Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T12:29:01.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gravity currents in horizontal porous layers: transition from early to late self-similarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2007

M. A. HESSE ,
H. A. TCHELEPI ,
B. J. CANTWEL  and
F. M. ORR Jr
M. A. HESSE
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA
H. A. TCHELEPI*
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA
B. J. CANTWEL
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA
F. M. ORR Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA
*
†Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the evolution of a finite release of fluid into an infinite, two-dimensional, horizontal, porous slab saturated with a fluid of different density and viscosity. The vertical boundaries of the slab are impermeable and the released fluid spreads as a gravity current along a horizontal boundary. At early times the released fluid fills the entire height of the layer, and the governing equation admits a self-similar solution that is a function of the viscosity ratio between the two fluids. This early similarity solution describes a tilting interface with tips propagating as x ∝ t1/2. At late times the released fluid has spread along the boundary and the height of the current is much smaller than the thickness of the layer. The governing equation simplifies and admits a different similarity solution that is independent of the viscosity ratio. This late similarity solution describes a point release of fluid in a semi-infinite porous half-space, where the tip of the interface propagates as x ∝ t1/3. The same simplification of the governing equation occurs if the viscosity of the released fluid is much higher than the viscosity of the ambient fluid. We have obtained an expression for the time when the solution transitions from the early to the late self-similar regime. The transition time increases monotonically with increasing viscosity ratio. The transition period during which the solution is not self-similar also increases monotonically with increasing viscosity ratio, for mobility ratios larger than unity. Numerical computations describing the full evolution of the governing equation show good agreement with the theoretical results. Estimates of the spreading of injected fluids over long times are important for geological storage of CO2, and for the migration of pollutants in aquifers. In all cases it is important to be able to anticipate when the spreading regime transitions from x ∝ t1/2 to x ∝ t1/3.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 577 , 25 April 2007 , pp. 363 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bachu, S. 2003 Screening and ranking of sedimentary basins for sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change. Environmental Geology 44, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barenblatt, G. I. 1952 On some unsteady motions of fluids and gases in a porous medium. Appl. Math. and Mech. (PMM) 16, 67–78.Google Scholar
Barenblatt, G. I. 1996 Scaling, Self-Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barenblatt, G. I. & Vishik, M. I. 1956 On the finite speed of propagation in the problems of unsteady filtration of fluid and gas in a porous medium. Appl. Math. Mech. (PMM) 20, 411–417.Google Scholar
Barenblatt, G. I. & Zeldovich, Ya. B. 1972 Self-similar solutions as intermediate asymptotics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1973 An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bear, J. 1972 Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bear, J. & Ryzhik, V. 1998 On displacement of NAPL lenses and plumes in a phreatic aquifer. Transp. Porous Media 33, 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, D. N. 1953 A theoretical approach to the problem of encroaching and by-passing edge water. Akad. van Wetenschappen, Proc. V. 56 B, 83–92.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. R., Sitar, N. & Udell, K. S. 1995 Nonaqueous phase liquid transport and cleanup. Part 1. Analysis of mechanisms. Water Resour. Res. 24, 1247–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. E. 1982 Propagation of two-dimensional viscous gravity currents over a rigid horizontal surface. J. Fluid Mech. 121, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. E. & Woods, A. W. 1995 Gravity-driven flows in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 292, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, L. L. 1989 Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Leveque, R. J. 2002 Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyle, S., Huppert, H. E., Hallworth, M., Bickle, M. & Chadwick, A. 2005 Axisymmetric gravity currents in a porous medium. J. Fluid Mech. 543, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, B. Davidson, O. de Coninck, H. Loos, M., & Meyer, L., (Eds.) 2006 Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nordbotten, J. M., Celia, M. A. & Bachu, S. 2005 Injection and storage of CO2 in deep saline aquifers: Analytical solution for the CO2 plume evolution during plume injection. Transp. Porous Media 58, 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozah, R. C., Lakshminarasimhan, S., Pope, G. A., Sepehrnoori, K. & Bryant, S. L. 2005 Numerical simulation of the storage of pure CO2 and CO2-H2S gas mixtures in deep saline aquifers. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (Dallas, TX).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riaz, A. & Tchelepi, H. A. 2006 Numerical simulation of immiscible two-phase flow in porous media. Phys. Fluids 18 014104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiteri, E. J., Juanes, R., Blunt, M. J. & Orr, F. M. Jr 2005 Relative permeability hysteresis: Trapping models and application to geological CO2 sequestration. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (Dallas, TX).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchelepi, H. A. 1994 Viscous fingering, gravity segregation and permeability heterogeneity in two-dimensional and three-dimensional flows. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Yortsos, Y. C. 1995 A theoretical analysis of vertical flow equilibrium. Transp. Porous Media 18, 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar