Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:08:27.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic fields and star formation – new observational results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Richard M. Crutcher
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA email: crutcher@uiuc.edu
Thomas H. Troland
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40502USA email: troland@pa.uky.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although the subject of this meeting is triggered star formation in a turbulent interstellar medium, it remains unsettled what role magnetic fields play in the star formation process. This paper briefly reviews star formation model predictions for the ratio of mass to magnetic flux, describes how Zeeman observations can test these predictions, describes new results – an extensive OH Zeeman survey of dark cloud cores with the Arecibo telescope, and discusses the implications. Conclusions are that the new data support and extend the conclusions based on the older observational results – that observational data on magnetic fields in molecular clouds are consistent with the strong magnetic field model of star formation. In addition, the observational data on magnetic field strengths in the interstellar medium strongly suggest that molecular clouds must form primarily by accumulation of matter along field lines. Finally, a future observational project is described that could definitively test the ambipolar diffusion model for the formation of cores and hence of stars.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Crutcher, R. M. 1979, ApJ 234, 881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutcher, R. M., Troland, T. H., Goodman, A. A., Heiles, C., Kazès, I., & Myers, P. C. 1993, ApJ 407, 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutcher, R. M. 1999, ApJ 520, 706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutcher, R. M. 2004, Ap&SS 292, 225Google Scholar
Elmegreen, B. G. 2000, ApJ 530, 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, A. A., Crutcher, R. M., Heiles, C., Myers, P. C., & Troland, T. H. 1989, ApJ 338, L61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, L., Ballesteros-Paredes, J., & Bergin, E. A. 2001, ApJ 562, 852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiles, C., & Troland, T. H., ApJ 624, 773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLow, M.-M., & Klessen, R. S. 2004, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouschovias, T., Ch. & Spitzer, L. 1976, ApJ 210, 326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouschovias, T., Ch. & Ciolek, G. E. 1999, in: Lada, C. J. & Kylafis, N. D. (eds.), The Origin of Stars and Planetary Systems (Kluwer), p. 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, T., & Nakamura, T. 1978, PASJ 30, 681Google Scholar
Wielebinski, R., & Beck, R. 2005, Cosmic Magnetic Fields (Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg)CrossRefGoogle Scholar