There is both a great unity and a great diversity in presentations of logic. The diversity is staggering indeed – propositional logic, first-order logic, higher-order logic belong to one classification; linear logic, intuitionistic logic, classical logic, modal and temporal logics belong to another one. Logical deduction may be presented as a Hilbert style of combinators, as a natural deduction system, as sequent calculus, as proof nets of one variety or other, etc. Logic, originally a field of philosophy, turned into algebra with Boole, and more generally into meta-mathematics with Frege and Heyting. Professional logicians such as Gödel and later Tarski studied mathematical models, consistency and completeness, computability and complexity issues, set theory and foundations, etc. Logic became a very technical area of mathematical research in the last half century, with fine-grained analysis of expressiveness of subtheories of arithmetic or set theory, detailed analysis of well-foundedness through ordinal notations, logical complexity, etc. Meanwhile, computer modelling developed a need for concrete uses of logic, first for the design of computer circuits, then more widely for increasing the reliability of sofware through the use of formal specifications and proofs of correctness of computer programs. This gave rise to more exotic logics, such as dynamic logic, Hoare-style logic of axiomatic semantics, logics of partial values (such as Scott's denotational semantics and Plotkin's domain theory) or of partial terms (such as Feferman's free logic), etc. The first actual attempts at mechanisation of logical reasoning through the resolution principle (automated theorem proving) had been disappointing, but their shortcomings gave rise to a considerable body of research, developing detailed knowledge about equational reasoning through canonical simplification (rewriting theory) and proofs by induction (following Boyer and Moore successful integration of primitive recursive arithmetic within the LISP programming language). The special case of Horn clauses gave rise to a new paradigm of non-deterministic programming, called Logic Programming, developing later into Constraint Programming, blurring further the scope of logic. In order to study knowledge acquisition, researchers in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics studied exotic versions of modal logics such as Montague intentional logic, epistemic logic, dynamic logic or hybrid logic. Some others tried to capture common sense, and modeled the revision of beliefs with so-called non-monotonic logics. For the careful crafstmen of mathematical logic, this was the final outrage, and Girard gave his anathema to such “montres à moutardes”.

Formalising mathematics in dependent type theory often requires to represent sets as setoids, i.e. types with an explicit equality relation. This paper surveys some possible definitions of setoids and assesses their suitability as a basis for developing mathematics. According to whether the equality relation is required to be reflexive or not we have total or partial setoid, respectively. There is only one definition of total setoid, but four different definitions of partial setoid, depending on four different notions of setoid function. We prove that one approach to partial setoids in unsuitable, and that the other approaches can be divided in two classes of equivalence. One class contains definitions of partial setoids that are equivalent to total setoids; the other class contains an inherently different definition, that has been useful in the modeling of type systems. We also provide some elements of discussion on the merits of each approach from the viewpoint of formalizing mathematics. In particular, we exhibit a difficulty with the common definition of subsetoids in the partial setoid approach.

TinkerType is a pragmatic framework for compact and modular description of formal systems (type systems, operational semantics, logics, etc.). A family of related systems is broken down into a set of clauses – individual inference rules – and a set of features controlling the inclusion of clauses in particular systems. Simple static checks are used to help maintain consistency of the generated systems. We present TinkerType and its implementation and describe its application to two substantial repositories of typed lambda-calculi. The first repository covers a broad range of typing features, including subtyping, polymorphism, type operators and kinding, computational effects, and dependent types. It describes both declarative and algorithmic aspects of the systems, and can be used with our tool, the TinkerType Assembler, to generate calculi either in the form of typeset collections of inference rules or as executable ML typecheckers. The second repository addresses a smaller collection of systems, and provides modularized proofs of basic safety properties.

A lambda-free logical framework takes parameterisation and definitions as the basic notions to provide schematic mechanisms for specification of type theories and their use in practice. The framework presented here, PAL+, is a logical framework for specification and implementation of type theories, such as Martin-Löf's type theory or UTT. As in Martin-Löf's logical framework (Nordström et al., 1990), computational rules can be introduced and are used to give meanings to the declared constants. However, PAL+ only allows one to talk about the concepts that are intuitively in the object type theories: types and their objects, and families of types and families of objects of types. In particular, in PAL+, one cannot directly represent families of families of entities, which could be done in other logical frameworks by means of lambda abstraction. PAL+ is in the spirit of de Bruijn's PAL+ for Automath (de Bruijn, 1980). Compared with PAL, PAL+ allows one to represent parametric concepts such as families of types and families of non-parametric objects, which can be used by themselves as totalities as well as when they are fully instantiated. Such parametric objects are represented by local definitions (let-expressions). We claim that PAL+ is a correct meta-language for specifying type theories (e.g., dependent type theories), as it has the advantage of exactly capturing the intuitive concepts in object type theories, and that its implementation reflects the actual use of type theories in practice. We shall study the meta-theory of PAL+ by developing its typed operational semantics and showing that it has nice meta-theoretic properties.

We show how to incorporate rewriting into the Calculus of Constructions and we prove that the resulting system is strongly normalizing with respect to beta and rewrite reductions. An important novelty of this paper is the possibility to define rewriting rules over dependently typed function symbols. We prove strong normalization for any term rewriting system, such that all function symbols satisfy the, so called, star dependency condition, and every rule is accepted by the Higher Order Recursive Path Ordering (which is an extension of the method created by Jouannaud and Rubio for the setting of the simply typed lambda calculus). The proof of strong normalization is done by using a typed version of reducibility candidates due to Coquand and Gallier. Our criterion is general enough to accept definitions by rewriting of many well-known higher order functions, for example dependent recursors for inductive types or proof carrying functions. This makes it a very good candidate for inclusion in a proof assistant based on the Curry-Howard isomorphism.

This paper discusses an application of the higher-order abstract syntax technique to general-purpose theorem proving, yielding shallow embeddings of the binders of formalized languages. Higher-order abstract syntax has been applied with success in specialized logical frameworks which satisfy a closed-world assumption. As more general environments (like Isabelle/HOL or Coq) do not support this closed-world assumption, higher-order abstract syntax may yield exotic terms, that is, datatypes may produce more terms than there should actually be in the language. The work at hand demonstrates how such exotic terms can be eliminated by means of a two-level well-formedness predicate, further preparing the ground for an implementation of structural induction in terms of rule induction, and hence providing fully-fledged syntax analysis. In order to apply and justify well-formedness predicates, the paper develops a proof technique based on a combination of instantiations and reabstractions of higher-order terms. As an application, syntactic principles like the theory of contexts (as introduced by Honsell, Miculan, and Scagnetto) are derived, and adequacy of the predicates is shown, both within a formalization of the π-calculus in Isabelle/HOL.