Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T03:00:34.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The sun always rises: Scientists also need semantics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

Gordon M. Burghardt
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-0900. gburghar@utk.eduhttp://web.utk.edu/~gburghar/

Abstract

Penn et al. do not demonstrate Darwin made a mistake, because they largely ignore the semantics underlying the meanings of “degree” and “kind.” An analysis based on the work of Mortimer Adler shows such terminology conflates at least three different meanings of “kind,” only one of which challenges Darwin – and one which the authors almost certainly would reject.

We must also admit that there is a much wider interval in mental power between one of the lowest fishes, as a lamprey or lancelet, and one of the higher apes, than between an ape and man; yet this immense interval is filled with numberless gradations.;>

— Charles Darwin (1871, p. 35)

The distance between man and ape is greater than the distance between ape and ameba.;>

— William Gaylin (1990, p. 8)

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright ©Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, M. J. (1968) The difference of man and the difference it makes. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burghardt, G. M. (1977) Of iguanas and dinosaurs: Social behavior and communication in neonate reptiles. American Zoologist 17:177–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.Google Scholar
Gaylin, W. (1990) Adam and Eve and Pinocchio Viking.Google Scholar