Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:21:21.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeology, education and Brazilian identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Pedro Paulo A. Funari
Pedro Paulo A. Funari*
Affiliation:
Departamento de História, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, C. Postal 6110, Campinas 13081-970 SP, Brazil, pedrofunari@sti.com.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is now well accepted that archaeology and education are inextricably linked (cf. MacKenzie & Stone 1994) and that the past is often represented as mirrored by the dominant groups in a given society. The late educator Paulo Freire warned that educators ‘need to use their students' cultural universe as a point of departure, enabling students to recognise themselves as possessing a specific and important cultural identity’ (interview in MacLaren 1988: 224). Both education and archaeology deal thus with the manipulation of present and past to forge identities useful for people in power and archaeologists and educators have been active promoters of critical approaches. Critical pedagogy has been concerned with student experience, taking the problems and needs of the students themselves as its starting point and fighting for pedagogical empowerment (Giroux & MacLaren 1986: 234–8).

Keywords

BrazilJoinvilleuniversitiesschools
Type
Special section: Archaeology in education
Information
Antiquity , Volume 74 , Issue 283 , March 2000 , pp. 182 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ArestizáBal, I. 1991. Parte Prima, in Arestizábal, I. & Piva, A. (ed.), Musei in trasformazioni:prospettive della museologia e della museogratia: 13–62. Milan: Gabriele Mazzotta.Google Scholar
Baker, F. 1991. Archaeology, Habermas and the pathologies of modernity, in Baker, F. & Thomas, J. (ed.), Writing the past in the present: 54–62. Lampeter: Lampeter University Press.Google Scholar
Beaudry, M.C., Cook, L.J. & Mrozowski, S.A.. 1991. Artifacts and active voices: material culture as social discourse, in Paynter, R. & McGuire, R. (ed.), The archaeology of inequality: 150–91. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bruno, M.C. 1998. A importância dos processos museológicos para a preservação do patrimònio. First International Meeting on Archaeological Theory in South America, Vitória, unpublished typescript.Google Scholar
Funari, P.P.A. 1991. Brazilian archaeology and world archaeology: some remarks, World Archaeological Bulletin 3: 60–68.Google Scholar
Funari, P.P.A. 1992 Archaeology in Brazil: politics and scholarship at a crossroads, World Archaeological Bulletin 5: 122–32.Google Scholar
Funari, P.P.A. 1994a. Rescuing ordinary people’s culture: museums, material culture and education in Brazil, , in Stone, P. & Molyneaux, B.L. (ed.), The presented past, Heritage, museums and education: 120–35. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Funari, P.P.A. 1994b. Brazilian archaeology: overview and reassessment, Revista de História da Arte e Arqueologia 1: 281–90.Google Scholar
Funari, P.P.A. 1995. Mixed features of archaeological theory in Brazil, in Ucko, P. (ed.), Theory in archaeology, A world perspective: 236–50. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Funari, P.P.A. 1998. Teoria Arqueológica na América do Sul. Campinas: Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas.Google Scholar
Giroux, H.A. 1989. Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: a critical analysis, Harvard Educational Review 53: 257–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giroux, H.A. & Maclaren, P.. 1986. Teacher education and the politics of engagement: the case for democratic schooling, Harvard Educational Review 56: 213–38.Google Scholar
Guarinello, N.L. 1994. Os Primeiros Habitantes do Brasil. São Paulo: Atual.Google Scholar
Jones, A.L. 1993. Exploding canons: the anthropology of museums, Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. 1997. The archaeology of ethnicity. Reconstructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leone, M.P. 1983. Method as message. Interpreting the Past with the public, Museum News 62: 35–41.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, R. & Stone, P.. 1994. Introduction: tire concept of excluded past, in Stone, P. & MacKenzie, R. (ed.), The excluded past: Archaeology in education: 1–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maclaren, P. 1988. Culture or canon? Critical pedagogy and the politics of literacy, Harvard Educational Review 58: 213–34.Google Scholar
Mazel, A.D. 1989. People making history: the last ten thousand years of hunter-gatherer communities in the Thukela Basin, Natal Museum Journal of Humanities 1: 1–168.Google Scholar
Mazel, A. D. & Stewart, P.M.. 1987. Meddling with the mind: the treatment of San hunter-gatherers and the origins of South Africa’s black population in recent South African history text-books, South African Archaeological Bulletin 42: 166–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, D.J. Adovasio, J.M. & Dillehay, T.D.. 1994. On a Pleistocene human occupation at Pedra Furada, Brazil, Antiquity 68: 695–714.Google Scholar
Morais, J. L. 1999. Perspectivas geoambientais da Arqueologia do Paranapanema Paulista. Unpublished postdoctoral thesis, São Paulo, Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia da USP.Google Scholar
Orser, C.E. 1988. Toward a theory of power for historical archaeology. Plantation and space, in Leone, M.P. & Potter, P.P. (ed.), The recovery of meaning: Historical archaeology in the Eastern United States: 313–43. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Paynter, R. 1990. Afro-Americans in the Massachusetts historical landscape, in Gathercole, P. & Lowenthal, D. (ed.), The politics of the past: 49–62. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Prous, A. 1991. Arqueologia Erasileira. Brasília: Editora da Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Prous, A. 1997. O povoamento da America visto do Brasil: uma perspectiva crítica, Revista USP 34: 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, P.S. 1996. Brazil’s bold effort to curb police violence, Time 10 June: 76.Google Scholar
Segall, M. 1997. Museus hoje para o amanhã, Novos Estudos Cebrap 47: 199–208.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C.. 1987a. Re-constructing archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tamanini, E. 1994. Museu Arqueológico de Sambaqui: um olhar necessário. Unpublished master’s thesis, Campinas.Google Scholar
Tamanini, E. 1998. Arqueologia e Educação: teoria e prática. First International Meeting on Archaeological Theory in South America, Vitória, unpublished typescript.Google Scholar
Tamanini, E. Forthcoming. Cultura material e identidade em Joinville, in Funari, P.P.A. (ed.), Cultura Material e Arqueologia Histórica. Campinas: Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas.Google Scholar
Tiburtius, G. 1996. Arquivo Tiburtíus. Joinville: Museu Arqueológico de Sambaqui de Joinville.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 1990. The 1990s: North American archaeology with a human face? Antiquity 64: 778–87.Google Scholar
Wirans, E.V. 1994. The head of the king: museums and the path to resistance, Comparative Studies in Society and History 36: 221–41.Google Scholar