Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T05:00:41.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homogeneity of mind can yield heterogeneity in behavior producing emergent collaboration in groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Rick O'Gorman
Rick O'Gorman*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK. rogorman@alumni.binghamton.eduhttp://www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/department/people/ogorman.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The evolved psychological process for producing social norms is both needed to facilitate emergent group-level traits and capable of delivering such a process. I discuss how this process can work to generate group-level traits and how specific mechanisms established to buttress social norms similarly can explain how group-level traits are supported.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 267 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ellickson, R. C. (2009) Order without law: How neighbors settle disputes. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995a) How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science 19(3):265–88. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995b) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.Google Scholar
O'Gorman, R., Henrich, J. & Van Vugt, M. (2009) Constraining free riding in public goods games: designated solitary punishers can sustain human cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276(1655):323–29. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Gorman, R., Sheldon, K. M. & Wilson, D. S. (2008a) For the good of the group? Exploring group-level evolutionary adaptations using multilevel selection theory. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 12(1):17–26. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.12.1.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Gorman, R., Wilson, D. S. & Miller, R. R. (2008b) An evolved cognitive bias for social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior 29(2):71–78. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoor, J. & Williams, K. D. (2007) The evolution of an ostracism detection system. In: Evolution and the social mind: evolutionary psychology and social cognition, ed. Forgas, J. P., von Hippel, W. & Haselton, M. G., Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. & Moll, H. (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(05):675–735. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, D. S. (2002) Darwin's cathedral: evolution, religion, and the nature of society. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S. & O'Gorman, R. (2003) Emotions and actions associated with norm-breaking events. Human Nature 14(3):277–304. doi:10.1007/s12110-003-1007-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed