. 11–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2004). The bilingual child. In Bhatia, T. & Ritchie, W. (eds.), The handbook of bilingualism, pp. 91–113. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mennen, I. (2004). Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 543–63.Google Scholar
Moulines, E., & Charpentier, F. (1990), Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones. Speech Communication, 9, 453–468.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate language attainment in L2 phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21 (1), 81–108.Google Scholar
Mozziconacci, S., & Hermes, D. (1998). Study of intonation patterns in speech expressing emotion or attitude: Production and perception (IPO Progress Report). Eindhoven: IPO.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J. (1995). Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent: Ratings of filtered speech, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 17–34.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language and Learning, 45, 73–97.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1998). The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning, 48, 159–182.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2001). Modeling perception of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23 (4), 451–68.Google Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1990). There is no interface between phonetics and phonology. A personal view. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 153–171.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2000). L2 influence on L1 in late bilingualism. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11 (2), 175–205.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2000). Tonal elements and their alignment. In Horne, M. (ed.), Prosody, theory and experiment: Studies presented to Gösta Bruce, pp. 11–36. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, pp. 137–158. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B., &. Beckman, M. E. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J. & Pollack, M. E. (eds.), Intentions in communication, pp. 271–311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.Google Scholar
Riney, T. J., Takagi, N., & Inutska, K. (2005). Phonetic parameters and perceptual judgement of accent in English by American and Japanese listeners. TESOL Quaterly, 39 (3), 441–466.Google Scholar
Saito, H. (2006). Nuclear-stress placement by Japanese learners of English: Transfer from Japanese. In Kawaguchi, Y., Fónagy, I. & Moriguchi, T. (eds.), Prosody and syntax, pp. 125–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 421–436.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. C., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 227–247.Google Scholar
Scobbie, J. (2007). Interface and overlap in phonetics and phonology. In Ramchand, G. & Reiss, C. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, pp. 17–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1995). Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing. In Goldsmith, J. A. (ed.), The Handbook of phonological theory, pp. 550–569. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (2011). Usage-based phonology. In Botma, B., Kula, N. C. & Nasukawa, K. (eds.), Continuum companion to phonology, pp. 369–395. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tajima, K., Port, R., & Dalby, J. (1997). Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 1–24.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (2005). Theories of second language acquisition: Three sides, three angles, three points. Second Language Research, 21 (4), 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect if L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 1–30.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2007). Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech: The effect of experience on child learners’ acquisition of five suprasegmentals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 251–276.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2007). A dynamic look at L2 phonological learning: Seeking psycholinguistic explanations for implicational phenomena. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 407–448.Google Scholar
Trouvain, J., & Gut, U. (eds.) (2007). Non-native prosody: Phonetic description and teaching practice (Trends in Linguistics: Studies & Monographs). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Mack, M., Sung, H., Bialystok, E., & Flege, J. E. (2004). Release bursts in English word-final voiceless stops produced by native English and Korean adults and children. Phonetica, 61, 67–83.Google Scholar
Ulbrich, C. (2004). A comparative study of declarative utterances in Swiss and German standards. In Gilles & Peters (eds.), pp. 99–122.Google Scholar
Ulbrich, C. (2005). Phonetische Untersuchungen zur Prosodie der Standardvarietäten des Deutschen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, in der Schweiz und in Österreich (Hallesche Schriften zur Sprechwissenschaft und Phonetik 16). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ulbrich, C. (2008). Acquisition of regional pitch patterns in L2. Speech Prosody 2008, 575–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaissière, J., & Boula de Mareuil, P. (2004). Identifying a language or an accent: From segments to prosody. Proceedings MIDL (Modelling for the Identification of Languages) Workshop, Paris, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
van Bezooijen, R., & Gooskens, C. (1999). Identification of language varieties: The contribution of different linguistic levels. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18 (1), 31–48.Google Scholar
van Leyden, K., & van Heuven, V. J. B. (2003). Prosody versus segments in the identification of Orkney and Shetland dialects. 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, pp. 1197–1200.Google Scholar
Walley, A. C., & Flege, J. E. (1999). Effect of lexical status on children's and adults’ perception of native and non-native vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 307–332.Google Scholar
Wichmann, A. (2000a). Intonation in text and discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wichmann, A. (2000b). The attitudinal effects of prosody, and how they relate to emotion. In Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, E. & Schröder, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the ISCA Workshop on Speech and Emotion, Belfast, Ireland, pp. 143–148.Google Scholar
Willems, N. (1982). English intonation from a Dutch point of view. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (1979). The modification of speech perception and production in second language learning. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 95–104.Google Scholar
Williams, L. 1980. Phonetic variation as a function of second-language learning. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanagh, J. & Ferguson, C. (eds.), Child phonology (vol. 2): Perception, pp. 185–215. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wode, H. (1978). The beginnings of L2-phonological acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 16, 109–124.Google Scholar
Wode, H. (1992). Categorical perception and segmental coding in the ontogeny of sound systems: A universal approach. In Ferguson, C., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications, pp. 605–631. Baltimore, MD: York PressGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y. (2005). Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication, 46, 220–251.Google Scholar
Xu, Y., & Sun, X. (2002). Maximum speed of pitch change and how it may relate to speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111: 1399–1413.Google Scholar
Young-Scholten, M. (1985). Interference reconsidered: The role of similarity in second language acquisition. Selecta, 6, 6–12.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L., & Vergnaud, J.-R. (2005). Phrasal stress and syntax. In Everaert, M. & van Riemsdijk, H. (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax (vol. III), pp. 522–568. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar